Why did it become the cool thing to do to bash Skyrim on forums?

  • 197 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#51 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

I enjoyed it so w/e

Haters gonna hate

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="heeweesRus"]Bethesda needs to learn how to populate its f*cking world. What's the point of having a huge ass map if their isnt anything in half of it? They need to take notes from R*.BPoole96
Every dev needs to take notes from Rockstar though

If every dev were more like CDPR,R* and Naughty Dog we would all have much better games

Avatar image for IPWNDU2
IPWNDU2

2535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 IPWNDU2
Member since 2006 • 2535 Posts

[QUOTE="HaRmLeSS_RaGe"]

Because it's shit.

Blabadon

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#54 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
I don't bash games nonsensically. I tend to form opinions about them as I play, and sometimes those opinions include criticisms of things I didn't like or things I thought could have been better. Skyrim is far from a "perfect" game not only on a technical level, but it felt forced when I played it. The world was drab, dull and lifeless. Even the "improved" Radiant AI that embarrassed Bethesda in Oblivion didn't improve much, if at all. The characters were equally dull and while the story was more interesting, it felt really drawn out (I played for about 20 hours and didn't finish a single quest line, other than individual side quests). Nothing about the game drew me into the world as much as Oblivion. Which felt like a livelier, more interesting world to explore. The gameplay was a significant improvement over Oblivion (which isn't saying much though) but if I'm not interested in exploring the world, then what fun is it to play? I'll "bash" Skyrim all I want. I'm entitled to my own opinion. I can understand that people might enjoy the game, but honestly, I really didn't. Not nearly as much as I enjoyed Oblivion.
Avatar image for Rocker6
Rocker6

13358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Rocker6
Member since 2009 • 13358 Posts

[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

This... also, I'd really love if they limited the scope of the game, have a smaller game world with less dungeons and places, but have most of them unique and varied, wih some small side stories, special pieces of loot that are actually useful, etc.

Bethesda RPGs like Skyrim and Oblivion are big for the sake of being big, while I'd much prefer if the design revolved over quality, instead of quantity.

Oh, and they should also finally make the jump animations look good, they're consistently atrocious! :P

seanmcloughlin

Yep, I made a video talking about how Skyrim is big for the sake of being big and the whole mission and fast travel system they implemented completely trivialises the open world aspect of it

It's impressive to see a world that big but when it's just there for the sake of it and the game doesn't utilise it properly then it's pretty bad. It's why I am worrying a bit about TW3 going full open world with a similar fast travel mechanic

Yeah, Skyrim is very enjoyable at the start while you're admiring the world size, but after some 30 hours when you fought most of the enemies, explored most of the dungeon types, etc, it gradually becomes more and more boring.

And yeah, I'm also slightly worried about TW3, but the dev promises the game will still be story orriented and focused, the open world aspect won't water it down, and I really hope they can deliver on it. TW series works best as a more focused RPG with smaller, but highly detailed environments.

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"][QUOTE="heeweesRus"]Bethesda needs to learn how to populate its f*cking world. What's the point of having a huge ass map if their isnt anything in half of it? They need to take notes from R*.seanmcloughlin

Every dev needs to take notes from Rockstar though

If every dev were more like CDPR,R* and Naughty Dog we would all have much better games

Yep, they are all masters of their craft. I'd love to say From Software as well but outside the Souls games and early Armored Core games they have made a lot of garbage. It depresses me to know they made Steel Battalion
Avatar image for ClassicRockFTW
ClassicRockFTW

1106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 ClassicRockFTW
Member since 2012 • 1106 Posts

Truth is its a very flawed game, but still very enjoyable

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="BPoole96"] Every dev needs to take notes from Rockstar thoughBPoole96

If every dev were more like CDPR,R* and Naughty Dog we would all have much better games

Yep, they are all masters of their craft. I'd love to say From Software as well but outside the Souls games and early Armored Core games they have made a lot of garbage. It depresses me to know they made Steel Battalion

I would say them too but they embarrassed themselves with that PC version. Their technical department seems to be pretty clueless on basic things

But they did make my second favourite game ever so I'll let it slide

Now if only my internet wasn't atrocious I would have started Demon's already :(

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#60 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
If every dev were more like [...] Naughty Dog we would all have much better gamesseanmcloughlin
 No, we need more developers like Platinum, Nintendo (internal studios) and From Software... developers who focus on highly-interactive gameplay and indirect narrative rather than overt narrative with mildly-interactive gameplay. But I do agree with CDPR and slightly agree with Rockstar (if only for their work with RDR).
Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#61 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts

Skyrim is a fantastic game, but I just can't get in to it like I got into Oblivion back in the day... I played it for 30-40 hours and got bored, but I don't know why. I thought I'd be spending hundreds of hours like I did with TESIV. I had a character that clocked 250 hours of game time, and another with 200+ and a couple of 50-100 hour characters... 

