Because the PC was in the TC's question, amrite?:roll: This is SW's not console wars. :roll:[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]
They're both equally inferior to the PC.
ermacness
This topic is locked from further discussion.
@ Garrus avatar guy. IGN may have said that crysis 2 was the best looking console game but IGN also said that PS3 is more powerful then 360. So you recognize both statements as fact or just the one that favors 360?
reviews are opinions what I posted are technical facts because again I am backing up my claim with evidence as to why KZ3 is technically superior to Crysis 2 while u are not[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"][QUOTE="sts106mat"] i really dont want to post that big long list of crysis 2 reviews LOL. you know the one with all the positive comments on it. i haven't seen KZ3 in person, i am certainly not saying it cant compare to crysis 2 which is what you basically did LOL. remember when you posted that you had never played alan wake, and that you didn't need to, because you had read enough reviews etc to know that it was bad? well i remember that, i have read enough reviews and comments from owners of all systems who say that crysis 2 is better looking than KZ3 etc. have you watched that youtube vid i linked above yet? that guy is talking to you it seems.sts106mat
i take it by evidence you mean the opinion of "lens of truth" they state on the very same page that its "the opinion of us" that makes it no different to any review. i am pretty sure i have seen you say "lens of lies" or "lems of truth" in the past. even if KZ3 is technically superior (i dunno) then you still haven't proven me wrong, like i said perhaps Crysis 2 is better than the sum of it parts. lets get this straight the current CGK has been decided by Lens of truth, is that your position on this matter, yes or no?
i also note, as usual, you still haven't answered the earlier question, you regularly ignored requests for proof you own a 360 in other threads.
umm no by evidence I mean the technical facts I postedumm no by evidence I mean the technical facts I posted[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"][QUOTE="sts106mat"]
i take it by evidence you mean the opinion of "lens of truth" they state on the very same page that its "the opinion of us" that makes it no different to any review. i am pretty sure i have seen you say "lens of lies" or "lems of truth" in the past. even if KZ3 is technically superior (i dunno) then you still haven't proven me wrong, like i said perhaps Crysis 2 is better than the sum of it parts. lets get this straight the current CGK has been decided by Lens of truth, is that your position on this matter, yes or no?
i also note, as usual, you still haven't answered the earlier question, you regularly ignored requests for proof you own a 360 in other threads.
sts106mat
here lets make it easy for you and me, you reply to these questions.
1. have you watched the crysis 2 sensitivity engage video i linked earlier?
2. if answer to question 1 is yes, what are your thoughts on it?
3. Where did you get the "technical facts" from?
4. If the answer to question 3 is "lens of truth" why have you suddenly started accepting their word as the law, when in the past you have said "lems of truth"
5. Why does PSU Say that crysis 2 is the best looking shooter on PS3, not KZ3?
6. Who decides the current Console Graphics King?
7. following the list of sites that claimed Crysis 2 is the best looking game on consoles, Is the 360 now proven to have been technically able to match PS3 exclusives?
8. why have i wrote all these questions when i know there is practically zero chance of an answer from you on?
lol I will address one question which is relevant to this topic KZ3 has better framerate, resolution, no screen tearing, no graphical bugs or pop in, better A.I. etc. these are all facts which u can't and haven't denied now going back to what started this, I said that KZ3 was technically superior to Crysis 2 in which u said it is not and that it's all about opinion in which I posted these facts. u then tried to change the subject, and currently still are and now here we are... u still not providing any evidence to prove me wrong[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"][QUOTE="sts106mat"]lol I will address one question which is relevant to this topic KZ3 has better framerate, resolution, no screen tearing, no graphical bugs or pop in, better A.I. etc. these are all facts which u can't and haven't denied now going back to what started this, I said that KZ3 was technically superior to Crysis 2 in which u said it is not and that it's all about opinion in which I posted these facts. u then tried to change the subject, and currently still are and now here we are... u still not providing any evidence to prove me wrong I said above KZ3 may well be technically superior, i agree with your "facts" there are inconsistencies in Crysis 2. i wont need to post any evidence to prove crysis 2 looks better, since that is a separate issue from which technically performs better. rather than use a rude analogy here, i will use an aircraft one instead. The A10 warthog is an amazing aircraft, it is technically superior to the spitfire in every single way, does it look anyway near as attractive to the eye? It doesn't mean KZ3 is a better game / CGK. how about you answer my questions now?here lets make it easy for you and me, you reply to these questions.
1. have you watched the crysis 2 sensitivity engage video i linked earlier?
2. if answer to question 1 is yes, what are your thoughts on it?
