[QUOTE="Shafftehr"][QUOTE="lettuceman44"] Anti German? I would say anti nazi...and actually the Americans were better then everyone else for America, British were better then anyone else for the British and so on...lettuceman44
Well pardon me then! This thread isn't anti-Gemran. In a like vein, I'm not anti-American at all. I'm anti-Truman! I'm anti-whoever was president during Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Guantanamo! You see, you're all totally wrong about me. Much like talking about a German political party and killing gads of German soldiers is OK, all I'm talking about is certain American political regimes and killing American troops. See? By his reasoning, I'm not anti-American at all! And Lettuceman, you still haven't told me why you're cherry-picking points I'm raising. Got no answers for most of them? Lol Anti-Korean. Ok, let our allies get taken over then.About your last statement, I posted something, but it got messed up.
Originally, I was only going to touch upon the things I thought were most important, as your post angered me, and I did, I didn't want to make a full scale debase as is system wars. Since then, I've just been dragging my arguments on forgetting about the earlier posts, and focusin only what was infront of me. Didn't even think about it until you said anything else. So, no I didn't argue your other points, and I don't really see any reason too as they are all subjective(at least more so then what I talked about).
I'm gonna quit now, as this isn't even on topic, this isn't going anywhere, and well, it doesn't even matter.
I only have to say that, you are just looking at it from one perspective and that is all. You do not seem to balance out the different scenarios. What would you have done instead of dropping the a bombs? Hmm?
I think you need to do research, as you don't seem to be doing fair analysis and reasoning. Again, you are looking at it through your own eyes and ideas only, disregarding the actual situation at hand.
If you take time to study history, then you will be able to look at things from different viewpoints, and give a more reasonable answer to it.
I have already given you the a bomb vs american casualties argument, which you give as an invalid reason...however you need to look at it from there perspective from there situation...
and with that I depart.
Why don't you take a stab at answering my questions first rather than just continuing to pose questions of your own? I've answered question after question after question, and you've dodged most of my major ones. Here's the deal - if you're not running off, answer my other questions, and THEN I will do the same for you and respond to the questions you pose here. Fair's fair, right? And so far, this "debate" has been "Ignore most of Shafftehr's major points and gril Shafftehr on the one I think I can make some headway on."
Oh, and that anger you're talking about... That's patriotism, not objectivity. If you want to get an eye for what history is actually all about, you can't look at it from a position "I'm a member of nation X" because that one nation's viewpoint will only bias you against seeing things clearly. I try very hard to adopt a nationless viewpoint - give it a try, and you won't see the world in shades of red, white, and blue.
Log in to comment