Avatar image for MacBoomStick
MacBoomStick

1822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 MacBoomStick
Member since 2011 • 1822 Posts

[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]Also they need new Voice Actors. I'm sick of hearing generic guy #7 all over the placeseanmcloughlin

Skyrim features a cast of more than 70 voice actors, including many notable actors. Really?

Yeah and I was excited for that too before playing it, until you get in and every single guard has the same voice or they all sound the bloody same anyway. 

Even notable characters who you spend a lot of time with don't have unique voices. I know it's hard for a game that size but Skyrim is shameless for repeating phrases and voices everywhere. They still sound the same as they did in Oblivion

Or they use different voice actors to say the exact same line. How dumb is that?
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]If every dev were more like [...] Naughty Dog we would all have much better gamesfoxhound_fox
 No, we need more developers like Platinum, Nintendo (internal studios) and From Software... developers who focus on highly-interactive gameplay and indirect narrative rather than overt narrative with mildly-interactive gameplay. But I do agree with CDPR and slightly agree with Rockstar (if only for their work with RDR).

From Software has been a bit hit and miss to be honest.
Avatar image for Rocker6
Rocker6

13358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Rocker6
Member since 2009 • 13358 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"][QUOTE="heeweesRus"]Bethesda needs to learn how to populate its f*cking world. What's the point of having a huge ass map if their isnt anything in half of it? They need to take notes from R*.seanmcloughlin

Every dev needs to take notes from Rockstar though

If every dev were more like CDPR,R* and Naughty Dog we would all have much better games

You want shitty gunplay and combat mechanics in all your games? :o

As I said on many occassions, I find UC to be the AAA game with the worst gunplay I've seen this gen, and according to some of you, that didn't change in TLoU, but the saving grace is how the game doesn't rely on shooting much. Their production values are impressive... the rest, nah...

I'm also not a fan of their extreme linearity, I find it very heavy-handed.

Avatar image for call_of_duty_10
call_of_duty_10

4954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 call_of_duty_10
Member since 2009 • 4954 Posts

Because Oblivion is 100x better.

Oblivion has legendary guilds and side quests,and cyrodill is FAR more interesting that skyrim.And when you consider mods like unique landscapes,better cities and obscuro's oblivion overhaul,skyrim looks like a freeware flash game made in the 80s in comparison.

Avatar image for moistsandwich
moistsandwich

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 moistsandwich
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

TC seems jealous that he can't play TLOU, he can't stop talking about it... it even comes up in his threads about open world rpgs. Poor guy :P

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#68 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"][QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

If every dev were more like CDPR,R* and Naughty Dog we would all have much better games

seanmcloughlin

Yep, they are all masters of their craft. I'd love to say From Software as well but outside the Souls games and early Armored Core games they have made a lot of garbage. It depresses me to know they made Steel Battalion

I would say them too but they embarrassed themselves with that PC version. Their technical department seems to be pretty clueless on basic things

But they did make my second favourite game ever so I'll let it slide

Now if only my internet wasn't atrocious I would have started Demon's already :(

Yes, you REALLY need to play Demon's Souls. I'm really curious to hear your perspective on it since you played Dark Souls first and are playing its predecessor second. I hate choosing between the two but if someone held a gun to my head I would say I enjoyed Demons Souls more
Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"][QUOTE="heeweesRus"]Bethesda needs to learn how to populate its f*cking world. What's the point of having a huge ass map if their isnt anything in half of it? They need to take notes from R*.seanmcloughlin

Every dev needs to take notes from Rockstar though

If every dev were more like CDPR,R* and Naughty Dog we would all have much better games

Yea, cause the combat in the Witcher games and Uncharted and TLOU is reeeeeal good :roll: wait, no its not.
Avatar image for superclocked
superclocked

