Who says CRYSIS aint possible on Consoles???

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Latina_Chick
Latina_Chick

391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Latina_Chick
Member since 2007 • 391 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Latina_Chick"][QUOTE="ZeroCrack1412"][QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]

[QUOTE="ZeroCrack1412"]i paid $1300 for E6320,2 gig ram,8800 GTS, 19'' LCD just to max out crysis.ZeroCrack1412

Mine cost more but its not for crysis.U need a quad core to max it out and is that the 320 mb version?

u dont need quad to max it out and yes it 320 MB.

But it wont play Crysis at 60 fps and atleast512 mb video ram is needed to max it out

Just out of curiosity, where are you getting all of these specs from? Are you just making it up, or do you actually have a link to where these specs were stated?

http://www.winbeta.org/comments.php?shownews=9745

Cevat Yerli stated that 8800 GTS can max it out.

Well they didnt say anything about the 320 Mb version. 2900hd is faster than the 8800GTs 320

Avatar image for ZeroCrack1412
ZeroCrack1412

202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 ZeroCrack1412
Member since 2007 • 202 Posts
[QUOTE="ZeroCrack1412"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Latina_Chick"][QUOTE="ZeroCrack1412"][QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]

[QUOTE="ZeroCrack1412"]i paid $1300 for E6320,2 gig ram,8800 GTS, 19'' LCD just to max out crysis.Latina_Chick

Mine cost more but its not for crysis.U need a quad core to max it out and is that the 320 mb version?

u dont need quad to max it out and yes it 320 MB.

But it wont play Crysis at 60 fps and atleast512 mb video ram is needed to max it out

Just out of curiosity, where are you getting all of these specs from? Are you just making it up, or do you actually have a link to where these specs were stated?

http://www.winbeta.org/comments.php?shownews=9745

Cevat Yerli stated that 8800 GTS can max it out.

Well they didnt say anything about the 320 Mb version. 2900hd is faster than the 8800GTs 320

like i said more ram=higher res.

Avatar image for Latina_Chick
Latina_Chick

391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Latina_Chick
Member since 2007 • 391 Posts
[QUOTE="Latina_Chick"][QUOTE="ZeroCrack1412"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Latina_Chick"][QUOTE="ZeroCrack1412"][QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]

[QUOTE="ZeroCrack1412"]i paid $1300 for E6320,2 gig ram,8800 GTS, 19'' LCD just to max out crysis.ZeroCrack1412

Mine cost more but its not for crysis.U need a quad core to max it out and is that the 320 mb version?

u dont need quad to max it out and yes it 320 MB.

But it wont play Crysis at 60 fps and atleast512 mb video ram is needed to max it out

Just out of curiosity, where are you getting all of these specs from? Are you just making it up, or do you actually have a link to where these specs were stated?

http://www.winbeta.org/comments.php?shownews=9745

Cevat Yerli stated that 8800 GTS can max it out.

Well they didnt say anything about the 320 Mb version. 2900hd is faster than the 8800GTs 320

like i said more ram=higher res.

MAX=2580X1024

Avatar image for Polaris_choice
Polaris_choice

2334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Polaris_choice
Member since 2007 • 2334 Posts

Even If this on xbox 360 or PS3, it cant be as good as the pc version. just a dumb down version like far cry. Why? cause console just cant handle crysis.ZeroCrack1412

Well then that sucks for hermits because if consoles cant handle Crysis then neither can any pc with a high end Dx9 card. I hope everyone has a 8800gtx. See doesnt that sound stupid? You know why? Because it is. Both the PS3 and 360 are fully capable of handling a very well done version of Crysis. Will it happen? Who knows but im not worried about it. The devs at Crytek have assembled a team for the PS3 to develope something so they obviously think theres something to the hardware are they wouldnt waste there time.

Avatar image for Polaris_choice
Polaris_choice

2334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Polaris_choice
Member since 2007 • 2334 Posts
[QUOTE="Latina_Chick"][QUOTE="ZeroCrack1412"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Latina_Chick"][QUOTE="ZeroCrack1412"][QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]

[QUOTE="ZeroCrack1412"]i paid $1300 for E6320,2 gig ram,8800 GTS, 19'' LCD just to max out crysis.ZeroCrack1412

Mine cost more but its not for crysis.U need a quad core to max it out and is that the 320 mb version?

u dont need quad to max it out and yes it 320 MB.

But it wont play Crysis at 60 fps and atleast512 mb video ram is needed to max it out

Just out of curiosity, where are you getting all of these specs from? Are you just making it up, or do you actually have a link to where these specs were stated?

http://www.winbeta.org/comments.php?shownews=9745

Cevat Yerli stated that 8800 GTS can max it out.

Well they didnt say anything about the 320 Mb version. 2900hd is faster than the 8800GTs 320

like i said more ram=higher res.

Well Cevat better get to optimizing it because right now it doesnt even run well on a 8800gtx as every preview has stated at E3.

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts

Well Cevat better get to optimizing it because right now it doesnt even run well on a 8800gtx as every preview has stated at E3.

Polaris_choice
It has been a while since E3, and the game is still a few months away. I am sure he is more than capable of doing so.
Avatar image for p3anut
p3anut

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 p3anut
Member since 2005 • 6636 Posts

This quote says it all

"We would just have to see how much of a sacrifice to the game we'd have to make. Or whether there would be a sacrifice at all, maybe we could find a way to make the game look exactly the same as it does on PC on the Xbox 360 and the PlayStation 3."

I highly doubt the 360 or ps3 could run Crysis the ways it's running on the pc. If it is ported it wont look as good as the pc, it will look good just not as good. Thats my 2 cents.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

I implore anyone to prove Crysis can run on consoles, with their woeful lack of memory.

256mb on the PS3, and 512mb shared on the 360. You wish.

WTF DID ANYONE SEE THE DATE: Matt Martin 16:14 06/10/2006

Avatar image for goldplus
goldplus

127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 goldplus
Member since 2006 • 127 Posts

Gay guys are hot!

Latina_Chick

Yes I know

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"]

I implore anyone to prove Crysis can run on consoles, with their woeful lack of memory.

256mb on the PS3, and 512mb shared on the 360. You wish.

Latina_Chick

U r a NOOB. Console memory and pc memory isnt the same. BIOSHOCK also needs 1 GB memory to run . SO!!!

:|

Orly.

:|

They are the same (though 360 uses shared not dedicated memory)

:|

A PC has a full operating system to run, and background programs dont you know

:|

Noob indeed!

Avatar image for ZeroCrack1412
ZeroCrack1412

202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 ZeroCrack1412
Member since 2007 • 202 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"]

I implore anyone to prove Crysis can run on consoles, with their woeful lack of memory.

256mb on the PS3, and 512mb shared on the 360. You wish.

Latina_Chick

U r a NOOB. Console memory and pc memory isnt the same. BIOSHOCK also needs 1 GB memory to run . SO!!!

LOL

Avatar image for coolviper2003
coolviper2003

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 coolviper2003
Member since 2003 • 1915 Posts

jeez would people shut up about dumbed down versions of Far Cry . You can call Instincts dumbed down if you want but it wasnt it was just different . It simply gave up wide open areas and exploring to more straight forward action based gameplay and powers, it was a totally different experience and the graphics were almost as good.

I expect something like this to happen with Crysis

Sonic_on_crack
It was dumbed down, they couldn't port over Far Cry so they just made a different game with the same name. And hell no, the graphics were not nearly as good.
Avatar image for michael098
michael098

3441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 michael098
Member since 2006 • 3441 Posts

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=20224


Hermits think PS3 and XBOX360 is like the Wii. Pc gamers have no idea what consoles can do.
My pc is capable of running Crysis on max though.

Latina_Chick

Consoles cant..... I think you don't know what pcs are capable of, if you think that crysis is the best a modern pc can do then your way off.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

[QUOTE="neveryoumind244"]The only thing about the game, that can't be done on consoles, is graphics. But they can easily dumb them down to work on any console. That's is the only thing. You can still get the same game. Personally, I think this game would rock on Xbox 360.farrell2k

Sigh.

Yepper. It would look a little less pretty, but would likely be just as fun.

No the graphics ARE NOT the problem. The 360s GPU can easily run Crysis.

Its the 360s lack of ram, iffy CPU and no hdd streaming that means Crysis CANNOT run on console in its current state.

Avatar image for michael098
michael098

3441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 michael098
Member since 2006 • 3441 Posts
you think people don't realise that animated movies are rendered in real-time on computers, good luck trying to get graphics like finding nemo on a console.
Avatar image for VACASCULIADAS
VACASCULIADAS

1001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 VACASCULIADAS
Member since 2007 • 1001 Posts
Enjoy ur gimped version with downgrade frames drawdistances and low-re textures.
Avatar image for coolviper2003
coolviper2003

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 coolviper2003
Member since 2003 • 1915 Posts
[QUOTE="farrell2k"]

[QUOTE="neveryoumind244"]The only thing about the game, that can't be done on consoles, is graphics. But they can easily dumb them down to work on any console. That's is the only thing. You can still get the same game. Personally, I think this game would rock on Xbox 360.skrat_01

Sigh.

Yepper. It would look a little less pretty, but would likely be just as fun.

No the graphics ARE NOT the problem. The 360s GPU can easily run Crysis.

Its the 360s lack of ram, iffy CPU and no hdd streaming that means Crysis CANNOT run on console in its current state.

Yeah, it's not that the 360 lacks the power to do it, it's just ram. You'd have to scale back the texture quality and environments to fit everything in memory. Hence why it would most likely just end up being a spinoff like instincts. They couldn't port Far Cry over due to it's huge environments, so instead Xbox owners got a game called Far Cry Instincts, a game that didn't play or look nearly as good asthe pc version. I'm sure having a console version of Crysis will be fun, but it won't be the same as th PC gameIMO. Unless the devs can pull something out of their @$$ and make some magic happen.

Avatar image for ComBaTsOuL
ComBaTsOuL

507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 ComBaTsOuL
Member since 2006 • 507 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="farrell2k"]

[QUOTE="neveryoumind244"]The only thing about the game, that can't be done on consoles, is graphics. But they can easily dumb them down to work on any console. That's is the only thing. You can still get the same game. Personally, I think this game would rock on Xbox 360.coolviper2003

Sigh.

Yepper. It would look a little less pretty, but would likely be just as fun.

No the graphics ARE NOT the problem. The 360s GPU can easily run Crysis.

Its the 360s lack of ram, iffy CPU and no hdd streaming that means Crysis CANNOT run on console in its current state.

Yeah, it's not that the 360 lacks the power to do it, it's just ram. You'd have to scale back the texture quality and environments to fit everything in memory. Hence why it would most likely just end up being a spinoff like instincts. They couldn't port Far Cry over due to it's huge environments, so instead Xbox owners got a game called Far Cry Instincts, a game that didn't play or look nearly as good asthe pc version. I'm sure having a console version of Crysis will be fun, but it won't be the same as th PC gameIMO. Unless the devs can pull something out of their @$$ and make some magic happen.

So how did they get oblivion to work on consoles again?

O and far cry instincts is a port from the xbox 1not the pc... ;)

Avatar image for coolviper2003
coolviper2003

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 coolviper2003
Member since 2003 • 1915 Posts
[QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="farrell2k"]

[QUOTE="neveryoumind244"]The only thing about the game, that can't be done on consoles, is graphics. But they can easily dumb them down to work on any console. That's is the only thing. You can still get the same game. Personally, I think this game would rock on Xbox 360.ComBaTsOuL

Sigh.

Yepper. It would look a little less pretty, but would likely be just as fun.

