What is it about Half Life 2 that i just ''don't get''

  • 157 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#51 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

TC, you are a few years late. While i still find the game enjoyable and good looking, it´s obviously a bit dated. In 2005 it was a masterpiece.

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#52 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

to be honest i think its a pretty average game :( at the time i prefered Far cry aswell.I like valve's games but to be honest im not that much of a fan of half life :/

Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts
I don't get all the "greatest game of all time" talk, but it's a great game. No other game is like it, really, and the only shooters off the top of my head that are better are Half Life, Far Cry, Crysis, and Halo CE.
Avatar image for ZombieKiller7
ZombieKiller7

6463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 ZombieKiller7
Member since 2011 • 6463 Posts

The game felt huge and epic.

As you're running thru the world, going thru so many different environments, it feels like the game goes on forever.

The puzzles.

You know how every FPS these days is just "shoot faster, shoot longer, shoot more."

HL2 rewards you for playing smarter, for figuring out puzzles, you don't have to go mano-a-mano against everything, you can be smart and use the environment against itself.

Intelligence beats aim.

I like the populist theme. Most games have you as "soldier" or "special forces" working for some big government and given "mission objectives."

I prefer to be guerilla, freedom fighter, scientist, man of the people.

The controls.

They feel fast and agile, I don't like syruppy shooters where it takes you two hours to go down a corridor.

Overall Orange Box just felt "good."

I felt like it was old school, classic hardcore gaming, with more focus on the gameplay and story than the graphics.

More popular games, they are like "ooooh look at the visuals" and the gameplay and story is garbage.

In this the gameplay and story is perfect, the graphics are mediocre.

Ravenholm was one of the coolest experiences ever in gaming.

Avatar image for brickdoctor
brickdoctor

9746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 156

User Lists: 0

#55 brickdoctor
Member since 2008 • 9746 Posts

Not everybody can like the same game. It's different than most shooters out there and the way the game is may not appeal to everyone. Personally, I love it, but that's just me.

Avatar image for el3m2tigre
el3m2tigre

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 el3m2tigre
Member since 2007 • 4232 Posts

The game was way ahead of it's time.

Avatar image for dontshackzmii
dontshackzmii

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#57 dontshackzmii
Member since 2009 • 6026 Posts

ywan life 2

Avatar image for Lethalhazard
Lethalhazard

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#58 Lethalhazard
Member since 2009 • 5451 Posts
It was AMAZING for its time because of the physics and graphics. Now going back and playing it, I don't feel it has aged all that well. The combat isn't exactly exciting or dynamic. Still a good game though, just not amazing.
Avatar image for TruestGamer
TruestGamer

294

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 TruestGamer
Member since 2008 • 294 Posts

The game was way ahead of it's time.

el3m2tigre

In a lot of areas definitely. It's kind of hard to look back at it as it were when it came out but it looked amazing and could run on anything. The physics, sound and atmosphere, AI and voice acting were all top notch, but now as more FPS's have emerged it definitely shows its weaknesses (half life 1 holds up so much better, by far the better game). Enemies are straight up bullet sponges that only flinch when they get hit, which is very annoying, also while some of the guns had excellent sound the impact/feeling of them was just a bit off, they just never felt as powerful as they sounded i suppose. Another thing, the driving elements are awful and need to go away. To get from one point to another doesnt have to require vehicles but something more creative (Half life 1 did it), and as a result would probably make the game a big longer.

Half-Life 1 did so much right, I could never understand how they made a facility so much more interesting to explore than an entire city. Not to knock on Half-Life 2's design because it's athestically better than Half-Life 1's but ultimately i feel like they made such a better use of their environment... (Minus a few awesome places like Ravenholm). I also felt like the marines were FAR more menacing as a threat, you weren't elite or some super soldier, but a scientist stuck in the middle just trying to survive.

Avatar image for TailBlood
TailBlood

944

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 TailBlood
Member since 2011 • 944 Posts

So you didn't get it... move along. There are hundreds of games out there, why single out half-life 2? Wait... because it's overated? :o

Avatar image for NerubianWeaver
NerubianWeaver

2046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 NerubianWeaver
Member since 2010 • 2046 Posts
Half-Life 2 is overrated. I mean gunplay is terrible, going to one place is dull, difficult at some point, and driving using the vehicle thing is just pure pathetic to me. Those people that praise it so much probably played it at its release so there's no game that could match it but it's pretty terrible for me.
Avatar image for cain006
cain006

8625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#62 cain006
Member since 2008 • 8625 Posts

Because other than its storytelling, it's nothing but an average or below average game. What's sad is the ai is actually worse than Half Life's...

Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#63 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

Those people that praise it so much probably played it at its release so there's no game that could match it but it's pretty terrible for me. NerubianWeaver

I played it just a couple of years ago in the Orange Box, i think is one of the best FPS games ever created.

Anyway, its hard for me to explain why i think is really good, first of all, i'm not a FPS fan at all, but with HLF2, despite the genre, i found myself very inmersed in this apocalyptic world, the lack of music, the lack of cut scenes, the paced of the game, the enemies, the atmosphere, everything just felt rigth, and i actually enjoyed the driving sequences, while the boat section was way too long for its own good and it got boring towards the end, i don't think it was that bad, and Ravenholme was just Godly, like i said, the atmosphere was just really good.

It might be the fact that i don't play that many FPS, however, i just don't seem to find any other FPS like Half Life 2, sure it has its flaws, but i still think is quite enjoyable, anyway, i would love to hear what games do you guys think are as good, or better than Half Life 2.

Avatar image for DarthBilf
DarthBilf

1357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 DarthBilf
Member since 2004 • 1357 Posts
I thought it was overrated as well. I got it along with Episodes 1 and 2 in the Orange Box, and the game was just ok. Not bad my any means, but it paled in comparison to Portal and TF2.
Avatar image for TrapJak
TrapJak

2933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 TrapJak
Member since 2011 • 2933 Posts

Damn, opinions are a ***** , huh?

Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts

Actually there seem to be quite a few NPCs, isolation isn't a big part of Half Life 2, in the episodes you spend nearly the entire game with Alyx. Are you sure you played the right game?

Avatar image for dom2000
dom2000

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 dom2000
Member since 2004 • 505 Posts

The game felt huge and epic.

As you're running thru the world, going thru so many different environments, it feels like the game goes on forever.

The puzzles.

You know how every FPS these days is just "shoot faster, shoot longer, shoot more."

HL2 rewards you for playing smarter, for figuring out puzzles, you don't have to go mano-a-mano against everything, you can be smart and use the environment against itself.

Intelligence beats aim.

I like the populist theme. Most games have you as "soldier" or "special forces" working for some big government and given "mission objectives."

I prefer to be guerilla, freedom fighter, scientist, man of the people.

The controls.

They feel fast and agile, I don't like syruppy shooters where it takes you two hours to go down a corridor.

Overall Orange Box just felt "good."

I felt like it was old school, classic hardcore gaming, with more focus on the gameplay and story than the graphics.

More popular games, they are like "ooooh look at the visuals" and the gameplay and story is garbage.

In this the gameplay and story is perfect, the graphics are mediocre.

Ravenholm was one of the coolest experiences ever in gaming.

ZombieKiller7
Great post, its fast paced intelligent gameplay is what makes it so fun. Not then "stand up shoot.....hide till health regenerates...rinse and repeat for 6 hours.... game over" thats heavily prevalent in todays games.
Avatar image for fadersdream
fadersdream

3154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#68 fadersdream
Member since 2006 • 3154 Posts

Before anyone comes in here trying to flame, i'm actually trying to have a civil discussion. I'm not saying the game is bad, obviously, it's not. I just didn't like/enjoy it...and i kinda hate myself(not really) because i REALLY wanted to!

I just disliked everything about it...but the sense of isolation/being alone really took a lot of the fun out of it for me. No real NPC's..no real characters...you just go from one side of the level to the next killing things. The mechanics of the game are great, no doubt....but it just didn't feel real? Blah. Hard to explain.

So far those of you who loved the game, what is it about the game you enjoyed?

cyclops10
It would be bomb if released today. Don't feel bad. Unless you got into it a long time ago the problems in it are hard to ignore. It has Zealots, and they are very vocal, but the game itself set the standards that we've gotten used to so it ends up seeming barren and sterile.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

[QUOTE="dommeus"]

The atmosphere and the pacing was what completed the experience for me. I think whenever there were parts I didn't like (some of the weapons having no ummph. the shoddy combine soldier AI, the finicky car sections, the cliffhanger ending etc), the overall atmosphere of the whole game kept me undeniably hooked, and the pacing for me was nigh on perfect.

They nailed the setting so well, and every element of the game, from music to sound effects to locations... hard to explain really. It is still to this day the best game I have ever played.

-Renegade

I am going to take a wild guess then and say you haven't played that many games. Half Life 2 had to be the most boring game I have ever finished.

So, because your opinion differs from his, he is wrong?
Avatar image for dom2000
dom2000

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 dom2000
Member since 2004 • 505 Posts
[QUOTE="-Renegade"]

[QUOTE="dommeus"]

The atmosphere and the pacing was what completed the experience for me. I think whenever there were parts I didn't like (some of the weapons having no ummph. the shoddy combine soldier AI, the finicky car sections, the cliffhanger ending etc), the overall atmosphere of the whole game kept me undeniably hooked, and the pacing for me was nigh on perfect.

They nailed the setting so well, and every element of the game, from music to sound effects to locations... hard to explain really. It is still to this day the best game I have ever played.

clone01

I am going to take a wild guess then and say you haven't played that many games. Half Life 2 had to be the most boring game I have ever finished.

So, because your opinion differs from his, he is wrong?

I have played basically every 6.0+ fps since i dunno 1998 or before and i think half life 2 is one of the very best if not the best.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Some people just don't like things, that's the very nature of subjectivity. I can tell you now HL2 is an extremely well crafted game, but that doesn't mean everyone is going to like it despite the barrier of entry not being tough. Anyway I found the world building to be superb, as with the sense of isolation; despite being in a city and its outskirts it felt like Half Life, and the NPCs are genuinely believable due to their a.i. routines and presentation.
Avatar image for Vari3ty
Vari3ty

11111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Vari3ty
Member since 2009 • 11111 Posts

So you didn't get it... move along. There are hundreds of games out there, why single out half-life 2? Wait... because it's overated? :o

TailBlood

Because SW treats HL2 as the pinnacle of FPS gaming.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#73 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15874 Posts

Before anyone comes in here trying to flame, i'm actually trying to have a civil discussion. I'm not saying the game is bad, obviously, it's not. I just didn't like/enjoy it...and i kinda hate myself(not really) because i REALLY wanted to!

I just disliked everything about it...but the sense of isolation/being alone really took a lot of the fun out of it for me. No real NPC's..no real characters...you just go from one side of the level to the next killing things. The mechanics of the game are great, no doubt....but it just didn't feel real? Blah. Hard to explain.

So far those of you who loved the game, what is it about the game you enjoyed?

cyclops10

Are you sure you played half-life 2?

Avatar image for deactivated-6079d224de716
deactivated-6079d224de716

2567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 deactivated-6079d224de716
Member since 2009 • 2567 Posts

It was amazing in 2004. Just didn't age that well. The first Half-Life aged better.

Avatar image for TH1Sx1SxSPARTA
TH1Sx1SxSPARTA

1852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 TH1Sx1SxSPARTA
Member since 2011 • 1852 Posts
prob cuz your playing it in 2011. for 2004 it was pretty groundbreaking, the graphics, the immersion, the story telling. of course by todays standards its sort of average. but its still a great game even today
Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#76 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

prob cuz your playing it in 2011. for 2004 it was pretty groundbreaking, the graphics, the immersion, the story telling. of course by todays standards its sort of average. but its still a great game even todayTH1Sx1SxSPARTA

What other FPS surpass it in terms of immersion and story telling? i would really love to know since i played it in 2008 and i thought it was fantastic.

Avatar image for deactivated-61cc564148ef4
deactivated-61cc564148ef4

10909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 deactivated-61cc564148ef4
Member since 2007 • 10909 Posts

Well here's my two cents

Loved the characters voice acting Pace Weapons Protagonist Enemies and The fact that there were no cutscenes, everything that happened you saw.

Hated the A.I though.

ABCarmine

Yeah the AI was dumb as hell, and not fun too fight

Avatar image for TH1Sx1SxSPARTA
TH1Sx1SxSPARTA

1852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 TH1Sx1SxSPARTA
Member since 2011 • 1852 Posts

[QUOTE="TH1Sx1SxSPARTA"]prob cuz your playing it in 2011. for 2004 it was pretty groundbreaking, the graphics, the immersion, the story telling. of course by todays standards its sort of average. but its still a great game even todaymadsnakehhh

What other FPS surpass it in terms of immersion and story telling? i would really love to know since i played it in 2008 and i thought it was fantastic.

its storytelling would hold up today still. but there are much more immersive games nowadays
Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#79 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

Nothing. It's mediocre in pretty much every sense of the word.

Avatar image for commonfate
commonfate

13320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 commonfate
Member since 2010 • 13320 Posts

Nothing. It's mediocre in pretty much every sense of the word.

DarkLink77

There's the Lord of Hate we all know and despise :P

Avatar image for AcidSoldner
AcidSoldner

7051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 AcidSoldner
Member since 2007 • 7051 Posts

[QUOTE="TH1Sx1SxSPARTA"]prob cuz your playing it in 2011. for 2004 it was pretty groundbreaking, the graphics, the immersion, the story telling. of course by todays standards its sort of average. but its still a great game even todaymadsnakehhh

What other FPS surpass it in terms of immersion and story telling? i would really love to know since i played it in 2008 and i thought it was fantastic.

Bioshock. While I love Half-Life 2 to death, Bioshock trumped it in both immersion and story telling.

That being said, Half-Life 2 is still an amazing game to this day and one of the greatests shooters of all time. If you don't like it, then you probably just have bad taste. :P

Avatar image for -Renegade
-Renegade

8340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#82 -Renegade
Member since 2007 • 8340 Posts
The game is 7 years old... what were you expecting? If you were in 2004 you'd like the game like every single person who've tried it.silversix_
Metroid Prime came out in 2002 and is IMO a better game. Yes I just said a console FPS is better then one of the most praised PC shooters of all time. A good game is going to be a good game no matter how old it gets. I still til this day find Super Mario Bros. 3 fun. Half Life 2 had its moments but overall it was a borefest.
Avatar image for -Renegade
-Renegade

8340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#83 -Renegade
Member since 2007 • 8340 Posts
[QUOTE="-Renegade"]

[QUOTE="dommeus"]

The atmosphere and the pacing was what completed the experience for me. I think whenever there were parts I didn't like (some of the weapons having no ummph. the shoddy combine soldier AI, the finicky car sections, the cliffhanger ending etc), the overall atmosphere of the whole game kept me undeniably hooked, and the pacing for me was nigh on perfect.

They nailed the setting so well, and every element of the game, from music to sound effects to locations... hard to explain really. It is still to this day the best game I have ever played.

clone01

I am going to take a wild guess then and say you haven't played that many games. Half Life 2 had to be the most boring game I have ever finished.

So, because your opinion differs from his, he is wrong?

I bet if you took a poll most would agree with me.
Avatar image for cain006
cain006

8625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#86 cain006
Member since 2008 • 8625 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"]

Nothing. It's mediocre in pretty much every sense of the word.

commonfate

There's the Lord of Hate we all know and despise :P

But I agree with him... it's really not that great of a game. Horrible ai, "ok" weapons besides the gravity gun, and bad vehicle sections make it very unremarkable.

Avatar image for cyclops10
cyclops10

696

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 cyclops10
Member since 2004 • 696 Posts
A lot of people seemed to really enjoy the story...but..ok, explain to me what it WAS about the story that was so unique/amazing/groundbreaking? It felt pretty standard/basic/typical to me. As for the people saying if you played it when it first came out, like i said, not an issue, i play old games all the time and still love them. Classic Zelda/FF/Mario/Starcraft etc.
Avatar image for commonfate
commonfate

13320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 commonfate
Member since 2010 • 13320 Posts

[QUOTE="commonfate"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"]

Nothing. It's mediocre in pretty much every sense of the word.

cain006

There's the Lord of Hate we all know and despise :P

But I agree with him... it's really not that great of a game. Horrible ai, "ok" weapons besides the gravity gun, and bad vehicle sections make it very unremarkable.

It's a bit of a joke. I'm sure he understood very well :P

Avatar image for cain006
cain006

8625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#89 cain006
Member since 2008 • 8625 Posts

It's a bit of a joke. I'm sure he understood very well :P

commonfate

Ah, ok. I could definitely see him getting that title though, he says what he thinks about games whether bad or good.

Avatar image for flashn00b
flashn00b

3961

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#90 flashn00b
Member since 2006 • 3961 Posts

Personally, i like how the game is paced in the sense that you aren't sucking your thumb just because you got shot, although at times, things can be really annoying when you have to scrounge for medkits. Because of this, i usually avoid medkits when my health is above 70, allowing myself to backtrack to places where I know have medkits.

Additionally, one awesome thing I like is the GRAVITY GUN!

Avatar image for sleepingzzz
sleepingzzz

2263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#91 sleepingzzz
Member since 2006 • 2263 Posts

Before anyone comes in here trying to flame, i'm actually trying to have a civil discussion. I'm not saying the game is bad, obviously, it's not. I just didn't like/enjoy it...and i kinda hate myself(not really) because i REALLY wanted to!

I just disliked everything about it...but the sense of isolation/being alone really took a lot of the fun out of it for me. No real NPC's..no real characters...you just go from one side of the level to the next killing things. The mechanics of the game are great, no doubt....but it just didn't feel real? Blah. Hard to explain.

So far those of you who loved the game, what is it about the game you enjoyed?

cyclops10

I don't get it either. Thought the game sucked. I find it to be quite similar to games like Metro 2033 except Metro has much better graphics. Yet, people that hail HL2 as one of the best games ever think Metro 2033 is an average game. I don't know, I just don't see the difference. The driving parts were slow and boring. Way to easy to get stuck or flip over. The gun fights were crap. Puzzle and platforming parts just felt out of place and was slow and painful. Story was some what interesting but, you only got bits and pieces after spending hours going through some boring sewer. Main character felt like a robot. I could go on and on.

Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#92 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts

[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]I loved everything about it. It sounds like your were just expecting the game to be something that it's not.-Renegade

A great game maybe? Who would have thought that with all the praise it gets? :roll:

It is a great game. Nearly revolutionary, in fact.
Avatar image for GD1551
GD1551

9645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 GD1551
Member since 2011 • 9645 Posts

I loved the game but it's not without its flaws I felt the combat was lacking a bit, but the mystery of the whole thing made up for it.

Avatar image for GD1551
GD1551

9645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 GD1551
Member since 2011 • 9645 Posts

[QUOTE="silversix_"]The game is 7 years old... what were you expecting? If you were in 2004 you'd like the game like every single person who've tried it.-Renegade
Metroid Prime came out in 2002 and is IMO a better game. Yes I just said a console FPS is better then one of the most praised PC shooters of all time. A good game is going to be a good game no matter how old it gets. I still til this day find Super Mario Bros. 3 fun. Half Life 2 had its moments but overall it was a borefest.

Well it's pretty much a difference in taste I guess. I found metroid prime to be unbearably boring but I can see why the game was praised.

Avatar image for Coyful
Coyful

373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Coyful
Member since 2011 • 373 Posts

Some people just don't get Half Life.

This doesn't make them bad people.

This doesn't make them dumb people.

They just don't get it; something doesn't click.

It's a culmination of feelings, visuals, atmosphere and experience; If you don't get all of those, you won't get Half-Life.

If you go into HL2 thinking it's something it's not, you're not going to enjoy it. It's no one thing, like the cover system in R6:Vegas/Gears of War, or the story in an RPG, or the gunplay in Max Payne, or the fast paced/smooth multiplayer of CoD. It's an experience, more than anything--HL2 is a meta phenomenon.

Ohaidere
I love this post.
Avatar image for TheLordHimself
TheLordHimself

3316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#97 TheLordHimself
Member since 2005 • 3316 Posts

I didn't like Half Life 2 that much either, though it may have been in part due to everyone raving about it at the time saying that there's no point in anyone else making an FPS because nirvana had been reached. I never felt interested in the stroy, I HATED the vehicle sections, I thought the combat itself was pretty bad, I thought the ending was rubbish, (and yes, I know there's episode 1 and 2 NOW but those took ages to be released) and I never understood why people go on and on about Ravenholm being so scary or atmospheric, because I didn't think it was either. On the plus side, it had nice see-saws and moving lips.

I actually still prefer Half Life 1. The feeling of loneliness and wonder, and the fact that anyone you meet ends up dead no matter what was really powerful. Plus, I feel it had more standout moments.The falling lift, the huge tentacles trying to tear you up, the trip to Xen, the 'surface tension' chapter, plus I actually thought the ending was pretty cool.

Deus Ex is still better than both IMO. :)

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
i think its great. Great enemies (who aren't combine) Nice selection of weapons Pacing was great imo. personally i think the first half life is a much better game in every way.
Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts
There are plenty of things wrong with HL2, but it's still a better game than just about any other fps out there. It's easily one of the 10 best fps's of all time, and I think it would be hard for anybody (haters included) to objectively put together a list of 10 better fps's.
Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#100 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

[QUOTE="madsnakehhh"]

[QUOTE="TH1Sx1SxSPARTA"]prob cuz your playing it in 2011. for 2004 it was pretty groundbreaking, the graphics, the immersion, the story telling. of course by todays standards its sort of average. but its still a great game even todayAcidSoldner

What other FPS surpass it in terms of immersion and story telling? i would really love to know since i played it in 2008 and i thought it was fantastic.

Bioshock. While I love Half-Life 2 to death, Bioshock trumped it in both immersion and story telling.

That being said, Half-Life 2 is still an amazing game to this day and one of the greatests shooters of all time. If you don't like it, then you probably just have bad taste. :P

Agree, already played Bioshock, truly impressive game, and Infinite seems its going to be amazing, but personally, i think Half Life 2 was better, i'm agree that Bioshock has a much better story telling, but Half Life 2 has something that just make it so special to me, again Ravenholm was godly among other things, still, Bioshock is by no means a lesser game.