5864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 superclocked
Member since 2009 • 5864 Posts
I think that Skyrim is a great game. In the 150+ hours that I've put into it, I've only ran into one glitch. Well, it did crash to the desktop a few times before the first patch. But besides that, there was a bookshelf in the Breezehome that would move books to other bookshelves in the home. That's not bad at all. In fact, I would go play it right now, but the 8 year old power supplies in my desktop started to fail a few nights ago...
Avatar image for CroidX
CroidX

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 CroidX
Member since 2013 • 1561 Posts

The game was dumbed down you couldn't kill certain NPC and the answers to all the puzzle for the dungeons were right in front you not to mention the design were almost all similar. Atmosphere for the game just like Fallout 3 was very bland Bethesda never did well in that category. Dialogue was boring didn't feel like talking to NPC they should take notes from the Witcher.

  Google Search  Google Translate  Wikipedia  Search YouTube  Search Amazon  Share Share:Google+FacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail  
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#72 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
From Software has been a bit hit and miss to be honest. clyde46
If they keep making games like Dark Souls, I'll keep buying them. The game barely has any spoken narrative at all, and yet can tell a story through gameplay and atmosphere better than most this generation. It's kind of like Metroid Prime in a way.
Avatar image for Rocker6
Rocker6

13358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Rocker6
Member since 2009 • 13358 Posts

Because Oblivion is 100x better.

Oblivion has legendary guilds and side quests,and cyrodill is FAR more interesting that skyrim.And when you consider mods like unique landscapes,better cities and obscuro's oblivion overhaul,skyrim looks like a freeware flash game made in the 80s in comparison.

call_of_duty_10

Right now, Oblivion is roughly 7 year old game... while Skyrim is not even 2 years old. How many of your listed mods were fully fleshed out in 2 years?

My point is, by the time Skyrim is 7 years old, who knows what kind of mods we'll have... modding communities last a loooong time on the PC, there are decade old games still getting community patches and levels.

Avatar image for OneInchMan99
OneInchMan99

1248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 OneInchMan99
Member since 2012 • 1248 Posts


Almost everyone was in awe of this game when it releaesed, it won more goty's than any game in recent memory, people sunk over 100 hours in it... is it angry PS3 fans because they got the broken version?

Yes it is buggy and the ai glitches out sometimes, but given the size and scope of the game it's amazing...

look at a game like TLOU which is arguably even buggier, with horrendous AI, only it's LINEAR and tiny in comparison to Skyrims sprawling vistas with virtually NO npcs, while skyrim has the most advanced and abundant use of npcs in gaming history.

robotapple

LOL................you seem some what obsessed with TLoU dude.............I don't know why,I mean it flopped here so is now a shit game.......right?

I guess the fact its really one of the best games of the generation despite what some plum on gamespot thinks burns deep..............LOL.MORON.

Avatar image for call_of_duty_10
call_of_duty_10

4954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 call_of_duty_10
Member since 2009 • 4954 Posts
[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="BPoole96"] Every dev needs to take notes from Rockstar thoughmems_1224

If every dev were more like CDPR,R* and Naughty Dog we would all have much better games

Yea, cause the combat in the Witcher games and Uncharted and TLOU is reeeeeal good :roll: wait, no its not.

Well,its about opinions... I give equal importance to story,presentation,gameplay mechanics/combat,characters,environments etc Since cdpr and nd's games get almost all of the stuff right,I too consider them to be top quality devs.
Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]If every dev were more like [...] Naughty Dog we would all have much better gamesfoxhound_fox
 No, we need more developers like Platinum, Nintendo (internal studios) and From Software... developers who focus on highly-interactive gameplay and indirect narrative rather than overt narrative with mildly-interactive gameplay. But I do agree with CDPR and slightly agree with Rockstar (if only for their work with RDR).

Well I'd lump FROM in there too then but I stand by ND.

We need the fan service, updating games years after release for free and anti DRM of CDPR

We need the scope and scale (not every game needs this) and the ability ti fully realise a world like R* can

The voice actin, mocap and over all attention to detail of ND 

and the highy interactive gameplay of a FROMsoft game

People are reacting negatively to me saying ND, but they are fvcking good at their craft. 

