The HALO killer is finally here!

And it came out 2 years before Halo.

mmm, I feel like playing now... bye all

but it's on the PC

I'll pass

Playing Halo is like playing Pong compared to Half-Life, and Half-Life 2. Nevermind CS. But yeah, Halo is a good for a console FPS.RawDeal_basic

halo ce is extremely superior to half-life 1 + cs in every way...

the story is superior by a longshot. the atmosphere is superior. the actually gameplay is much more fun and innovative and has much more depth to it. the graphics are about leveled in comparison for their time.

im sorry, but HL1 is a cookie cutter FPS in comparison to Halo CE.

[QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"]Playing Halo is like playing Pong compared to Half-Life, and Half-Life 2. Nevermind CS. But yeah, Halo is a good for a console FPS._en1gma_

halo ce is extremely superior to half-life 1 + cs in every way...

the story is superior by a longshot. the atmosphere is superior. the actually gameplay is much more fun and innovative and has much more depth to it. the graphics are about leveled in comparison for their time.

im sorry, but HL1 is a cookie cutter FPS in comparison to Halo CE.

:lol:

[QUOTE="_en1gma_"]

[QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"]Playing Halo is like playing Pong compared to Half-Life, and Half-Life 2. Nevermind CS. But yeah, Halo is a good for a console FPS.RawDeal_basic

halo ce is extremely superior to half-life 1 + cs in every way...

the story is superior by a longshot. the atmosphere is superior. the actually gameplay is much more fun and innovative and has much more depth to it. the graphics are about leveled in comparison for their time.

im sorry, but HL1 is a cookie cutter FPS in comparison to Halo CE.

:lol:

that rebuttal was amazing. :?

[QUOTE="_en1gma_"]

[QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"]Playing Halo is like playing Pong compared to Half-Life, and Half-Life 2. Nevermind CS. But yeah, Halo is a good for a console FPS.RawDeal_basic

halo ce is extremely superior to half-life 1 + cs in every way...

the story is superior by a longshot. the atmosphere is superior. the actually gameplay is much more fun and innovative and has much more depth to it. the graphics are about leveled in comparison for their time.

im sorry, but HL1 is a cookie cutter FPS in comparison to Halo CE.

:lol:

That seriously is sig. worthy :lol:

Should I put it as myu new quote of the month?

[QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"]Playing Halo is like playing Pong compared to Half-Life, and Half-Life 2. Nevermind CS. But yeah, Halo is a good for a console FPS._en1gma_

halo ce is extremely superior to half-life 1 + cs in every way...

the story is superior by a longshot. the atmosphere is superior. the actually gameplay is much more fun and innovative and has much more depth to it. the graphics are about leveled in comparison for their time.

im sorry, but HL1 is a cookie cutter FPS in comparison to Halo CE.

did you you actually just call HL1 generic?

Half Life 1 wasnt just inovative....it was revolutionary....it completly changed the way FPS's were played....in no way in hell was Halo CE more inovative then HL1...everything else is opinionated....

Playing Halo is like playing Pong compared to Half-Life, and Half-Life 2. Nevermind CS. But yeah, Halo is a good for a console FPS.RawDeal_basic

I've played both Half life games and think Halo is more fun.

[QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"][QUOTE="_en1gma_"]

[QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"]Playing Halo is like playing Pong compared to Half-Life, and Half-Life 2. Nevermind CS. But yeah, Halo is a good for a console FPS.Dencore

halo ce is extremely superior to half-life 1 + cs in every way...

the story is superior by a longshot. the atmosphere is superior. the actually gameplay is much more fun and innovative and has much more depth to it. the graphics are about leveled in comparison for their time.

im sorry, but HL1 is a cookie cutter FPS in comparison to Halo CE.

:lol:

That seriously is sig. worthy :lol:

Should I put it as myu new quote of the month?

Why is that sig worthy? Most of what he said was his opinion.

[QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"][QUOTE="_en1gma_"]

[QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"]Playing Halo is like playing Pong compared to Half-Life, and Half-Life 2. Nevermind CS. But yeah, Halo is a good for a console FPS.Dencore

halo ce is extremely superior to half-life 1 + cs in every way...

the story is superior by a longshot. the atmosphere is superior. the actually gameplay is much more fun and innovative and has much more depth to it. the graphics are about leveled in comparison for their time.

im sorry, but HL1 is a cookie cutter FPS in comparison to Halo CE.

:lol:

That seriously is sig. worthy :lol:

Should I put it as myu new quote of the month?

:lol: Definitely. I still can't stop laughing!

[QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"]Playing Halo is like playing Pong compared to Half-Life, and Half-Life 2. Nevermind CS. But yeah, Halo is a good for a console FPS._en1gma_

halo ce is extremely superior to half-life 1 + cs in every way...

the story is superior by a longshot. the atmosphere is superior. the actually gameplay is much more fun and innovative and has much more depth to it. the graphics are about leveled in comparison for their time.

im sorry, but HL1 is a cookie cutter FPS in comparison to Halo CE.

As a gamer who has played Halo since it came out, and playing Half Life 2, Halo fails in comparison with Half Life 2 in the story part. Half Life 2feels oppressive, because you actually see yourown peoplebeing enslaved as soon as you get out of the train. I have read all the Halo novels(exept the new one) and its still interesting, but Half Life has the best atmosphere.

[QUOTE="Dencore"][QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"][QUOTE="_en1gma_"]

[QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"]Playing Halo is like playing Pong compared to Half-Life, and Half-Life 2. Nevermind CS. But yeah, Halo is a good for a console FPS.Zuluking187

halo ce is extremely superior to half-life 1 + cs in every way...

the story is superior by a longshot. the atmosphere is superior. the actually gameplay is much more fun and innovative and has much more depth to it. the graphics are about leveled in comparison for their time.

im sorry, but HL1 is a cookie cutter FPS in comparison to Halo CE.

:lol:

That seriously is sig. worthy :lol:

Should I put it as myu new quote of the month?

Why is that sig worthy? Most of what he said was his opinion.

Well he has a messed up opinion, which is why it is sig worthy. Honestly calling Half-life 1 a cookie cutter FPS is the stupidest thing I've ever heard.MIYAMOTOnext007

Key Word: Comparison

How about instead of laughing you counter his statement.-Sora

[QUOTE="_en1gma_"]

[QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"]Playing Halo is like playing Pong compared to Half-Life, and Half-Life 2. Nevermind CS. But yeah, Halo is a good for a console FPS.cobrax25

halo ce is extremely superior to half-life 1 + cs in every way...

the story is superior by a longshot. the atmosphere is superior. the actually gameplay is much more fun and innovative and has much more depth to it. the graphics are about leveled in comparison for their time.

im sorry, but HL1 is a cookie cutter FPS in comparison to Halo CE.

did you you actually just call HL1 generic?

Half Life 1 wasnt just inovative....it was revolutionary....it completly changed the way FPS's were played....in no way in hell was Halo CE more inovative then HL1...everything else is opinionated....

Story - Bungie actually presented their story to the player. There is much more depth and levels to it. HL1 characters were presented as totally flat and the actual story is laughable.

Gameplay - HL1 revolutionized FPS? As did Halo CE with the integration of sandbox, non-anchored vehicles for both SP and MP...one button for all weapon melee....one button press for throwing actual integrated grenades....recharging shields....etc

I DID NOT say HL1 wasn't innovative or revolutionary, I just said I found Halo CE's MORESO

Halo CE was a completely new and refreshing feel for an FPS. and i played all the big ones prior to it.

[QUOTE="MIYAMOTOnext007"] Well he has a messed up opinion, which is why it is sig worthy. Honestly calling Half-life 1 a cookie cutter FPS is the stupidest thing I've ever heard.-Sora

Key Word: Comparison

To what, HALO? Hahahaha. It should be the other way around.Oh no, I laughed again, sorry.

the funny thing is that I prefer PC-style FPS and was a TOTAL hermit before Halo CE was released.

I played CS non-stop and was in love with Doom and Quake and Half-Life and Tribes.

Until Halo CE came out. It completely changed my outlook on FPS. I think it is a joke for hermits nowadays to find Halo CE just an average FPS and HL1 to be kick the snot out of Halo CE. And then fail to make an argument.

[QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="_en1gma_"]

[QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"]Playing Halo is like playing Pong compared to Half-Life, and Half-Life 2. Nevermind CS. But yeah, Halo is a good for a console FPS._en1gma_

halo ce is extremely superior to half-life 1 + cs in every way...

the story is superior by a longshot. the atmosphere is superior. the actually gameplay is much more fun and innovative and has much more depth to it. the graphics are about leveled in comparison for their time.

im sorry, but HL1 is a cookie cutter FPS in comparison to Halo CE.

did you you actually just call HL1 generic?

Half Life 1 wasnt just inovative....it was revolutionary....it completly changed the way FPS's were played....in no way in hell was Halo CE more inovative then HL1...everything else is opinionated....

Story - Bungie actually presented their story to the player. There is much more depth and levels to it. HL1 characters were presented as totally flat and the actual story is laughable.

Gameplay - HL1 revolutionized FPS? As did Halo CE with the integration of sandbox, non-anchored vehicles for both SP and MP...one button for all weapon melee....one button press for throwing actual integrated grenades....recharging shields....etc

I DID NOT say HL1 wasn't innovative or revolutionary, I just said I found Halo CE's MORESO

Halo CE was a completely new and refreshing feel for an FPS. and i played all the big ones prior to it.

Halo wasnt even close to the first FPS with vehiclas....

half Life...on the other hand changed the way All FPS would be played in the future...it was the first FPS ever to put scripted sequences in-game rather then into cutscenes.

BTW..Halo wasnt the first FPS with rechargable shields either...

[QUOTE="-Sora"][QUOTE="MIYAMOTOnext007"] Well he has a messed up opinion, which is why it is sig worthy. Honestly calling Half-life 1 a cookie cutter FPS is the stupidest thing I've ever heard.RawDeal_basic

Key Word: Comparison

To what, HALO? Hahahaha. It should be the other way around.Oh no, I laughed again, sorry.

Point proved, yet again. Shameful....

[QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"][QUOTE="-Sora"][QUOTE="MIYAMOTOnext007"] Well he has a messed up opinion, which is why it is sig worthy. Honestly calling Half-life 1 a cookie cutter FPS is the stupidest thing I've ever heard._en1gma_

Key Word: Comparison

To what, HALO? Hahahaha. It should be the other way around.Oh no, I laughed again, sorry.

Point proved, yet again. Shameful....

[QUOTE="_en1gma_"][QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="_en1gma_"]

[QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"]Playing Halo is like playing Pong compared to Half-Life, and Half-Life 2. Nevermind CS. But yeah, Halo is a good for a console FPS.cobrax25

halo ce is extremely superior to half-life 1 + cs in every way...

the story is superior by a longshot. the atmosphere is superior. the actually gameplay is much more fun and innovative and has much more depth to it. the graphics are about leveled in comparison for their time.

im sorry, but HL1 is a cookie cutter FPS in comparison to Halo CE.

did you you actually just call HL1 generic?

Half Life 1 wasnt just inovative....it was revolutionary....it completly changed the way FPS's were played....in no way in hell was Halo CE more inovative then HL1...everything else is opinionated....

Story - Bungie actually presented their story to the player. There is much more depth and levels to it. HL1 characters were presented as totally flat and the actual story is laughable.

Gameplay - HL1 revolutionized FPS? As did Halo CE with the integration of sandbox, non-anchored vehicles for both SP and MP...one button for all weapon melee....one button press for throwing actual integrated grenades....recharging shields....etc

I DID NOT say HL1 wasn't innovative or revolutionary, I just said I found Halo CE's MORESO

Halo CE was a completely new and refreshing feel for an FPS. and i played all the big ones prior to it.

Halo wasnt even close to the first FPS with vehiclas....

half Life...on the other hand changed the way All FPS would be played in the future...it was the first FPS ever to put scripted sequences in-game rather then into cutscenes.

