Why do the majority of people prefer gaming on consoles rather than Pc?

[QUOTE="Birdy09"]Likewise to your statement? we dont like fixing bugs, I also dont like it when my 360 has a disc read error, but what can I do about that? oh right.. nothing.lowe0

Actually, I find those problems entertaining. I'll often find games that I know won't work well on my system (like Grim Fandango) and find a solution myself using troubleshooting techniques and Google. Though, I think that stems from my love of software and computers rather than my love of gaming.

Why are PC gamers always trying to "Convert" or just talk down on people that don't play PC. Just play games on the system of your choice and be happy. Stop trying to convert people to just playing on PC.

Plus why limit your gaming to just PC when you can game on everything?

CajunShooter

How did you get that from this thread? Do you not see what the OP and thread title is? Why do consolities think defending our platform = converting?

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

3. Consoles is all they know about, venturing to a different form of gaming is intimidating.

lowe0

Ya, so? thats you, but for the general population of consolers its true

4. Fanboyism plays a big role in bashing, denial, and telling lies to try to make their favorite item be on top when its not.

04dcarraher

Im not attcking you directly :lol: , But when people come up with only price, tv's, couchs, and controllers and the few exclusives left as an excuse in why their system is best..... see? Also I own a 360, And I also pointedother reasons in console gaming but yet you focus on these points...

I don't like keyboards and I've always gamed on consoles; it's what I know the best.

overall its cheaper to get a console, any software title is compatible no matter what, instead of a 60$ a year for 1 game to play online, you pay 50$ for 90% of the library to play online or free for 90% of the library. the 10% is offline games fyi. you have a wider choice for titles that are compatible. with a pc you try playing a 1995 game on a disc and it dont work but with a console, a 1995 game will run 100% on a ps3 or wii

you have a wider choice for titles that are compatible. with a pc you try playing a 1995 game on a disc and it dont work but with a console, a 1995 game will run 100% on a ps3 or wii

bigM10231

[QUOTE="bigM10231"]

you have a wider choice for titles that are compatible. with a pc you try playing a 1995 game on a disc and it dont work but with a console, a 1995 game will run 100% on a ps3 or wii

04dcarraher

As for the consoles, the Wii has it in spades (not only because of its hardware compatibility with the GameCube--guaranteed because of similar hardware--but also because of sanctioned emulation of early-gen consoles). The 360 at least makes a reasonable attempt given its radically different hardware. If anything, it's Sony that's leaving its retro games behind. This could be a strategic move by Sony, though, probably because it realizes more people are likely to own a PS2 (which is backward-compatible with PS1 games) than a PS3 and the odds are passing fair, especially at current prices, that people who want it all would own both.

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="bigM10231"]

you have a wider choice for titles that are compatible. with a pc you try playing a 1995 game on a disc and it dont work but with a console, a 1995 game will run 100% on a ps3 or wii

HuusAsking

As for the consoles, the Wii has it in spades (not only because of its hardware compatibility with the GameCube--guaranteed because of similar hardware--but also because of sanctioned emulation of early-gen consoles). The 360 at least makes a reasonable attempt given its radically different hardware. If anything, it's Sony that's leaving its retro games behind. This could be a strategic move by Sony, though, probably because it realizes more people are likely to own a PS2 (which is backward-compatible with PS1 games) than a PS3 and the odds are passing fair, especially at current prices, that people who want it all would own both.

The simple fact is pc offers a lot bigger backwards compatibility. You can run most of it's games from the last 30 years. Sure, sometiems it will require tinkering, downloading special patches or emulators, but in most cases you can get it to work, can't say the same about console. A 1995 console game won't run on most modern consoles. It definitly won't run on Wii as it lacks cartidge slot, it also won't work on all new PS3s, not to mention no console today can run Saturn, Jaguar or 3DO games.

I don't prefer any of them, I have a frame of mind for each one and if Im in the mood to play my pc Ill set up my profile for the game Im playing and play that, but sometimes I may want to hide upstairs or somewhere and play a handheld for a bit. I can't say I care what Im playing it on as long as the game is good.

Then general facts of Pc gaming.

