Anything involving fanboys, but usually graphics or sales arguments.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I hate when people make statements and follow it with "IMO". Ex. "Infamous sux!!! Prototype iz wayyy better, IMO". Everybody knows it's your opinion. All this board is is everybody going with or against each others opinions. There is no need to point it out with every statement you make
But I also hate the Infamous vs. Prototype argument. The games are not even that similar
Whenever ppl selectively choose certain "facts" or sources, only when it's convenient.
IE: -Only GS matters!/Teh GR and MC are the real world D:
-Sales don't matter! -runs to make sales thread to brag as soon as their system/game sells well-
I hate when people make statements and follow it with "IMO". Ex. "Infamous sux!!! Prototype iz wayyy better, IMO". Everybody knows it's your opinion. All this board is is everybody going with or against each others opinions. There is no need to point it out with every statement you make
But I also hate the Infamous vs. Prototype argument. The games are not even that similar
if you dont put IMO at the end of your post all the people with no common sense (the majority of the people here) will flame you[QUOTE="mitu123"]LOL Haze > Crysis, Uncharted > Crysis, Killzone 2 > Crysis, MGS4 > Crysis, etc. Wow, I missed Haze, LOL. You need to add Heavy Rain, 2 cows mentioned made threads about it and 1 got banned too.Anything Forza v.s. GT related.
Insert console game(mainly PS3) looks better than Crysis.
SilverChimera
And one said GT5.:lol:
[QUOTE="BPoole96"]if you dont put IMO at the end of your post all the people with no common sense (the majority of the people here) will flame youI hate when people make statements and follow it with "IMO". Ex. "Infamous sux!!! Prototype iz wayyy better, IMO". Everybody knows it's your opinion. All this board is is everybody going with or against each others opinions. There is no need to point it out with every statement you make
But I also hate the Infamous vs. Prototype argument. The games are not even that similar
toast_burner
lol thats true. I must have forget sometimes where I'm posting. System Wars- Leave your logic at the front door
"*insert PS3 game here* has better graphics than Crysis" "By today's standards, *1-2 year old game* sucks and would have scored lower!!!" "Teh Cell is the beast!!!!11!!!!" "PSN is better than XBL cause it's free"93soccer
Interesting points, specially the ones below your gamercard.
why do pc gamers complain about no dedicated servers... their just spoiled and should shut the f up! i mean 360/ps3has an inferior matchmaking system since forever so why should we expect more? i mena even if they have had a better online experience and community that cannot be found in live or psn b/c of lack ofdedicated servers or mod support, why would the sudden change anger them? my 360/ps3 is not as good as your $500000000000 computer so we'll just accept shortcomings in games or lack of features b/c well its only a console. i dont see why pc gamers are mad at having to pay for dlc i mena i paid $60 bucks for a game i dont see why i cant pay $10 more for a couple of junk maps or a new costume. i dont realize dlc is something they should have already put into the game in the first place and it is only a way of milking me out of my parents money which i am so ready to spend.
that right there makes me so angry at how stupid people are
"If was in the 360/PS3 it would get an 8.0"
The reason why I hate this argument is because it usually has to do with graphics. What people who use this argument fail to see though is that if Super Mario Galaxy (or other great game) was released/developed for those systems its graphics would be better so the score would most likely be kept the same. That argument is yet another one that needs to be filed in the "System Wars Logic" category.
Pierst179
not only that, there are huge technical differences b/w wii games and 360/ps3 games. physics and graphics are huge parts. look at the amount of things that are in the game, most of the time wii games have 1/2 the content you see in 360/ps3 games. the wiishould not have that problem b/c its on a cdsame asthe 360 games, so wii devs are not putting as much content as they can and should.multiplayer is nonexistant in wii games and while isnt the determining factor of course it does contribute greatly. a lot of wii games are only noted for motion conrtol gimmicks, take that away and they are nothing new or special at all. look at the overall polish of wii games, they look worse than a lot of ps2/xbox games and play worse.
the only exception to this is the 1st party nitendo games (excluding the multitude of mario shovelware)
More people playing x game online means its better. Because clearly we're always simultaneously playing with 10000+ people at the same time. ;)
When people say the DS and Wii only have kiddy games
When people say the DS and Wii have no good games, but when you list them they find some way to disregard them for not being HD, or not having online, or something stupid.
When people think any games graphics are compareable to Crysis.
Any argument which involves people thinking a certain game is better because the graphics are better.
The "standards" argument, but mainly because 99% of the time it's a fanboy using this argument, and they have no idea what they're talking about.
1. Graphics are the most important thing in gaming.
2. Online is all that matters.
3. Reviews are Gods final word on the quality of a game.
4. Sales mean nothing.
5. Only hyped blockbuster mainstream games are worth talking about.
6. You have to play all the hyped games on day one to be "cool".
7. Internet trends are great so I'll mindlessly follow them.
8. Calling anything gimmicks that you don't like or agree with.
9. "I'm a better gamer because I play this genre and you play that genre".
10. Mature = 'hardcore'.
"thats just opinion" is an intellectual black hole. there is no point in posting this as an 'argument', because youre not making one. youre making a nega-argument, actually adding to the other standpoint by showing youre incapable of coming up with a coherent counterpoint. its also a spam post, since it has no substance of any kind--its kind of like spamming your signature or something.
Here are some good ones...
5. (Wii fanboys) "Look at these ten exclusives that PS3/360 owners would die for"
4. (360 fanboys) "Since we have four exclusives coming out for the 360, the PS3 will not be as good next year"
3. (all fanboys) "console sales determine the best console"
2. (360 fanboys) "back in 2007..."
1. (PC fanboys) Crysis vs Uncharted 2 comparisions
You'd think you'd at least put SOME sort of token PS3 representation in there, just to not come off as a massive fanboy. But then you didn't, and unbiased opinion took another beating.... I didnt come here to be "politically" correct, I came here to give my top 5. Political correctness is not the same as being unbiased, and neither has anything to do with rabid fanboyism.How about comparing graphics of exclusives when there is no basis for comparison?Comparing graphics between multiplats when there are minimal differences.
Zerocrossings
"If **insert best-looking exclusive console game here** were done on **insert other console here**, it would've looked even better!"
[QUOTE="Zerocrossings"]How about comparing graphics of exclusives when there is no basis for comparison?Comparing graphics between multiplats when there are minimal differences.
dsmccracken
For example?
Tope Five
5. When Nintendo Fans (or Ps2 fans last gereration)defend the console with Sales Figures (no one should ever defend with sales becuase you cannot play sales.
4. When 360 fans claim that the 360 has equal graphics as the Ps3 (ok whatever)
3. When Ps3 Fans Try to act as if they do not think that Sony completely messed up this generation in a million ways (Psp Go and a 600$ ps3 anyone? anyone? no i did not think so either.)
2. Games with guns are "Hardcore" (honestly having been there for the release of Zelda part one on NES waiting outside in the rain in a elf suit is "Hardcore" Having a gun? Not so much.
1. And the Worse argument ever on SW that is used a million times a day..... "Teh Wii is kiddy!"O boy. Less gun obssessed = kiddy real mature.
How about comparing graphics of exclusives when there is no basis for comparison?[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="Zerocrossings"]
Comparing graphics between multiplats when there are minimal differences.
Zerocrossings
For example?
I think he means comparing Uncharted 2 to Xbox 360 games. We don't know if it can be done on the 360, because it was never done.
"Games on PC and 360 are still 360 exclusives because you can't play them on PS3" :lol:
Doolz2024
We've seen a lot of that lately.
[QUOTE="Zerocrossings"]
[QUOTE="dsmccracken"] How about comparing graphics of exclusives when there is no basis for comparison?RickLemieux
For example?
I think he means comparing Uncharted 2 to Xbox 360 games. We don't know if it can be done on the 360, because it was never done.
Competing for console graphics king, though annoying, is a fair basis for comparison imo.
"Games on PC and 360 are still 360 exclusives because you can't play them on PS3" :lol:
Doolz2024
When people post things like this and put a laughing face. That is annoying to me....I don't understand what's so funny! Most of the time, 360 fans will post a list of games coming out and PS3 fans come out in droves saying "not exclusive! LOL" even when that wasn't the point of the thread.
[QUOTE="RickLemieux"]
[QUOTE="Zerocrossings"]
For example?
Zerocrossings
I think he means comparing Uncharted 2 to Xbox 360 games. We don't know if it can be done on the 360, because it was never done.
Competing for console graphics king, though annoying, is a fair basis for comparison imo.
I agree, but how do we really know what would have happened if "fill in the game" was released for the other system.
[QUOTE="Zerocrossings"]
[QUOTE="RickLemieux"]
I think he means comparing Uncharted 2 to Xbox 360 games. We don't know if it can be done on the 360, because it was never done.
RickLemieux
Competing for console graphics king, though annoying, is a fair basis for comparison imo.
I agree, but how do we really know what would have happened if "fill in the game" was released for the other system.
Well yeah i agree that that arguement is retarded. What im talking about is when they are comparing Uncharted 2 graphicsto Gears 2, which is fine imo.
Comparing everything to halo sales or unique users online.Jerell_rast
Yeah, Lemmings fall back on Halo players anytime they get nervous or flustered.
Of course Cows have their own worn down, fallback slam, that looks just as desperate every time it gets pulled out, and I'm surprised I haven't seen it listed (unless I missed it). Thats "RROD! RROD! 54% (or whatever hypothetical blogged up number)!!!! OMGWTBBQSAUZ!!!!!"
"Halo is best game ever made... it sold millions so it must be the greatest... killzone2 didn't sell 9million games so it must suck." something like annoys me.. halo is not great to me. "xblive is better than psn" Midnightshade29
That never happens. Where are you seeing this?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment