The current SW Console Graphics King?

[QUOTE="kalipekona"]

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

GeOW3 is confirmed to be jaggie just like all the other versions. It looks great for what it is but no, maybe graphics king if you are only talking aobut xbox360.

casharmy

Yet somehow cows like you are always saying that anti-aliasing isn't really a big deal when it comes to multiplatform gamesand the 360 has it and the PS3 doesn't. What you are doing is called selective criticism -- focusing on the weakest element and ingoring all the strengths.

:| what the **** are you talking about, I've never said that.

You need to get your info straight before you start talking nonsense.

I've seen enough of your comments to know that you fall into the diehard cow camp. I also know that cows are always claiming that multiplats are the same even when the 360 version has anti-aliasing and the PS3 version doesn't. I've also seen cows act like anti-aliasing is no big deal when they are trying to pretend that PC gaming doesn't really offer that much of a graphical improvement over consoles. I just find it funny that now all of a sudden anti-aliasing is the sole determinant of whether a game has good graphics.

[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]

Not close. Obviously it's pretty close considering a group of people agree and debate such. I've got UC2, which I can prove. And Gears of war 3 looks miles superior and is more consistant. I'll wait to play UC3 though to decide, though you've still yet to awnswer where those pictures are from?

Cow4ever

Crysis 2 looks fantastic, especially the outdoor parts. There's somebody on this forum who swears it's the ugliest game ever, and then you claim it's really ugly. It isn't perfect graphically, but it's a great looking game, probably still the best on consoles to date.

In other news, I really think XBox 360 fans are way overplaying their hand, as PS3 fans did before them. Gears is up there with the best. It doesn't blow anything away. It isn't perfect graphically. I'm not impressed with the lighting. It does have some jaggy issues in some places, which honestly, was the first thing I noticed. That's not to say that it's ugly. On the contrary, it looks fantastic, but there's nothing that makes it clearly better than other titles. It's even, but not better.

I seriously doubt there will be a game that's clearly head and shoulders above the competition for the rest of this generation. I do think that Gears 3, Crysis 2, Uncharted 3, Rage, God of War 3, Killzone 3, etc. are about as good as possible from this batch of hardware. I think there will be minor bumps graphically, but not major improvements. Time to put the whole graphics king discussion to rest.

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="kalipekona"]

Yet somehow cows like you are always saying that anti-aliasing isn't really a big deal when it comes to multiplatform gamesand the 360 has it and the PS3 doesn't. What you are doing is called selective criticism -- focusing on the weakest element and ingoring all the strengths.

kalipekona

:| what the **** are you talking about, I've never said that.

You need to get your info straight before you start talking nonsense.

I've seen enough of your comments to know that you fall into the diehard cow camp. I also know that cows are always claiming that multiplats are the same even when the 360 version has anti-aliasing and the PS3 version doesn't. I've also seen cows act like anti-aliasing is no big deal when they are trying to pretend that PC gaming doesn't really offer that much of a graphical improvement over consoles. I just find it funny that now all of a sudden anti-aliasing is the sole determinant of whether a game has good graphics.

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"]

[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]

Not close. Obviously it's pretty close considering a group of people agree and debate such. I've got UC2, which I can prove. And Gears of war 3 looks miles superior and is more consistant. I'll wait to play UC3 though to decide, though you've still yet to awnswer where those pictures are from?

romans828_2002

Crysis 2 looks fantastic, especially the outdoor parts. There's somebody on this forum who swears it's the ugliest game ever, and then you claim it's really ugly. It isn't perfect graphically, but it's a great looking game, probably still the best on consoles to date.

In other news, I really think XBox 360 fans are way overplaying their hand, as PS3 fans did before them. Gears is up there with the best. It doesn't blow anything away. It isn't perfect graphically. I'm not impressed with the lighting. It does have some jaggy issues in some places, which honestly, was the first thing I noticed. That's not to say that it's ugly. On the contrary, it looks fantastic, but there's nothing that makes it clearly better than other titles. It's even, but not better.

I seriously doubt there will be a game that's clearly head and shoulders above the competition for the rest of this generation. I do think that Gears 3, Crysis 2, Uncharted 3, Rage, God of War 3, Killzone 3, etc. are about as good as possible from this batch of hardware. I think there will be minor bumps graphically, but not major improvements. Time to put the whole graphics king discussion to rest.

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="kalipekona"]

Yet somehowcows like you are always saying that anti-aliasing isn't really a big deal when it comes to multiplatform gamesand the 360 has it and the PS3 doesn't. What you are doing is called selective criticism -- focusing on the weakest element and ingoring all the strengths.

kalipekona

:| what the **** are you talking about, I've never said that.

You need to get your info straight before you start talking nonsense.

