*shrugs* really don't see what all of the fuss is about TBH.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Screenshots don't do Killzone 2's engine justice.
The weather effects, the lighting, the debris flowing in the wind, everything looks phenomenal
The art direction, and the way they pull it off with the tech is a visual feat that Gears cannot compete with.
Try as I might, I cannot see that pic as anything other than ugly. I know it's pre-alpha, but still... ;?
Gears 3 looks better. Look at the foilage in the second Killzone 3 pic. :lol:
WhenCicadasCry
Try as I might, I cannot see that pic as anything other than ugly. I know it's pre-alpha, but still... ;?[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]
Gears 3 looks better. Look at the foilage in the second Killzone 3 pic. :lol:
windsquid9000
It's not as if Killzone 2 looks any better. How a game with textures as bad as this gets any kind of praise is beyond me. I guess slapping on tons of gradiant film grain and over exessive smoke effects is impressive these days.
[QUOTE="windsquid9000"]
Try as I might, I cannot see that pic as anything other than ugly. I know it's pre-alpha, but still... ;?
WhenCicadasCry
It's not as if Killzone 2 looks any better. How a game with textures as bad as this gets any kind of praise is beyond me. I guess slapping on tons of gradiant film grain and over exessive smoke effects is impressive these days.
My eyes... They are bleedingthis is a funny thread.. you sony fans dont know what good graphics are..daveg1
Please show everyone, we could use more obvious 'worst pics I could find'pics on this thread.
Nothing on PS3 looks better than Gears of War 3.
yodaddyninja
Same thing we herd about Alan Wake, guess we just wait. ;)
[QUOTE="yodaddyninja"]
Nothing on PS3 looks better than Gears of War 3.
FragTycoon
Same thing we herd about Alan Wake, guess we just wait. ;)
Weak argument. Alan Wake has nothing to do with Gears of War 3, and Gears 2 already surpasses Aw anyway. And wasn't AW in sub-hd.
Try as I might, I cannot see that pic as anything other than ugly. I know it's pre-alpha, but still... ;?[QUOTE="windsquid9000"]
[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]
Gears 3 looks better. Look at the foilage in the second Killzone 3 pic. :lol:
WhenCicadasCry
It's not as if Killzone 2 looks any better. How a game with textures as bad as this gets any kind of praise is beyond me. I guess slapping on tons of gradiant film grain and over exessive smoke effects is impressive these days.
*killzone 2 pics*
Yeah! Let's compare games we've never played before! I can tell you've never touched Killzone 2 because you chose either bad shots or pre alpha shots (you'd know since the butt of the gun in basically all of your pics is not how it appears in the finished game). As for the screenshots I posted, one is a bullshot, one is not. Can you guess the bullshot?
Honestly, I thought we all knew that EPIC is the best in the industry for touching up/rendering shots at ultrahigh resolutions on computers and passing it off as "pre-alpha" code, and in this case, people are making it out to be like Killzone 3's alpha code is bad in comparison. Now the shots above are Gears 2 and Killzone 2, and we all know which one really looks better, don't we? I don't see Gears 3 even beating that Killzone 2 shot, to be honest. As for the foliage comment, why not wait until we see the jungle level, not an arctic wasteland...on a cruiser. As someone else said, why not wait until both games are out instead of watching blurry youtube videos?
ITT: People arguing over "console graphic kings" by posting screenshots of games that aren't even out yet. This thread has so much credibility!
Gears 3 bullshots don't offend Cows at all.....
Instead they highly offend Hermits because even the Hermit's $700 PC rig can't run those Bullshots
yugioh3ds
You do know that the UDK has had the same updated engine that gears 3 runs on for a while now, and have the ability to use anti-aliasing:
Gears of war 3 is the graphics king.
Gears Of War 3 is the current console graphics king-fact.
slipknot0129
^ This is why I try to avoid these threads. I mean, what's the point of arguing with people who think their opinion is fact?
*edit*
And did you just declare GeOW3 graphics king, as in over Crysis? :shock:
UE3 is good.That's RO2 right? I had no idea that was UE3 when I watched the videos. Good to know. Should run really well then.SAGE_OF_FIRE
[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]
[QUOTE="GodofEmpires"]
The pics he showed were in bad quality. Let's wait until they both come out to judge, shall we?
Gears 3 looks better. Look at the foilage in the second Killzone 3 pic. :lol:
Bullshots, buddy. From both of the games :roll:
the second gears pic doesn't look too altered though just AA I mean look at that ground texture its obivous its an in game shot of the alpha build (or maybe it dropped back into pre alpha due to the 6 month delay) either way the game will more than likely look better than the second shot. First shot though seems more altered its the same charcter model as the second except it seems the blur effect was added in along side the blood being touched up. outside of that I'm near positive that gears 3 will surpass that pic in ceritan aspects due to it having an entire year of dev time left.[QUOTE="koolbobfatslob"]killzone3 lacks HDR LOL. http://i52.tinypic.com/o5xd2f.jpg lol moh look better Bus-A-Bus
Yes,KZ3 does not have HDR neither it has object based motion blru.GOW III is technically more impressive game...
that pic actually makes MOH look bad, im trying to get picture of canyon map that looks badass.I was going to start a rant about how KZ graphics pwn anything on consoles but realized that I'm tired of arguing with KZ haters. So whatever.
I've never played it but from vids and pics imo it looks better than Uncharted 2 which i have played.I was going to start a rant about how KZ graphics pwn anything on consoles but realized that I'm tired of arguing with KZ haters. So whatever.
Orchid87
[QUOTE="Orchid87"]I've never played it but from vids and pics imo it looks better than Uncharted 2 which i have played.I was going to start a rant about how KZ graphics pwn anything on consoles but realized that I'm tired of arguing with KZ haters. So whatever.
ferret-gamer
Yes, it does. It's surely no Crysis or Metro but for as mindf**king hardware as PS3 it does amazing stuff.
So this was a joke thread, right? I mean, I don't doubt KZ3 will look great but those pics are horrible, a blurry weapon with flat textures and nothing but debris and then he says "look at the detail" lol, so it was a joke right?!!
This however, take a look at this:
So this was a joke thread, right? I mean, I don't doubt KZ3 will look great but those pics are horrible, a blurry weapon with flat textures and nothing but debris and then he says "look at the detail" lol, so it was a joke right?!!
This however, take a look at this:
*pic*
themyth01
You're talking about flat textures and yet your pic has no bump-mapping in sight. What the hell happened to Crytek? Crysis 1 is still a king but C2 shots look depressing.
[QUOTE="themyth01"]
So this was a joke thread, right? I mean, I don't doubt KZ3 will look great but those pics are horrible, a blurry weapon with flat textures and nothing but debris and then he says "look at the detail" lol, so it was a joke right?!!
This however, take a look at this:
*pic*
Orchid87
You're talking about flat textures and yet your pic has no bump-mapping in sight. What the hell happened to Crytek? Crysis 1 is still a king but C2 shots look depressing.
What picture are you looking at?[QUOTE="themyth01"]
So this was a joke thread, right? I mean, I don't doubt KZ3 will look great but those pics are horrible, a blurry weapon with flat textures and nothing but debris and then he says "look at the detail" lol, so it was a joke right?!!
This however, take a look at this:
*pic*
Orchid87
You're talking about flat textures and yet your pic has no bump-mapping in sight. What the hell happened to Crytek? Crysis 1 is still a king but C2 shots look depressing.
I see bump/normal mapping in that picture. Cryengine3 also uses POM.Talking down about a game you've never played doesn't exactly help your credibility there.Look people, I know these aren't the best quality and the offscreen pics have taken away quite a lot of finer details but in 720p HD the graphics is looking down right unparalleled. gears 3 doesn't stand a chance TBH.
gpuking
I see bump/normal mapping in that picture. Cryengine3 also uses POM.ferret-gamer
I see it only on those pillars. Other walls and floor look completely flat.
On the other hand, just look at this:
I call downgrade.
[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]I see bump/normal mapping in that picture. Cryengine3 also uses POM.Orchid87
I see it only on those pillars. Other walls and floor look completely flat.
On the other hand, just look at this:
I call downgrade.
In all honestly you are comparing a used dirt road to the floor of a train station. But it does suffer from alot of flat textures, but i see that as a console shotand hopefully the pc is better.Talking down about a game you've never played doesn't exactly help your credibility there. themyth01Just judging from the non bullshot footage and pictures, of course we'll measure things up once newer trailers and media are shown. But for now I stand by my statement.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment