The PS3 is the graphics king!

very funny, check the facts, please.

Devil May Cry 4 = 1280x720 (2xAA, temporal) on ps3, by the way , you know what temporal AA means?:)

Devil May Cry 4 = 1280x720 (2xAA) on xb360

GTA IV

1152x640 (no AA) ON PS3

1280x 720P(2xAA) ON XB360

AND gta4 framerate analysis

Test1
Old 360: 31.990fps
Old PS3: 26.460fps
New 360: 31.627fps (3.77% torn frames)
New PS3: 26.504fps

Test2
Old 360: 28.624fps
Old PS3: 23.452fps
New 360: 29.233fps (4.26% torn frames)
New PS3: 23.989fps

Test3
Old 360: 35.252fps
Old PS3: 29.041fps
New 360: 35.662fps (2.37% torn frames)
New PS3: 29.523fps

Test4
Old 360: 26.076fps
Old PS3: 26.081fps
New 360: 26.015fps (6.07% torn frames)
New PS3: 25.803fps

Test5
Old 360: 26.712fps
Old PS3: 23.781fps
New 360: 26.507fps (4.9% torn frames)
New PS3: 23.781fps

Test6
Old 360: 33.798fps
Old PS3: 28.313fps
New 360: 33.713fps (2.35% torn frames)
New PS3: 28.313fps

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=48001

jrpgliker

Source for the Resolution info please. In regards to framerate:

1. difference between 25fps and 30fps isn't visible to the human eye.

2. FPS doesn not equal visual quality.

Yes they are facts, but they are not necesaarily relevant.

If you can see a difference then I can see Santa Claus in the background.

And no, Temporal AA has no real effect on the visual quality as neither game is running as 60FPS, another useless fact.

PS3 is certainly capable of good things. But so is the 360.

We have plenty of examples at this point to show us that the machines are capable of similar graphics (with the expected thing or 2 each can do that the other cannot do easily).

Why we argue ad infinitum is silly.

I'm 100% sure the PS3 can do Gears of War's visuals.

I'm 100% sure the 360 can do Metal Gear's visuals.

I'm 100% sure that arguing about the details is a waste of everyone's time at this point because any differences are absolutely negligible.

Dreams-Visions

Thank you, for being the voice of reason on this thread, I 100% agree with your comments

[QUOTE="MyzeDivine"][QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

Naughty Dog obviously knows what they are doing with the PS3.

Don't forget about Ratchet and Clank! It uses the same engine as Uncharted!

Gran Turismo 5 looks amazing too.

Rikusaki

(whisper)Just so you know, Uncharted is made by Naughty Dog and R&C is made by Insomniac. Resistance 2 is using the R&C F:ToD engine.(/whisper)

Insomniac has been using the Naughty Dog engine for all the Ratchet and Clank games

It says so in the credits.

Considering the name of the engine that R&C F:ToD used is called Insomniac Engine v.2.0, and about 100 sites with the headline "Resistance 2 to use Ratchet and Clank FTOD engine," I doubt it's a Naughty Dog engine. Maybe previous R&C games were run on a ND engine, but Insomniac is much bigger now.

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"][QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

Uncahrted is still the Console Graphics king:

useLOGIC

um wut?

Personally, I think MGS4 looks better than Uncharted by a country mile. I also think Gears of War is equivalent to Uncharted. But the pretty color palette makes people assume Uncharted is graphically superior.

That being said, I love Uncharted's animations, colors and effects. I just haven't found it to be technically any better or worse than Gears of War.

MGS4 > * on consoles, however.

[QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"][QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

Uncahrted is still the Console Graphics king:

Dreams-Visions

um wut?

Personally, I think MGS4 looks better than Uncharted by a country mile. I also think Gears of War is equivalent to Uncharted. But the pretty color palette makes people assume Uncharted is graphically superior.

That being said, I love Uncharted's animations, colors and effects. I just haven't found it to be technically any better or worse than Gears of War.

MGS4 > * on consoles, however.