I've seen enough of your comments to know that you fall into the diehard cow camp. I also know that cows are always claiming that multiplats are the same even when the 360 version has anti-aliasing and the PS3 version doesn't. I've also seen cows act like anti-aliasing is no big deal when they are trying to pretend that PC gaming doesn't really offer that much of a graphical improvement over consoles. I just find it funny that now all of a sudden anti-aliasing is the sole determinant of whether a game has good graphics.

PROBLEM: you respond to "ME" not a generic populous of "cows"

If you are going to quote me then you need to reply to what I wrote or have written in the past, if you are just going to make **** up then don't bother.

So you can kill that cow banter you keep trying to push on me, it doesn't help your argument. "I" didn't say those random accusations you keep spouting so stop trying to latch arguments on to me because of your assumptions.

I have said I think PC graphical improvement over consoles is exaggerated...but that's be cause I also am a PC gamer. I recognize the "technical" advangate PC gameing offers but when it comes down to it the base graphics are very comparible. Then again I don't mod my PC games.

[QUOTE="romans828_2002"]

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"] Eh no. people debated about Crysis 2 (which I do have) and it's a really REALLY ugly game. Yes IMO also Gears looks at least 10X than that mess. The pictures are from U2 MP And that video I really think both looked equally bad. But TBH I can't really see jaggies on utube very easily. Crysis 2 looked good on utube but playing it you see all the horrible jaggies.

Cow4ever

Crysis 2 looks fantastic, especially the outdoor parts. There's somebody on this forum who swears it's the ugliest game ever, and then you claim it's really ugly. It isn't perfect graphically, but it's a great looking game, probably still the best on consoles to date.

In other news, I really think XBox 360 fans are way overplaying their hand, as PS3 fans did before them. Gears is up there with the best. It doesn't blow anything away. It isn't perfect graphically. I'm not impressed with the lighting. It does have some jaggy issues in some places, which honestly, was the first thing I noticed. That's not to say that it's ugly. On the contrary, it looks fantastic, but there's nothing that makes it clearly better than other titles. It's even, but not better.

I seriously doubt there will be a game that's clearly head and shoulders above the competition for the rest of this generation. I do think that Gears 3, Crysis 2, Uncharted 3, Rage, God of War 3, Killzone 3, etc. are about as good as possible from this batch of hardware. I think there will be minor bumps graphically, but not major improvements. Time to put the whole graphics king discussion to rest.

There isn't any game that puts out better native resolution 1080x720gfx then GOW3 PERIOD. having the best AA on console doesn't hurt either.

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]

What game is that? Glad it's not Gears 3, textures look awful. And jaggies are very, very apparent.

Cow4ever

Its Uncharted 2 but whoever did the shots went into the theatre mode and played around with some of the setting likes bloom and DoF. The MP in Uncharted 2 doesn't have any AA which is why there are so many jaggles. I think the textures in the second pic look pretty good though, but the grass and ground texture in the 3rd pic are pretty atrocious

The second picture has some bloom applied to it and the last picture definitely has a super low DoF to get that blur effect in the background. The game does not look like that when you play it, otherwise anything 5 feet in front of you would be so blurry that you wouldn't even be able to see

The games that I would say look best on consoles are (in no order)

• Gears 3
• God of War 3
• Uncharted 2/3
• Wipeout HD Fury (1080p native at 60FPS)
• Killzone 2/3
• Crysis 1/2
• Final Fantasy XIII

Any of these could be considered the best looking games and in the end it comes down to art direction and preference

[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"]

This one:

All pics from the MP

Cow4ever

What game is that? Glad it's not Gears 3, textures look awful. And jaggies are very, very apparent.

seems gears 3 has taken the crown from crysis 2. it's kinda sad that the poor ps3 hasn't produces anything that tops uncharted 2 for two years straight.

seems gears 3 has taken the crown from crysis 2. it's kinda sad that the poor ps3 hasn't produces anything that tops uncharted 2 for two years straight.

MozartXVI

Killzone 3 and God of War 3 came out after Uncharted 3

FFXIII

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="BPoole96"]

Its Uncharted 2 but whoever did the shots went into the theatre mode and played around with some of the setting likes bloom and DoF. The MP in Uncharted 2 doesn't have any AA which is why there are so many jaggles. I think the textures in the second pic look pretty good though, but the grass and ground texture in the 3rd pic are pretty atrocious

BPoole96

The second picture has some bloom applied to it and the last picture definitely has a super low DoF to get that blur effect in the background. The game does not look like that when you play it, otherwise anything 5 feet in front of you would be so blurry that you wouldn't even be able to see

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"]

[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]

What game is that? Glad it's not Gears 3, textures look awful. And jaggies are very, very apparent.

Funconsole

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"]

Eh no. people debated about Crysis 2 (which I do have) and it's a really REALLY ugly game.T-razor1

[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"]

This one:

All pics from the MP

Cow4ever

What game is that? Glad it's not Gears 3, textures look awful. And jaggies are very, very apparent.

The King, Queen and Prince all belong on the PC. There are at least 10 games that all have better graphics on the PC than any console game.

Well as of right now at this moment with games that are RELEASED it seems Gears of War 3 is the current console graphics king, beating all other console exclusive and multiplt games released so far AT THE MOMENT. What do you guys believe? I think it's undebatable as of this moment in time.

Aquaunitpatrol

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"]

[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]

What game is that? Glad it's not Gears 3, textures look awful. And jaggies are very, very apparent.

mitu123

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"] Awful? Are you kidding me? It looks way better this close than gears from far away! Gears 3 textures are just a solid color. And The reason jaggies are apparent(not a surprise since it's very close) is because it uses the same AA implementation as Gears 3 which is... none lol! The SP on the other hand uses MLAA which Gears can't touch.

monkeysmoke

Wait has the title been Graphics Queen??? What does that even mean?

[QUOTE="DarthJohnova"][QUOTE="commonfate"]

Gonna go with Nier

commonfate

Serious like you've never known.

Wait has the title been Graphics Queen??? What does that even mean?

commonfate

Not a console game.

[QUOTE="monkeysmoke"][QUOTE="mitu123"] I wouldn't say it's awful, but there's some noticeably bad textures in some pics, and nice use of photomode again.:lol:And my god, the jaggies.

mitu123

You're generally bias if you don't think each has its flaws.

But I assure you, I could easily find a texture in Gears of war 3 as well that looked inferior to an Uncharted 3 texture.

Gears 3

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="monkeysmoke"] Those textures are beyond anything on the 360 and Gears of War 3's texture are not realy impressive compared to Killzone 3's textures. Textures on Uncharted games are always more detailed than any Unreal engine texture. When i first played Unchated 2 the modern warfare level, i was blown out by the details on each wall's texture like they didnt even repeat a single texture work.Bretter2200

You're generally bias if you don't think each has its flaws.

Those textures are beyond anything on the 360 and Gears of War 3's texture are not realy impressive compared to Killzone 3's textures. Textures on Uncharted games are always more detailed than any Unreal engine texture. When i first played Unchated 2 the modern warfare level, i was blown out by the details on each wall's texture like they didnt even repeat a single texture work.monkeysmoke

So let's test your theory...

Uncharted 2

Killzone 3

Gears of War 3

Gears 3 textures are sharper and more detailed up close and far away thanks to something that we call texture filtering. Look at the building in the background and compare it to Uncharted 2 which has poor filtering on background objects.

LOL, even Killzone 3 has some bad textures, how do people not notice this?

seems gears 3 has taken the crown from crysis 2. it's kinda sad that the poor ps3 hasn't produces anything that tops uncharted 2 for two years straight.

MozartXVI

Gears 3 for me.

[QUOTE="MozartXVI"]

seems gears 3 has taken the crown from crysis 2. it's kinda sad that the poor ps3 hasn't produces anything that tops uncharted 2 for two years straight.

Mozelleple112

Resident Evil 5 came out in 2009.

Are those gears and uncharted pics meant to be impressive?

HL2 in 2004 had better textures and filtering.

Are those gears and uncharted pics meant to be impressive?

HL2 in 2004 had better textures and filtering.

kraken2109

And then you woke up.

PS3 - Uncharted 3

360 - Gears of War 3

Wii - Xenoblade Chronicles

[QUOTE="MozartXVI"]

seems gears 3 has taken the crown from crysis 2. it's kinda sad that the poor ps3 hasn't produces anything that tops uncharted 2 for two years straight.

Mozelleple112

sorry, but gears 2 in 2008 looks miles better than uncharted 1. just because you don't want to admit it doesn't mean it's not true. ;)

Aren't there like 50?

Everyone says something different.

[QUOTE="kraken2109"]

Are those gears and uncharted pics meant to be impressive?

HL2 in 2004 had better textures and filtering.

CorbraMax

And then you woke up.

*poor quality shots*

And then you changed the settings from low to max.

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="MozartXVI"]

seems gears 3 has taken the crown from crysis 2. it's kinda sad that the poor ps3 hasn't produces anything that tops uncharted 2 for two years straight.

MozartXVI

sorry, but gears 2 in 2008 looks miles better than uncharted 1. just because you don't want to admit it doesn't mean it's not true. ;)

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="MozartXVI"]

seems gears 3 has taken the crown from crysis 2. it's kinda sad that the poor ps3 hasn't produces anything that tops uncharted 2 for two years straight.

CorbraMax

Resident Evil 5 came out in 2009.