[QUOTE="AntiType"]When nintendo makes a games based on their main franchises, lets bash them for rehashing, when they put them aside for new ones, lets assume they are not making any games!subrosian
Re-read the Joystiq article, they didn't say "Zelda" or such is two ~ three years away - they're saying games for the core gamer. We're going to certainly see more of this "Animal Crossing, aren't your core gamers happy?" stuff - but what we had with the GCN? No.
See, I was happy with the GCN launch - Pikmin was an awesome new game, and frankly quite challenging with the timer to get every piece in under the limit. Animal Crossing? Well in the US we didn't have Animal Forest - great job there. Partnering with Silicon Knights and delivering Eternal Darkness? An "M" rated game *published by Nintendo*, which was for core gamers and story driven? Really? I mean really?
The best version of Resident Evil 4 - and it was an innovative game for the series, not a port with Wiimote functionality tacked on? Metroid Prime? After all these years, a Metroid, and its hard as hell, and frankly fantastic?
The Gamecube had a library I was happy with - it was slim, but it delivered the quality in spades. The Wii... it delivers those games and they're watered down, no longer on the cutting-edge of audio-visual presentation, remakes, ports, or rehashes. The bulk of the "new" content is not for the core audience.
So - two to three years, let the waiting begin - real Nintendo fans (aka, clas sic Nintendo fans) have shared my beliefs on this for some time - but watching the new-age Wii fanboys try and defend a possible two year gap in strong library-leaders? They're not really coming from third parties - if a SEGA game is the best we're going to have in two years on the system, well, just, damn.
Maybe you need to re-read.. "We still have developers working on popular core gaming franchises..."
There is nothing in this article saying they are only focusing on casual games for the next 2 years as you imply.
Log in to comment