Avatar image for ShaineTheNerd
ShaineTheNerd

1578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 ShaineTheNerd
Member since 2012 • 1578 Posts
A lot of people just say "it's flawed", "it's garbage", "overrated", "stupid". They bash it, yet never give an actual reason why. I LOVED the game when I first got it. Spent a good 3 weeks on it. After I was finished with it, took a break, and tried coming back, it sunk into my head that... It's really just a big world with lots of little things to do. The characters have the personality and emotion of a wooden plank. The combat style isn't very fun at all. A majority of quests in the game are half-assed fillers. It's still a fun game, but it's isn't a masterpiece as I originally proclaimed.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#78 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rnBZoYnVq8Stringerboy
:lol: Oh the comments! :lol:
Avatar image for mynamesdenvrmax
mynamesdenvrmax

2228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#79 mynamesdenvrmax
Member since 2004 • 2228 Posts

My theory: Playstation fanboys are some of the most childish.  They are also the loudest.  Skyirim didnt play very well on the PS3 because it was incredibly difficult to develop on.  I swear to God there must be some strange uplink to Sony (thats where they spent all of their R&D because it sure as hell wasnt on the console) that feeds fanboys phrases, feelings and general direction.  They unite on forums literally all over the internet, they're even on Majornelson.com, to bash anything and everything that doesnt praise Sony or benefit it. (Edit: By benefiting Sony I mean in mind share, their fanboys arent great at giving them much money or buying all of those excellent exclusives we hear so much about)  I used to think Sony Defense Force was a joke, I chuckled and moved on, but I quickly realized its in every Playstation box.  

Proof?  

Microsoft considered making games more difficult to buy used.  HELL BREAKS LOOSE.

Sony makes their users pay for online multiplayer after it was a major selling point to the PS3.  No a word is really said about it.  

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="clyde46"]From Software has been a bit hit and miss to be honest. foxhound_fox
If they keep making games like Dark Souls, I'll keep buying them. The game barely has any spoken narrative at all, and yet can tell a story through gameplay and atmosphere better than most this generation. It's kind of like Metroid Prime in a way.

Yep, I keep saying Dark Souls has enough story and lore in one game to fill a trilogy and it does it all without cutscenes or forcing you through endless dialogue. It's mightily impressive. 

Avatar image for Rocker6
Rocker6

13358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Rocker6
Member since 2009 • 13358 Posts

I think that Skyrim is a great game. In the 150+ hours that I've put into it, I've only ran into one glitch. Well, it did crash to the desktop a few times before the first patch. But besides that, there was a bookshelf in the Breezehome that would move books to other bookshelves in the home. That's not bad at all. In fact, I would go play it right now, but the 8 year old power supplies in my desktop started to fail a few nights ago...superclocked

Well, 8 years is a good life for a PSU... but better get that replaced soon, a bad PSU failure can be very costly, as I'm sure you know! :P

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#82 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="BPoole96"] Every dev needs to take notes from Rockstar thoughRocker6

If every dev were more like CDPR,R* and Naughty Dog we would all have much better games

You want shitty gunplay and combat mechanics in all your games? :o

As I said on many occassions, I find UC to be the AAA game with the worst gunplay I've seen this gen, and according to some of you, that didn't change in TLoU, but the saving grace is how the game doesn't rely on shooting much. Their production values are impressive... the rest, nah...

I'm also not a fan of their extreme linearity, I find it very heavy-handed.

From Naughty Dog I would say their better at production value type stuff than actual gameplay (although I have yet to play TLOU). I usually bash Rockstar for having auto targeting in their games but they proved they can make excellent gunplay in Max Payne 3. CDPR is pretty average with gameplay, but at least their games gives you actual choice that isn't completely black and white where you say "I'm guna be da bad guy dis tyme!!!"
Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="Stringerboy"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rnBZoYnVq8foxhound_fox
:lol: Oh the comments! :lol:

Damn I missed that post :lol: 

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

If every dev were more like CDPR,R* and Naughty Dog we would all have much better games

call_of_duty_10
Yea, cause the combat in the Witcher games and Uncharted and TLOU is reeeeeal good :roll: wait, no its not.

Well,its about opinions... I give equal importance to story,presentation,gameplay mechanics/combat,characters,environments etc Since cdpr and nd's games get almost all of the stuff right,I too consider them to be top quality devs.

