Why Cant PS3 Fans Admit the 360 has a better game library? (Proof inside)

lol i cant believe this thread is still being kept alive by 4 people...dont you guys want to move on from this topic?

[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="lild1425"]

The Lems have been relentless recently. Can't accept the fact that the slow Tortoise start of the PS3 caught up (and passed) the 360's Hare.

lild1425

Let me clarify because I've mentioned a few times on this very page that the 360 has indeed more highly rated games as I have done a count. Both desperate, but lems appear far worse. Using HD Collection is definitely asinine, but the initial post that says 200 more games rated 70-100 (or something like that), which is significantly more absurd. DLC, doublecounting special editions, and counting arcade games was obviously done, which is what I argued with Mike about for like 1000 pages of this thread. 

Even accepting that there are more highly rated 360 games on Metacritic still doesn't mean it is a slam dunk.

What I was referring to was that the 360 absolutely destroyed the PS3 out of the gate, but PS3 came back and very very quickly. The Tortoise and the Hare analogy is actually a pretty terrible one. It's actually the reverse if anything so just disregard that nonsense. Sawwy. 

But it seems the cow/lem situation is like this: Have you ever been to a sporting event like an American football event when your team is up by 40 points, so you basically trash talk the visiting fan next to you relentlessly because they were favored to win. Next thing you know, the opposing team gains insurmountable momentum to tie the game and is perhaps even winning and that visiting fan just tears you a new one. You are so dumbfounded that you just grasp at straws? That's the kind of the desperation I'm talking about. I have done it in my life one way or another. Oh wait, I did. I bashed the PS3 into oblivion. Luckily, I don't blindly follow a system and now I now own one.

[QUOTE="lild1425"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"] There;s no nitpicking. It's fact. There;s more highly rated 360 games then PS3 games. The only nitpickers are cows. Using PS1 games, really? Well 360 plays freaking Atari 2600 games in it's gameroom, guess they count too? Come on... we talk about actual games made for the consoles. Not BC stuff, that's just sad.locopatho

Let me clarify because I've mentioned a few times on this very page that the 360 has indeed more highly rated games as I have done a count. Both desperate, but lems appear far worse. Using HD Collection is definitely asinine, but the initial post that says 200 more games rated 70-100 (or something like that), which is significantly more absurd. DLC, doublecounting special editions, and counting arcade games was obviously done, which is what I argued with Mike about for like 1000 pages of this thread. 

Even accepting that there are more highly rated 360 games on Metacritic still doesn't mean it is a slam dunk.

What I was referring to was that the 360 absolutely destroyed the PS3 out of the gate, but PS3 came back and very very quickly. The Tortoise and the Hare analogy is actually a pretty terrible one. It's actually the reverse if anything so just disregard that nonsense. Sawwy. 

But it seems the cow/lem situation is like this: Have you ever been to a sporting event like an American football event when your team is up by 40 points, so you basically trash talk the visiting fan next to you relentlessly because they were favored to win. Next thing you know, the opposing team gains insurmountable momentum to tie the game and is perhaps even winning and that visiting fan just tears you a new one. You are so dumbfounded that you just grasp at straws? That's the kind of the desperation I'm talking about. I have done it in my life one way or another. Oh wait, I did. I bashed the PS3 into oblivion. Luckily, I don't blindly follow a system and now I now own one.

Let me clarify because I've mentioned a few times on this very page that the 360 has indeed more highly rated games as I have done a count. Both desperate, but lems appear far worse. Using HD Collection is definitely asinine, but the initial post that says 200 more games rated 70-100 (or something like that), which is significantly more absurd. DLC, doublecounting special editions, and counting arcade games was obviously done, which is what I argued with Mike about for like 1000 pages of this thread. 

Even accepting that there are more highly rated 360 games on Metacritic still doesn't mean it is a slam dunk.

What I was referring to was that the 360 absolutely destroyed the PS3 out of the gate, but PS3 came back and very very quickly. The Tortoise and the Hare analogy is actually a pretty terrible one. It's actually the reverse if anything so just disregard that nonsense. Sawwy. 

But it seems the cow/lem situation is like this: Have you ever been to a sporting event like an American football event when your team is up by 40 points, so you basically trash talk the visiting fan next to you relentlessly because they were favored to win. Next thing you know, the opposing team gains insurmountable momentum to tie the game and is perhaps even winning and that visiting fan just tears you a new one. You are so dumbfounded that you just grasp at straws? That's the kind of the desperation I'm talking about. I have done it in my life one way or another. Oh wait, I did. I bashed the PS3 into oblivion. Luckily, I don't blindly follow a system and now I now own one.