No the graphics ARE NOT the problem. The 360s GPU can easily run Crysis.

Its the 360s lack of ram, iffy CPU and no hdd streaming that means Crysis CANNOT run on console in its current state.

Yeah, it's not that the 360 lacks the power to do it, it's just ram. You'd have to scale back the texture quality and environments to fit everything in memory. Hence why it would most likely just end up being a spinoff like instincts. They couldn't port Far Cry over due to it's huge environments, so instead Xbox owners got a game called Far Cry Instincts, a game that didn't play or look nearly as good asthe pc version. I'm sure having a console version of Crysis will be fun, but it won't be the same as th PC gameIMO. Unless the devs can pull something out of their @$$ and make some magic happen.

So how did they get oblivion to work on consoles again?

O and far cry instincts is a port from the xbox 1not the pc... ;)

Why does running Oblivion on medium settings on a PC look a little better then the 360 version? Why is there so much pop up and draw in in the 360 version? Why do the textures look medicore? Why are the loading times almost unbearable sometimes? Crysis can be done on consoles, butwith compromies. If you don't mind downgraded textures, pop up, draw in, and longer load times, then go for it.
Avatar image for Runningflame570
Runningflame570

10388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 Runningflame570
Member since 2005 • 10388 Posts
Because they can't without being cutdown in some way?
Avatar image for Mordred19
Mordred19

8259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Mordred19
Member since 2007 • 8259 Posts
wait wait wait wait wait a second. couldn't consoles just stream everything on Crysis? correct me if I'm wrong, but streaming means that you have seamless transitions in levels that are actually bigger than the system RAM, correct?
Avatar image for Sonic_on_crack
Sonic_on_crack

2428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Sonic_on_crack
Member since 2007 • 2428 Posts
[QUOTE="ComBaTsOuL"][QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="farrell2k"]

[QUOTE="neveryoumind244"]The only thing about the game, that can't be done on consoles, is graphics. But they can easily dumb them down to work on any console. That's is the only thing. You can still get the same game. Personally, I think this game would rock on Xbox 360.coolviper2003

Sigh.

Yepper. It would look a little less pretty, but would likely be just as fun.

No the graphics ARE NOT the problem. The 360s GPU can easily run Crysis.

Its the 360s lack of ram, iffy CPU and no hdd streaming that means Crysis CANNOT run on console in its current state.

Yeah, it's not that the 360 lacks the power to do it, it's just ram. You'd have to scale back the texture quality and environments to fit everything in memory. Hence why it would most likely just end up being a spinoff like instincts. They couldn't port Far Cry over due to it's huge environments, so instead Xbox owners got a game called Far Cry Instincts, a game that didn't play or look nearly as good asthe pc version. I'm sure having a console version of Crysis will be fun, but it won't be the same as th PC gameIMO. Unless the devs can pull something out of their @$$ and make some magic happen.

So how did they get oblivion to work on consoles again?

O and far cry instincts is a port from the xbox 1not the pc... ;)

Why does running Oblivion on medium settings on a PC look a little better then the 360 version? Why is there so much pop up and draw in in the 360 version? Why do the textures look medicore? Why are the loading times almost unbearable sometimes? Crysis can be done on consoles, butwith compromies. If you don't mind downgraded textures, pop up, draw in, and longer load times, then go for it.

sounds like the same exact game .... not a so called dumbed down "instincts"

Avatar image for coolviper2003
coolviper2003

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 coolviper2003
Member since 2003 • 1915 Posts

sounds like the same exact game .... not a so called dumbed down "instincts"

Sonic_on_crack
but the pc version is miles ahead of the 360 version, that's not even including the texture mod that makes it look light years ahead of it.
Avatar image for Cali3350
Cali3350

16134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Cali3350
Member since 2003 • 16134 Posts

wait wait wait wait wait a second. couldn't consoles just stream everything on Crysis? correct me if I'm wrong, but streaming means that you have seamless transitions in levels that are actually bigger than the system RAM, correct?Mordred19

Streaming doesnt work that way. You cant stream nonstop into a game. "Streaming" is really a bad word for it, its more like "loading a little a lot".

Avatar image for Derek240
Derek240

842

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Derek240
Member since 2004 • 842 Posts
It is literally impossible for Crysis to look as good on the consoles. In fact, they wouldn't even be able to come close. There is just too large a gap between dx10 and dx9. As long as consoles have dx9 vid cards, then it will be impossible for them to even touch max settings on pc.
Avatar image for Sonic_on_crack
Sonic_on_crack

2428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Sonic_on_crack
Member since 2007 • 2428 Posts
[QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]

sounds like the same exact game .... not a so called dumbed down "instincts"

coolviper2003

but the pc version is miles ahead of the 360 version, that's not even including the texture mod that makes it look light years ahead of it.

so basically Crysis can be down on 360 but it wont have as good looking textures and might have pop up draw distance and longer load times.............. thats to be expected and I think everyone would be fine with that , it would be the same extact version from what I hear just with not as good looking textures like bioshock or oblivion .

Avatar image for coolviper2003
coolviper2003

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 coolviper2003
Member since 2003 • 1915 Posts
[QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]

sounds like the same exact game .... not a so called dumbed down "instincts"

Sonic_on_crack

but the pc version is miles ahead of the 360 version, that's not even including the texture mod that makes it look light years ahead of it.

so basically Crysis can be down on 360 but it wont have as good looking textures and might have pop up draw distance and longer load times.............. thats to be expected and I think everyone would be fine with that , it would be the same extact version from what I hear just with not as good looking textures like bioshock or oblivion .

But then you have to take into account the sheer amount of physics going on, the AI, explosions everywhere, huge draw distances, and all that crap. They will most likely have to make the enviroments smaller to make it work.

Avatar image for Sonic_on_crack
Sonic_on_crack

2428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Sonic_on_crack
Member since 2007 • 2428 Posts
[QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"][QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]

sounds like the same exact game .... not a so called dumbed down "instincts"

coolviper2003

but the pc version is miles ahead of the 360 version, that's not even including the texture mod that makes it look light years ahead of it.

so basically Crysis can be down on 360 but it wont have as good looking textures and might have pop up draw distance and longer load times.............. thats to be expected and I think everyone would be fine with that , it would be the same extact version from what I hear just with not as good looking textures like bioshock or oblivion .

But then you have to take into account the sheer amount of physics going on, the AI, explosions everywhere, huge draw distances, and all that crap. They will most likely have to make the enviroments smaller to make it work.

I dont understand how Oblvion could that huge but Crysis would have to be scaled down , would they just make load times longer and simply disguise them like in Metriod

Avatar image for Runningflame570
Runningflame570

10388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 Runningflame570
Member since 2005 • 10388 Posts

It is literally impossible for Crysis to look as good on the consoles. In fact, they wouldn't even be able to come close. There is just too large a gap between dx10 and dx9. As long as consoles have dx9 vid cards, then it will be impossible for them to even touch max settings on pc.Derek240

The ONLY consoles to ever use DX at all are Microsoft consoles, everything else uses OpenGL.

Avatar image for Runningflame570
Runningflame570

10388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 Runningflame570
Member since 2005 • 10388 Posts

I dont understand how Oblvion could that huge but Crysis would have to be scaled down , would they just make load times longer and simply disguise them like in Metriod

Sonic_on_crack

Consoles don't have the pixel fill rate necessary to make a game like Crysis on max.

Avatar image for furtherfan
furtherfan

3699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 furtherfan
Member since 2007 • 3699 Posts

"We would just have to see how much of a sacrifice to the game we'd have to make. Or whether there would be a sacrifice at all, maybe we could find a way to make the game look exactly the same as it does on PC on the Xbox 360 and the PlayStation 3."

well,.. there will be sacrifices to textures on ps3, that's for sure.. and physics on the 360.

Avatar image for Sonic_on_crack
Sonic_on_crack

2428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Sonic_on_crack
Member since 2007 • 2428 Posts
[QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]

I dont understand how Oblvion could that huge but Crysis would have to be scaled down , would they just make load times longer and simply disguise them like in Metriod

Runningflame570

Consoles don't have the pixel fill rate necessary to make a game like Crysis on max.

Who said max, isnt bioshock on 360 somewhere in between high and med on pc settings .

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"][QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]

sounds like the same exact game .... not a so called dumbed down "instincts"

Sonic_on_crack

but the pc version is miles ahead of the 360 version, that's not even including the texture mod that makes it look light years ahead of it.

so basically Crysis can be down on 360 but it wont have as good looking textures and might have pop up draw distance and longer load times.............. thats to be expected and I think everyone would be fine with that , it would be the same extact version from what I hear just with not as good looking textures like bioshock or oblivion .

But then you have to take into account the sheer amount of physics going on, the AI, explosions everywhere, huge draw distances, and all that crap. They will most likely have to make the enviroments smaller to make it work.

I dont understand how Oblvion could that huge but Crysis would have to be scaled down , would they just make load times longer and simply disguise them like in Metriod

Sigh.

OBBLIVION DOES NOT HAVE NEAR AS MUCH HAPPENING IN THE GAME WORLD AS CRYSIS.

Full world Physics for every object, dynamic a.i for every entity - enimies, animals, far more higher texture resolutions, bump mapping, volmetric clouds, full world dynamic lighting.

The list goes on.

Dont even try comparing Oblivion to Crysis - as there is none.

Crysis cannot be 'scaled down' to run on consoles. The 360s hardware - primarity RAM and CPU (and disk streaming) CANNOT take the game itself - The grapics however are scaleable.

Avatar image for Activision_QAT
Activision_QAT

122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Activision_QAT
Member since 2007 • 122 Posts

Crysis might not be but by late 08 to early 09 they'll probably be games on console that look better than Crysis . Alan Wake could be one IMOSonic_on_crack

your saying a DX9 game on consoles like alan wake...(which is also on PC with better graphics) will look better than a DX10 crysis on PC?

OMG SELFOWNED

Avatar image for narf101
narf101

1091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 narf101
Member since 2003 • 1091 Posts
Alan Wake will at best look as good as Crysis, but RE 5 looks as just as good if not better as well. I dont see why Crysis couldn't be rendered on the consoles. Sure it would probably be possible for PC's to have higher texture resolution but it would still look amazing on consoles.
Avatar image for michael098
michael098

3441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 michael098
Member since 2006 • 3441 Posts

Alan Wake will at best look as good as Crysis, but RE 5 looks as just as good if not better as well. I dont see why Crysis couldn't be rendered on the consoles. Sure it would probably be possible for PC's to have higher texture resolution but it would still look amazing on consoles.narf101

If you go into detail you will see that RE 5 and crysis are not comparable, you would need alot more than just a slight downgrade for crysis to work well on a console.

Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts

Alan Wake will at best look as good as Crysis, but RE 5 looks as just as good if not better as well. I dont see why Crysis couldn't be rendered on the consoles. Sure it would probably be possible for PC's to have higher texture resolution but it would still look amazing on consoles.narf101

We haven't even seen a gameplay footage of Alan Wake yet and RE5 does not look as good as Crysis

Avatar image for Latina_Chick
Latina_Chick

391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Latina_Chick
Member since 2007 • 391 Posts
[QUOTE="ComBaTsOuL"][QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="farrell2k"]

[QUOTE="neveryoumind244"]The only thing about the game, that can't be done on consoles, is graphics. But they can easily dumb them down to work on any console. That's is the only thing. You can still get the same game. Personally, I think this game would rock on Xbox 360.coolviper2003

Sigh.

Yepper. It would look a little less pretty, but would likely be just as fun.

No the graphics ARE NOT the problem. The 360s GPU can easily run Crysis.

Its the 360s lack of ram, iffy CPU and no hdd streaming that means Crysis CANNOT run on console in its current state.

Yeah, it's not that the 360 lacks the power to do it, it's just ram. You'd have to scale back the texture quality and environments to fit everything in memory. Hence why it would most likely just end up being a spinoff like instincts. They couldn't port Far Cry over due to it's huge environments, so instead Xbox owners got a game called Far Cry Instincts, a game that didn't play or look nearly as good asthe pc version. I'm sure having a console version of Crysis will be fun, but it won't be the same as th PC gameIMO. Unless the devs can pull something out of their @$$ and make some magic happen.

So how did they get oblivion to work on consoles again?

O and far cry instincts is a port from the xbox 1not the pc... ;)

Why does running Oblivion on medium settings on a PC look a little better then the 360 version? Why is there so much pop up and draw in in the 360 version? Why do the textures look medicore? Why are the loading times almost unbearable sometimes? Crysis can be done on consoles, butwith compromies. If you don't mind downgraded textures, pop up, draw in, and longer load times, then go for it.

Why do u lie?

Avatar image for -wii60-
-wii60-

3287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 -wii60-
Member since 2007 • 3287 Posts
Enjoy ur gimped version with downgrade frames drawdistances and low-re textures.VACASCULIADAS
Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=20224


Hermits think PS3 and XBOX360 is like the Wii. Pc gamers have no idea what consoles can do.
My pc is capable of running Crysis on max though.

Latina_Chick

:lol: 2006 post by the art designer, or a very very recent post by Cervat Yerli himself how its impossible ... you know the game graphically has changed since then right?

Xbox360 struggled to get 16 players on freakin Vegas , let alone Crysis PS 32 player

Avatar image for Mordred19
Mordred19

8259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Mordred19
Member since 2007 • 8259 Posts
the fact is that Crysis has it both ways: the levels are massive, and every part ofit looks better than any other game in development so far. you can't have those visuals combined with those huge levels on a console. it would be one or the other, or both in extremely downgraded forms.
Avatar image for Velocitas8
Velocitas8

10748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Velocitas8
Member since 2006 • 10748 Posts
Jesus, it seems like every other thread here in System Wars is about Halo and/or Crysis -_-..
Avatar image for Banankraken
Banankraken

7400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#95 Banankraken
Member since 2004 • 7400 Posts

As always.

Crysis? No.
Dumbed down port/spin-off? Perhaps.

Avatar image for legol1
legol1

1998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 legol1
Member since 2005 • 1998 Posts

YESSSS i will not waste anymore monney on my pc and waiting the 360 version the same thing i should have do with dark messiah:D

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

YESSSS i will not waste anymore monney on my pc and waiting the 360 version the same thing i should have do with dark messiah:D

legol1
You 'wasted' money on your PC for Dark Messiah :|
Avatar image for legol1
legol1

1998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 legol1
Member since 2005 • 1998 Posts
[QUOTE="legol1"]

YESSSS i will not waste anymore monney on my pc and waiting the 360 version the same thing i should have do with dark messiah:D

skrat_01
You 'wasted' money on your PC for Dark Messiah :|

what i mean is the pc version was awefull and they are reworking itto make the jump on the 360 and im almost certain crysis will be full of bug and the 360 version will be much better.
Avatar image for Velocitas8
Velocitas8

10748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Velocitas8
Member since 2006 • 10748 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="legol1"]

YESSSS i will not waste anymore monney on my pc and waiting the 360 version the same thing i should have do with dark messiah:D

legol1

You 'wasted' money on your PC for Dark Messiah :|

what i mean is the pc version was awefull and they are reworking itto make the jump on the 360 and im almost certain crysis will be full of bug and the 360 version will be much better.

Rofl. Wow.

Avatar image for froidnite
froidnite

2294

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#100 froidnite
Member since 2006 • 2294 Posts
Jesus, it seems like every other thread here in System Wars is about Halo and/or Crysis -_-..Velocitas8
Just shows how big the hype for the the game is:D