The Witcher 2 is best on PC.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#551 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Video is heavilly compressed and probably off screen too

Here is PC in medium, high and Ultra in 360 resolution

The difference is minor, 360 version will look spectacular, that is all

.

Also has far better shadows than the crappy PC ones in any setting

Jebus213

That's not the point... you said above medium, dev say they aim for medium...

Also take a picture at the sun... you'll see difference there.

But it's missing the effect that covers everything in saran wrap and the black hole shadows.

Well either way, we can't see crap from the X360 videos.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#552 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62037 Posts

Yes, so ?

I know it is weaker, i happen to own one

Where is the proof that wont render all Witcher 2 DX9 effects because is weaker ?

I still dont see it

Speculation wont do, sorry, proof is not speculation

loosingENDS

Good God. I've already addressed that point in, I think, two of my posts.

The fact that your card failed to render something due to compatability issues calls into question whether or not your card is rendering everything correctly. There is no absolute proof, just like how you have no absolute proof. Regardless, your GPU fails to meet minimum specs, which likely could cause a whole slew of issues.

Avatar image for Damnsmooth
Damnsmooth

542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#553 Damnsmooth
Member since 2006 • 542 Posts

[QUOTE="Damnsmooth"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

And where does it say that a 5450 wont render the game with same effects and image quality as a 8800 ?

I dont see it

loosingENDS

Your phd from Captain Corky's School of Assclownery is obviously not helping you to understand anything. A 5450 is weaker than a 3850. You are not meeting minimum specs. Period. DX11 means absolutely nothing in this situation.

Really ?

Well, that is not proof, that is a joke

Try more next time

Try what? Bringing you a dose of reality? I gave up on that a long time ago. Just because you are incapable of understanding something, doesn't mean it isn't true. Case in point: You think that grass should cast leaf shadows. Now, when you step.out of your house and whine to nature that grass casts grass shadows, does nature turn all of the grass shadows in to leaf shadows for you? Nope.
Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#554 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Yes, so ?

I know it is weaker, i happen to own one

Where is the proof that wont render all Witcher 2 DX9 effects because is weaker ?

I still dont see it

Speculation wont do, sorry, proof is not speculation

lundy86_4

Good God. I've already addressed that point in, I think, two of my posts.

The fact that your card failed to render something due to compatability issues calls into question whether or not your card is rendering everything correctly. There is no absolute proof, just like how you have no absolute proof. Regardless, your GPU fails to meet minimum specs, which likely could cause a whole slew of issues.

Nice fairy tale, you have any more ?

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#555 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62037 Posts

Nice fairy tale, you have any more ?

loosingENDS

Oh God.

I'm going to go ahead and assume you're an idiot. You were under the impression that your card met minimum specifications for this game. It's apparent that it does not.

I'm kinda done listening to your drivel.

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#556 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

[QUOTE="Jebus213"] But it's missing the effect that covers everything in saran wrap and the black hole shadows. loosingENDS

Black hole shadows are better than garbage shadows on PC, that is for sure

That's your opinion.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#557 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

It's time to spam spiderman pics now. Jebus213

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#559 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

Oh God.

I'm going to go ahead and assume you're an idiot. You were under the impression that your card met minimum specifications for this game. It's apparent that it does not.

I'm kinda done listening to your drivel.

lundy86_4

If it does not, then how do i play the game in Ultra exactly ? My game looks exactly like the Ultra pics posted here

So, i have to assume the exact same for you, most definatly

In fact, i dont even have to assume, i am sure of it

Try what? Bringing you a dose of reality? I gave up on that a long time ago. Just because you are incapable of understanding something, doesn't mean it isn't true. Case in point: You think that grass should cast leaf shadows. Now, when you step.out of your house and whine to nature that grass casts grass shadows, does nature turn all of the grass shadows in to leaf shadows for you? Nope.Damnsmooth

I suppose you did not see the tree that casts the shadow to the whole rock behind the tent and on the tent and you think all those shadows is from the grass or something ?

