[QUOTE="SpinoRaptor24"]I was kinda hoping this would be the 3DS' first AAAE.charizard1605That's going to be Mario Kart 7
Nah, I think it's going to be Paper Mario.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
I don't understand the review. It is pretty much all praise, yet scores an 8?
fitzokoli
I feel ya bro, thats pretty much what everyones been pointing out. Cant seem to understand how he actually arrived at that score, 8.5 or 9 would have made more sense.
maybe it's not that the game is getting marked down for bad things, but just doesn't offer enough good things[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="SpinoRaptor24"]I was kinda hoping this would be the 3DS' first AAAE.ShinobishyguyThat's going to be Mario Kart 7 nah it's not. If this couldn't get AAA, Mario kart 7 sure as hell isn't Remember, Super Mario 64 DS didn't get a AAA score, Metroid Prime Hunters didn't get a AAA score, but Mario Kart DS remains Nintendo's highest rated DS game on this site. Mario Kart 7 is going to follow in its footsteps.
I'm not suprised at all GS rates all scores lower than the other sites. Just look at the metacritic for the game.
^ all scores are arbitrary. There is no mathematical equation for how good a game is.
stizz-
I know that. :P
I meant that the Good/Bad portion usually fails to coincide with the score itself. If the only bad thing they could pinpoint was poor StreetPass implementation (I think that was it), but they had several good merits, why an 8 and not a 9?
Not that it really matters, I'm just pointing it out for the sake of it.
4 other AA scores. Hm, I don't see how Gamespot's review is in the minority.I'm not suprised at all GS rates all scores lower than the other sites. Just look at the metacritic for the game.
HaloPimp978
[QUOTE="HaloPimp978"]4 other AA scores. Hm, I don't see how Gamespot's is in the minority. Well, to be fair, there are at least fourteen other scores that are AAA. I'm not disagreeing with Gamespot's score here (I have never played the game after all), I am just pointing out that he has a point.I'm not suprised at all GS rates all scores lower than the other sites. Just look at the metacritic for the game.
sammyjenkis898
[QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"][QUOTE="HaloPimp978"]4 other AA scores. Hm, I don't see how Gamespot's is in the minority. Well, to be fair, there are at least fourteen other scores that are AAA. I'm not disagreeing with Gamespot's score here (I have never played the game after all), I am just pointing out that he has a point. No, he really doesn't. He's acting like Gamespot is in the minority with their review (which, I may add, is labeled as "Great"), when they're really not. 1UP and Destructoid, two well known gaming sites, gave it AA scores as well.I'm not suprised at all GS rates all scores lower than the other sites. Just look at the metacritic for the game.
charizard1605
[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"] 4 other AA scores. Hm, I don't see how Gamespot's is in the minority.sammyjenkis898Well, to be fair, there are at least fourteen other scores that are AAA. I'm not disagreeing with Gamespot's score here (I have never played the game after all), I am just pointing out that he has a point. No, he really doesn't. He's acting like Gamespot is in the minority with their review (which, I may add, is labeled as "Great"), when they're really not. 1UP and Destructoid, two well known gaming sites, gave it AA scores as well. due to the fact that most reviews for this are AAA , the AA reviews are in the minority.
that what minority means...
No, he really doesn't. He's acting like Gamespot is in the minority with their review (which, I may add, is labeled as "Great"), when they're really not. 1UP and Destructoid, two well known gaming sites, gave it AA scores as well. due to the fact that most reviews for this are AAA , the AA reviews are in the minority.[QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"][QUOTE="charizard1605"] Well, to be fair, there are at least fourteen other scores that are AAA. I'm not disagreeing with Gamespot's score here (I have never played the game after all), I am just pointing out that he has a point.Shinobishyguy
that what minority means...
Quiet you, simple logic has no place here in SW :P[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"] 4 other AA scores. Hm, I don't see how Gamespot's is in the minority.sammyjenkis898Well, to be fair, there are at least fourteen other scores that are AAA. I'm not disagreeing with Gamespot's score here (I have never played the game after all), I am just pointing out that he has a point. No, he really doesn't. He's acting like Gamespot is in the minority with their review (which, I may add, is labeled as "Great"), when they're really not. 1UP and Destructoid, two well known gaming sites, gave it AA scores as well.
Except, you know, maybe they are... 11/16 reviews are 90 or above. The other 5 are below 90, with the lowest beings GSs 80... 5 is less than 11, ergo, Gamespot is indeed in the minority.
[QUOTE="fueled-system"][QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]It comes down to people agreeing with the review because of their preconceived notions of the games.I have zero I forgot the game even existed. I watched the review and read it to see what it was about and was left more confused then anything I watched first thinking he must of missed a part where he talked about the negatives and then I read the review and was still confused and figured it was just poorly writtenagreed. Still nintendo haters will cling to it like the word of the gospel regardless of how poorly written it is.I just wish people actually try these games out before even saying stuff like this.Shinobishyguy
Whoa...I was right on this one but the only way to find out if it deserves the score it gets is by playing it myself.:?
I just wish that future platformers will be slightly more difficult or challenging.
[QUOTE="stizz-"]
^ all scores are arbitrary. There is no mathematical equation for how good a game is.
mmmwksil
I know that. :P
I meant that the Good/Bad portion usually fails to coincide with the score itself. If the only bad thing they could pinpoint was poor StreetPass implementation (I think that was it), but they had several good merits, why an 8 and not a 9?
Not that it really matters, I'm just pointing it out for the sake of it.
Just because there aren't a lot of bullet points under The Bad doesn't mean the game couldn't have been better.
He could have put "The level design isn't exactly superb" but I think that goes without saying since he gave it an 8.0 and there aren't any outstanding 'problems' mentioned.