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="locopatho"] I don't make the claim of hundreds or whatever. But it is in the lead. That's a fact. Not an opinion, or an argument, or an idea. A FACT. When idiots deny facts, what else can you do but call them an idiot? It's like them shouting THE STATUE OF LIBERTY IS IN LONDON LOL LEMS NEVER BEEN TO LONDON DON'T EVEN KNOW ITS THERE LOL THOSE PHOTOS OF IT IN NEW YORK ARE SHOPPED LOL ONLY LEMS WOULD BELIEVE THEM LOL ALL THOSE TEXT SOURCES THAT SAY ITS IN NEW YORK ARE BIASED LOL BRIBED BY M$ LOL POOR LEMS LOL BUTTHURT That's essentially what Cows have done the past few years: just denied reality. The funny thing is it wasn't always that way. There were loads of reasonable cows at the start of the gen who had good arguments, and accepted logic. But they all left, or switched to other consoles when PS3 sorta chugged along all gen. The only cows left are people too poor or stupid to play other systems with better online and multiplats (either PC or 360, either or both) and so they have to just lie and say they're the best when they simply, factually, aren't... MstaPrimeMnista

Its funny because 100 percent of those games is on the PS3..The only problem is that most reviewers rated the game lowered compared to the 360..Because many devlopers have problems with the cell.YOU FAIL..Just because you get better reviews scores doesnt mean you have a better game libary...If you want to compared  games gather all the exclusive games and see who have  the highest rating..Lets see  for the PS3 we  have infamous 1-3, Uncharted, God of War 3 and Ascension , Heavenly Sword, Yukuza, Demon Souls, Resistance, LittleBigPlanet, Ratchet and Clank, Heavy Rain, Journey, WarHawk, Star Hawk All Stars Battle, Metal Gear Solid 4, Twisted Metal, Sly Cooper, The Last of US, Beyond 2 souls, Gran Tursimo, Diablo 3, Ni No Kuni, Killzone 3, and etc..what does the 360 have nothin..All their games on the PC lmao

Its funny because 100 percent of those games is on the PS3..The only problem is that most reviewers rated the game lowered compared to the 360..Because many devlopers have problems with the cell.YOU FAIL..Just because you get better reviews scores doesnt mean you have a better game libary...If you want to compared  games gather all the exclusive games and see who have  the highest rating..Lets see  for the PS3 we  have infamous 1-3, Uncharted, God of War 3 and Ascension , Heavenly Sword, Yukuza, Demon Souls, Resistance, LittleBigPlanet, Ratchet and Clank, Heavy Rain, Journey, WarHawk, Star Hawk All Stars Battle, Metal Gear Solid 4, Twisted Metal, Sly Cooper, The Last of US, Beyond 2 souls, Gran Tursimo, Diablo 3, Ni No Kuni, Killzone 3, and etc..what does the 360 have nothin..All their games on the PC lmao

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="locopatho"] I don't make the claim of hundreds or whatever. But it is in the lead. That's a fact. Not an opinion, or an argument, or an idea. A FACT. When idiots deny facts, what else can you do but call them an idiot? It's like them shouting THE STATUE OF LIBERTY IS IN LONDON LOL LEMS NEVER BEEN TO LONDON DON'T EVEN KNOW ITS THERE LOL THOSE PHOTOS OF IT IN NEW YORK ARE SHOPPED LOL ONLY LEMS WOULD BELIEVE THEM LOL ALL THOSE TEXT SOURCES THAT SAY ITS IN NEW YORK ARE BIASED LOL BRIBED BY M$ LOL POOR LEMS LOL BUTTHURT That's essentially what Cows have done the past few years: just denied reality. The funny thing is it wasn't always that way. There were loads of reasonable cows at the start of the gen who had good arguments, and accepted logic. But they all left, or switched to other consoles when PS3 sorta chugged along all gen. The only cows left are people too poor or stupid to play other systems with better online and multiplats (either PC or 360, either or both) and so they have to just lie and say they're the best when they simply, factually, aren't... MstaPrimeMnista

[QUOTE="MstaPrimeMnista"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Is not a fact silly rodent. Learn to distinguish between facts and your own delusions.jsmoke03

[QUOTE="MstaPrimeMnista"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Is not a fact silly rodent. Learn to distinguish between facts and your own delusions.kuraimen

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="locopatho"] I don't make the claim of hundreds or whatever. But it is in the lead. That's a fact. Not an opinion, or an argument, or an idea. A FACT. When idiots deny facts, what else can you do but call them an idiot? It's like them shouting THE STATUE OF LIBERTY IS IN LONDON LOL LEMS NEVER BEEN TO LONDON DON'T EVEN KNOW ITS THERE LOL THOSE PHOTOS OF IT IN NEW YORK ARE SHOPPED LOL ONLY LEMS WOULD BELIEVE THEM LOL ALL THOSE TEXT SOURCES THAT SAY ITS IN NEW YORK ARE BIASED LOL BRIBED BY M$ LOL POOR LEMS LOL BUTTHURT That's essentially what Cows have done the past few years: just denied reality. The funny thing is it wasn't always that way. There were loads of reasonable cows at the start of the gen who had good arguments, and accepted logic. But they all left, or switched to other consoles when PS3 sorta chugged along all gen. The only cows left are people too poor or stupid to play other systems with better online and multiplats (either PC or 360, either or both) and so they have to just lie and say they're the best when they simply, factually, aren't... MstaPrimeMnista

I count every PS3 game as a PS3 game. I include PS3 games whether they are PSN or on disc, whether they are exclusive or multiplat, whether they are on VITA or not. PS3 is still losing in library compared to 360. This is a fact, if you go by GS scores or Metacritic scores.

I don't count PS1 or PS2 games as PS3 games, because they aren't. I don't count Xbox games for 360 either, since they aren't 360 games.

By that logic Wii won this gen since the Virtual Console has hundreds of fantastic games from NES, SNES, N64, Gamecube, Master System, Megadrive, Neo Geo, Atari, and Arcade. Do you think Wii won because of SNES games?

This damn thread is still going? :|rjdofu

Only one PS3 fan in this thread admitted the truth. PS3 fans are in such denial it's scary.Miketheman83

Only one PS3 fan in this thread admitted the truth. PS3 fans are in such denial it's scary.Miketheman83

:lol: Now that Gears has flopped, 360 is now down to only having two games. " HaloForza :cry: "

:P I'm enjoying the sweet tears of my lemming friends.

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"]Only one PS3 fan in this thread admitted the truth. PS3 fans are in such denial it's scary.clyde46

Mikethebutthurt lol.

Did the flop hurt you that much?

Just accept it, jump out and the recovery will begin ...

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"]Only one PS3 fan in this thread admitted the truth. PS3 fans are in such denial it's scary.Miketheman83

Purely based on facts.  The 360 does indeed have a larger library of games.

Purely based on facts.  The 360 does indeed have a larger library of games.

crusadernm

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"]Only one PS3 fan in this thread admitted the truth. PS3 fans are in such denial it's scary.Miketheman83

So you took into consideration all of those games that came out on the ps2,xbox, and 360 when the ps3 wasn out huh? Since multiplats matter so much now why dont we take into consideration all of the games the ps3 can play? LIKE THE ENTIRE PSONE LIBRARY.

Either you count every single game that each console can play or dont count them multiplats at all. Take away those multiplats that were also on the playstation 2    

and then show me some numbers.  The PS3 can play more games than the 360, f-a-c-t. See I can come up with stupid numbers to solely based off of the psone library. 

So you took into consideration all of those games that came out on the ps2,xbox, and 360 when the ps3 wasn out huh? Since multiplats matter so much now why dont we take into consideration all of the games the ps3 can play? LIKE THE ENTIRE PSONE LIBRARY.

Bren128

[QUOTE="Bren128"]

So you took into consideration all of those games that came out on the ps2,xbox, and 360 when the ps3 wasn out huh? Since multiplats matter so much now why dont we take into consideration all of the games the ps3 can play? LIKE THE ENTIRE PSONE LIBRARY.

Miketheman83

[QUOTE="crusadernm"]

Purely based on facts.  The 360 does indeed have a larger library of games.

Miketheman83

[QUOTE="Bren128"]

So you took into consideration all of those games that came out on the ps2,xbox, and 360 when the ps3 wasn out huh? Since multiplats matter so much now why dont we take into consideration all of the games the ps3 can play? LIKE THE ENTIRE PSONE LIBRARY.

Miketheman83

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="Bren128"]

So you took into consideration all of those games that came out on the ps2,xbox, and 360 when the ps3 wasn out huh? Since multiplats matter so much now why dont we take into consideration all of the games the ps3 can play? LIKE THE ENTIRE PSONE LIBRARY.

Bren128

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="crusadernm"]

Purely based on facts.  The 360 does indeed have a larger library of games.

Murderstyle75

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="Bren128"]

So you took into consideration all of those games that came out on the ps2,xbox, and 360 when the ps3 wasn out huh? Since multiplats matter so much now why dont we take into consideration all of the games the ps3 can play? LIKE THE ENTIRE PSONE LIBRARY.

Bren128

Not this abomination again... :(

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="Bren128"]

So you took into consideration all of those games that came out on the ps2,xbox, and 360 when the ps3 wasn out huh? Since multiplats matter so much now why dont we take into consideration all of the games the ps3 can play? LIKE THE ENTIRE PSONE LIBRARY.

kuraimen

Only one PS3 fan in this thread admitted the truth. PS3 fans are in such denial it's scary.Miketheman83

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="Bren128"]

So you took into consideration all of those games that came out on the ps2,xbox, and 360 when the ps3 wasn out huh? Since multiplats matter so much now why dont we take into consideration all of the games the ps3 can play? LIKE THE ENTIRE PSONE LIBRARY.

kuraimen

Metacritic is rubbish. :|

Same reason why vampires don't shower with holy water.. It burnnnnnns.. :twisted:

SecretPolice

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"]Only one PS3 fan in this thread admitted the truth. PS3 fans are in such denial it's scary.clone01

ps2 of this generation lol,keep dreaming.

reynal1287

Agree ps2 library put both ps3 and 360 library to shame but both ps3 and 360 do good,decent .medicore collection of games but not great like the ps2

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] You guys already tried this ten pages ago. Everyone laughed considering we are comparing games released this gen not games from twelve years ago.EzcapeTheFate