3. Where did you get the "technical facts" from?
4. If the answer to question 3 is "lens of truth" why have you suddenly started accepting their word as the law, when in the past you have said "lems of truth"
5. Why does PSU Say that crysis 2 is the best looking shooter on PS3, not KZ3?
6. Who decides the current Console Graphics King?
7. following the list of sites that claimed Crysis 2 is the best looking game on consoles, Is the 360 now proven to have been technically able to match PS3 exclusives?
8. why have i wrote all these questions when i know there is practically zero chance of an answer from you on?
sts106mat
I'm pretty sure you need evidence to back up your claim if you want to be relevant
Not by much for sure but yes better. Sony's first part titles are some of the best looking games this gen on consoles. Lay off PC gamers! lol.
LOL at IGN, same site that says GTA IV looks better on PS3, in which it doesn't with sub HD and no AA unlike 360 version which was 720p and had 2xAA.@ Garrus avatar guy. IGN may have said that crysis 2 was the best looking console game but IGN also said that PS3 is more powerful then 360. So you recognize both statements as fact or just the one that favors 360?
Pray_to_me
Lol, what? "If we disclude the majority of people who voted, we get results I like"If we disclude the middle options we can see that 92% of people (33/36) agree that Ps3 has WAY better graphics. Hopefully that'll shut the Xbox fanboys up for a while :lol:
YoYo278
[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"][QUOTE="sts106mat"]actually there are several facts as to why KZ3 is technically better than Crysis 2sts106mat
funny cause you said "in almost every way" just above, suddenly its just "several" remember its just your opinion, if you can post a list of reviews with as much praise for KZ3's graphics as those for Crysis 2, you will have a basis for an argument.
LOT is "opinion", it says on their site, what they say is not really proof of anything, just as IGN's statement that "crysis 2 takes the crown" isn't proof of anything. the only real evidence we have that crysis 2 is the best looking game at the moment is a general consensus of opinion.
in terms of both consoles, i have said before PS3, seems to have the edge with exlclusives over 360. however anyone who says "PS3 far surpasses 360" or words to that effect are just lying to themselves, or simply trolling.
observe
framerate - KZ3
no screen tearing - KZ3
no graphical bugs/pop in - KZ3
resolution - KZ3
A.I. - KZ3
Animations - KZ3
graphical consistancy - KZ3
as you can see KZ3 really does far surpass Crysis 2
U forgot better draw distance and AAReally? I know the Xbox was stronger, but a gen?Better, but not like Xbox vs PS2 where it looks a generation apart.
magnax1
[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"][QUOTE="sts106mat"]No PS3 :) smooth as mothaf****** butter. Ok I go to school now I respond in some hours. played the 360 version have you? i have seen zero slowdown, maybe its my playstyle or the fact i have it installed? So do I WITHOUTH install. PS3 wins againso your a PC gamer now LOL
sts106mat
[QUOTE="Pray_to_me"]
@ Garrus avatar guy. IGN may have said that crysis 2 was the best looking console game but IGN also said that PS3 is more powerful then 360. So you recognize both statements as fact or just the one that favors 360?
i know that the PS3 has slight lead in terms of power, however its down to how you implement that power.
PS3 exclusives look great (i never denied this), but multiplats and some openworld games (RDR) dont perform as well on PS3 due to its lower memory. it all adds up to them being basically equal.
If Mass effect 1 had been a PS3 exclusive, i would likely have switched consoles to be honest.
dont get me wrong, i am perfectly happy with the 360 at the moment, no long system updates, an online system that works consistently well etc (again i dont have a PS3, just going of what i have seen posted here).
i just disagree with those that say 360 cannot perfom anywhere near as well as PS3 graphically. this has been proven wrong by crysis2, harcore cows, like my friend Kevinbutler up there are still in denial, i dont understand why
Only thing Crysis 2 proved was that 360 could perform better than Alan Wake, but nowhere near PS3 exclusives.[QUOTE="Pray_to_me"]
@ Garrus avatar guy. IGN may have said that crysis 2 was the best looking console game but IGN also said that PS3 is more powerful then 360. So you recognize both statements as fact or just the one that favors 360?
i know that the PS3 has slight lead in terms of power, however its down to how you implement that power.
PS3 exclusives look great (i never denied this), but multiplats and some openworld games (RDR) dont perform as well on PS3 due to its lower memory. it all adds up to them being basically equal.