1. Dont need a zillion dollar Pc to play games. A simple $100 upgrade on a 3-4 year old Pc can spruse a family Pc into a Pc that can game equal or better then current console graphics abilities.

2. Gaming on Pc has gotten alot easier with new OS's like Windows Vista / 7 , Programs like Steam unifying gaming into a single package like consoles do.

3. Pc technology goes leaps and bounds over consoles by the time a new generation comes out Pc is already there and will be ahead.

4. Connecting Controllers and TV's is not hard, but very easy.

5. Pc gaming isnt dying but expanding,

04dcarraher

I agree with all but 5. What exactly has improved over the last year? I know that StarCraft 2 is a fan favorite, but have I been missing out on some new awesome titles?

The PC-console wars continue to rage on, I see.

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] What? I think you have it backwards, an old console game wont work on a new console unless MS,Nintendo, or Sony recreate those select titles for you to pay and play again. Then On Pc backwards compatibilty is heck of alot better then consoles, and consoles really dont have backwards compatibilty anymore.AdrianWerner

As for the consoles, the Wii has it in spades (not only because of its hardware compatibility with the GameCube--guaranteed because of similar hardware--but also because of sanctioned emulation of early-gen consoles). The 360 at least makes a reasonable attempt given its radically different hardware. If anything, it's Sony that's leaving its retro games behind. This could be a strategic move by Sony, though, probably because it realizes more people are likely to own a PS2 (which is backward-compatible with PS1 games) than a PS3 and the odds are passing fair, especially at current prices, that people who want it all would own both.

The simple fact is pc offers a lot bigger backwards compatibility. You can run most of it's games from the last 30 years. Sure, sometiems it will require tinkering, downloading special patches or emulators, but in most cases you can get it to work, can't say the same about console. A 1995 console game won't run on most modern consoles. It definitly won't run on Wii as it lacks cartidge slot, it also won't work on all new PS3s, not to mention no console today can run Saturn, Jaguar or 3DO games.

I beg to differ. Since you pretty much need a software emulator to play pre-Windows PC games, how is that any different from software-based console emulation?HuusAsking

Also... you can play most pc games, while Wii's virtual console only offers you a fraction of older titles. So how does PC not win in backwards compatibility? Even if somebody would agree with your VC argumentation it still doesn't make a difference in the end result as PC has the same thing too and then some.

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]I beg to differ. Since you pretty much need a software emulator to play pre-Windows PC games, how is that any different from software-based console emulation?AdrianWerner

Also... you can play most pc games, while Wii's virtual console only offers you a fraction of older titles. So how does PC not win in backwards compatibility? Even if somebody would agree with your VC argumentation it still doesn't make a difference in the end result as PC has the same thing too and then some.

I beg to differ. Since you pretty much need a software emulator to play pre-Windows PC games, how is that any different from software-based console emulation?HuusAsking

Also... you can play most pc games, while Wii's virtual console only offers you a fraction of older titles. So how does PC not win in backwards compatibility? Even if somebody would agree with your VC argumentation it still doesn't make a difference in the end result as PC has the same thing too and then some.

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]Because you can actualy play older pc games on PC? Games released in those years, you can take your old gaming collection and play it today, on Wii you can't. Yoy have to buy the games once again, that's not so much a backwards compatibility as it is simple porting of games to modern system.

Also... you can play most pc games, while Wii's virtual console only offers you a fraction of older titles. So how does PC not win in backwards compatibility? Even if somebody would agree with your VC argumentation it still doesn't make a difference in the end result as PC has the same thing too and then some.

04dcarraher

I also prefer my PC because I can play wii and gamecube games on it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdWnNgTLbKw&playnext_from=TL&videos=TUpeIDMVHfg&feature=sub

This is why PC owns. watch the vid. this goofy guy knows whats up.

I also prefer my PC because I can play wii and gamecube games on it.

Hakkai007

consoles is what i started with. i cant get used key board and mouse.

only games i can play on pc are mmos

[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

I also prefer my PC because I can play wii and gamecube games on it.

HuusAsking

Yah I play the games I own.

I play them at high resolution with AA and AF.

Most popular Wii games work well and even more gamecube games work.

They are all smooth.

All you need is a good cpu and a mediocre video card as the games are not exactly gpu intensive.

Here is an 8 year old gamecube game (RE0) and it looked great for it's age with the help of some new PC settings applied.

And I will also add in Onechanbara and RE Umbrella chronicles.

I don't take many screenshots while I play my games.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdWnNgTLbKw&playnext_from=TL&videos=TUpeIDMVHfg&feature=sub

This is why PC owns. watch the vid. this goofy guy knows whats up.

consoles is what i started with. i cant get used key board and mouse.

only games i can play on pc are mmos

monson21502

IMO the majority of people can't grasp deep games so they need dumbed down console games they can understand. That or they just lack the intelligence to operate a PC.

blizzle

easier to set up(you dont have to build your console) and it is less expensive.

also, can you play local multiplayer on the pc?

IMO the majority of people can't grasp deep games so they need dumbed down console games they can understand. That or they just lack the intelligence to operate a PC.

blizzle

Intelligence has nothing to do with it. I can operate a PC just fine, as I use one everyday to perform task at work and at home. I would argue that the average PC gamer can't do some of the complex things I do with spreadsheets at work. I do not consider them less intelligent because of this.

It prefer consoles for the convenience. And, PC games are not inherently more "deep" than console games.

And, PC games are not inherently more "deep" than console games.

WardCleaver02

It prefer consoles for the convenience. And, PC games are not inherently more "deep" than console games.

WardCleaver02

I would argue otherwise. Compare the Console version of Civilization to the PC version. Compare the console version of IL2: Birds of Prey to the PC IL2: Sturmovik.

[QUOTE="WardCleaver02"]

It prefer consoles for the convenience. And, PC games are not inherently more "deep" than console games.

br0kenrabbit

I would argue otherwise. Compare the Console version of Civilization to the PC version. Compare the console version of IL2: Birds of Prey to the PC IL2: Sturmovik.

IMO the majority of people can't grasp deep games so they need dumbed down console games they can understand. That or they just lack the intelligence to operate a PC.

blizzle

There is no need to insult the intelligence of people here and your comment can be see as offensive to them.

I also prefer my PC because I can play wii and gamecube games on it.

Hakkai007

Discussing that you use an emulator to play Wii and GameCube games is against the rules here.

[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]

[QUOTE="WardCleaver02"]

It prefer consoles for the convenience. And, PC games are not inherently more "deep" than console games.

HuusAsking

I would argue otherwise. Compare the Console version of Civilization to the PC version. Compare the console version of IL2: Birds of Prey to the PC IL2: Sturmovik.

Then why are we arguing that 'PC games are not deeper than console games'? Why change the argument now to 'console gamers don't want deep games' when that's the whole freaking point of 'deeper games are on the PC'?

I think everyone is confusing "deeper" game with harder more complex game. AND that to me doesnt make a game "deeper" but makes me NOT want to play it at all. MODS? I could absolutely care less about mods. To me they can do more harm than good. AND NO I wont give examples.

PC gamers Im sorry you feel the need to keep trying to convice everyone else to switch over. Seems to me if you have a back catalog of games from the early 90s to now that you can play...You would be doing that instead of trying to hype up your wonderful gaming device? jmho

Here'sthe answer:

Most new TVs have the right ports to hook up a computer. Just a matter of time before you can play computer on the couch or sofa. Some people already do it. Consoles and computer gaming are melding in to one thing.

Most new TVs have the right ports to hook up a computer. Just a matter of time before you can play computer on the couch or sofa. Some people already do it. Consoles and computer gaming are melding in to one thing.

James00715

Too much work involved.

[QUOTE="James00715"]

Most new TVs have the right ports to hook up a computer. Just a matter of time before you can play computer on the couch or sofa. Some people already do it. Consoles and computer gaming are melding in to one thing.

NielsNL

Too much work involved.

No more than plugging in a console.

Like he said. Most new TVs have the ports in the back to hook up a computer.

[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]

[QUOTE="WardCleaver02"]

It prefer consoles for the convenience. And, PC games are not inherently more "deep" than console games.

HuusAsking

I would argue otherwise. Compare the Console version of Civilization to the PC version. Compare the console version of IL2: Birds of Prey to the PC IL2: Sturmovik.

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]

[QUOTE="James00715"]

Most new TVs have the right ports to hook up a computer. Just a matter of time before you can play computer on the couch or sofa. Some people already do it. Consoles and computer gaming are melding in to one thing.

treedoor

Too much work involved.

No more than plugging in a console.

Like he said. Most new TVs have the ports in the back to hook up a computer.

Hmmmkay. But I'm not going to put my PC under my TV. See what I'm getting at?

[QUOTE="treedoor"]

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]

Too much work involved.

NielsNL

No more than plugging in a console.

Like he said. Most new TVs have the ports in the back to hook up a computer.

Hmmmkay. But I'm not going to put my PC under my TV. See what I'm getting at?

I actually don't see what you're getting at.

That's like me saying I'm not going to put my console under my tv......It's just confusing to think why you wouldn't without some reasoning behind it.

[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

I also prefer my PC because I can play wii and gamecube games on it.

thom_maytees

Discussing that you use an emulator to play Wii and GameCube games is against the rules here.

I never talked about that you were the only one to bring it up.

I actually don't see what you're getting at.

That's like me saying I'm not going to put my console under my tv......It's just confusing to think why you wouldn't without some reasoning behind it.

treedoor

A console sits close to your tv whereas a pc doesn't. Hence, hooking one up to your tv takes less work than hooking the other up.

Besides, you try and play a game comfortably sitting in this:

Using this:

[QUOTE="treedoor"]

I actually don't see what you're getting at.

That's like me saying I'm not going to put my console under my tv......It's just confusing to think why you wouldn't without some reasoning behind it.

NielsNL

A console sits close to your tv whereas a pc doesn't. Hence, hooking one up to your tv takes less work than hooking the other up.

Besides, you try and play a game comfortably sitting in this:

Using this:

And you would sit the k/m where? Thats the problem with PCgamers thinking they can sit comfortable in a chair is they dont think about where to sit the m/k??

Ok yeah and there are wired 360 controllers.

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]

[QUOTE="treedoor"]

I actually don't see what you're getting at.

That's like me saying I'm not going to put my console under my tv......It's just confusing to think why you wouldn't without some reasoning behind it.

VanDammFan

A console sits close to your tv whereas a pc doesn't. Hence, hooking one up to your tv takes less work than hooking the other up.

Besides, you try and play a game comfortably sitting in this:

Using this:

And you would sit the k/m where? Thats the problem with PCgamers thinking they can sit comfortable in a chair is they dont think about where to sit the m/k??

Took away the pictures so you can maybe read what I wrote.

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]

[QUOTE="treedoor"]

I actually don't see what you're getting at.

That's like me saying I'm not going to put my console under my tv......It's just confusing to think why you wouldn't without some reasoning behind it.

VanDammFan

A console sits close to your tv whereas a pc doesn't. Hence, hooking one up to your tv takes less work than hooking the other up.

Besides, you try and play a game comfortably sitting in this:

Using this:

And you would sit the k/m where? Thats the problem with PCgamers thinking they can sit comfortable in a chair is they dont think about where to sit the m/k??

you can use joypads too if you really can't stand mouse and keyboard. and I don't see why people absolutely need to play games being sprawled across the sofa?

[QUOTE="treedoor"]

I actually don't see what you're getting at.

That's like me saying I'm not going to put my console under my tv......It's just confusing to think why you wouldn't without some reasoning behind it.

NielsNL

A console sits close to your tv whereas a pc doesn't. Hence, hooking one up to your tv takes less work than hooking the other up.

Besides, you try and play a game comfortably sitting in this:

Using this:

I don't really get how a computer doesn't sit close to your tv, or how it's harder to hook up. I've got one that sits in the entertainment center, and uses ONE cable to hook up to the TV just like a console does.

And they have tables specifically designed for couches or chairs that you can use a mouse on. That, and computers can use controllers too. I'd much rather have both control options even if one requires buying a cheap table. Sounds much nicer than being restricted to one control type