Truth about Crysis. Let all consolities know this!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Holden1985
Holden1985

530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 Holden1985
Member since 2007 • 530 Posts

But but Crysis is suppose look like this not the one you posted with fraps

AnxietyDisorder

But no hardware can run it like that yet, but its still the best looking game available.

Avatar image for mo0ksi
mo0ksi

12337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#152 mo0ksi
Member since 2007 • 12337 Posts
[QUOTE="wklzip"][QUOTE="AnxietyDisorder"][QUOTE="wklzip"]

Whoever the TC is, he has no idea of PC hardware...

He thinks the 9800GTX is a lot better than the 8800gt :roll:

[QUOTE="AnxietyDisorder"]

[QUOTE="MRCORNBREAD"]Will upgrading to a 8800GT from a X1950 Pro be a big performence gain. Could I play Crysis on high setting with 1280X1024. I can play Crysis with the X1950 pro on medium 1024X768.AnxietyDisorder

It wont be a big performance gain. get a 9800gtx

source

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/5363-bfg-9800gtx-512mb-review-10.html

if 10 fps in Crysis isnt big of a difference I dont know what is. Now stop licking my ass.

Read again what i said.

The 9800GTX is better than the 8800gt but for those 5-10% higher fps is not worth double the price. And recommending a 9800GTX over a 8800GTS shows you prefer to pick higher numbers before doing some research. :roll:

The truth is that those two cards are very close in performance, im talking in gaming in general not only in crysis.

I recomended a 9800GTX over a 8800GT not a GTs you **** face and its not 5-10% higher its more like 30%to 45% higher you dip****

Pretty sad how someone is getting fueled up in anger over something like this...
Avatar image for Evz0rz
Evz0rz

4624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 Evz0rz
Member since 2006 • 4624 Posts
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"]

That screenshot is ancient ...

Sorry but I can with a 8800 GTS .. with no AA 1680 x 1050, Very High Shaders/textures and it looks exactly like that ( bar some more distant jaggies ) at 25-30 FPS (Playable).

Meu2k7

I have an overclocked 8800GTS 512 and I'd be lucky to get 20FPS on 1680 x 1050 on very high. :?

Mines the 8800 GTS 640 MB model, I also have 3GB RAM... may make teh difference

But the 640 model isn't as good as the 512....strange

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
I recomended a 9800GTX over a 8800GT not a GTs you **** face and its not 5-10% higher its more like 30%to 45% higher you dip****AnxietyDisorder
Still, to be fair, if given the option, the 8800GTS 512MB cards provide a significant bang for the buck which is only slightly lower than that of the 9800GTX.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"]

That screenshot is ancient ...

Sorry but I can with a 8800 GTS .. with no AA 1680 x 1050, Very High Shaders/textures and it looks exactly like that ( bar some more distant jaggies ) at 25-30 FPS (Playable).

Evz0rz

I have an overclocked 8800GTS 512 and I'd be lucky to get 20FPS on 1680 x 1050 on very high. :?

Mines the 8800 GTS 640 MB model, I also have 3GB RAM... may make teh difference

But the 640 model isn't as good as the 512....strange

The lower bus width is more than made up with the newer G92 chipset which includes more and faster shaders.
Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts

is it just me or do pc gamers like to stare at the graphics rather than actually shooting something or actually playing..

there obsessed with graphics

mlbslugger86

Its just you.

Avatar image for leejohnson7
leejohnson7

2909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 leejohnson7
Member since 2007 • 2909 Posts
Get an 8800 GT, and play it on the 1100 something resolution on very high with no AA, and it still looks breath taking compared to anything else.
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts
[QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"]

That screenshot is ancient ...

Sorry but I can with a 8800 GTS .. with no AA 1680 x 1050, Very High Shaders/textures and it looks exactly like that ( bar some more distant jaggies ) at 25-30 FPS (Playable).

Evz0rz

I have an overclocked 8800GTS 512 and I'd be lucky to get 20FPS on 1680 x 1050 on very high. :?

Mines the 8800 GTS 640 MB model, I also have 3GB RAM... may make teh difference

But the 640 model isn't as good as the 512....strange

depends if your CPU is holding you back.

Avatar image for aliblabla2007
aliblabla2007

16756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#159 aliblabla2007
Member since 2007 • 16756 Posts

is it just me or do pc gamers like to stare at the graphics rather than actually shooting something or actually playing..

there obsessed with graphics

mlbslugger86

And what about the lemmings/cows that keep bashing the Wii's graphics? :roll:

Avatar image for gianshomai
gianshomai

414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 gianshomai
Member since 2006 • 414 Posts

[QUOTE="gianshomai"]AnxietyDisorder
Your tweaks made it look like Crapsis

LOL mine looks like crap!?!?!? Tell me you joking!! Mine looks 23462456xbetter than yours and I dont need a 9800GX2 to play it at decent and playable FPS. C'mon just admit it. You=Fail.PC is either cheap or expensive.One 8800GTS 512m=less than 200$. If you bought a 9800GTX and can't figure out a way to play it looking great and running great then theres nothing we can do can we?? And I bet most cheaper high end PC's have way better screenshot than the one you used to wipe an elephant's a$s.

More Screenshots.

Avatar image for GaMeR_Willz
GaMeR_Willz

1050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 GaMeR_Willz
Member since 2008 • 1050 Posts
MGS4 looks good as Crysis.
Avatar image for bballm10
bballm10

1025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#162 bballm10
Member since 2006 • 1025 Posts
I'm sorry, but personally no game is worth spending over 1000$ on for graphics alone.
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

I'm sorry, but personally no game is worth spending over 1000$ on for graphics alone.bballm10

What game does that?

Avatar image for gianshomai
gianshomai

414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 gianshomai
Member since 2006 • 414 Posts

I'm sorry, but personally no game is worth spending over 1000$ on for graphics alone.bballm10

You don't need to spend 1000$. honestly

Avatar image for bladeeagle
bladeeagle

1863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 bladeeagle
Member since 2006 • 1863 Posts

MGS4 looks good as Crysis.GaMeR_Willz

No.

Avatar image for Kez1984
Kez1984

4548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#166 Kez1984
Member since 2007 • 4548 Posts

MGS4 looks good as Crysis.GaMeR_Willz

I'm sure it's an excellent visual extravaganza, but don't get ahead of yourself...

Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts

I'm sorry, but personally no game is worth spending over 1000$ on for graphics alone.bballm10

I play Crysis for the gameplay not the graphics. ;)

Avatar image for gianshomai
gianshomai

414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 gianshomai
Member since 2006 • 414 Posts

[QUOTE="bballm10"]I'm sorry, but personally no game is worth spending over 1000$ on for graphics alone.Lonelynight

I play Crysis for the gameplay not the graphics. ;)

Same here!

Actually I play for both gameplay and graphics.

Avatar image for Saturos3091
Saturos3091

14937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#169 Saturos3091
Member since 2005 • 14937 Posts

This is what Crysis looks like on my 8800GT. :|

Avatar image for FamiBox
FamiBox

5481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 FamiBox
Member since 2007 • 5481 Posts
[QUOTE="Lonelynight"]

[QUOTE="bballm10"]I'm sorry, but personally no game is worth spending over 1000$ on for graphics alone.gianshomai

I play Crysis for the gameplay not the graphics. ;)

Same here!

Actually I play for both gameplay and graphics.

I only have the Crysis demo at the moment... but I must have played it 50 times. The gameplay is so fun.

And it's the amazing physics that are possible, combined with the graphics that makes it even more amazing.

Avatar image for FamiBox
FamiBox

5481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 FamiBox
Member since 2007 • 5481 Posts
[QUOTE="IgorVitaly"][QUOTE="IgorVitaly"][QUOTE="FamiBox"]

one 8800GT.... most settings on high (some on medium) 1440x900. Looks good to me.

(dipped down to 21fps for 1 second before jumping back up here.)

Very playable. Mostly 30-40fps average. 25-30 with lots of action.

AnxietyDisorder

This thread /OP owned

Also you can see the resolution is correct becouse of the size of the hud or just do a pixel count to verify native resolution /thread

Absolutely

Everybody can tell the shaders setting is at medium. Look at the first three pics! lol

Actually, it's set on high. .......... lol?

Avatar image for MetroidPrimePwn
MetroidPrimePwn

12399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#172 MetroidPrimePwn
Member since 2007 • 12399 Posts

is it just me or do pc gamers like to stare at the graphics rather than actually shooting something or actually playing..

there obsessed with graphics

mlbslugger86

Which is why we all liked S.T.A.L.K.E.R. so much right? Because that has such amazing graphics...

Avatar image for VoodooGamer
VoodooGamer

1864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 VoodooGamer
Member since 2007 • 1864 Posts

MGS4 looks good as Crysis.GaMeR_Willz

Srsly???? :roll:

FAIL!

Avatar image for MikeE21286
MikeE21286

10405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#174 MikeE21286
Member since 2003 • 10405 Posts

That screenshot is ancient ...

Sorry but I can with a 8800 GTS .. with no AA 1680 x 1050, Very High Shaders/textures and it looks exactly like that ( bar some more distant jaggies ) at 25-30 FPS (Playable).

Meu2k7

no way.....not even my 8800 GT does that...

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts
[QUOTE="Meu2k7"]

That screenshot is ancient ...

Sorry but I can with a 8800 GTS .. with no AA 1680 x 1050, Very High Shaders/textures and it looks exactly like that ( bar some more distant jaggies ) at 25-30 FPS (Playable).

MikeE21286

no way.....not even my 8800 GT does that...

What's your CPU?

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#176 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50074 Posts
[QUOTE="MikeE21286"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"]

That screenshot is ancient ...

Sorry but I can with a 8800 GTS .. with no AA 1680 x 1050, Very High Shaders/textures and it looks exactly like that ( bar some more distant jaggies ) at 25-30 FPS (Playable).

Bebi_vegeta

no way.....not even my 8800 GT does that...

What's your CPU?

I have an overclocked 8800GTS 512 with a Q6600 and there's no way you can get that high of a frame rate with that card unless you have high-end memory and one helluva processor.
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts
[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"][QUOTE="MikeE21286"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"]

That screenshot is ancient ...

Sorry but I can with a 8800 GTS .. with no AA 1680 x 1050, Very High Shaders/textures and it looks exactly like that ( bar some more distant jaggies ) at 25-30 FPS (Playable).

Stevo_the_gamer

no way.....not even my 8800 GT does that...

What's your CPU?

I have an overclocked 8800GTS 512 with a Q6600 and there's no way you can get that high of a frame rate with that card unless you have high-end memory and one helluva processor.

I have a 8800GTX OC'ed with Qx6700@ 3.3GHZ... with 2gigs of 800MHZ@4-4-4-12. I play high 1680x1050 @+30fps... ill do a test wait up.

Edit:

I did the insane benchmark test tool and it gave me average of 32fps.

Avatar image for Polaris_choice
Polaris_choice

2334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 Polaris_choice
Member since 2007 • 2334 Posts

Even that looks better than Console games. And the physics are top notch. I didn't find the game enjoyable however.waynehead895

MGS4 and RE5 smoke that picture of Crysis sorry but you need to play more console games.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#179 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50074 Posts

I have a 8800GTX OC'ed with Qx6700@ 3.3GHZ... with 2gigs of 800MHZ@4-4-4-12. I play high 1680x1050 @+30fps... ill do a test wait up.

Edit:

I did the insane benchmark test tool and it gave me average of 32fps.

Bebi_vegeta
Granted you do realize that your setup is better than ours, correct? Overclocked 8800 GTX and a better overclocked processor. So of course you're going to get better FPS than us. :P
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]Even that looks better than Console games. And the physics are top notch. I didn't find the game enjoyable however.Polaris_choice

MGS4 and RE5 smoke that picture of Crysis sorry but you need to play more console games.

Comon, admit Crysis looks better... saying otherwise is denying or being a fanboy.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts
[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

I have a 8800GTX OC'ed with Qx6700@ 3.3GHZ... with 2gigs of 800MHZ@4-4-4-12. I play high 1680x1050 @+30fps... ill do a test wait up.

Edit:

I did the insane benchmark test tool and it gave me average of 32fps.

Stevo_the_gamer

Granted you do realize that your setup is better than ours, correct? Overclocked 8800 GTX and a better overclocked processor. So of course you're going to get better FPS than us. :P

Your GTS is a bit weaker, but should be able to reach higher clock speed to make up for it. But it's true that the GTX was made for higher resolution gaming in mind with it specs.

But if your CPU is clocked at the same speed as mine, it will go just as fast.

Avatar image for Kez1984
Kez1984

4548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#182 Kez1984
Member since 2007 • 4548 Posts

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]Even that looks better than Console games. And the physics are top notch. I didn't find the game enjoyable however.Polaris_choice

MGS4 and RE5 smoke that picture of Crysis sorry but you need to play more console games.

Uh-huh :roll:

Avatar image for Virus214
Virus214

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#183 Virus214
Member since 2007 • 2052 Posts
I don't like the 9800's, the 8800 pwn face of 9800
Avatar image for gianshomai
gianshomai

414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#184 gianshomai
Member since 2006 • 414 Posts

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]Even that looks better than Console games. And the physics are top notch. I didn't find the game enjoyable however.Polaris_choice

MGS4 and RE5 smoke that picture of Crysis sorry but you need to play more console games.

Sorry you need your eyes checked.

Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]Even that looks better than Console games. And the physics are top notch. I didn't find the game enjoyable however.Polaris_choice

MGS4 and RE5 smoke that picture of Crysis sorry but you need to play more console games.

You mean combing the graphics of RE5 and MGS4 beats that single picture of Crysis?

Then of course they would smoke it.

Avatar image for lyndonrebutoc
lyndonrebutoc

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 lyndonrebutoc
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
Well 2 9800 Video Cards can display textures and models in VERY HIGH , But not smoothly when u add the AA effects because the AA are like extras that polish the Graphics much more
Avatar image for lyndonrebutoc
lyndonrebutoc

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 lyndonrebutoc
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]Even that looks better than Console games. And the physics are top notch. I didn't find the game enjoyable however.Polaris_choice

MGS4 and RE5 smoke that picture of Crysis sorry but you need to play more console games.

Are u blind????? CRYSIS has the best graphics in any game today, The 360 and ps3 cant even handle crysis's full graphics

Avatar image for mavven
mavven

560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 50

User Lists: 0

#188 mavven
Member since 2005 • 560 Posts

one 8800GT.... most settings on high (some on medium) 1440x900. Looks good to me.

(dipped down to 21fps for 1 second before jumping back up here.)

Very playable. Mostly 30-40fps average. 25-30 with lots of action.

FamiBox

That's crazy, man!!

Avatar image for gianshomai
gianshomai

414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#189 gianshomai
Member since 2006 • 414 Posts
^Those screenies look very nice...because its so small.:P
Avatar image for gianshomai
gianshomai

414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#190 gianshomai
Member since 2006 • 414 Posts

Offcourse this

does not look the same as this.

Avatar image for Hot_Potato
Hot_Potato

3422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#191 Hot_Potato
Member since 2004 • 3422 Posts
[QUOTE="Meu2k7"]

That screenshot is ancient ...

Sorry but I can with a 8800 GTS .. with no AA 1680 x 1050, Very High Shaders/textures and it looks exactly like that ( bar some more distant jaggies ) at 25-30 FPS (Playable).

AnxietyDisorder

Dou you know that 2 9800GX2s struggle to play at that resolution?

My single 8800GTX plays Crysis at the same resolution, all high except AA.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

MGS4 and RE5 smoke that picture of Crysis sorry but you need to play more console games.

Polaris_choice

If so, then why can't MGS4 even be rendered at a native 1280x720@60fps? A slightly-more-than-decent PC system should be able to handle Crysis at this resolution with High detail without any trouble. Meanwhile, a serious gaming PC should max out Very High at 720p.

Avatar image for tubbyc
tubbyc

4004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#194 tubbyc
Member since 2005 • 4004 Posts

Crysis showed us that traditonal graphics rendering is useless for photorealistic graphics. Ray Tracing is the next step.Wasdie

I don't know about exactly what they'll come up with for the next big step in graphics, but I know what you mean. I don't find that Crysis looks that much better than the best looking console games. Certainly not the "way better than anything on consoles" some people like to claim. For example, even if you have textures set to very high, there are plenty of bland, blurry textures around if you get up close, especially with rocks and leaves. Polygons are often very visible on rocks too.

Avatar image for FamiBox
FamiBox

5481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#195 FamiBox
Member since 2007 • 5481 Posts

^Those screenies look very nice...because its so small.:Pgianshomai

1400x900 8800GT 39FPS Most settings high (except 3)

View image better HERE

Avatar image for Kez1984
Kez1984

4548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#196 Kez1984
Member since 2007 • 4548 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]Crysis showed us that traditonal graphics rendering is useless for photorealistic graphics. Ray Tracing is the next step.tubbyc

I don't know about exactly what they'll come up with for the next big step in graphics, but I know what you mean. I don't find that Crysis looks that much better than the best looking console games. Certainly not the "way better than anything on consoles" some people like to claim. For example, even if you have textures set to very high, there are plenty of bland, blurry textures around if you get up close, especially with rocks and leaves. Polygons are often very visible on rocks too.

:roll:

Avatar image for blackice1983
blackice1983

2021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 blackice1983
Member since 2006 • 2021 Posts

consolites talking down on crysis's graphics

Avatar image for Polaris_choice
Polaris_choice

2334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 Polaris_choice
Member since 2007 • 2334 Posts
[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]Even that looks better than Console games. And the physics are top notch. I didn't find the game enjoyable however.Kez1984

MGS4 and RE5 smoke that picture of Crysis sorry but you need to play more console games.

Uh-huh :roll:

Um go play the game on that settings and then go play MGS4 and then get back to me. Untill then just movealong.

Avatar image for Polaris_choice
Polaris_choice

2334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#199 Polaris_choice
Member since 2007 • 2334 Posts

But but Crysis is suppose look like this not the one you posted with fraps

AnxietyDisorder

What settings is that one? All the hermits were under the impression there DX9 cards would get close to running that lmao.

Avatar image for Polaris_choice
Polaris_choice

2334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 Polaris_choice
Member since 2007 • 2334 Posts
[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

MGS4 and RE5 smoke that picture of Crysis sorry but you need to play more console games.

HuusAsking

If so, then why can't MGS4 even be rendered at a native 1280x720@60fps? A slightly-more-than-decent PC system should be able to handle Crysis at this resolution with High detail without any trouble. Meanwhile, a serious gaming PC should max out Very High at 720p.

Um Actually MGS4 is running at true 720p and 60fps yes I have the game you dont. The information you are refering to is MGO online(it was downscaled to I belive 640p) which obviously does not look as good as the single player. You need to get your facts straight before you make more baseless assumptions.