[QUOTE="Pariah-"]
If you had read my earlier responses you would know that is not the case. My issue is not with consumers who only want to play games, it is with the SW users who are using Sony's activity to argue for the platform in regard to the SW. There is nothing about the price cut and increase in high quality exclusives that a Sony fanboy should be proud of, if they are they are ignoring the business side.
[QUOTE="Pariah-"]
And, yet again, you shift accountability from the developers, who take on the project, to the company that publicly offers the medium it will be made on. With that kind of outlook, you probably resent Sony for every good game they put out there.AnnoyedDragon
A Cow shifting blame away from Sony's hardware decisions and towards developers? Using Sony funded 1st party developers with none of the time/budget constraints of 3rd party developers as a counter argument to PS3 development difficulty?
Who would have thought :roll:
Never mind all these games that you would use as examples of developers doing well on PS3 are Sony funded titles, you blame the developers for not going bankrupt in their attempt to push PS3...
The PS3's architectural ****is no different from any of the past console designs out there (sans Microsoft consoles). The only reason there's any sort of controversy about it now is because more and more PC devs are forced to work with consoles nowadays. The Xbox brand is far more similar to the PC, and so they show greater preference for the technology all the while condemning the PS3 design for being non-user friendly as if console design was supposed to be like the Xbox all along.Pariah-
Interesting that you would make that claim, considering long time console developers have been struggling with the PS3, popular ones with a long history with Playstation like Free Radical at that. But then a long time PC developer like Crytek make a high end console optimized engine that blows people away, one that looks and runs fine on PS3.
You would have to ignore every "console" developer that has criticised the PS3 to make that sort of claim.
It's exactly because I read your earlier responses that I can tell you're trying to conflate the quality of the game with your scrutiny of the business for the purpose of distracting from the game itself. The point here is that no one should have to "feel proud" of anything, and yet you project the implication that people are supposed to.
I blame the developers for biting off a project that's more than they can chew. Sony is not accountable for devs not being able to use the hardware efficiently. If you feel there's some kind of disparity in fairness, then that's on you. But no matter what financial reasons you feel like pushing to the forefront for devs being unable or unwilling to optimize the PS3's performance, none of those reasons will ever equate to an excuse.
It's funny, I don't recall Free Radical making any kind of complaint about the PS3 architecture. And with regard to PC devs, I'm referring moreso to Carmack and Newell. Their ilk has been the loudest in its criticism of the PS3's architecture.
Log in to comment