Just because you cant understand what you see, does not mean the tree shadow is wrong or anything

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#560 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62037 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Oh God.

I'm going to go ahead and assume you're an idiot. You were under the impression that your card met minimum specifications for this game. It's apparent that it does not.

I'm kinda done listening to your drivel.

loosingENDS

If it does not, then how do i play the game in Ultra exactly ? My game looks exactly like the Ultra pics posted here

So, i have to assume the exact same for you, most definatly

In fact, i dont even have to assume, i am sure of it

Sh*t the bed. You don't play the game in ultra. You system fails to meet minimum specifications for the game. The game may well boot, but it certainly does not run. No, crawling does not count as running.

A system not reaching minimum specs can still run a game.

You're f*cking stupid bud.

Avatar image for Damnsmooth
Damnsmooth

542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#561 Damnsmooth
Member since 2006 • 542 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Oh God.

I'm going to go ahead and assume you're an idiot. You were under the impression that your card met minimum specifications for this game. It's apparent that it does not.

I'm kinda done listening to your drivel.

loosingENDS

If it does not, then how do i play the game in Ultra exactly ? My game looks exactly like the Ultra pics posted here

So, i have to assume the exact same for you, most definatly

In fact, i dont even have to assume, i am sure of it

Try what? Bringing you a dose of reality? I gave up on that a long time ago. Just because you are incapable of understanding something, doesn't mean it isn't true. Case in point: You think that grass should cast leaf shadows. Now, when you step.out of your house and whine to nature that grass casts grass shadows, does nature turn all of the grass shadows in to leaf shadows for you? Nope.Damnsmooth

I suppose you did not see the tree that casts the shadow to the whole rock behind the tent and on the tent and you think all those shadows is from the grass or something ?

Just because you cant understand what you see, does not mean the tree shadow is wrong or anything

Circle it again then loosey. I've only asked you to do that 10 times.
Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#562 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Oh God.

I'm going to go ahead and assume you're an idiot. You were under the impression that your card met minimum specifications for this game. It's apparent that it does not.

I'm kinda done listening to your drivel.

lundy86_4

If it does not, then how do i play the game in Ultra exactly ? My game looks exactly like the Ultra pics posted here

So, i have to assume the exact same for you, most definatly

In fact, i dont even have to assume, i am sure of it

Sh*t the bed. You don't play the game in ultra. You system fails to meet minimum specifications for the game. The game may well boot, but it certainly does not run. No, crawling does not count as running.

You're f*cking stupid bud.

I never said that it runs it in playable frame rates in Ultra, did i ?

but the pics i take are exactly like any DX9 and above PC in Ultra

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#563 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62037 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

If it does not, then how do i play the game in Ultra exactly ? My game looks exactly like the Ultra pics posted here

So, i have to assume the exact same for you, most definatly

In fact, i dont even have to assume, i am sure of it

loosingENDS

Sh*t the bed. You don't play the game in ultra. You system fails to meet minimum specifications for the game. The game may well boot, but it certainly does not run. No, crawling does not count as running.

You're f*cking stupid bud.

I never said that it runs it in playable frame rates in Ultra, did i ?

but the pics i take are exactly like any DX9 and above PC in Ultra

I'm not circling this inane debate with you again. We've come full-cricle.

Your assumption is that a system that does not meet minimum specifications will not run the game. That assumption is incorrect.

Even officially unsupported cards can play games, however it does not mean they will play, or be rendered evem remotely accurately.

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#564 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

If it does not, then how do i play the game in Ultra exactly ? My game looks exactly like the Ultra pics posted here

So, i have to assume the exact same for you, most definatly

In fact, i dont even have to assume, i am sure of it

loosingENDS

Sh*t the bed. You don't play the game in ultra. You system fails to meet minimum specifications for the game. The game may well boot, but it certainly does not run. No, crawling does not count as running.

You're f*cking stupid bud.

I never said that it runs it in playable frame rates in Ultra, did i ?

but the pics i take are exactly like any DX9 and above PC in Ultra

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PR_rzF8ofw
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#565 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Sh*t the bed. You don't play the game in ultra. You system fails to meet minimum specifications for the game. The game may well boot, but it certainly does not run. No, crawling does not count as running.

You're f*cking stupid bud.

Jebus213

I never said that it runs it in playable frame rates in Ultra, did i ?

but the pics i take are exactly like any DX9 and above PC in Ultra

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PR_rzF8ofw

I love you

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#566 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Really ?

Well, that is not proof, that is a joke

Try more next time

loosingENDS

5450 is drastically weaker than a 3850:

Yes, so ?

I know it is weaker, i happen to own one

Where is the proof that wont render all Witcher 2 DX9 effects because is weaker ?

I still dont see it

Speculation wont do, sorry, proof is not speculation

you said your card was way above minimum specs. :|

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#567 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

I'm not circling this inane debate with you again. We've come full-cricle.

Your assumption is that a system that does not meet minimum specifications will not run the game. That assumption is incorrect.

Even officially unsupported cards can play games, however it does not mean they will play, or be rendered evem remotely accurately.

lundy86_4

And i still dont see anything that proves the nonsense in the bolded part

Do you like to make up fairy tales ?

Avatar image for dj_pulserfan
dj_pulserfan

3102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#568 dj_pulserfan
Member since 2007 • 3102 Posts

PC has first party titles?

Who makes them?

Oh yeah, third parties.

And if it sells over 500k, they port em to consoles.

That's what PC is nowadays, a "lets throw schit against the wall and see what sticks" platform.

LazySloth718
So by that logic if it's thrown against the wall, sticks, sells well and gets ported to the consoles then all you get is our sloppy seconds at best? That explains Witcher 2 LOL!
Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#569 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

you said your card was way above minimum specs. :|

CaseyWegner

DX11 spec is not above DX9 spec ?

Avatar image for dj_pulserfan
dj_pulserfan

3102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#570 dj_pulserfan
Member since 2007 • 3102 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

I'm not circling this inane debate with you again. We've come full-cricle.

Your assumption is that a system that does not meet minimum specifications will not run the game. That assumption is incorrect.

Even officially unsupported cards can play games, however it does not mean they will play, or be rendered evem remotely accurately.

loosingENDS

And i still dont see anything that proves the nonsense in the bolded part

Do you like to make up fairy tales ?

Just keep digging at him. He's destroying himself. This is the first time I've seen him actually acknowledge his hardware.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#571 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

you said your card was way above minimum specs. :|

loosingENDS

DX11 spec is not above DX9 spec ?

performance hurr durr and it's way below minimum.
Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#572 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

you said your card was way above minimum specs. :|

loosingENDS

DX11 spec is not above DX9 spec ?

they give you a card number for a reason. the spec does NOT say "any dx11 card will do." you got caught being a **** liar now knock this **** off.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#573 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

you said your card was way above minimum specs. :|

loosingENDS

DX11 spec is not above DX9 spec ?

Not really... the games doesn't support higher then Dx9.

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#574 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
I love youwis3boi
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#575 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

you said your card was way above minimum specs. :|

loosingENDS

DX11 spec is not above DX9 spec ?

Yet a 5 year old Direct x 10 card is 3x faster then your POS.
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#577 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

DX11 spec is not above DX9 spec ?

loosingENDS

they give you a card number for a reason. the spec does NOT say "any dx11 card will do." you got caught being a **** liar now knock this **** off.

Any DX9 card will do, the minimum spec is about the minimum card that will give you playable and good frame rate, not the minimum card that will run the game as 1fps obviously

That is the reason they give you a card number, other than that any DX9 card can start and play an DX9 game, obviously

Otherwise what would be the point in making a DX9 card if it could not run DX9 effects due to beeing weak ?

It is funny that the so called hermits in this forum have the knowledge of a retarded squirel about PC

LoosingENDS wrote:

"My PC is not a gaming PC in the sense that does not have a GPU that will run games in playable frame rates, other than that is a DX11 GPU that will run any game in any setting"

Derp much?

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#578 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

they give you a card number for a reason. the spec does NOT say "any dx11 card will do." you got caught being a **** liar now knock this **** off.

04dcarraher

Any DX9 card will do, the minimum spec is about the minimum card that will give you playable and good frame rate, not the minimum card that will run the game as 1fps obviously

That is the reason they give you a card number, other than that any DX9 card can start and play an DX9 game, obviously

Otherwise what would be the point in making a DX9 card if it could not run DX9 effects due to beeing weak ?

It is funny that the so called hermits in this forum have the knowledge of a retarded squirel about PC

LoosingENDS wrote:

"My PC is not a gaming PC in the sense that does not have a GPU that will run games in playable frame rates, other than that is a DX11 GPU that will run any game in any setting"

Derp much?

As i said, it is hardly my fault that you cant understand the extremely simple thing i wrote

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#579 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
Any DX9 card will doloosingENDS
By that logic my old FX 5700GT can play The Witcher 2. I'n reality, the game wouldn't even start.
Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#580 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

DX11 spec is not above DX9 spec ?

loosingENDS

they give you a card number for a reason. the spec does NOT say "any dx11 card will do." you got caught being a **** liar now knock this **** off.

Any DX9 card will do, the minimum spec is about the minimum card that will give you playable and good frame rate, not the minimum card that will run the game even at 1fps obviously

That is the reason they give you a card number, other than that any DX9 card can start and play an DX9 game, obviously, only the frame rate varies

Otherwise what would be the point in making a low end DX9 card if it could not run DX9 effects due to beeing weak ?

playable framerate = running. don't use your asperger's syndrome to get out of this one.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#581 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

DX11 spec is not above DX9 spec ?

loosingENDS

they give you a card number for a reason. the spec does NOT say "any dx11 card will do." you got caught being a **** liar now knock this **** off.

Any DX9 card will do, the minimum spec is about the minimum card that will give you playable and good frame rate, not the minimum card that will run the game even at 1fps obviously

That is the reason they give you a card number, other than that any DX9 card can start and play an DX9 game, obviously, only the frame rate varies

Otherwise what would be the point in making a low end DX9 card if it could not run DX9 effects due to beeing weak ?

It is funny that the so called hermits in this forum have the knowledge of a retarded squirel about PC

as Weird Al Yankovic once said "everything you know is wrong."

Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#582 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

you said your card was way above minimum specs. :|

loosingENDS

DX11 spec is not above DX9 spec ?

AHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAAH

LMAO

And you're a PhD? AHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHA

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#583 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Any DX9 card will do, the minimum spec is about the minimum card that will give you playable and good frame rate, not the minimum card that will run the game as 1fps obviously

That is the reason they give you a card number, other than that any DX9 card can start and play an DX9 game, obviously

Otherwise what would be the point in making a DX9 card if it could not run DX9 effects due to beeing weak ?

It is funny that the so called hermits in this forum have the knowledge of a retarded squirel about PC

loosingENDS

LoosingENDS wrote:

"My PC is not a gaming PC in the sense that does not have a GPU that will run games in playable frame rates, other than that is a DX11 GPU that will run any game in any setting"

Derp much?

As i said, it is hardly my fault that you cant understand the extremely simple thing i wrote

No one can understand your incorrect rabblings
Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#584 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

they give you a card number for a reason. the spec does NOT say "any dx11 card will do." you got caught being a **** liar now knock this **** off.

