Wow, this is still going on? If this actually has to be asked, PC gamers clearly don't understand why there's a market for consoles in the first place. It comes down to cost and convenience. Consoles are that 'low cost out of the box ready to use appliance'.
We know this, but what does System Wars debate? we always go on about "Quality of Games is more important than Sales" all of a sudden this doesnt apply to the gaming systems themselves?
The PC gamers here often argue that building your own rig is not as complicated as it seems at first, that it can be learned by anybody. And yes, they are right about this. Make no mistake. But you want to know the truth? THAT DOESN'T MATTER.
What a double-edged logic we have going here, apperently Cost and Conveniance MATTERS here, but the fact that we are right about it being cheap and easy doesnt matter? the very fact that most people that post here have way too much free time diminishes any REAL arguement of conveniance.
Even if the perception of building your own PC is wrong, that's not the point. What is the point is that the general consumer doesn't WANT to build it themselves, even if they thought they were capable of learning and taking the time to do it themselves, it's more a matter of "why should they in the first place"? The frame of mind is that PCs are just another electronic appliance, categorized like stereo systems, microwave ovens, MP3 players, VCRs, DVD players and so on. They don't expect to build their own movie player or music player, and that's what they expect from the device they want to use for home productivity. There's plenty of stores that carry these devices in boxes on shelves, and they just want to take it home, take it out of the box and it's ready to use.
Your right, but again this forum is one pool of hypocrisy, the ammount of time consolites spend on here looking up why Console Gaming is better than PC, thye could of took just 1 day out of thier time and resolved this issue. but instead Quality, Games Library and "Cost of what you get" is thrown out the window because they cant be a smart consumer FOR ONE DAY OUT OF THIER LIVES. sorry, dont buy it.... cancelling out the merits of PC gaming for something so superficial, liek the majority of these "Hardcore Gaming" System Warriors care what "the average consumer" is capable of when it doesnt favour them.
The Ultimatum is, you get what you pay for and what time is invested, a PC does so much more inside and outside gaming, and is easily accessible with minimal research, THIS IS FACT.
The minute you introduce the need for a tool kit (screw drivers, pliers, fasteners, etc...) to be able to assemble something, it's perceived in a whole new light. Right or wrong about the complexity of the procedure, it's no longer the convenient ready to use device, and that's not what they wanted in the first place. This hasn't even taken into consideration the expanded shopping list of buying each component separately and the product knowledge needed for each one to understand the requirements from the variety of brands and models out there. Like I said, you can argue that it can be learned all you want, in the end it won't matter. This also in no way makes them stupid or lazy either. It comes down to the expectation. If it's for entertainment, it should be convenient.
True, but your final point is subjective... entertainment isnt always conveniant, a deeper interest in something shows passions and intilligence, I have no interest in cars, but i can do the basics, I hate DiY yet I do it anyway. I have a strong interest in games, SO I TAKE ONE DAY OUT OF MY LIFE TO DO THESE SIMPLE THINGS.
Lazy... maybe not so much stupid, but still, I ask again, when discussing system wars, when has appealing to the lowest common denominator been the primary focus of what makes something "good"?
The other factor the PC vs Console debate hinges on is expense. And again it is true that PC gaming does NOT require an initial investment of $4500, nor the bi-annual upkeep of $400 in upgrades. All the prices that hermits have quoted here, being about $200-300 more than consoles, are accurate. Buuuuuuuuut... every one of those quotes have made one assertion, that the PC in question is self built, which again, is against the general consumer's expectation.
This is the big Catch 22. For that consumer crowd to get into PC gaming it's either:
A) to get it at the cost they want, they need to go to more trouble than their willing to
B) they do have the option to get a PC capable rig at a store and is ready out of the box, but that option is 3X more than a console
If you understand the expectations of the general consumer, you then understand why the market for consoles exist in the first place. They are the balanced package of low cost and ready to use convenience. Oh and what ever technical superiority PCs hold over consoles, again to the average gamer it doesn't matter. The current generation of consoles more than satisfies the eye candy cravings. Only in forums to people nit pick over resolutions and textures. That is completely immaterial in the real world, where the oveall design and visual styIes are what people see as good graphics.
Very True.
In fact the REAL question isn't, "why do people choose console over PC to game on?", it's "why do PC gamers care what other people game on?". Is it really that difficult to accept a diiferent venue from your own? Like yours is the only perception that matters?
AdobeArtist
I dont disagree with anything you have said, I just dont like circular logic, this is system wars, where the intention is to debate quality, content and games library, this defines the winner for some odd reason.
But these excuses, these pitiful things which these forumites read for hours and hours, yet do nothing about is just hilariously bad.
I cant talk, I use to buy pre-made expensive PCs which wouldnt even max some games. I came here for a month and BAM... oh look, it was godamn simple.
Its about confidence in your ability to research and follow up like anything else. this isnt company or consumer wars, its system wars.
Log in to comment