They are quality devs, but so is Bethesda. CDPR and ND are both bad in the gameplay mechanics/combat area, probably just as bad as Bethesda. Neither can create huge, interesting worlds like Bethesda though.
Avatar image for call_of_duty_10
call_of_duty_10

4954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 call_of_duty_10
Member since 2009 • 4954 Posts

[QUOTE="call_of_duty_10"]

Because Oblivion is 100x better.

Oblivion has legendary guilds and side quests,and cyrodill is FAR more interesting that skyrim.And when you consider mods like unique landscapes,better cities and obscuro's oblivion overhaul,skyrim looks like a freeware flash game made in the 80s in comparison.

Rocker6

Right now, Oblivion is roughly 7 year old game... while Skyrim is not even 2 years old. How many of your listed mods were fully fleshed out in 2 years?

My point is, by the time Skyrim is 7 years old, who knows what kind of mods we'll have... modding communities last a loooong time on the PC, there are decade old games still getting community patches and levels.

Yes,I can understand that. But no mod can make skyrim's quests and guilds(i.e the most important stuff in ES games) better than those in oblivion. See,the thing is,mods can easily make a good game great,but they rarely make bad games good(talking about game mechanics here,not technical stuff like bugs).
Avatar image for Granny_Spanked
Granny_Spanked

1341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Granny_Spanked
Member since 2013 • 1341 Posts
[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

It's a rather flawed game, and lots of valid criticisms can be made. That said, I still enjoyed it, but there are many glaring design issues on display, and most can be summed up by describing the game as "the ocean the depth of a puddle."

mems_1224
Every game is flawed though. Why does a game like TLOU or Journey get a pass on all their flaws but people shit on skyrim all the time?

They don't?
Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts


Almost everyone was in awe of this game when it releaesed, it won more goty's than any game in recent memory, people sunk over 100 hours in it... is it angry PS3 fans because they got the broken version?

Yes it is buggy and the ai glitches out sometimes, but given the size and scope of the game it's amazing...

look at a game like TLOU which is arguably even buggier, with horrendous AI, only it's LINEAR and tiny in comparison to Skyrims sprawling vistas with virtually NO npcs, while skyrim has the most advanced and abundant use of npcs in gaming history.

robotapple

It's an average game with a huge world, nothing to piss yourself in your panties about. Plenty of things in it could've been done much better.

Avatar image for Rocker6
Rocker6

13358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Rocker6
Member since 2009 • 13358 Posts

The voice actin, mocap and over all attention to detail of ND 

People are reacting negatively to me saying ND, but they are fvcking good at their craft. 

seanmcloughlin

Alright, that's fair enough, but the problem is, for those attributes to be noticeable the most, the game needs to be highly linear.

Still, they do a great job when it comes to production values, one would have to be crazy to deny that.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#89 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Right now, Oblivion is roughly 7 year old game... while Skyrim is not even 2 years old. How many of your listed mods were fully fleshed out in 2 years?

My point is, by the time Skyrim is 7 years old, who knows what kind of mods we'll have... modding communities last a loooong time on the PC, there are decade old games still getting community patches and levels.

Rocker6
We had pretty much the final version of OOO in 2007. That was a year after Oblivion released. Skyrim's mod community is the fraction of the size that Oblivion's ever was.
Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

If every dev were more like CDPR,R* and Naughty Dog we would all have much better games

BPoole96

You want shitty gunplay and combat mechanics in all your games? :o

As I said on many occassions, I find UC to be the AAA game with the worst gunplay I've seen this gen, and according to some of you, that didn't change in TLoU, but the saving grace is how the game doesn't rely on shooting much. Their production values are impressive... the rest, nah...

I'm also not a fan of their extreme linearity, I find it very heavy-handed.

From Naughty Dog I would say their better at production value type stuff than actual gameplay (although I have yet to play TLOU). I usually bash Rockstar for having auto targeting in their games but they proved they can make excellent gunplay in Max Payne 3. CDPR is pretty average with gameplay, but at least their games gives you actual choice that isn't completely black and white where you say "I'm guna be da bad guy dis tyme!!!"

Yea but the world in The Witcher 2 is very very small compared to Skyrim. Lets see if the can keep the same densely populated world and meaningful choices once they switch to an open world game in The Witcher 3.
Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="Rocker6"]

It's a rather flawed game, and lots of valid criticisms can be made. That said, I still enjoyed it, but there are many glaring design issues on display, and most can be summed up by describing the game as "the ocean the depth of a puddle."

Granny_Spanked
Every game is flawed though. Why does a game like TLOU or Journey get a pass on all their flaws but people shit on skyrim all the time?

They don't?

Not really.
Avatar image for call_of_duty_10
call_of_duty_10

4954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 call_of_duty_10
Member since 2009 • 4954 Posts
[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="call_of_duty_10"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] Yea, cause the combat in the Witcher games and Uncharted and TLOU is reeeeeal good :roll: wait, no its not.

Well,its about opinions... I give equal importance to story,presentation,gameplay mechanics/combat,characters,environments etc Since cdpr and nd's games get almost all of the stuff right,I too consider them to be top quality devs.

They are quality devs, but so is Bethesda. CDPR and ND are both bad in the gameplay mechanics/combat area, probably just as bad as Bethesda. Neither can create huge, interesting worlds like Bethesda though.

Yeah,but bethesda games have bad presentation and storytelling,bland environments,forgettable characters and the games are usually loaded with glitches.Plus,skyrim feels more like an action game,than an rpg game. Of course,that doesn't mean that there's nothing right in skyrim.There ARE some interesting side quests and environments,and the actual stories of quests can be pretty interesting due to lore. But as I said,it's about opinions.I prefer the stuff that cdpr and nd do better,while you prefer things that bethesda specialises in:)
Avatar image for GONtheSKYLORD
GONtheSKYLORD

3042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 GONtheSKYLORD
Member since 2008 • 3042 Posts
Skyrim took an arrow to the knee.
Avatar image for Rocker6
Rocker6

13358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Rocker6
Member since 2009 • 13358 Posts

[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

[QUOTE="call_of_duty_10"]

Because Oblivion is 100x better.

Oblivion has legendary guilds and side quests,and cyrodill is FAR more interesting that skyrim.And when you consider mods like unique landscapes,better cities and obscuro's oblivion overhaul,skyrim looks like a freeware flash game made in the 80s in comparison.

call_of_duty_10

Right now, Oblivion is roughly 7 year old game... while Skyrim is not even 2 years old. How many of your listed mods were fully fleshed out in 2 years?

My point is, by the time Skyrim is 7 years old, who knows what kind of mods we'll have... modding communities last a loooong time on the PC, there are decade old games still getting community patches and levels.

Yes,I can understand that. But no mod can make skyrim's quests and guilds(i.e the most important stuff in ES games) better than those in oblivion. See,the thing is,mods can easily make a good game great,but they rarely make bad games good(talking about game mechanics here,not technical stuff like bugs).

Alright, I can agree with that, Oblivion indeed had much more memorable quests, and guilds were far better, more detail, more interesting storylines, etc. Dark Brotherhood was the most awesome of all, of course! :P

Sad how in Skyrim, the guilds had very short and uninteresting questlines with lots of padding based on the radiant quest system... I just wanted to get them over with, and that sucks...

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
[QUOTE="call_of_duty_10"][QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="call_of_duty_10"] Well,its about opinions... I give equal importance to story,presentation,gameplay mechanics/combat,characters,environments etc Since cdpr and nd's games get almost all of the stuff right,I too consider them to be top quality devs.

They are quality devs, but so is Bethesda. CDPR and ND are both bad in the gameplay mechanics/combat area, probably just as bad as Bethesda. Neither can create huge, interesting worlds like Bethesda though.

Yeah,but bethesda games have bad presentation and storytelling,bland environments,forgettable characters and the games are usually loaded with glitches.Plus,skyrim feels more like an action game,than an rpg game. Of course,that doesn't mean that there's nothing right in skyrim.There ARE some interesting side quests and environments,and the actual stories of quests can be pretty interesting due to lore. But as I said,it's about opinions.I prefer the stuff that cdpr and nd do better,while you prefer things that bethesda specialises in:)

I disagree. There are a ton of interesting stories and gorgeous enviornments in Skyrim
Avatar image for Granny_Spanked
Granny_Spanked

1341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Granny_Spanked
Member since 2013 • 1341 Posts
[QUOTE="Granny_Spanked"][QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="Rocker6"]

It's a rather flawed game, and lots of valid criticisms can be made. That said, I still enjoyed it, but there are many glaring design issues on display, and most can be summed up by describing the game as "the ocean the depth of a puddle."

mems_1224
Every game is flawed though. Why does a game like TLOU or Journey get a pass on all their flaws but people shit on skyrim all the time?

They don't?

Not really. [/QUOTE You're right about Journey, it probably deserves more criticism than it got. But, The Last of Us has caught far more flak than Skyrim ever has.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#97 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
The voice actin, mocap and over all attention to detail of NDseanmcloughlin
What does this have to do with making a game fun? Retro Studios has an attention to detail that I personally feel is pretty much unmatched by any current developer (I cite Metroid Prime as my evidence). Motion capture might make animations "more realistic" but what if the game is being made to be unrealistic? Like Okami? Team ICO is obsessed with perfected motion capture and look where that got them with The Last Guardian. I honestly haven't played a Naughty Dog game yet that I have truly enjoyed. Crash Bandicoot, Jak & Daxter, and Uncharted... the only game from those three franchises I liked was Crash Bash, and ND didn't make it. What they make might be entertaining for many, but it isn't for me, and I don't think they are essential to the progress of the gaming industry. Not like Nintendo, Platinum or CDPR might be.
Avatar image for call_of_duty_10
call_of_duty_10

4954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 call_of_duty_10
Member since 2009 • 4954 Posts
[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

Right now, Oblivion is roughly 7 year old game... while Skyrim is not even 2 years old. How many of your listed mods were fully fleshed out in 2 years?

My point is, by the time Skyrim is 7 years old, who knows what kind of mods we'll have... modding communities last a loooong time on the PC, there are decade old games still getting community patches and levels.

foxhound_fox
We had pretty much the final version of OOO in 2007. That was a year after Oblivion released. Skyrim's mod community is the fraction of the size that Oblivion's ever was.

Is that a fact?I always felt so,but I didn't know that skyrim mod community is smaller. I mean,whenever I go to skyrim nexus,I get the feeling that most modders are concentrating only on garbage like skimpy armour and catgirls. I checked the skyrim nexus profiles of the elite oblivion modders like bananasplit,and most of them had uploaded literally nothing.A few of them had uploaded some small mods that don't change the gameplay...Just some programs to make modding easier.
Avatar image for Rocker6
Rocker6

13358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Rocker6
Member since 2009 • 13358 Posts

[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

If every dev were more like CDPR,R* and Naughty Dog we would all have much better games

BPoole96

You want shitty gunplay and combat mechanics in all your games? :o

As I said on many occassions, I find UC to be the AAA game with the worst gunplay I've seen this gen, and according to some of you, that didn't change in TLoU, but the saving grace is how the game doesn't rely on shooting much. Their production values are impressive... the rest, nah...

I'm also not a fan of their extreme linearity, I find it very heavy-handed.

From Naughty Dog I would say their better at production value type stuff than actual gameplay (although I have yet to play TLOU). I usually bash Rockstar for having auto targeting in their games but they proved they can make excellent gunplay in Max Payne 3. CDPR is pretty average with gameplay, but at least their games gives you actual choice that isn't completely black and white where you say "I'm guna be da bad guy dis tyme!!!"

Yeah, I can agree with that, ND really drops the ball as far as gameplay is concerned IMO, and since lots of time in UC is spent around shooting, it's no wonder I find the entire franchise mediocre.

And true, CDPR doesn't have the best gamplay around, but as a whole package, I find both Witcher games awesome. I mean, I could point out a lot of shortcomings if I analyzed every game element on its own, but ultimately, everything ties together nicely, and that's what matters the most.

-----------

Also, have you played MP3 on the PC?

For me, it's easily the best TPS this gen, has awesome combat mechanics and the most satisfying gunplay I saw this gen. My only complaint was a few cutscenes too many...

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#100 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Yea but the world in The Witcher 2 is very very small compared to Skyrim. Lets see if the can keep the same densely populated world and meaningful choices once they switch to an open world game in The Witcher 3.mems_1224
I think the important aspect here is striking a balance between the largeness of the world and how populated it can be given technical limitations. Liberty City in GTAIV on consoles feels the same way as Skyrim due to the technical limitations of number of cars and pedestrians allowed. If Skyrim and GTAIV were developed as PC exclusives, I don't doubt they would have been much different games. They would have had densely populated worlds with plenty of things to do in them. Rather than wasting resources on scenery and square-mileage.