Every time there is a comparison between 360 and ps3 games, somebody always brings up, well its on pc so it doesnt count?
where is the logic in this?
In a comparison between the two this doesnt make sense.
If i were to go in to a shop to buy either a ps3 or a 360, i will notice that Gears of war, left 4 dead, mass effect are availible on the 360 and not the ps3.
If i had only a ps3 i would not be able to play these games, just as my 360 will not play Uncharted 2, and MGS4.
I spent about £600 this year upgrading my pc to play such games as crysis on max settings, and there is not one person i know who would spend that much on a PC to play a handful of games.
So these same people who claim to have teh massivez spes pc and a ps3, and spent a load of money upgrading thier pc to play these 360/ pc games, does it not make more sense to spend that money on a 360? especially when this year only two gameshave come out on the pc that are worth upgrading for, ( empire total war , arma 2 )
But then i do suspect most Sony fanboys say they have a high spec pc as damage control.
your thoughts
Log in to comment