BTW..Halo wasnt the first FPS with rechargable shields either...

It wasn't just having vehicles, it was how they were placed and used in a MUCH MORE sandbox fashion (sorry Tribes integrates them totally different)

And you ignored the rest. The fact is that Halo CE was a revolutionary FPS. Once again, I know HL1 was, I just found Halo CE moreso. There is no denying how influential Halo CE was on all FPS's that followed.

[QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="_en1gma_"][QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="_en1gma_"]

[QUOTE="RawDeal_basic"]Playing Halo is like playing Pong compared to Half-Life, and Half-Life 2. Nevermind CS. But yeah, Halo is a good for a console FPS._en1gma_

halo ce is extremely superior to half-life 1 + cs in every way...

the story is superior by a longshot. the atmosphere is superior. the actually gameplay is much more fun and innovative and has much more depth to it. the graphics are about leveled in comparison for their time.

im sorry, but HL1 is a cookie cutter FPS in comparison to Halo CE.

did you you actually just call HL1 generic?

Half Life 1 wasnt just inovative....it was revolutionary....it completly changed the way FPS's were played....in no way in hell was Halo CE more inovative then HL1...everything else is opinionated....

Story - Bungie actually presented their story to the player. There is much more depth and levels to it. HL1 characters were presented as totally flat and the actual story is laughable.

Gameplay - HL1 revolutionized FPS? As did Halo CE with the integration of sandbox, non-anchored vehicles for both SP and MP...one button for all weapon melee....one button press for throwing actual integrated grenades....recharging shields....etc

I DID NOT say HL1 wasn't innovative or revolutionary, I just said I found Halo CE's MORESO

Halo CE was a completely new and refreshing feel for an FPS. and i played all the big ones prior to it.

Halo wasnt even close to the first FPS with vehiclas....

half Life...on the other hand changed the way All FPS would be played in the future...it was the first FPS ever to put scripted sequences in-game rather then into cutscenes.

BTW..Halo wasnt the first FPS with rechargable shields either...

It wasn't just having vehicles, it was how they were placed and used in a MUCH MORE sandbox fashion (sorry Tribes integrates them totally different)

And you ignored the rest. The fact is that Halo CE was a revolutionary FPS. Once again, I know HL1 was, I just found Halo CE moreso. There is no denying how influential Halo CE was on all FPS's that followed.

how exacly did Halo implement Vehicals differently then any other game?

and their isnt a single new feature in Halo, that is in every FPS made today...unlike Half Life with its scripted sequences....

If you think PC shooters have one click grenades, and rechargable shields you are horribly mistaken....turns out that schme was only good for Console Fps's....

rofl, the Halo campaign was very generic, the outdoor maps were all corridors, with little exception, no real interesting events or scripted sequences throught the entire game.

A complete tribes & UT99 clone.

How about instead of laughing you counter his statement.-Sora

Halo never wins FPSOTY ... there you go, arguement over.

I don't get all the Halo hate, I could see why someone could consider the best they've played, even if they've played many FPS (console or PC).

I personally don't think it's the best, I enjoyed the thoughtfulness of HL a little bit more, but Halo was a fun run and gun title, and I really enjoy the plot. I mean it's not by luck that Halo titles break sales records and sell millions upion millions of copies. I know sales to equate quality, but add in good/great industry reviews and you should at least understand why people might think of it the way they do.

i usually play CS:S for at least 2 hours each night. I don't understand why Hermits say PC FPS>>Console FPS. I have played both and I don't agree. Game superiority for me is on a case by case basis, not a generalization.TheBigDrat

This thread isnt about PC FPS vs Console FPS.... just CS/HL vs Halo.

i usually play CS:S for at least 2 hours each night. I don't understand why Hermits say PC FPS>>Console FPS. I have played both and I don't agree. Game superiority for me is on a case by case basis, not a generalization.TheBigDrat

I agree, I don't understand how an "FPS fan" could not enjoy what both system forms have to offer. :?

[QUOTE="TheBigDrat"]i usually play CS:S for at least 2 hours each night. I don't understand why Hermits say PC FPS>>Console FPS. I have played both and I don't agree. Game superiority for me is on a case by case basis, not a generalization.Meu2k7

This thread isnt about PC FPS vs Console FPS.... just CS/HL vs Halo.

CS Online>Halo Online, Halo Lan>CS Lan, thats my opinion

Yeah, CS has a superior MP experience and HL has a superior SP experience.smokeydabear076

Personally I prefer Halo's MP. I've hated Counterstrike with a passion since it came out.

To everyone saying "teh halo si teh UT and Triibs cloen!!!1!!!one!!!". Please, play Halo long enough to actually understand the mechanics at work. Put it in 2001 (anyone playing the PC version, just get out. A three year old port should not be the point of comparison). Halo fundamentally changed the actual gameplay in First Person Shooters beyond most games out there. The "golden triad" of Halo combat was completely revolutionary, along with the AI and health system. If you have only played it for a short while on a friend's house, you are not capable of understanding this.

Halo's mechanics are still emulated to this day by shooters as diverse as Gears, Call of Duty 2 & 3, Rainbow six, Resistance (a game that did evolve the health system a bit more) and others.

Although halo had very few specific points in where it was completely innovative, the whole of it was nearly perfectly executed.

[QUOTE="TheBigDrat"]i usually play CS:S for at least 2 hours each night. I don't understand why Hermits say PC FPS>>Console FPS. I have played both and I don't agree. Game superiority for me is on a case by case basis, not a generalization.Meu2k7

This thread isnt about PC FPS vs Console FPS.... just CS/HL vs Halo.

Too bad a fellow hermit brought that in here, eh?

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]Yeah, CS has a superior MP experience and HL has a superior SP experience.Grive

Personally I prefer Halo's MP. I've hated Counterstrike with a passion since it came out.

To everyone saying "teh halo si teh UT and Triibs cloen!!!1!!!one!!!". Please, play Halo long enough to actually understand the mechanics at work. Put it in 2001 (anyone playing the PC version, just get out. A three year old port should not be the point of comparison). Halo fundamentally changed the actual gameplay in First Person Shooters beyond most games out there. The "golden triad" of Halo combat was completely revolutionary, along with the AI and health system. If you have only played it for a short while on a friend's house, you are not capable of understanding this.

Halo's mechanics are still emulated to this day by shooters as diverse as Gears, Call of Duty 2 & 3, Rainbow six, Resistance (a game that did evolve the health system a bit more) and others.

Although halo had very few specific points in where it was completely innovative, the whole of it was nearly perfectly executed.

exactly

i usually play CS:S for at least 2 hours each night. I don't understand why Hermits say PC FPS>>Console FPS. I have played both and I don't agree. Game superiority for me is on a case by case basis, not a generalization.TheBigDrat

i agree 100%, i enjoy both Halo and the Battlefield Series

[QUOTE="Meu2k7"]

[QUOTE="TheBigDrat"]i usually play CS:S for at least 2 hours each night. I don't understand why Hermits say PC FPS>>Console FPS. I have played both and I don't agree. Game superiority for me is on a case by case basis, not a generalization.TheBigDrat

This thread isnt about PC FPS vs Console FPS.... just CS/HL vs Halo.

CS Online>Halo Online, Halo Lan>CS Lan, thats my opinion

I agree, this year in College we have had Halo 1 16 player LAN (On minimal settings, on mac machines) (Intergrated gfx im guessing).

Playing Lan with them is the ONLY time ive enjoyed playing Halo ever, playing it against randoms online is boring compared to most other fps like Battlefield/UT/CS:S imo.

|May I ask though, if the health system in halo was "Revolutioanary" then why on earth have I not seen another FPS that uses it?

Crysis takes 2 things that Halo "created"

Left Arm grenade throwing (fast) in a similar way to Halo.

Health/Shield regen (Regeneration mode on Nano-suit heals your health slowly - lowers energy.

Energy while in armour mode is basically like Halo's shield...

But other than Crysis, no other FPS has used Halo's Health system ....