CaseyWegner

Any DX9 card will do, the minimum spec is about the minimum card that will give you playable and good frame rate, not the minimum card that will run the game even at 1fps obviously

That is the reason they give you a card number, other than that any DX9 card can start and play an DX9 game, obviously, only the frame rate varies

Otherwise what would be the point in making a low end DX9 card if it could not run DX9 effects due to beeing weak ?

playable framerate = running. don't use your asperger's syndrome to get out of this one.

Ehm, playable frame rate = running in playable frame rate

Running = starting, at any frame rate

You know, a program is running when it loads, the performance has nothing to do with the fact that is running, lets not change simple facts to suit your silly arguments

Running well = playable

Running slow = not playable

Right ?

We are back in kindergarden as it seems

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#585 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Any DX9 card will do, the minimum spec is about the minimum card that will give you playable and good frame rate, not the minimum card that will run the game even at 1fps obviously

That is the reason they give you a card number, other than that any DX9 card can start and play an DX9 game, obviously, only the frame rate varies

Otherwise what would be the point in making a low end DX9 card if it could not run DX9 effects due to beeing weak ?

loosingENDS

playable framerate = running. don't use your asperger's syndrome to get out of this one.

Ehm, playable frame rate = running in playable frame rate

Running = starting, at any frame rate

You know, a program is running when it loads, the performance has nothing to do with the fact that is running, lets not change simple facts to suit your silly arguments

Running well = playable

Running slow = not playable

Right ?

We are back in kindergarden as it seems

back in kindergarden? Great, since you never passed it, we can get started right away

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#586 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

AHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAAH

LMAO

And you're a PhD? AHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHA

N30F3N1X

And you are a PC gamer ?

Funny

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#587 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Any DX9 card will do, the minimum spec is about the minimum card that will give you playable and good frame rate, not the minimum card that will run the game even at 1fps obviously

That is the reason they give you a card number, other than that any DX9 card can start and play an DX9 game, obviously, only the frame rate varies

Otherwise what would be the point in making a low end DX9 card if it could not run DX9 effects due to beeing weak ?

loosingENDS

playable framerate = running. don't use your asperger's syndrome to get out of this one.

Ehm, playable frame rate = running in playable frame rate

Running = starting, at any frame rate

You know, a program is running when it loads, the performance has nothing to do with the fact that is running, lets not change simple facts to suit your silly arguments

Running well = playable

Running slow = not playable

Right ?

We are back in kindergarden as it seems

we're back to you not understanding simple expressions. for a phd you sure do need to have things dumbed down an awful lot for you to understand them. i'd tell you to hang on but then i'd be worried you'd take that literally as well and go hang yourself.

Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#588 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

And you are a PC gamer ?

loosingENDS

The DirectX versions aren't "specs", idiot :lol:

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#589 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

[QUOTE="N30F3N1X"]

AHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAAH

LMAO

And you're a PhD? AHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHA

loosingENDS

And you are a PC gamer ?

Funny

Your denial is amazing!
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#590 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

And you are a PC gamer ?

N30F3N1X

The DirectX versions aren't "specs", idiot :lol:

I bash my face against my keyboard to type.
Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#591 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

And you are a PC gamer ?

N30F3N1X

The DirectX versions aren't "specs", idiot :lol:

I did not say specs, i said spec

Which is the short of specification, which is a global thing

DX11 spec is above DX9 spec, as i said

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#592 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="N30F3N1X"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

And you are a PC gamer ?

loosingENDS

The DirectX versions aren't "specs", idiot :lol:

I did not say specs, i said spec

Which is the short of specification, which is a global thing

DX11 spec is above DX9 spec, as i said

which is irrelevant, as the 6 year old DX10 card I have rotting in my basement is faster than your DX11 one.
Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#593 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

we're back to you not understanding simple expressions. for a phd you sure do need to have things dumbed down an awful lot for you to understand them. i'd tell you to hang on but then i'd be worried you'd take that literally as well and go hang yourself.

CaseyWegner

Well, i understand fine, you have a problem of using terms that dont fit

So, if Witcher 2 does not run in Ultra on my PC, what does it do then ? Backflips ? Because i can surely load it and play in it, just with very low frame rate

If you dont call that running, then what do you call it ?

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#594 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

we're back to you not understanding simple expressions. for a phd you sure do need to have things dumbed down an awful lot for you to understand them. i'd tell you to hang on but then i'd be worried you'd take that literally as well and go hang yourself.

loosingENDS

Well, i understand fine, you have a problem of using terms that dont fit

So, if Witcher 2 does not run in Ultra on my PC, what does it do then ? Backflips ? Because i can surely load it and play in it, just with very low frame rate

If you dont call that running, then what do you call it ?

chugging along. sputtering. inching along. you'd be amazed at how many words or phrases mean the same basic thing. you should learn them so that when you hear them in the future you can avoid situations like this.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#595 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

[QUOTE="N30F3N1X"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

And you are a PC gamer ?

loosingENDS

The DirectX versions aren't "specs", idiot :lol:

I did not say specs, i said spec

Which is the short of specification, which is a global thing

DX11 spec is above DX9 spec, as i said

Again your an idiot, Just because its Direct x 11 does not mean that it can perform faster then a Direct x 9 card or even Direct x 10 based GPU. A 5450 does 104 GFLOPS its Direct x 11 based while the 360's Xenos does 240 GFLOPS and its Direct x 9, or better yet an ATI 3850 which is the minimum requirement for TW2 and is Direct x 10 , its does 428 GFLOPS, while an AMD 6870 does over 2000 GFLOPS. Just because it can start and run the game in single digits of framerate does make it playable which is why the 360 version will not be BEYOND STUNNING.....

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#596 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="N30F3N1X"]

The DirectX versions aren't "specs", idiot :lol:

04dcarraher

I did not say specs, i said spec

Which is the short of specification, which is a global thing

DX11 spec is above DX9 spec, as i said

Again your an idiot, Just because its Direct x 11 does not mean that it can perform faster then a Direct x 9 card or even Direct x 10 based GPU. A 5450 does 104 GFLOPS its Direct x 11 based while the 360's Xenos does 240 GFLOPS and its Direct x 9, or better yet an ATI 3850 which is the minimum requirement for TW2 and is Direct x 10 , its does 428 GFLOPS, while an AMD 6870 does over 2000 GFLOPS. Just because it can start and run the game in single digits does make it playable which is why the 360 version will not be BEYOND STUNNING.....

360 version is beyond stunning though and has better shadows than Ultra too and runs as smoothly as it gets

Also i never said that a DX11 card will always outperform a DX10 card, are you imagining things ?

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#597 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
I'm calling 300 page thread this time!
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#598 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

I'm calling 300 page thread this time!Jebus213

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#599 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

I did not say specs, i said spec

Which is the short of specification, which is a global thing

DX11 spec is above DX9 spec, as i said

loosingENDS

Again your an idiot, Just because its Direct x 11 does not mean that it can perform faster then a Direct x 9 card or even Direct x 10 based GPU. A 5450 does 104 GFLOPS its Direct x 11 based while the 360's Xenos does 240 GFLOPS and its Direct x 9, or better yet an ATI 3850 which is the minimum requirement for TW2 and is Direct x 10 , its does 428 GFLOPS, while an AMD 6870 does over 2000 GFLOPS. Just because it can start and run the game in single digits does make it playable which is why the 360 version will not be BEYOND STUNNING.....

360 version is beyond stunning though and has better shadows than Ultra too and runs as smoothly as it gets

Also i never said that a DX11 card will always outperform a DX10 card, are you imagining things ?

BEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNINGBEYOND STUNNING If you say it enough it might come true! NOT!!!!!
Avatar image for themagicbum9720
themagicbum9720

6536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#600 themagicbum9720
Member since 2007 • 6536 Posts
i don't know how someone can be that stupid.