The Witcher 2 is best on PC.

And i still dont see anything that proves the nonsense in the bolded part

Do you like to make up fairy tales ?

loosingENDS

I have yet to see you put forth evidence that it will render everything accurately. I've already stated that neither of us holds any proof, thus we must conclude that any comparisons using your system as a basis for The Witcher 2 are beyond moot.

You stated that your card was above minimum spec for The Witcher 2. It's not even remotely close (in fact, about half as powerful as a 3850 in most instances). How can we be sure that your card is capable of rendering anything accurately -- after all, Geralt's legs must be damn difficult to render ;)

if it's beyond stunning then you need to find a new word to use.

if it's beyond stunning then you need to find a new word to use.

CaseyWegner

He suffers from chronic adverbia....leave him alone.....

Ah who am I kidding, tease the hell out of him

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

And i still dont see anything that proves the nonsense in the bolded part

Do you like to make up fairy tales ?

lundy86_4

I have yet to see you put forth evidence that it will render everything accurately. I've already stated that neither of us holds any proof, thus we must conclude that any comparisons using your system as a basis for The Witcher 2 are beyond moot.

You stated that your card was above minimum spec for The Witcher 2. It's not even remotely close (in fact, about half as powerful as a 3850 in most instances). How can we be sure that your card is capable of rendering anything accurately -- after all, Geralt's legs must be damn difficult to render ;)

DX11 is above DX9, so my card is above the minimum DX spec indeed

I am sure it renders everything accuratly, because it is DX11, which is above DX9

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

And i still dont see anything that proves the nonsense in the bolded part

Do you like to make up fairy tales ?

loosingENDS

I have yet to see you put forth evidence that it will render everything accurately. I've already stated that neither of us holds any proof, thus we must conclude that any comparisons using your system as a basis for The Witcher 2 are beyond moot.

You stated that your card was above minimum spec for The Witcher 2. It's not even remotely close (in fact, about half as powerful as a 3850 in most instances). How can we be sure that your card is capable of rendering anything accurately -- after all, Geralt's legs must be damn difficult to render ;)

DX11 is above DX9, so my card is above the minimum DX spec indeed

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

I have yet to see you put forth evidence that it will render everything accurately. I've already stated that neither of us holds any proof, thus we must conclude that any comparisons using your system as a basis for The Witcher 2 are beyond moot.

You stated that your card was above minimum spec for The Witcher 2. It's not even remotely close (in fact, about half as powerful as a 3850 in most instances). How can we be sure that your card is capable of rendering anything accurately -- after all, Geralt's legs must be damn difficult to render ;)

wis3boi

DX11 is above DX9, so my card is above the minimum DX spec indeed

What does performance have to do with the still images i take from my PC in Ultra setting ?

[QUOTE="wis3boi"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

DX11 is above DX9, so my card is above the minimum DX spec indeed

loosingENDS

What does performance have to do with the still images i take from my PC in Ultra setting ?

your card oes not meet the requirements and can't even render the game properly or at anything above 15fps

DX11 is above DX9, so my card is above the minimum DX spec indeed

I am sure it renders everything accuratly, because it is DX11, which is above DX9

loosingENDS

Ahhhhh, which means zip diddly squat. Having a higher level DX card does not mean you meet minimum specifications.

Your system clearly had issues rendering Geralt's legs. I can only assume that it is indicative of compatability issues with your card. Isn't it more reasonable to assume that your card and the software may have compatibility issues affecting rendering of the game? Or is it less reasonable?

.

.

wis3boi

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

.

ferret-gamer

typo, but you get the idea :P

.

wis3boi

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

And i still dont see anything that proves the nonsense in the bolded part

Do you like to make up fairy tales ?

loosingENDS

I have yet to see you put forth evidence that it will render everything accurately. I've already stated that neither of us holds any proof, thus we must conclude that any comparisons using your system as a basis for The Witcher 2 are beyond moot.

You stated that your card was above minimum spec for The Witcher 2. It's not even remotely close (in fact, about half as powerful as a 3850 in most instances). How can we be sure that your card is capable of rendering anything accurately -- after all, Geralt's legs must be damn difficult to render ;)

DX11 is above DX9, so my card is above the minimum DX spec indeed

I am sure it renders everything accuratly, because it is DX11, which is above DX9

Again your an idiot, Just because its Direct x 11 does not mean that it can perform faster then a Direct x 9 card or even Direct x 10 based GPU. A 5450 does 104 GFLOPS its Direct x 11 based while the 360's Xenos does 240 GFLOPS and its Direct x 9, or better yet an ATI 3850 which is the minimum requirement for TW2 and is Direct x 10 , its does 428 GFLOPS, while an AMD 6870 does over 2000 GFLOPS. Just because it can start and run the game in single digits of framerate does make it playable which is why the 360 version will not be BEYOND STUNNING.....

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

My card does not have rendering issues, that was a bug of the game, which was fixed right after i went to the menu

So, how do you explain that with your "simple reasoning" ?

loosingENDS

Mhmm, in which the card had rendering issues with his legs. It is a bug of the game. I didn't refute, nor deny that. However, it undermines the idea that your card is rendering everything correctly in-game. The software is having issues due to your card being incompatible, or not officially supported. Meaning, that any number of "hiccups" can occur.

The fact that a bug occurred due to your card not being officially supported, directly resulted in a rendering issue, only solidifies the idea that it may not be the only issue in terms of rendering.

How is my card not supported ?

http://www.destructoid.com/the-witcher-2-s-system-requirements-are-reasonable-197264.phtml

Minimum specs:
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo 2.2 GHz or AMD 2.5 GHz equivalent
Graphics Card: Nvidia GeForce 8800, 512 MB memory or ATI HD3850 512 MB
Memory: 1 GB for Windows XP / 2 GB for Windows Vista and Windows 7
Hard Disk: 8 GB for the game installation and 8 GB for bonus materials

.

I have an ATI HD 5450 really, which is way above minimum spec

So, you have some actual proof that my card is not supported ? Or are you just making things up ?

Not everyone prefers better resolution, graphics, framerates, user interface and controls though.

For someone who hates all those things, maybe it isn't?

Not everyone prefers better resolution, graphics, framerates, user interface and controls though.

For someone who hates all those things, maybe it isn't?

SPYDER0416

Indeed, not everyone prefers terrible PC controls, garbage gameplay, half the content at launch, horrible shadows that destroy the game visuals completly, no specular effects like on PC

And who prefers to pay 130$ for the artbook, then just 80$ on 360 in the first place ?

And who prefers to pay 130$ for the artbook, then just 80$ on 360 in the first place ?

loosingENDS

Ours had more stuff with it. PC wins again.

And who prefers to pay 130$ for the artbook, then just 80$ on 360 in the first place ?

loosingENDS

Dont start on price, PC gamers can get the proper verion of the witcher 2 not for 20 quid, that includes all the content of the 360 version.

Your going to pay 60 for a gimped version that has half the visuals of the pc version.

Grats to you, suck head.

Lol PC virgins are so desperate.Smileyvirus

Lol PC virgins are so desperate.Smileyvirus

LOLOLOLOLOL :lol:

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

And who prefers to pay 130$ for the artbook, then just 80$ on 360 in the first place ?

tenaka2

Dont start on price, PC gamers can get the proper verion of the witcher 2 not for 20 quid, that includes all the content of the 360 version.

Your going to pay 60 for a gimped version that has half the visuals of the pc version.

Grats to you, suck head.

The visuals will be about same as Ultra on my 720p 32'' HDTV

Also i can get the artbook for 80$ and not 130$ like on PC

The visuals will be about same as Ultra on my 720p 32'' HDTV

Also i can get the artbook for 80$ and not 130$ like on PC

loosingENDS

You cannot afford a decent TV, you will not be paying anything for an art book lol.

The visuals will be about same as Ultra on my 720p 32'' HDTV

Also i can get the artbook for 80$ and not 130$ like on PC

loosingENDS

I could just buy the art book off eBay.

Or buy the game from gog.com for $34 and get it for free.

You cannot afford a decent TV, your parents will not be paying anything for an art book lol.

tenaka2

Fix'd.

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

The visuals will be about same as Ultra on my 720p 32'' HDTV

Also i can get the artbook for 80$ and not 130$ like on PC

tenaka2

You cannot afford a decent TV, you will not be paying anything for an art book lol.

I dont want a bigger than 32'' HDTV

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

And who prefers to pay 130$ for the artbook, then just 80$ on 360 in the first place ?

loosingENDS

Dont start on price, PC gamers can get the proper verion of the witcher 2 not for 20 quid, that includes all the content of the 360 version.

Your going to pay 60 for a gimped version that has half the visuals of the pc version.

Grats to you, suck head.

The visuals will be about same as Ultra on my 720p 32'' HDTV

Also i can get the artbook for 80$ and not 130$ like on PC

So your TV is going to change the settings of the games pushing the graphics from medium to ultra... That's a nice HDTV, where can I buy it?

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

The visuals will be about same as Ultra on my 720p 32'' HDTV

Also i can get the artbook for 80$ and not 130$ like on PC

loosingENDS

You cannot afford a decent TV, you will not be paying anything for an art book lol.

I dont want a bigger than 32'' HDTV

Yeah, it would prob increase your electric bill far beyond your poor families ability to pay.

[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

Not everyone prefers better resolution, graphics, framerates, user interface and controls though.

For someone who hates all those things, maybe it isn't?

loosingENDS

Indeed, not everyone prefers terrible PC controls, garbage gameplay, half the content at launch, horrible shadows that destroy the game visuals completly, no specular effects like on PC

And who prefers to pay 130$ for the artbook, then just 80$ on 360 in the first place ?

You're such a jackass. The edition is 100 dollars, check the updated price.

The reason the PC versions collectors cost so much was because you also had a dice board game you play in the pubs and a solid ceramic headbust of Geralt. And the edition was 120, not 130. The if they added the bust of Geralt to the 360 edition the price would go up ANOTHER 30 dollars. Now SHUT UP!

Lol PC virgins are so desperate.Smileyvirus

Assuming someone is a virgin... The "go to", "I'm a dumbass and have nothing else" insult :lol:

[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

Not everyone prefers better resolution, graphics, framerates, user interface and controls though.

For someone who hates all those things, maybe it isn't?

loosingENDS

Indeed, not everyone prefers terrible PC controls, garbage gameplay, half the content at launch, horrible shadows that destroy the game visuals completly, no specular effects like on PC

And who prefers to pay 130$ for the artbook, then just 80$ on 360 in the first place ?

half the content at launch? what did the 360 get of the game last year? nothing? right. how in the world is getting the game early and then dlc coming out later a disadvantage for the pc anda late launch an advantage for 360 when they will both have the exact same content on the same day?

and then you brag about 360 skyrim having timed exclusive dlc?

[QUOTE="Smileyvirus"]Lol PC virgins are so desperate.lundy86_4

Assuming someone is a virgin... The "go to", "I'm a dumbass and have nothing else" insult :lol:

I'm just bored dude. Bored to absolute hellish death with the PC fanboys who have such low self esteem that they feel the desperate and shallow need to come on these boards day after day, night after night trying to make people as interested in their overcompensation they call a l33t gaming rig. They are told time and time again that no-one cares, but they can't hack it and they come back with another tired, beaten old pony of an argument. This time its that some game that sounds the same, plays the same, has the same content, but *looks marginally more attractive* makes them somehow better at..... what? life? Social standing? Once again - no-one cares. As for the virgin remark, well its become pretty common practice here by some of the PC fanboy windowlickers to refer to console owners as "peasants". I don't know somehow meaning they have less money? Really? Well ok then PC fanboys can now be called "virgins". And I think I know which cheap insult is closer to the mark.Smileyvirus

I don't even want to bother replying to more baseless insults to be honest. It's rather pathetic that one draws such personality traits on people, when you likely have no training in the field, or enough data to draw a conclusion.

Yep, certain PC users have been doing that. They're wrong, and likely, so are you. Enough with petty insults. It's boring. Yes, boring.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="Smileyvirus"]Lol PC virgins are so desperate.Smileyvirus

Assuming someone is a virgin... The "go to", "I'm a dumbass and have nothing else" insult :lol:

i guess you didn't know that this thread was just a reaction to somebody spamming the forum about how the 360 version of this game looks better than the pc version and other such outlandish claims.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="Smileyvirus"]Lol PC virgins are so desperate.Smileyvirus

Assuming someone is a virgin... The "go to", "I'm a dumbass and have nothing else" insult :lol:

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

And who prefers to pay 130$ for the artbook, then just 80$ on 360 in the first place ?

loosingENDS

Dont start on price, PC gamers can get the proper verion of the witcher 2 not for 20 quid, that includes all the content of the 360 version.

Your going to pay 60 for a gimped version that has half the visuals of the pc version.

Grats to you, suck head.

The visuals will be about same as Ultra on my 720p 32'' HDTV

Also i can get the artbook for 80$ and not 130$ like on PC

No, you can't. And it's 100 dollars. Check Amazon, you idjit. You're missing the dice pub game, you're missing the creamic Geralt headbust,you're missing the playing cards. THERE IS A REASON YOU'RE MISSING 30 DOLLARS OF CONTENT YOU COCK A ceramic bust of that size is worth 40 dollars alone.

[QUOTE="Smileyvirus"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Assuming someone is a virgin... The "go to", "I'm a dumbass and have nothing else" insult :lol:

CaseyWegner

i guess you didn't know that this thread was just a reaction to somebody spamming the forum about how the 360 version of this game looks better than the pc version and other such outlandish claims.

Which were hardly worst than

1. hermits going in every thread i make calling the game crap on 360 and like a N64 game

2. posting fake pics from low on PC and present them as 360 pics and then go all the way to bash the game and call it crap based on fake pics that are far lower than 360 graphics

.

So, that thread is just another of those reactions. Laughable as it gets as always

Like anyone would think the game would look better in 7 years old hardware or something, hermits are making trully epic posts these days

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="Smileyvirus"] I'm just bored dude. Bored to absolute hellish death with the PC fanboys who have such low self esteem that they feel the desperate and shallow need to come on these boards day after day, night after night trying to make people as interested in their overcompensation they call a l33t gaming rig. They are told time and time again that no-one cares, but they can't hack it and they come back with another tired, beaten old pony of an argument. This time its that some game that sounds the same, plays the same, has the same content, but *looks marginally more attractive* makes them somehow better at..... what? life? Social standing? Once again - no-one cares. As for the virgin remark, well its become pretty common practice here by some of the PC fanboy windowlickers to refer to console owners as "peasants". I don't know somehow meaning they have less money? Really? Well ok then PC fanboys can now be called "virgins". And I think I know which cheap insult is closer to the mark.loosingENDS

i guess you didn't know that this thread was just a reaction to somebody spamming the forum about how the 360 version of this game looks better than the pc version and other such outlandish claims.

Which were hardly worst than

1. hermits going in every thread i make calling the game crap on 360 and like a N64 game

2. posting fake pics from low on PC and present them as 360 pics and then go all the way to bash the game and call it crap based on fake pics that are far lower than 360 graphics

.

So, that thread is just another of those reactions. Laughable as it gets as always

Like anyone would think the game would look better in 7 years old hardware or something, hermits are making trully epic posts these days

Hey folks. He has a PhD. :lol:

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

i guess you didn't know that this thread was just a reaction to somebody spamming the forum about how the 360 version of this game looks better than the pc version and other such outlandish claims.

zeta

Which were hardly worst than

1. hermits going in every thread i make calling the game crap on 360 and like a N64 game

2. posting fake pics from low on PC and present them as 360 pics and then go all the way to bash the game and call it crap based on fake pics that are far lower than 360 graphics

.

So, that thread is just another of those reactions. Laughable as it gets as always

Like anyone would think the game would look better in 7 years old hardware or something, hermits are making trully epic posts these days

Hey folks. He has a PhD. :lol:

That just makes going to school look bad lol

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

i guess you didn't know that this thread was just a reaction to somebody spamming the forum about how the 360 version of this game looks better than the pc version and other such outlandish claims.

zeta

Which were hardly worst than

1. hermits going in every thread i make calling the game crap on 360 and like a N64 game

2. posting fake pics from low on PC and present them as 360 pics and then go all the way to bash the game and call it crap based on fake pics that are far lower than 360 graphics

.

So, that thread is just another of those reactions. Laughable as it gets as always

Like anyone would think the game would look better in 7 years old hardware or something, hermits are making trully epic posts these days

Hey folks. He has a PhD. :lol:

[QUOTE="zeta"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Which were hardly worst than

1. hermits going in every thread i make calling the game crap on 360 and like a N64 game

2. posting fake pics from low on PC and present them as 360 pics and then go all the way to bash the game and call it crap based on fake pics that are far lower than 360 graphics

.

So, that thread is just another of those reactions. Laughable as it gets as always

Like anyone would think the game would look better in 7 years old hardware or something, hermits are making trully epic posts these days

Jebus213

Hey folks. He has a PhD. :lol:

Grammar? What are is this%

Don't you guys think you are making this all incredibly nasty and personal?

You're not discussing games anymore, now you are discussing how you wish someone else was dead.

Don't you guys think you are making this all incredibly nasty and personal?

You're not discussing games anymore, now you are discussing how you wish someone else was dead.

LazySloth718

1. I don't think anyone is doing that.

2. I think others have stated multiple times that this thread is a response to that other ridiculous thread that Loosing created.

As I stated multiple times, I don't think TW2 looks bad on the 360... as a standalone product! Claiming that it's better on the 360 in graphics, controls and content (even though the devs said that everything the 360 gets, the PC will also have on day one) is ridiculous.

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

And who prefers to pay 130$ for the artbook, then just 80$ on 360 in the first place ?

loosingENDS

Dont start on price, PC gamers can get the proper verion of the witcher 2 not for 20 quid, that includes all the content of the 360 version.

Your going to pay 60 for a gimped version that has half the visuals of the pc version.

Grats to you, suck head.

The visuals will be about same as Ultra on my 720p 32'' HDTV

Also i can get the artbook for 80$ and not 130$ like on PC

Hey look. It's that other other Witcher 2 thread.

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

i guess you didn't know that this thread was just a reaction to somebody spamming the forum about how the 360 version of this game looks better than the pc version and other such outlandish claims.

zeta

Which were hardly worst than

1. hermits going in every thread i make calling the game crap on 360 and like a N64 game

2. posting fake pics from low on PC and present them as 360 pics and then go all the way to bash the game and call it crap based on fake pics that are far lower than 360 graphics

.

So, that thread is just another of those reactions. Laughable as it gets as always

Like anyone would think the game would look better in 7 years old hardware or something, hermits are making trully epic posts these days

Hey folks. He has a PhD. :lol: