[QUOTE="tormentos"] Is not doing that well and we never read about developers canceling games and stalling them for the DS,getting a 3rd party battery is not a solution because it involves paying for and extra battery,which wasn't acceptable when the topic was DS vs PSP,face it 3+ hours the minimum is as bad as the PSP was period,there can't be any change of argument now. Which say allot the Wii is only worth owning if you are a nintendo fan that like Mario or a kid,3 gens ago the Snes had a very good 3rd party support in fact the Snes had better 3rd party support that probably the wii,N64 and Gamecube,back then pretty much all 3rd parties did games for nintendo,and not just shallow mini games,down grade version of games,and old ports,in most cases top of the line games.SuperFlakeman
You're right about DS vs PSP that it wasn't acceptable because DS > PSP and DS + battery pack > PSP + battery pack. It's not fair to say that PSP + battery pack = DS.
3DS is on par with equivalent gaming devices on the market. It's an issue from a Nintendo fan's perspective as we are spoiled, but the battery life card is not something Sony or MS fans have the right to play until proven otherwise, you don't know Vita's battery life yet so a comparison is needed.
3DS first year lineup easily beats DS', that's all I'm saying. However it's not guaranteed that 3DS will even come close to DS' library of games over the course of 7 years.
What I don't get is why you brought Wii into this. So, those who like their Wii, are either Nintendo fans OR kids. That statement directly implies that you've become a Nintendo fan, if you enjoyed Wii.
It's impossible to NOT be a Nintendo fan, and enjoy Wii, being an adult? You've got some serious logic skills.
Nope.If PSVita has a poor battery life, thenwe will criticize it as well.As it stands, the battery life in3DS is prettypoor for a handheld.
Log in to comment