[QUOTE="mmmwksil"]
[QUOTE="stizz-"]
^ all scores are arbitrary. There is no mathematical equation for how good a game is.
Cherokee_Jack
I know that. :P
I meant that the Good/Bad portion usually fails to coincide with the score itself. If the only bad thing they could pinpoint was poor StreetPass implementation (I think that was it), but they had several good merits, why an 8 and not a 9?
Not that it really matters, I'm just pointing it out for the sake of it.
Just because there aren't a lot of bullet points under The Bad doesn't mean the game couldn't have been better.
He could have put "The level design isn't exactly superb" but I think that goes without saying since he gave it an 8.0 and there aren't any outstanding 'problems' mentioned.
it's strange that you say that seeing as it looks like the game's levels are it's biggest strength[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="mmmwksil"]
I know that. :P
I meant that the Good/Bad portion usually fails to coincide with the score itself. If the only bad thing they could pinpoint was poor StreetPass implementation (I think that was it), but they had several good merits, why an 8 and not a 9?
Not that it really matters, I'm just pointing it out for the sake of it.
Shinobishyguy
Just because there aren't a lot of bullet points under The Bad doesn't mean the game couldn't have been better.
He could have put "The level design isn't exactly superb" but I think that goes without saying since he gave it an 8.0 and there aren't any outstanding 'problems' mentioned.
it's strange that you say that seeing as it looks like the game's levels are it's biggest strength Level design is pretty much the one important thing about platformers, after controls and camera. Since he had no issues with the base mechanics, I have to assume he just didn't think the levels were masterpieces or anything. Which isn't that hard to believe. But I never said I agreed with the review, so he could totally be wrong. We'll see when the game is out.[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"][QUOTE="charizard1605"] Remember, Super Mario 64 DS didn't get a AAA score, Metroid Prime Hunters didn't get a AAA score, but Mario Kart DS remains Nintendo's highest rated DS game on this site. Mario Kart 7 is going to follow in its footsteps.charizard1605Super mario 64 ds was a port, ofcourse it didn't get AAA. This is an all new mario, but they still flopped it for some for god knows what reasons. MK7 already has the "more of the same" thing going against it.; Mario Kart 7 is changing too much for it to have that mark against it- this was always looking like a budget Super Mario Bros 3 in 3D game, designed for a quick fix. Mario Kart 7 boasts Nintendo's best online infrastructure so far, it boasts Retro's contribution to track design (meaning we are potentially looking at the most superior track design in the series so far), it fixes all the balance issues the games have had so far.... Trust me, this is going to be AAA.
if the blue shells are still in then mk7 didnt fix anything and hope it flops like crazy if they still are in! otherwise.. im guessing a 8.5-9
Mario Kart 7 is changing too much for it to have that mark against it- this was always looking like a budget Super Mario Bros 3 in 3D game, designed for a quick fix. Mario Kart 7 boasts Nintendo's best online infrastructure so far, it boasts Retro's contribution to track design (meaning we are potentially looking at the most superior track design in the series so far), it fixes all the balance issues the games have had so far.... Trust me, this is going to be AAA.[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"] Super mario 64 ds was a port, ofcourse it didn't get AAA. This is an all new mario, but they still flopped it for some for god knows what reasons. MK7 already has the "more of the same" thing going against it.;campzor
if the blue shells are still in then mk7 didnt fix anything and hope it flops like crazy if they still are in! otherwise.. im guessing a 8.5-9
They change the blue shell a bit so that it more similar to the N64 one I think along with removing some of the powerful weapons like that lighting cloud from MKWii (thank god) and POW block sothose should improve those issues a bit.
I think the GS review is really sloppy For example the reviewer criticizes the game for not making use of the 3D effect out side aesthetic appeal while many other reviews go out of their way to praise the games creative use of 3D.
I mean, certain levels in this game are actually marked with a 3D symbol to indicate that it benefits from playing with the 3D on ... how could the reviewer ignore this?
What's come out of most reviews is that this is a throw back to 2D Mario games but in 3D ... which makes me really happy. I'm super excited to play it [spoiler] and get past the first 8 worlds and onto the other, harder worlds. [/spoiler]
Anyone else going to go for 100% completion?
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="mmmwksil"]
I know that. :P
I meant that the Good/Bad portion usually fails to coincide with the score itself. If the only bad thing they could pinpoint was poor StreetPass implementation (I think that was it), but they had several good merits, why an 8 and not a 9?
Not that it really matters, I'm just pointing it out for the sake of it.
Shinobishyguy
Just because there aren't a lot of bullet points under The Bad doesn't mean the game couldn't have been better.
He could have put "The level design isn't exactly superb" but I think that goes without saying since he gave it an 8.0 and there aren't any outstanding 'problems' mentioned.
it's strange that you say that seeing as it looks like the game's levels are it's biggest strength Most of the level design looks too straight forward and simple if you ask me.[QUOTE="campzor"]
[QUOTE="charizard1605"] Mario Kart 7 is changing too much for it to have that mark against it- this was always looking like a budget Super Mario Bros 3 in 3D game, designed for a quick fix. Mario Kart 7 boasts Nintendo's best online infrastructure so far, it boasts Retro's contribution to track design (meaning we are potentially looking at the most superior track design in the series so far), it fixes all the balance issues the games have had so far.... Trust me, this is going to be AAA.Wanderer5
if the blue shells are still in then mk7 didnt fix anything and hope it flops like crazy if they still are in! otherwise.. im guessing a 8.5-9
They change the blue shell a bit so that it more similar to the N64 one I think along with removing some of the powerful weapons like that lighting cloud from MKWii (thank god) and POW block sothose should improve those issues a bit.
I don't see what's so difficult about making SKILL more important than LUCK in Mario Kart.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment