Which Console maker is the Greediest?

  • 117 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Tony-Baxter
Tony-Baxter

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 Tony-Baxter
Member since 2003 • 6498 Posts
(Poll) I'd say MS since they're the only ones charging you to use your own Netflix account on their console.
Avatar image for fusionhunter
fusionhunter

2009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 fusionhunter
Member since 2008 • 2009 Posts

Micro$oft :P

Avatar image for cloudff7tm
cloudff7tm

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 cloudff7tm
Member since 2006 • 3975 Posts
Microsoft
Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

Hmmm I would say MS > Nintendo > Sony, but obviously they are all greedy in their own ways and rightfully so I guess :P.

Avatar image for Crimsader
Crimsader

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Crimsader
Member since 2008 • 11672 Posts
Micro$oft, hands down.
Avatar image for Tony-Baxter
Tony-Baxter

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 Tony-Baxter
Member since 2003 • 6498 Posts
I wonder if MS have ever worked the nerve up to be as greedy had it not been for that "$599" crap from Sony early on.
Avatar image for MFDOOM1983
MFDOOM1983

8465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 MFDOOM1983
Member since 2010 • 8465 Posts

Nintendo's overpriced hardware;)

Avatar image for noodlevixen
noodlevixen

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 noodlevixen
Member since 2010 • 480 Posts

Where's the all poll option? Gimped poll FTL

Avatar image for lazerface216
lazerface216

7564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 lazerface216
Member since 2008 • 7564 Posts

gee, i wonder what the TC was going for with this thread...:roll:

Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#10 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts

Nintendo easy

Nintendo DS

DS Lite

DSi

Avatar image for fadersdream
fadersdream

3154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#11 fadersdream
Member since 2006 • 3154 Posts

hey look, cow bait!

Avatar image for Diviniuz
Diviniuz

6460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#12 Diviniuz
Member since 2009 • 6460 Posts
MS because of the fact they shipped out 360 consoles early (to beat nintendo and sony) knowing that RROD was an issue
Avatar image for fusionhunter
fusionhunter

2009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 fusionhunter
Member since 2008 • 2009 Posts

MS because of the fact they shipped out 360 consoles early (to beat nintendo and sony) knowing that RROD was an issue Diviniuz
That also allowed for the PS3 to come out with something better and it's the same for the NGP.

Avatar image for TheMoreYouOwn
TheMoreYouOwn

3927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 TheMoreYouOwn
Member since 2010 • 3927 Posts

To quote Gordon Gekko,

"Greed is good."

Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

We all know what direction this thread will take.

Avatar image for NanoMan88
NanoMan88

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 NanoMan88
Member since 2006 • 1220 Posts

How about all of them because the bottom line is all they care about is your money

Avatar image for Tony-Baxter
Tony-Baxter

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 Tony-Baxter
Member since 2003 • 6498 Posts
MS because of the fact they shipped out 360 consoles early (to beat nintendo and sony) knowing that RROD was an issue Diviniuz
and ignored their own consumers until September 2007!!!
Avatar image for fadersdream
fadersdream

3154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 fadersdream
Member since 2006 • 3154 Posts

We all know what direction this thread will take.

madsnakehhh
"will" take? I think it started there. this is one of those threads that exists just so someone can get some kind of illusory moral validation. "I'm a better person because I don't like microsoft" well, thank god for you TC, thank god for you.
Avatar image for Tony-Baxter
Tony-Baxter

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 Tony-Baxter
Member since 2003 • 6498 Posts
[QUOTE="fadersdream"][QUOTE="madsnakehhh"]

We all know what direction this thread will take.

"will" take? I think it started there. this is one of those threads that exists just so someone can get some kind of illusory moral validation. "I'm a better person because I don't like microsoft" well, thank god for you TC, thank god for you.

Microsoft is just lovely Letting their consumers get RROD and paying them to fix it until Q4 2007! They take the cake and I guess it's all Me the topic creator's fault they did it.
Avatar image for Vinegar_Strokes
Vinegar_Strokes

3401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Vinegar_Strokes
Member since 2010 • 3401 Posts

To quote Gordon Gekko,

"Greed is good."

TheMoreYouOwn

he should be careful with those ciggs or he'll catch throat cancer

Avatar image for SaudiFury
SaudiFury

8709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

#22 SaudiFury
Member since 2007 • 8709 Posts

If i had to pick i'd say Microsoft.

but Nintendo and Sony both are pretty 'greedy' as well.

Nintendo's constant iterations on the DS.

Sony's getting rid of backward compatility but now swelling HD remakes and maybe even one day a PS2 digital library (that was rumored a while back).

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#23 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

They're all greedy, so what difference does deciding whos the most greedy? You personally don't benefit for sticking up for any of them or singling one out.

Avatar image for Tony-Baxter
Tony-Baxter

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#24 Tony-Baxter
Member since 2003 • 6498 Posts
These thing are all my (TC) FAULT! * Letting their consumers get RROD and paying them to fix it until Q4 2007! *charging you to use your own Netflix account on their console. *auto billing for renewal of xbl gold memberships. *charging for online (they could do what Sony does and charge extra for extra)
Avatar image for Kingpin0114
Kingpin0114

2607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Kingpin0114
Member since 2008 • 2607 Posts

You can make an argument for all of them.

Avatar image for CB4McGusto
CB4McGusto

2644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 CB4McGusto
Member since 2007 • 2644 Posts

M$ charges for online multiplayer

Sony charges for psn icons

Nintendo charges extra for a gamecube w/ a 4 button and d-pad direct tv remote

hmm............tough call, but I'm going to go with M$ and there charging for p2p which has been free for years before the first damn xbox released.

Avatar image for Tony-Baxter
Tony-Baxter

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 Tony-Baxter
Member since 2003 • 6498 Posts
]

They're all greedy, so what difference does deciding whos the most greedy? You personally don't benefit for sticking up for any of them or singling one out.

vashkey
I disagree because MS is so Epic with their greed that a boycot would help them and us and the entire industry. They need to get the memo that the PS3 is affordable now and we arent exactly STUCK with their product.
Avatar image for Tony-Baxter
Tony-Baxter

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#28 Tony-Baxter
Member since 2003 • 6498 Posts
[QUOTE="CB4McGusto"]

M$ charges for online multiplayer

Sony charges for psn icons

Nintendo charges extra for a gamecube w/ a 4 button and d-pad direct tv remote

hmm............tough call, but I'm going to go with M$ and there charging for p2p which has been free for years before the first damn xbox released.

They got the idea from Microwart!
Avatar image for fadersdream
fadersdream

3154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#29 fadersdream
Member since 2006 • 3154 Posts

You can make an argument for all of them.

Kingpin0114
yes, but you can't make them hear the "argument", and some people choose to only hear what they want to.
Avatar image for markinthedark
markinthedark

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 markinthedark
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts

The correct answer? They are all equally greedy....

because every publicly traded company has a fiduciary duty to their share holders, to be as greedy as humanly possible.

If these companies even give the illusion of doing something for the consumer, its because they think the consumer will be more likely to give them money as a result. MS/Sony/Nintendo dont care about you, just your wallet.

The proper question should be, which company is the worst at pretending they arent greedy?

In which case MS is probably the worst at pretending not to be greedy, while sony and nintendo are the best at fooling fanboys.

Avatar image for T-Aldous
T-Aldous

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 T-Aldous
Member since 2006 • 1244 Posts
[QUOTE="Tony-Baxter"]These thing are all my (TC) FAULT! * Letting their consumers get RROD and paying them to fix it until Q4 2007! *charging you to use your own Netflix account on their console. *auto billing for renewal of xbl gold memberships. *charging for online (they could do what Sony does and charge extra for extra)

Are you kidding me? Did you forget the pile of hardware junk known as the PS2. MS owned up to their mistake by upping the warranty and reinbursting all those who paid for repairs in the first 3 years. Did Sony do that for the PS2? On the topic on online fees. You think that Sony did for free out of the goodness of their hearts? They did it because they had to. No one would pay $600 for a console and still have to pay for online. Evidence of that is that now that they are doing better they suddenly introduced PSN plus in hopes of getting in on the action. Sony fans are so funny. That being said, they are all equally greedy.
Avatar image for hiphops_savior
hiphops_savior

8535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#32 hiphops_savior
Member since 2007 • 8535 Posts
They're running a business, greediness is sort of a requirement. In this case, MS takes the cake.
Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

Nintendo does overprice some of its products however M$ charges for Live so... M$...

Avatar image for Raymundo_Manuel
Raymundo_Manuel

4641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Raymundo_Manuel
Member since 2010 • 4641 Posts

Well, which one wants my money the most?

As far as I can tell it's Nintendo for having a console that appeals to me more than the PS3 and 360, so I guess they're the greediest.

Avatar image for babyeatermax
babyeatermax

272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 babyeatermax
Member since 2010 • 272 Posts
Sony and MS sold their hardware at a loss to bring us cutting edge technology. Nintendo has cut the Wii's price only once in 4 years. So Nintendo. It's definitely Nintendo.
Avatar image for BillyLee912
BillyLee912

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 BillyLee912
Member since 2011 • 123 Posts

[QUOTE="Tony-Baxter"]These thing are all my (TC) FAULT! * Letting their consumers get RROD and paying them to fix it until Q4 2007! *charging you to use your own Netflix account on their console. *auto billing for renewal of xbl gold memberships. *charging for online (they could do what Sony does and charge extra for extra)T-Aldous
Are you kidding me? Did you forget the pile of hardware junk known as the PS2. MS owned up to their mistake by upping the warranty and reinbursting all those who paid for repairs in the first 3 years. Did Sony do that for the PS2? On the topic on online fees. You think that Sony did for free out of the goodness of their hearts? They did it because they had to. No one would pay $600 for a console and still have to pay for online. Evidence of that is that now that they are doing better they suddenly introduced PSN plus in hopes of getting in on the action. Sony fans are so funny. That being said, they are all equally greedy.

Yea true all the companies can be greedy but Microsoft in my opinion can be just ridiculous. My brother went through 6 360s due to RROD and one time he had to tell the people at Microsoft that he was going to purchase a PS3 just to get them to ship him a new 360 they where not willing to do it until then and he was under the warranty. Charging for online play is just wrong to me and if Sony starts making gamers pay to play online I will not be online either. I hope Sony keeps their free online service going. I have played Xbox live and it is a good service probably a little better than the PSN, but for 60 dollars a year it should be.

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

(Poll) I'd say MS since they're the only ones charging you to use your own Netflix account on their console.Tony-Baxter

All three companies are just companies trying to make money, and all have done things that would be percieved as Greedy...

But I'm not going to chicken out, I will answer instead of trying to run away and avoid answering. I would say, probably M$. I've been with them the longest this generation, and they have some practices that really bother me as a consumer. So, M$ would be my guess as the greediest. Shutting down, downsizing, and selling off 1st party studios in lieu of buying timed exclusive DLC/games just really irks me. That means we consumers supporting them are actually getting less videogames as these new deals are done with games coming out anyways. Obviously, Xbox Live's price, the Live Price Hike, the Xbox Point system, and the way things are run like Netflix are all up there as well.

Nintendo though does have a couple of things that I wish they would fix :

1.) Drop the price only Once this generation for the Wii? Only $50? They can do better than that, ESPECIALLY considering the technology powering the Wii is very, very outdated, and was outdated since day one.

2.) Bring back the Greatest Hits, games that launched with the Wii nearly 5 years ago shouldn't be still $50 full price.

3.) Offer up some Discounts during the holidays for VC and Wiiware games like I see on XBLA and PSN and Steam. Only once all these years was there a small discount on Wii Virtual Console games only for Sega Games, and it wasn't Nintendo, it was Sega doing it.

Avatar image for markinthedark
markinthedark

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 markinthedark
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts

[QUOTE="T-Aldous"][QUOTE="Tony-Baxter"]These thing are all my (TC) FAULT! * Letting their consumers get RROD and paying them to fix it until Q4 2007! *charging you to use your own Netflix account on their console. *auto billing for renewal of xbl gold memberships. *charging for online (they could do what Sony does and charge extra for extra)BillyLee912

Are you kidding me? Did you forget the pile of hardware junk known as the PS2. MS owned up to their mistake by upping the warranty and reinbursting all those who paid for repairs in the first 3 years. Did Sony do that for the PS2? On the topic on online fees. You think that Sony did for free out of the goodness of their hearts? They did it because they had to. No one would pay $600 for a console and still have to pay for online. Evidence of that is that now that they are doing better they suddenly introduced PSN plus in hopes of getting in on the action. Sony fans are so funny. That being said, they are all equally greedy.

Yea true all the companies can be greedy but Microsoft in my opinion can be just ridiculous. My brother went through 6 360s due to RROD and one time he had to tell the people at Microsoft that he was going to purchase a PS3 just to get them to ship him a new 360 they where not willing to do it until then and he was under the warranty. Charging for online play is just wrong to me and if Sony starts making gamers pay to play online I will not be online either. I hope Sony keeps their free online service going. I have played Xbox live and it is a good service probably a little better than the PSN, but for 60 dollars a year it should be.

ahh yes, damn greedy companies repairing someone's console 5 times for free.

Avatar image for krunkfu2
krunkfu2

4218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 krunkfu2
Member since 2007 • 4218 Posts

Microsoft because of avatar gear.

Back in 2006 I thought it was bad enough that they charged for gamerpics and themes, but after the update that changed the dashboard themes got more expensive, the old ones became worhtless for the most part, and now to customize your avatr you have to pay.

I can't even put a wife beater on my avatar anymore:cry:

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

all of them? they are all greedy they all want your money any one that doesn't think so is just deluding themselves.

Avatar image for Demonjoe93
Demonjoe93

9869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 107

User Lists: 0

#42 Demonjoe93
Member since 2009 • 9869 Posts

Microsoft totally. They're the only one out of the three that actually make you pay for online service.

Avatar image for Blaze-Agent
Blaze-Agent

1951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 Blaze-Agent
Member since 2010 • 1951 Posts

all of them? they are all greedy they all want your money any one that doesn't think so is just deluding themselves.

WilliamRLBaker

the topic clearly said who is the GREEDIEST? The answer is microsoft. Plain and simple. Even though i voted for nintendo because of their overpriced Hardware. The GREEDIEST! is Microsoft

Avatar image for Vinegar_Strokes
Vinegar_Strokes

3401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Vinegar_Strokes
Member since 2010 • 3401 Posts

the PC is the greediest those this cost like £2000 or something like that.

Avatar image for markinthedark
markinthedark

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 markinthedark
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

all of them? they are all greedy they all want your money any one that doesn't think so is just deluding themselves.

Blaze-Agent

the topic clearly said who is the GREEDIEST? The answer is microsoft. Plain and simple. Even though i voted for nintendo because of their overpriced Hardware. The GREEDIEST! is Microsoft

No microsoft is just the worste at PR. They are all equally greedy, its just a matter of how good they are at convincing you otherwise.

Avatar image for turtlethetaffer
turtlethetaffer

18973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 0

#46 turtlethetaffer
Member since 2009 • 18973 Posts

I'd say MS, cus they charge for online.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#47 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
generic system wars thread #414 answer is microsoft btw
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

everyone is guilty.

nintendo makes two versions of the same game everytime a new pokeagame comes out and make minute improvements to the gameboy to spur sales.

ms cut costs on the 360 hardware and made crap and sony has done it all from installing rootkits on yourhardware to selling a $100 hardrive for the ps2 that worked with 2 games.

Avatar image for Grawse
Grawse

4342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 Grawse
Member since 2010 • 4342 Posts

Only MS makes me pay to play online, so them.

Avatar image for TheEpicGoat
TheEpicGoat

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 TheEpicGoat
Member since 2011 • 2006 Posts

Sony they are releasing exclusives left and right and know I'll spend $60 for them.