It's actually harder for a game to have alot of colors and look good then it is for a game to basically have only one color and look good. With that I am going to have to give the graphical trophy to Uncharted.

Gears 2 is going to destroy Uncharted and MGS4's muddy textures.

MGS 4 looks horrible in screenshots. However, in motion it is jaw droppingly good. Best graphics I've ever seen on a console, even rivals Crysis.

To all the RAGING pc fanboys, look at my specs, I've played Crysis.

MGS 4 looks horrible in screenshots. However, in motion it is jaw droppingly good. Best graphics I've ever seen on a console, even rivals Crysis.

To all the RAGING pc fanboys, look at my specs, I've played Crysis.

the_one34

I am going to soon play Crysis on my rig. So I can judge if MGS4 can hold a candle to Crysis. ;)

am i the only one who isn't that impressed by MGS4 in game graphics? I mean the cut scenes look good but the gameplay doesn't look any better than anything else thats on console. Its great graphics but I can think of more than a handful of other games that look just as good in game. NFJSupreme

like?

and do you have a HDTV? :|

[QUOTE="NFJSupreme"]am i the only one who isn't that impressed by MGS4 in game graphics? I mean the cut scenes look good but the gameplay doesn't look any better than anything else thats on console. Its great graphics but I can think of more than a handful of other games that look just as good in game. FragTycoon

like?

and do you have a HDTV? :|

52 in LCD HDTV by sony. The game looks great but I don't know, after playing all sorts of games and being well immersed into this current generation its not jaw dropping graphics that makes me go OMG am I playing a movie.

The PS3 is the graphics princess.
PC is graphics king
360 is graphics prince
Wii is graphics court jesture.

I put it so elementary but damn it, its true.
Pro_wrestler

QFT, assuming you think of the prince and princess as essentially equal.

MGS4 / Gran Turismo 5 / Uncharted

Graphically, the 360 has nothing that can compete with these titles.

Quote from IGN review for MGS

All of these features contribute to an excellent gameplay experience, but additionally striking are its visuals, which make MGS4 one of the best looking titles to date in gaming history.thetruespin

IGN said one of the best, not the best. But still, PS3 can't achieve the texture quality that X-box 360 games have.

MGS4 fail, not only does it look bland but the AI is the pure definition of stupid AI. Seems Snake is almost dead. It is more like MGS3.5.

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee243/nitrojew/SOUTHAMERICACONFINEMENTFACILITY_2.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3138/2578443084_3f3f3fa3da_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3100/2578443462_36986c232e_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3139/2577610975_90959fd4b1_o.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v101/utterlyjp/MIDDLEEASTREDZONE_1.jpg

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee243/nitrojew/SOUTHAMERICAMOUNTAINTRAIL_2.jpg

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee243/nitrojew/SOUTHAMERICARESEARCHLAB_6.jpg

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee243/nitrojew/EASTERNEUROPERIVERSIDEWEST.jpg

http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x204/RDK333/SOUTHAMERICAMOUNTAINTRAIL.jpg

hahahahahah, calling MGS4 the graphics king? or part of it? are you kidding me????? it might be fluid but it's upscaled sub-HD resolution, jam packed with low res textures, suffers from framerate issues - EVEN DURING CUTSCENES! (this is noted in many reviews). it also has ZERO anti-aliasing and is covered in jaggies in parts.

what. the. hell. are. cows. smoking???? :P

drakes looks soooo much better, and that isn't saying much imo.

cows calling a 1024x768 game the graphics king = the strongest irony i've seen in here in ages.

priceless.

3picuri3

desperation sets in....

good! I can feel you're hate!

Gears 2 is going to destroy Uncharted and MGS4's muddy textures.

PS3_3DO

Generally what happens when a game comes out a year or two later...

Stop comparing to crysis, it is so useless. You need a $1300+ rig to run that game on full, much more than any of the consoles.

MGS4 fail, not only does it look bland but the AI is the pure definition of stupid AI. Seems Snake is almost dead. It is more like MGS3.5.

