LOL, I'm the blind fanboy? I'm not the one making up numbers to try to back up MS's decision to no longer make exclusive games for their console. Everything I use is verifiable fact. MS stated in their last earnings report that they sold fewer Xbox consoles last year than the year before. Don't had the lowest attach rate for exclusives? Prove it. Xbox is heavily slanted towards US sales and their exclusives are slanted towards US tastes. Therefore it makes sense when a couple get more sales. Sony has a works wide appeal with a wider range of exclusives all serving different tastes, do it makes sense if the sales are sorry out more among more exclusives. NPD only covers the US. So it won there a few months (plus a couple in Australia and UK). So what? This is a global business. And brand loyalty will only get you so far. Look at Vita, or Sega.
sega never had much brand loyalty. the sony fans aren't handheld fans. PlayStation consoles have lots of brand loyalty. The XB1 came out weaker, more expensive, had a kinect bundled which many didn't want, and had a disastrous reveal because of the overreaction of the word DRM and their online only approach . the PS4 was cheaper, more power powerful and didn't have any DRM or TV stuff. they just focused on games. the combination of all that swung alot of swing buyers. That mixed with brand loyalty made a huge difference. That's your sales gap right there.
There is literally 0 proof that exclusives are selling consoles. all the numbers state otherwise. Nintendo the one console that is mostly exclusives had the worst sales this gen. You have a theory that the exclusives are the reason the PS4 is selling but have failed to offer up any proof other then tin foil hat theory.
Also I'm not making up numbers and I could care less about MS exclusives going to PC. I think it's a good thing because I'm not a fanboy who wants to argue list wars. I'm just making logical explanations of things
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11001/11001490ee90165b44328ef107de82eac9561744" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60609/606093fb84b5689b4875fbb7eacb0d48b8ea5c3a" alt=""
and yes i have an xb1 as well. The only thing I don't have is a Wii U
Sega had nearly as big of a fanbase as Nintendo and even still has fans now. Sony's PSP sold roughly 80 million units to whom, then? The Xbox One fixed those issues in less than a year, a third of the gen so far, and the PS4 did not gain a 25ish million lead in that year. The gap had only expanded since that first year. I also never claimed that exclusives were the only thing that sold consiked.
Again, you are the one who claimed that exclusives don't sell consoles, so the onus is on you. You have not provided any proof of this. You made up the 9 attach rate the mystery lowest exclusive attach rate and cited VGChartz's made up numbers.
Sega didn't nearly have the fan base of nintendo. not even close. the PSP did sell alot sure but the issue with handhelds is alot of people moved onto tablets and phone games. The days of portable systems are pretty much dead. only it's big in japan but the 3DS is popular there and eating up all the sales. back in the PSP days there wasn't tablet and phone gaming like there is today. Also the gap has pretty much always been 2>1 since launch. still is give or take
I already proved my point. sorry if there isn't a better source the VGchartz but any gamer can clearly see what the top selling games are. Why do you think sony and MS buy marketing rights to games like destiny, CoD, battlefield etc. those games move consoles. You think Sony and MS are dumb? It's business 101. Also my 9 attahch rate i said was an estimate. since the actual one of 7.5 you provided is lower that only further proves my point. We all know nintendo gets almost no 3rd party support and has had tons of high scoring exclusives yet the Wii U failed in sales.
Log in to comment