Uncharted 3 is Definitely Console Graphics King (Extreme 56k)

[QUOTE="tormentos"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Gears 3 is on a whole other level than U3 imo, clearly seen in the below pics, in U3 i can barely make out anything in the messy looking forest and jaggied look is just too apparent, it is not that Gears 3 does not have some jaggies too, but in U3 they are far more visible and somehow textures are affected too

loosingENDS

You actually call UC3 messy and that you can barely make out anything.?:o

That Gears screen look even wash out and colors are bland,look at how superior and strong the shadows are on that forest compare to Gears.

This U3 forest looks dated, i cant make out any of the vegetation due to jaggies, that is all

The Gears 3 pic looks way cleaner and more next gen to me

That is my opinion and wont change of course

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Only they are not rendered in real time, there is zero difference between rendering CGI in a workstation and rendering Uncharted 3 cut scenes in a PS3

Both are the exact same thing, rendering and not in real time

tormentos

Not on real time on the game,but when they were recorded they were real time on the game owns engine,that is the real difference between CGI and in game,the PS3 could never ever produce FF13 CGI in real time,Uncharted 3 cutscenes were done on the PS3 dev kits,they are not done on some fancy work station,which mean that what you saw there did ran on PS3 while it was recorded.

Rendering on a Work station is incredibly different to doing so on PS3,i mean light years away in difference only some one who doesn't know the difference between in engine and CGI would make a comment like that.

No, they were not real time when they were recorded of course, otherwise why record them and not just play them real time on PS3 ?

Plus they look 10000x better and cleaner than the actual game, which means they probably rendered them for weeks

If real time is a frame rendered per day then maybe you have a point

There is zero difference between an engine and CGI renderers, any renderer could be an engine if they could render in hardware fast enough

I know the "difference" very very well

[QUOTE="tormentos"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Gears 3 is on a whole other level than U3 imo, clearly seen in the below pics, in U3 i can barely make out anything in the messy looking forest and jaggied look is just too apparent, it is not that Gears 3 does not have some jaggies too, but in U3 they are far more visible and somehow textures are affected too

loosingENDS

You actually call UC3 messy and that you can barely make out anything.?:o

That Gears screen look even wash out and colors are bland,look at how superior and strong the shadows are on that forest compare to Gears.

This U3 forest looks dated, i cant make out any of the vegetation due to jaggies, that is all

The Gears 3 pic looks way cleaner and more next gen to me

That is my opinion and wont change of course

Ok now is clear what you are doing,mods should ban you for doing that,if you want to have argument with people is one thing,but to say that about games just to get a reaction from posters is sad,is impossible that you can't make out anything because of jaggies that only exist on your mind,when you have a valid point and want to actulaly devate graphics without makings things up i am here.

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"]

You actually call UC3 messy and that you can barely make out anything.?:o

That Gears screen look even wash out and colors are bland,look at how superior and strong the shadows are on that forest compare to Gears.

tormentos

This U3 forest looks dated, i cant make out any of the vegetation due to jaggies, that is all

The Gears 3 pic looks way cleaner and more next gen to me

That is my opinion and wont change of course

Ok now is clear what you are doing,mods should ban you for doing that,if you want to have argument with people is one thing,but to say that about games just to get a reaction from posters is sad,is impossible that you can't make out anything because of jaggies that only exist on your mind,when you have a valid point and want to actulaly devate graphics without makings things up i am here.

I see jaggies and a confusing image

I dont want "people to react", the TC said U3 is graphics king and i see all those jaggies and terrible image quality, so i will post about it

P.s.s And Gears 3 doesn't even have AA lmaoactionjunkie10

Indeed, it is strange how it looks so much sharper, cleaner and detailed than U3

I know the "difference" very very well

loosingENDS

You clearly don't. Just admit you were wrong and move on.

Indeed, it is strange how it looks so much sharper, cleaner and detailed than U3

loosingENDS

Maybe if you're a lemming it will. Might wanna take off those tinted goggles.

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

I know the "difference" very very well

ChubbyGuy40

You clearly don't. Just admit you were wrong and move on.

I was right, so why admit something that is 100% wrong ?

No, i will not admit anything

Uncharted 3 cut scenes are pre-rendered, that is all

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"]P.s.s And Gears 3 doesn't even have AA lmaoloosingENDS

Indeed, it is strange how it looks so much sharper, cleaner and detailed than U3

This topic is still going on? The answer is so obvious.

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"] Lol I actually agree with you. Rage wrecks Crysis 2 and Battlefield 3 looks better then both IMO. Crysis 2 doesn't even look better then Crysis 1. actionjunkie10

On the console side, I'm not sure either way. But on the PC side of things..... Since upgrading my video card and playing Crysis 2 with full DX11, I've jumped ship from Crysis 1/Warhead to the Crysis 2 camp as the better looking vanilla.

Anyway, between UC3 and Gears 3, I like UC3's looks better. Of course, my bias towards nice, ornate details played a bigger part on my choice. Same goes for UC2.

Rage on Xbox 360 looks better.KC_Hokie

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Rage on Xbox 360 looks better.actionjunkie10

I was right, so why admit something that is 100% wrong ?

No, i will not admit anything

Uncharted 3 cut scenes are pre-rendered, that is all

loosingENDS

-Can't admit he's wrong and doesn't know what he's talking about

-Trys to change subject.

And the Xbox 360 version runs at a higher resolution at 60 fps. So stop making up stuff.KC_Hokie

They both run at 720p and 60FPS. Both drop resolution when action gets to heretic. :|

Who's the one making stuff up? (Besides Saolin of course.)

Rage on Xbox 360 looks better.KC_Hokie

I dunno, Resistance fall of man gives it a run for its money.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"] And the Xbox 360 version runs at a higher resolution at 60 fps. So stop making up stuff.ChubbyGuy40

They both run at 720p and 60FPS. Both drop resolution when action gets to heretic. :|

Who's the one making stuff up? (Besides Saolin of course.)

No, Xbox 360 version can run up to 1080p. And even with dynamic scaling the Xbox 360 version runs at a higher resolution (1152×720 for 360 and 640×720 on PS3).

KC_Hokie

If you have a core 360 is pop in heaven.

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"] And the Xbox 360 version runs at a higher resolution at 60 fps. So stop making up stuff.KC_Hokie

They both run at 720p and 60FPS. Both drop resolution when action gets to heretic. :|

Who's the one making stuff up? (Besides Saolin of course.)

1. Scaling does absolutely nothing.

2. Both the 360 and Ps3 versions run as low as 640x720.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="actionjunkie10"] LOL And the thing is, the PS3 version of Rage is slightly superior to the 360 version. Really, lol on so many levels actionjunkie10

"...based on our experience, Rage on Xbox 360 manages to maintain the illusion of a full high definition presentation even when it is switching between various resolutions: there's just the odd shimmering visible in the aliasing every now and again but overall integrity of the effect is sound. The effect on PlayStation 3 seems to be much more frequent and the resolution drops are significantly more noticeable. "

"In terms of the consoles, the purchase recommendation is very straightforward: Rage is an easy win for the Xbox 360 - if you have the hard drive attached. The dynamic resolution scaling technology works more effectively on the Microsoft platform, and there are very few instances where you feel or even recognise that you're playing a sub-HD experience - unfortunately the same cannot be said for the PlayStation 3 where the visual sleight of hand is not quite so effective."

Quotes from Digital Foundary. Xbox 360 version IS superior.

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Rage on Xbox 360 looks better.KC_Hokie

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="actionjunkie10"] LOL And the thing is, the PS3 version of Rage is slightly superior to the 360 version. Really, lol on so many levels actionjunkie10

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Just giving my honest opinion. Rage on Xbox 360 is the best looking console game this generation. And I own both an Xbox 360 and PS3. And the Xbox 360 version runs at a higher resolution at 60 fps. So stop making up stuff.KC_Hokie

"...based on our experience, Rage on Xbox 360 manages to maintain the illusion of a full high definition presentation even when it is switching between various resolutions: there's just the odd shimmering visible in the aliasing every now and again but overall integrity of the effect is sound. The effect on PlayStation 3 seems to be much more frequent and the resolution drops are significantly more noticeable. "

"In terms of the consoles, the purchase recommendation is very straightforward: Rage is an easy win for the Xbox 360 - if you have the hard drive attached. The dynamic resolution scaling technology works more effectively on the Microsoft platform, and there are very few instances where you feel or even recognise that you're playing a sub-HD experience - unfortunately the same cannot be said for the PlayStation 3 where the visual sleight of hand is not quite so effective."

Quotes from Digital Foundary. Xbox 360 version IS superior.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"]lol we are not in 2007 anymore where multi plats were superior on the 360. Things have changed. Get with the times! You are stuck in the past. Now a days all multi plats are either 98% identical or slightly superior on the PS3 P.s And were you trying to say you own both console versions of Rage? Anyway, here are some quick facts that I will leave you with You need to insall the 360 version to get it up to the level of the PS3 version. And from what I remember the 360 version needs like 10 discs to be played. ( I'm obviously exaggerating and joking, but you should get the jest of it)actionjunkie10

"...based on our experience, Rage on Xbox 360 manages to maintain the illusion of a full high definition presentation even when it is switching between various resolutions: there's just the odd shimmering visible in the aliasing every now and again but overall integrity of the effect is sound. The effect on PlayStation 3 seems to be much more frequent and the resolution drops are significantly more noticeable. "

"In terms of the consoles, the purchase recommendation is very straightforward: Rage is an easy win for the Xbox 360 - if you have the hard drive attached. The dynamic resolution scaling technology works more effectively on the Microsoft platform, and there are very few instances where you feel or even recognise that you're playing a sub-HD experience - unfortunately the same cannot be said for the PlayStation 3 where the visual sleight of hand is not quite so effective."

Quotes from Digital Foundary. Xbox 360 version IS superior.

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Just giving my honest opinion. Rage on Xbox 360 is the best looking console game this generation. And I own both an Xbox 360 and PS3. And the Xbox 360 version runs at a higher resolution at 60 fps. So stop making up stuff.KC_Hokie

No, Xbox 360 version can run up to 1080p. And even with dynamic scaling the Xbox 360 version runs at a higher resolution (1152×720 for 360 and 640×720 on PS3).

KC_Hokie

It cannot run in 1080p. Don't know where you even got that from because it sure isn't in your DF article. Both consoles go at the lowest 640x720. Some scenes are lower on the PS3 than 360 and vice versa.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

No, Xbox 360 version can run up to 1080p. And even with dynamic scaling the Xbox 360 version runs at a higher resolution (1152×720 for 360 and 640×720 on PS3).

ChubbyGuy40

It cannot run in 1080p. Don't know where you even got that from because it sure isn't in your DF article. Both consoles go at the lowest 640x720. Some scenes are lower on the PS3 than 360 and vice versa.

The xbox 360 version runs at a higher resolution. Read the last 30 minutes worth of posts so I don't have to copy and paste. KC_Hokie

I did better. I read your article. Both are 60FPS and 1280x720 a majority of the time.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]The xbox 360 version runs at a higher resolution. Read the last 30 minutes worth of posts so I don't have to copy and paste. ChubbyGuy40

I did better. I read your article. Both are 720p and 60FPS a majority of the time.

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]"It seems to be running at 640x720 on PS3 while Xbox 360 is in the region of 896x720. In the bottom shot, we're again seeing 640x720 on the PlayStation 3, while 360 renders the same scene at 1152x720." -

"...based on our experience, Rage on Xbox 360 manages to maintain the illusion of a full high definition presentation even when it is switching between various resolutions: there's just the odd shimmering visible in the aliasing every now and again but overall integrity of the effect is sound. The effect on PlayStation 3 seems to be much more frequent and the resolution drops are significantly more noticeable. "

"In terms of the consoles, the purchase recommendation is very straightforward: Rage is an easy win for the Xbox 360 - if you have the hard drive attached. The dynamic resolution scaling technology works more effectively on the Microsoft platform, and there are very few instances where you feel or even recognise that you're playing a sub-HD experience - unfortunately the same cannot be said for the PlayStation 3 where the visual sleight of hand is not quite so effective."

Quotes from Digital Foundary. Xbox 360 version IS superior.

KC_Hokie

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="actionjunkie10"] So its superior because of some slight resolution increase in some instances over thr PS3 version lol If I showed you pics of Rage without labeling or telling you which one was which console version I bet you everything that you wouldn't be able to tell them apart Are you also forgetting that 360 users without a hard drive will get a TRUE SIGNIFICANTLY INFERIOR version to the PS3 version and that all 360 users need multiple discs? actionjunkie10

And Rage on Xbox 360 is a superior looking game. You're entitled your opinion and so am I.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]It's still the superior version even if it's not lightyears ahead. It's still the best looking console game I've played this generation. And, again, I own both an Xbox 360 and PS3. ChubbyGuy40

And Rage on Xbox 360 is a superior looking game. You're entitled your opinion and so am I.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]The xbox 360 version runs at a higher resolution. Read the last 30 minutes worth of posts so I don't have to copy and paste. ChubbyGuy40

I did better. I read your article. Both are 60FPS and 1280x720 a majority of the time.

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]It's still the superior version even if it's not lightyears ahead. It's still the best looking console game I've played this generation. And, again, I own both an Xbox 360 and PS3. KC_Hokie

And Rage on Xbox 360 is a superior looking game. You're entitled your opinion and so am I.

[QUOTE="Blazerdt47"]

[QUOTE="o0HAPPY0o"] You must be confusing your own fantasies with reality or just plain trolling because DF did not say that.

o0HAPPY0o

Quote from Digital Foundry: "a game that somehow manages to eclipse the technical brilliance of its predecessor, offering up a range of graphical effects and physics work that is quite unlike anything else we've seen on the current generation platforms."

ol...no! Read my last five or six posts. Digital Foundry said the Xbox 360 version is superior and runs at higher resolutions even when they drop down lower resolutions as needed.KC_Hokie

I read the article. The one where you're getting all of your information from. Their words, not mine. Maybe you need to read it over again.

That's why you install it, Einstein. I don't know anyone with an Xbox 360 without a harddrive these days.

And Rage on Xbox 360 is a superior looking game. You're entitled your opinion and so am I.

KC_Hokie

Considering the core 360 is a good seller i would say a ton of 360 owners do have 360 without HDD.

Can't we just agree that UC3, Gears 3, KZ3, GoW3, Halo Reach, Crysis 2 and Rage all look great?

They all look great. :)

They all look great. :)

Peredith

Yep, but its system wars, and you have to remember that fanboys are devoid of logic.

Just finished an all night UC3 playthrough, its a good game, I like the 2nd way better, in fact that scene in the Uncharted 2 when the helicopter blows away that room and everything in the room is flying everywere, so much going on on screen at that one time, that is one of the best moments I've had in gaming. I felt Uncharted 3 had none of those moments. It looked better but I found they sacrificed something, it just wasnt as much fun.

[QUOTE="Peredith"]They all look great. :)

clone01

Yep, but its system wars, and you have to remember that fanboys are devoid of logic.

[QUOTE="Peredith"]They all look great. :)

clone01

Yep, but its system wars, and you have to remember that fanboys are devoid of logic.