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee243/nitrojew/SOUTHAMERICACONFINEMENTFACILITY_2.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3138/2578443084_3f3f3fa3da_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3100/2578443462_36986c232e_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3139/2577610975_90959fd4b1_o.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v101/utterlyjp/MIDDLEEASTREDZONE_1.jpg

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee243/nitrojew/SOUTHAMERICAMOUNTAINTRAIL_2.jpg

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee243/nitrojew/SOUTHAMERICARESEARCHLAB_6.jpg

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee243/nitrojew/EASTERNEUROPERIVERSIDEWEST.jpg

http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x204/RDK333/SOUTHAMERICAMOUNTAINTRAIL.jpg

IgorVitaly

[QUOTE="the_one34"]

MGS 4 looks horrible in screenshots. However, in motion it is jaw droppingly good. Best graphics I've ever seen on a console, even rivals Crysis.

To all the RAGING pc fanboys, look at my specs, I've played Crysis.

PS3_3DO

I am going to soon play Crysis on my rig. So I can judge if MGS4 can hold a candle to Crysis. ;)

If you haven't played MGS4 on an HDTV yourself, don't bother. I suggest you do however, it really is a work of art.

[QUOTE="PS3_3DO"]

Gears 2 is going to destroy Uncharted and MGS4's muddy textures.

Sammojo

Generally what happens when a game comes out a year or two later...

Stop comparing to crysis, it is so useless. You need a $1300+ rig to run that game on full, much more than any of the consoles.

My rig costs 876$ including shipment of parts excluding monitor (hooked to TV) and it runs Crysis at very high+ 1280*1024 30-40fps. Also Crysis medium setting **** all over this game, just look at MGS4 screenshots... *pukes in mouth* BUT hey its all about the gameplay right? Right if only the AI was not the definition of stupidity and so suicide prone. ;)

MGS 4 looks horrible in screenshots. However, in motion it is jaw droppingly good. Best graphics I've ever seen on a console, even rivals Crysis.

To all the RAGING pc fanboys, look at my specs, I've played Crysis.

the_one34

:lol: keep dreaming cows.......Crysis doesnt have muddy textures and small enviroments,and it doesnt run at subpar resolution with 0 anti aliasing :lol:

[QUOTE="Sammojo"][QUOTE="PS3_3DO"]

Gears 2 is going to destroy Uncharted and MGS4's muddy textures.

IgorVitaly

Generally what happens when a game comes out a year or two later...

Stop comparing to crysis, it is so useless. You need a $1300+ rig to run that game on full, much more than any of the consoles.

My rig costs 876$ including shipment of parts excluding monitor (hooked to TV) and it runs Crysis at very high+ 1280*1024 30-40fps. Also Crysis medium setting **** all over this game, just look at MGS4 screenshots... *pukes in mouth* BUT hey its all about the gameplay right? Right if only the AI was not the definition of stupidity and so suicide prone. ;)

Send me all of your parts and their prices, and make sure that's in $AU which is what I said. I included the monitor in the price though. Don't bother turning this into a PC vs console debate, PC is far better but it does cost more than a console. Crysis is on neither console and PC was never meant to be compared to the consoles, it is such an unfair comparison. I am a PC gamer myself.

To clarify, it doesn't rival crysis at all, but it sure beats the crap out of crysis on medium-low.

[QUOTE="IgorVitaly"][QUOTE="Sammojo"][QUOTE="PS3_3DO"]

Gears 2 is going to destroy Uncharted and MGS4's muddy textures.

Sammojo

Generally what happens when a game comes out a year or two later...

Stop comparing to crysis, it is so useless. You need a $1300+ rig to run that game on full, much more than any of the consoles.

My rig costs 876$ including shipment of parts excluding monitor (hooked to TV) and it runs Crysis at very high+ 1280*1024 30-40fps. Also Crysis medium setting **** all over this game, just look at MGS4 screenshots... *pukes in mouth* BUT hey its all about the gameplay right? Right if only the AI was not the definition of stupidity and so suicide prone. ;)

Send me all of your parts and their prices, and make sure that's in $AU which is what I said. I included the monitor in the price though. Don't bother turning this into a PC vs console debate, PC is far better but it does cost more than a console. Crysis is on neither console and PC was never meant to be compared to the consoles, it is such an unfair comparison. I am a PC gamer myself.

To clarify, it doesn't rival crysis at all, but it sure beats the crap out of crysis on medium-low.

In Austria the prices are sky high, tell me the price for a PS3. And I like that you said low-medium and not pure medium! :)

:lol: keep dreaming cows.......Crysis doesnt have muddy textures and small enviroments,and it doesnt run at subpar resolution with 0 anti aliasing :lol:

MojondeVACA

I'm not about to compare Metal Gear to Crysis, but MGS4's environments are hardly small, its textures are crisp, and there's no aliasing to be seen. And how exactly are you defining "subpar" resolution. My television set says that the gameis being played in 720p right now.

Play the game. Then we'll talk.

[QUOTE="MojondeVACA"]:lol: keep dreaming cows.......Crysis doesnt have muddy textures and small enviroments,and it doesnt run at subpar resolution with 0 anti aliasing :lol:

Pariah_001

I'm not about to compare Metal Gear to Crysis, but MGS4's environments are hardly small, its textures are crisp, and there's no aliasing to be seen. And how exactly are you defining "subpar" resolution. My television set says that the gameis being played in 720p right now.

Play the game. Then we'll talk.

The game is 6665p or 1024*768 aka not HD resolution, that is facts already proven. BEcouse you see it at 720p is becouse it is being upscaled.

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee243/nitrojew/SOUTHAMERICACONFINEMENTFACILITY_2.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3138/2578443084_3f3f3fa3da_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3100/2578443462_36986c232e_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3139/2577610975_90959fd4b1_o.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v101/utterlyjp/MIDDLEEASTREDZONE_1.jpg

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee243/nitrojew/SOUTHAMERICAMOUNTAINTRAIL_2.jpg

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee243/nitrojew/SOUTHAMERICARESEARCHLAB_6.jpg

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee243/nitrojew/EASTERNEUROPERIVERSIDEWEST.jpg

http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x204/RDK333/SOUTHAMERICAMOUNTAINTRAIL.jpg

[QUOTE="Pariah_001"][QUOTE="MojondeVACA"]:lol: keep dreaming cows.......Crysis doesnt have muddy textures and small enviroments,and it doesnt run at subpar resolution with 0 anti aliasing :lol:

IgorVitaly

I'm not about to compare Metal Gear to Crysis, but MGS4's environments are hardly small, its textures are crisp, and there's no aliasing to be seen. And how exactly are you defining "subpar" resolution. My television set says that the gameis being played in 720p right now.

Play the game. Then we'll talk.

The game is 6665p or 1024*768 aka not HD resolution, that is facts already proven. BEcouse you see it at 720p is becouse it is being upscaled.

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee243/nitrojew/SOUTHAMERICACONFINEMENTFACILITY_2.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3138/2578443084_3f3f3fa3da_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3100/2578443462_36986c232e_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3139/2577610975_90959fd4b1_o.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v101/utterlyjp/MIDDLEEASTREDZONE_1.jpg

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee243/nitrojew/SOUTHAMERICAMOUNTAINTRAIL_2.jpg

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee243/nitrojew/SOUTHAMERICARESEARCHLAB_6.jpg

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee243/nitrojew/EASTERNEUROPERIVERSIDEWEST.jpg

http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x204/RDK333/SOUTHAMERICAMOUNTAINTRAIL.jpg

Those are downsized preview images. I'll wait until B3D actually does a pixel count thanks.

Those are downsized preview images. I'll wait until B3D actually does a pixel count thanks.Pariah_001

No those are ingame framebuffer grabs, you should know that if you have the game. Camera in act 2 to take screenshots.

B3D alreaady confirmed it, you need to step out of your denial act! ;)

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241

In Austria the prices are sky high, tell me the price for a PS3. And I like that you said low-medium and not pure medium! :)

IgorVitaly

Yup they are pretty brutal, but it boils down to: in most countries, to play crysis you need rig which is about twice as much as a console. Just to clarify, it takes a fair computer to pump out crysis on medium, I ran bioshock on high and could barely run crysis on low. This isn't about that though, this is about MGS4 as a console game, which does have great graphics in comparison to many others. Crysis flattens all other console titles so it was useless bringing it into this in the first place.

[QUOTE="Sammojo"][QUOTE="PS3_3DO"]

Gears 2 is going to destroy Uncharted and MGS4's muddy textures.

IgorVitaly

Generally what happens when a game comes out a year or two later...

Stop comparing to crysis, it is so useless. You need a $1300+ rig to run that game on full, much more than any of the consoles.

My rig costs 876$ including shipment of parts excluding monitor (hooked to TV) and it runs Crysis at very high+ 1280*1024 30-40fps. Also Crysis medium setting **** all over this game, just look at MGS4 screenshots... *pukes in mouth* BUT hey its all about the gameplay right? Right if only the AI was not the definition of stupidity and so suicide prone. ;)

You can look at old screenshots all you want Crysis has nothing on MGS4.

[QUOTE="IgorVitaly"][QUOTE="Sammojo"][QUOTE="PS3_3DO"]

Gears 2 is going to destroy Uncharted and MGS4's muddy textures.

Polaris_choice

Generally what happens when a game comes out a year or two later...

Stop comparing to crysis, it is so useless. You need a $1300+ rig to run that game on full, much more than any of the consoles.

My rig costs 876$ including shipment of parts excluding monitor (hooked to TV) and it runs Crysis at very high+ 1280*1024 30-40fps. Also Crysis medium setting **** all over this game, just look at MGS4 screenshots... *pukes in mouth* BUT hey its all about the gameplay right? Right if only the AI was not the definition of stupidity and so suicide prone. ;)

You can look at old screenshots all you want Crysis has nothing on MGS4.

You would have to be a retard if you claim Metal Gear Solid 4 looks better than Crysis.

The best looking console graphics out there are Uncharted and Gears of War. MGS4 looks great too, but if you look at all of the comparisons out there, the 360 has the better looking games. That means that the 360 could run Uncharted, Metal Gear Solid, Killzone 2 EVEN BETTER.wapahala

HAHAHAHA. Notice the could. You know why it can't? A little format called Blu-ray. Uncharted devs said they couldn't port it because it wouldn't fit. Killzone2 is 2GB per level, maybe you could play 3 levels on the 360... and MGS4, let's not even start on how you would fit that onto a DVD. Sorry man, but 360 couldn't run these games. Looking at all the comparisons for ports, GTA IV, COD4, DMC4 are just a few games with no differences in graphics. If we are talking comparing exclusives then comparisons are pretty useless, as it is way too subjective to come to a conclusion.

The best looking console graphics out there are Uncharted and Gears of War. MGS4 looks great too, but if you look at all of the comparisons out there, the 360 has the better looking games. That means that the 360 could run Uncharted, Metal Gear Solid, Killzone 2 EVEN BETTER.wapahala

HAHAHAHA!!

There is no way in hell the 360 would be able to handle the workload of Killzone 2's deferred rendering engine.

There isn't even a single game in the 360's library that could compete with Uncharted's polygon count and environmental textures--Gears had to cut their environments and polygon sequences in half just to keep the game running smoothly; they had to rely on art-based textures to make up for the lack of polygons.

Metal Gear Solid's performance on the 360 might be possible if there weren't so many things happening on the screen at once. The environments are too open and detailed to keep the engine running smoothly.

[QUOTE="the_one34"]

MGS 4 looks horrible in screenshots. However, in motion it is jaw droppingly good. Best graphics I've ever seen on a console, even rivals Crysis.

To all the RAGING pc fanboys, look at my specs, I've played Crysis.

MojondeVACA

:lol: keep dreaming cows.......Crysis doesnt have muddy textures and small enviroments,and it doesnt run at subpar resolution with 0 anti aliasing :lol:

Rofl you're calling me a cow? I bought a PS3 for MGS 4 and you're calling me a cow, that's rich ROFL

[QUOTE="MojondeVACA"][QUOTE="the_one34"]

MGS 4 looks horrible in screenshots. However, in motion it is jaw droppingly good. Best graphics I've ever seen on a console, even rivals Crysis.

To all the RAGING pc fanboys, look at my specs, I've played Crysis.

the_one34

:lol: keep dreaming cows.......Crysis doesnt have muddy textures and small enviroments,and it doesnt run at subpar resolution with 0 anti aliasing :lol:

Rofl you're calling me a cow? I bought a PS3 for MGS 4 and you're calling me a cow, that's rich ROFL

How is that rich? It actually makes sense. MGS4 doesn't rival Crysis, that was a dumb thing to say, hence you getting called a cow. Don't even try to argue that MGS4 looks as good as Crysis, especially Crysis on full.

[QUOTE="the_one34"][QUOTE="MojondeVACA"][QUOTE="the_one34"]

MGS 4 looks horrible in screenshots. However, in motion it is jaw droppingly good. Best graphics I've ever seen on a console, even rivals Crysis.

To all the RAGING pc fanboys, look at my specs, I've played Crysis.

Sammojo

:lol: keep dreaming cows.......Crysis doesnt have muddy textures and small enviroments,and it doesnt run at subpar resolution with 0 anti aliasing :lol:

Rofl you're calling me a cow? I bought a PS3 for MGS 4 and you're calling me a cow, that's rich ROFL

How is that rich? It actually makes sense. MGS4 doesn't rival Crysis, that was a dumb thing to say, hence you getting called a cow. Don't even try to argue that MGS4 looks as good as Crysis, especially Crysis on full.

I've played Crysis on full settings and I go so far as to say that it rivals Crysis. Yeah, I went there.

Some people haven't played it yet, so i don't think they understand how good this game looks. if people think this game has no anti-aliasing and has muddy textures, then those are exactly the people who are making these comments and should be ignored.

Most if not all reviews have gave it a 9 or above in graphics. Some review scores are just plain silly, a 7 in value? What are you smoking?

I don't get it, all this debate... I thought it was a widely known fact that PC will always have the graphical advantage on the consoles BUT at the expense of a much higher price. What's to argue about? You can't build a PC for just a couple of hundred bucks that would pull off PS3 graphics, just like the PS3 wouldn't pull off high-end PC graphics. You can't deny it, so what to argue about?

And why do you even care how games on other platforms look, can't you just enjoy the **** games?..

Kinda weird that the 360 is so easy to program compared to the ps3 that the 360 should be killing the ps3 right lol. Still only game that is great for the 360 is Gears, while graphically the ps3 has GTP, Drakes fortune, MGS4 already and fixing to have Rfom2 and Killzone2 is already leaving critics mouths wide open after seeing it.

PS3 hard to program for so no reason that the 360 hasn't already seen what it can do for the most part.

MGS4 in my oppionion is the winner right now, Drakes looks great but the overall look MGS4 has it. And man the game runs smooth, the smoothest of all games so far it even kills the 60fps smoothness of COD4.

Kinda weird that the 360 is so easy to program compared to the ps3 that the 360 should be killing the ps3 right lol. Still only game that is great for the 360 is Gears, while graphically the ps3 has GTP, Drakes fortune, MGS4 already and fixing to have Rfom2 and Killzone2 is already leaving critics mouths wide open after seeing it.

PS3 hard to program for so no reason that the 360 hasn't already seen what it can do for the most part.

MGS4 in my oppionion is the winner right now, Drakes looks great but the overall look MGS4 has it. And man the game runs smooth, the smoothest of all games so far it even kills the 60fps smoothness of COD4.

GreyFoXX4

[QUOTE="IgorVitaly"][QUOTE="Sammojo"][QUOTE="PS3_3DO"]

Gears 2 is going to destroy Uncharted and MGS4's muddy textures.

Polaris_choice

Generally what happens when a game comes out a year or two later...

Stop comparing to crysis, it is so useless. You need a $1300+ rig to run that game on full, much more than any of the consoles.

My rig costs 876$ including shipment of parts excluding monitor (hooked to TV) and it runs Crysis at very high+ 1280*1024 30-40fps. Also Crysis medium setting **** all over this game, just look at MGS4 screenshots... *pukes in mouth* BUT hey its all about the gameplay right? Right if only the AI was not the definition of stupidity and so suicide prone. ;)

You can look at old screenshots all you want Crysis has nothing on MGS4.

[QUOTE="wapahala"]The best looking console graphics out there are Uncharted and Gears of War. MGS4 looks great too, but if you look at all of the comparisons out there, the 360 has the better looking games. That means that the 360 could run Uncharted, Metal Gear Solid, Killzone 2 EVEN BETTER.Sammojo

HAHAHAHA. Notice the could. You know why it can't? A little format called Blu-ray. Uncharted devs said they couldn't port it because it wouldn't fit. Killzone2 is 2GB per level, maybe you could play 3 levels on the 360... and MGS4, let's not even start on how you would fit that onto a DVD. Sorry man, but 360 couldn't run these games. Looking at all the comparisons for ports, GTA IV, COD4, DMC4 are just a few games with no differences in graphics. If we are talking comparing exclusives then comparisons are pretty useless, as it is way too subjective to come to a conclusion.

Oh, my God... are serious? Uncharted couldn't run on the 360? That game was short as hell and there wasn't really much replay value and extras. People, Uncharted was good, but please don't be moronic and say that it can't run on the 360. If the devs made the game for the 360... well, let's just say that it would be better.

As for Killzone 2... there is no need for 2GB per level! I've seen games (f. ex. Bioshock, Mass Effect, GeOW) with more details and stuff going on.

Exclusive to exclusive the ps3 wins hands down in graphics. And if KZ2 wasn't out of the ordinary then the critics wouldve already stated that from the play throughs and what not. As it stands KZ2 still is leaving critics catching flies in their mouths after playing it. That is even after playing Geow, Mass Effect lol, and Bioshock. Those games were great atleast Geow and Bioshock which were the first games that pushed graphics, but now there is alot better graphics out there just because the 360 hasn't had any yet doesn't mean graphics aren't getting better else where lol.

Some people haven't played it yet, so i don't think they understand how good this game looks. if people think this game has no anti-aliasing and has muddy textures, then those are exactly the people who are making these comments and should be ignored.

Most if not all reviews have gave it a 9 or above in graphics. Some review scores are just plain silly, a 7 in value? What are you smoking?

Adrian_Cloud

Now hold on bessy. Am I hearing this right? Because CRYSIS is not played at high settings by most people MGS4 looks better? LOL :lol::lol::lol::lol::shock::o:lol::lol::lol::lol::o:|. No. Let me tell every console owner in this forum one thing right now. Crysis at high settings will be a first gen game ( in terms of the level other games will have) of the PS4 or what ever. ( kinda seems we wont really see a xbox720.) the point is Ignorance is no excuse to go around acting a fool. Clearly some of you have made bad ost. lets not let this continue to hinder the glory that MGS4 is. The best looking console game ever period. 360-ps3-wii-pc

QFT

MGS4 looks awesome for a console game but it is a known and obvious fact denied only by retards that PC games have always had much better graphics (albeit at a much higher pricetag.) There is no comparison to crysis.

Excluding the PC, I agree that PS3 is graphics king, some good examples of good graphics games being in the OP. However the difference between the PS3 and Xbox360 is so slight that you have a pretty equal amount of video game reviewers saying that PS3 is better and that 360 is better (in terms of graphics.)