If Mass effect 1 had been a PS3 exclusive, i would likely have switched consoles to be honest.
dont get me wrong, i am perfectly happy with the 360 at the moment, no long system updates, an online system that works consistently well etc (again i dont have a PS3, just going of what i have seen posted here).
i just disagree with those that say 360 cannot perfom anywhere near as well as PS3 graphically. this has been proven wrong by crysis2, harcore cows, like my friend Kevinbutler up there are still in denial, i dont understand why
Only thing Crysis 2 proved was that 360 could perform better than Alan Wake, but nowhere near PS3 exclusives. If you believe Crysis 2 is no where near PS3 exclusives, then you are blinded by fanboyism. It's right there with them.[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"][QUOTE="sts106mat"]Only thing Crysis 2 proved was that 360 could perform better than Alan Wake, but nowhere near PS3 exclusives. If you believe Crysis 2 is no where near PS3 exclusives, then you are blinded by fanboyism. It's right there with them. Or maybe I'm blinded by the lower resolution, jaggies, worse draw distance, worse animations & worse performance?i know that the PS3 has slight lead in terms of power, however its down to how you implement that power.
PS3 exclusives look great (i never denied this), but multiplats and some openworld games (RDR) dont perform as well on PS3 due to its lower memory. it all adds up to them being basically equal.
If Mass effect 1 had been a PS3 exclusive, i would likely have switched consoles to be honest.
dont get me wrong, i am perfectly happy with the 360 at the moment, no long system updates, an online system that works consistently well etc (again i dont have a PS3, just going of what i have seen posted here).
i just disagree with those that say 360 cannot perfom anywhere near as well as PS3 graphically. this has been proven wrong by crysis2, harcore cows, like my friend Kevinbutler up there are still in denial, i dont understand why
cainetao11
played the 360 version have you? i have seen zero slowdown, maybe its my playstyle or the fact i have it installed?sts106matSo do I WITHOUTH install. PS3 wins again PS3 has a mandatory install of whatever. 360's is completely optional as always, i do it to keep the noise of the console to a minimum, it has the added benefit of improving load times. PS3 does not win in this case LOL I don't remember Crysis 2 having a mandatory install, if it had it would be much smaller than the 360 install anyways.. LOL
I don't remember Crysis 2 having a mandatory install, if it had it would be much smaller than the 360 install anyways.. LOL[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"][QUOTE="sts106mat"] PS3 has a mandatory install of whatever. 360's is completely optional as always, i do it to keep the noise of the console to a minimum, it has the added benefit of improving load times. PS3 does not win in this case LOLsts106mat
crysis 2 requires ZERO install on the 360, its completely optional, as always.
Again I don't think there was an install for this game.I don't remember Crysis 2 having a mandatory install, if it had it would be much smaller than the 360 install anyways.. LOLcharlesdarwin55
It's a 3 gigabyte mandatory install compared to the 360's optional 5 gigs. How do you not know the game has a mandatory install?
[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]I don't remember Crysis 2 having a mandatory install, if it had it would be much smaller than the 360 install anyways.. LOLwaltefmoney
It's a 3 gigabyte mandatory install compared to the 360's optional 5 gigs. How do you not know the game has a mandatory install?
I forgot I guess. I thought there was none.played the 360 version have you? i have seen zero slowdown, maybe its my playstyle or the fact i have it installed? So do I WITHOUTH install. PS3 wins again Funny how you are CERTAIN there was no install, but later say "im pretty sure there wasnt an install" only to be shown PS3 = MANDATORY 2.9g install. lol /self owned. PS: is it reaaaally that hard to remember having to install something? Oh wait, you just said you didnt have to, to prove "teh ps3's" superiority. hmm.. next time check your facts. oh wait, this is SW.. nvm[QUOTE="sts106mat"][QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"] No PS3 :) smooth as mothaf****** butter. Ok I go to school now I respond in some hours.charlesdarwin55
played the 360 version have you? i have seen zero slowdown, maybe its my playstyle or the fact i have it installed?sts106matSo do I WITHOUTH install. PS3 wins again Funny how you are CERTAIN there was no install, but later say "im pretty sure there wasnt an install" only to be shown PS3 = MANDATORY 2.9g install. lol /self owned. PS: is it reaaaally that hard to remember having to install something? Oh wait, you just said you didnt have to, to prove "teh ps3's" superiority. hmm.. next time check your facts. oh wait, this is SW.. nvm Ok... So do I WITH ONLY 2.9g install. PS3 wins again. Fixed
[QUOTE="waltefmoney"][QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]I don't remember Crysis 2 having a mandatory install, if it had it would be much smaller than the 360 install anyways.. LOLcharlesdarwin55
It's a 3 gigabyte mandatory install compared to the 360's optional 5 gigs. How do you not know the game has a mandatory install?
I forgot I guess. I thought there was none.It's Killzone 3 (the better looking game) which has no install.
Digital Foundry:
"The crucial thing is that both are phenomenally attractive games, producing effects quite different and in many ways more advanced than anything we've seen elsewhere on console. We all wanted Crysis on console to be an event, a showcase release: by and large, Crytek has delivered, and those cutting edge visuals are backed by a truly impressive game design. However, there's the nagging feeling that a few more months in development could perhaps have ironed out the issues both versions of the game have."
Definition of cutting edge:
[QUOTE="dRuGGeRnaUt"][QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"] So do I WITHOUTH install. PS3 wins againFunny how you are CERTAIN there was no install, but later say "im pretty sure there wasnt an install" only to be shown PS3 = MANDATORY 2.9g install. lol /self owned. PS: is it reaaaally that hard to remember having to install something? Oh wait, you just said you didnt have to, to prove "teh ps3's" superiority. hmm.. next time check your facts. oh wait, this is SW.. nvm Ok... So do I WITH ONLY 2.9g install. PS3 wins again. Fixedcharlesdarwin55
LOL 2.9g MANDATORY install. xbox wins. lol Wow man, you REAAAALLY need to prove your ps3 the best hey? Personally i dont care, they are both awesome systems. but again NOTHING ON XBOX REQUIRES AN INSTALL. = XBOX WINNER cause while you were still installing crysis 2, i was playing. = MORE PLAY TIME
[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"][QUOTE="waltefmoney"]I forgot I guess. I thought there was none. so in this thread you have "forgot" about a mandatory install & posted a link to an IGN article as proof that IGN were not credible, but you hadn't bothered to read that article which actually did make sense LOL. ok then! i will be sure to read your posts in future LOL Doesn't matter the intall thing doesn't matter, neither does IGN, KZ3>Crysis2 which is the main point. & which article "did make sense"? in any case the fact that u use IGN as proof proves everything lol.It's a 3 gigabyte mandatory install compared to the 360's optional 5 gigs. How do you not know the game has a mandatory install?
sts106mat
Ok... So do I WITH ONLY 2.9g install. PS3 wins again. Fixed[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"][QUOTE="dRuGGeRnaUt"] Funny how you are CERTAIN there was no install, but later say "im pretty sure there wasnt an install" only to be shown PS3 = MANDATORY 2.9g install. lol /self owned. PS: is it reaaaally that hard to remember having to install something? Oh wait, you just said you didnt have to, to prove "teh ps3's" superiority. hmm.. next time check your facts. oh wait, this is SW.. nvm dRuGGeRnaUt
LOL 2.9g MANDATORY install. xbox wins. lol Wow man, you REAAAALLY need to prove your ps3 the best hey? Personally i dont care, they are both awesome systems. but again NOTHING ON XBOX REQUIRES AN INSTALL. = XBOX WINNER cause while you were still installing crysis 2, i was playing. = MORE PLAY TIME
But 5 minutes later when my install was finished I was playing the superior version with better texture filtering, no terrible frame drops, no screen tearing & no pop in. LOL[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]Doesn't matter the intall thing doesn't matter, neither does IGN, KZ3>Crysis2 which is the main point. & which article "did make sense"? in any case the fact that u use IGN as proof proves everything lol. i haven't used IGN to prove anything, that was you and you failed epic style. I am done discussing this with you, you have proved yourself wrong and guilty of posting things without first thinking. i am wasting my time, try harder next time. Yes you used all these diferent reviews. Yes indeed but I admit I failed with the IGN because Im not some crazy fan boy. Anyway all what you just wrote just proves one thing: u got PWND[QUOTE="sts106mat"] so in this thread you have "forgot" about a mandatory install & posted a link to an IGN article as proof that IGN were not credible, but you hadn't bothered to read that article which actually did make sense LOL. ok then! i will be sure to read your posts in future LOLsts106mat
I chose, "Better, but not much better." Crysis 2 is outstanding, but the best looking PS3 exclusives are still tops imo.
[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"] I admit I failed with the IGN.sts106mat
finally i can agree with something you said LOL i am not replying to any more of your posts as you are basically a couple away from being presented with "trollface.gif" my feeding time is up LOL
Weak dude I admit I was wrong on 2 occasions something unseen in SW before. But in any case those 2 points had hardly anything to do with the main point and I didn't see any evidence that disproves the fact that KZ3 totally pwns the s*** out of Crysis 2. You mad cause Crysis 2 doesn't come near the 4 top ps3 exclusives and you take out the anger on me cause I was strong enough to admit a fail. JUST WEAK.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment