Witcher 2 on XBOX 360 - SUB HD

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for KiZZo1
KiZZo1

3989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 KiZZo1
Member since 2007 • 3989 Posts

Anyone surprised?

What's the excuse now: "Bu bu bu - the PS3 was holding it back ?"

SubHDBox - CONFIRMED !

P.S. No save import - Witcher 2 FE (FAIL EDITION)

P.P.S. Enhanced Edition - free upgrade for PC owners. All future content also free; Xbox - not so lucky.

Avatar image for Eddie-Vedder
Eddie-Vedder

7810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Eddie-Vedder
Member since 2003 • 7810 Posts

Wow the 360 is so bad. What a shame.

Play this game on the PC guys, it's the best RPG ever imo.

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts
A better question is how many people would have known if they weren't told.
Avatar image for PcGamingRig
PcGamingRig

7386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 PcGamingRig
Member since 2009 • 7386 Posts

are those people in that picture? lol j/k... :)

but it isn't surprising considering the witcher 2 is one of the best looking pc games, it had to be scaled down alot for it to work.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#5 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

If I cared, I'd go buy/build a beefcake PC. I don't so I'll enjoy the 360 version. :)

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

Looks really blurry. Still will be a great game for those that neevr played it and the blurriness probably isn't as apparent to those who have never seen how nice it looks running on a PC

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

hmm....seems to look great to me...seems that its not being released on ps3 as of yet....

Avatar image for Chemical_Viking
Chemical_Viking

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Chemical_Viking
Member since 2010 • 2145 Posts

That screenshot looks pretty sound to me.

Avatar image for shadiezz2012
shadiezz2012

2474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 shadiezz2012
Member since 2012 • 2474 Posts
lol i didn't know that so ( Screen tearing / low res textures / textures slow loading/low frame rate .. and now a sub HD ) yeah it's an xbox360 game and who in the blue hell said that ps3 is holding back the xbox ???? it's the other way around and both are holding back pc
Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

It is funny that this thread shows an amazing picture from the 360 version, one that looks way better than anything on PS3

Avatar image for Duckyindiana
Duckyindiana

3040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Duckyindiana
Member since 2006 • 3040 Posts

Wow the 360 is so bad. What a shame.

Play this game on the PC guys, it's the best RPG ever imo.

Eddie-Vedder

And yet most PS3 games are sub hd but don't see you **** and maon about that?!

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

Wow the 360 is so bad. What a shame.

Play this game on the PC guys, it's the best RPG ever imo.

Eddie-Vedder
wow your stupid.
Avatar image for gpuking
gpuking

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 gpuking
Member since 2004 • 3914 Posts
LOL, the new hope is ONCE AGAIN lost for the lemmings. Let's see, we had Alan wake, Halo Reach, Crysis 2 all going for best console graphics but all failed to do so, now this joins the long and sad history of lemming's foolish pipe dream. Yep, guess what all those games all have in common, low res textures, bad case of pop ins, frame rate issues and last but not the least, SUB HD resolution.
Avatar image for Strutten
Strutten

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Strutten
Member since 2008 • 1263 Posts

lol i didn't know that so ( Screen tearing / low res textures / textures slow loading/low frame rate .. and now a sub HD ) yeah it's an xbox360 game and who in the blue hell said that ps3 is holding back the xbox ???? it's the other way around and both are holding back pcshadiezz2012

What the effing are you on about lol, try read digital foundry lulz

"In terms of actual frame-rates, it's rare for The Witcher 2 to dip below 28FPS - quite an outstanding achievement bearing in mind the richness of the visuals, the varying numbers of NPCs roaming around the environments and the multitude of effects in play at any given point. "

-

"it's a move that will not only generate immense levels of goodwill from its existing customers but will doubtless encourage more people to buy the full game - and based on how good the 360 release looks, the PC Enhanced Edition should be something truly special. "

And texture pop.in is fixed by installing.. but i guess cows damage control raid or jelly perhaps i dunno.. anyway just more people gets to enjoy a masterpiece rpg like this ..

Avatar image for KiZZo1
KiZZo1

3989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 KiZZo1
Member since 2007 • 3989 Posts

BTW, how's the lack of save import? Pushing around characters, you know nothing about?

I remember it was a big issue on PS3 version of ME2, but now it OK, amirite?

Avatar image for shadiezz2012
shadiezz2012

2474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 shadiezz2012
Member since 2012 • 2474 Posts

[QUOTE="shadiezz2012"]lol i didn't know that so ( Screen tearing / low res textures / textures slow loading/low frame rate .. and now a sub HD ) yeah it's an xbox360 game and who in the blue hell said that ps3 is holding back the xbox ???? it's the other way around and both are holding back pcsts106mat

installing fixes most of those problems, its confirmed. and a sub hd version lol. 672p>>>>>>>>>>>>0p which is the current res of the ps3 version.

this thread is nothing but damage control from butt hurt cows.

TRUE pc gamers will be happy that the 360 owners will help support the devs.

i'm a pc/ps3 owner dude i don't care about ps3 version i already own it on my pc with DX11 on ultra love every part about it
Avatar image for Strutten
Strutten

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Strutten
Member since 2008 • 1263 Posts

LOL, the new hope is ONCE AGAIN lost for the lemmings. Let's see, we had Alan wake, Halo Reach, Crysis 2 all going for best console graphics but all failed to do so, now this joins the long and sad history of lemming's foolish pipe dream. Yep, guess what all those games all have in common, low res textures, bad case of pop ins, frame rate issues and last but not the least, SUB HD resolution. gpuking

try play the game instead, it runs flawless and is def up on top 3 grafix contenders imo. but this isnt new its cows ..
*edit* anyway why are cows freaking out of this, its multiplat anyway lulz , and sure is one of the best looking games even if its sub-hd .. imo i couldnt care less, with such an hardware demanding game, im impressed thats its even came to xbox360 in the first place.. but seriously cows to learn to grow up.. :roll:

Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

BTW, how's the lack of save import? Pushing around characters, you know nothing about?

I remember it was a big issue on PS3 version of ME2, but now it OK, amirite?

You know how the fanboy hypocrisy works. Anyways good for 360 only owners but I've had this on PC since launch so, I'll stick with the far Superior version.
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

BTW, how's the lack of save import? Pushing around characters, you know nothing about?

I remember it was a big issue on PS3 version of ME2, but now it OK, amirite?

KiZZo1
lol Remember folks cows didn't claim that the ps3 version of ME2 was the definitive version, the first ME was s*** wasn't needed ps3 players got the comic book type choice thingy... cows forced it upon themselves, no one lemming said Witcher 1 was S*** wasn't needed...etc
Avatar image for rilpas
rilpas

8161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 rilpas
Member since 2012 • 8161 Posts
as a PC gamer I don't see what the big deal is, the game still looks pretty good, specially considering it's on a console
Avatar image for Strutten
Strutten

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Strutten
Member since 2008 • 1263 Posts

BTW, how's the lack of save import? Pushing around characters, you know nothing about?

I remember it was a big issue on PS3 version of ME2, but now it OK, amirite?

KiZZo1

Wtf are ytou talking ?

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts
[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

BTW, how's the lack of save import? Pushing around characters, you know nothing about?

I remember it was a big issue on PS3 version of ME2, but now it OK, amirite?

You know how the fanboy hypocrisy works. Anyways good for 360 only owners but I've had this on PC since launch so, I'll stick with the far Superior version.

lol flames please dont act as though you unbiased or level headed and superior version? in graphics only otherwise it seems like witcher 2 transfered well to the 360. P.S: I hate people that talk about the faults of fanboys yet has those same faults quite often.
Avatar image for Strutten
Strutten

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Strutten
Member since 2008 • 1263 Posts

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

[QUOTE="shadiezz2012"]lol i didn't know that so ( Screen tearing / low res textures / textures slow loading/low frame rate .. and now a sub HD ) yeah it's an xbox360 game and who in the blue hell said that ps3 is holding back the xbox ???? it's the other way around and both are holding back pcshadiezz2012

installing fixes most of those problems, its confirmed. and a sub hd version lol. 672p>>>>>>>>>>>>0p which is the current res of the ps3 version.

this thread is nothing but damage control from butt hurt cows.

TRUE pc gamers will be happy that the 360 owners will help support the devs.

i'm a pc/ps3 owner dude i don't care about ps3 version i already own it on my pc with DX11 on ultra love every part about it

and yet you are bashing a 7 year old console, which is pretty impressive that it can run witcher around med settings +/- tho with sub-hd

Avatar image for shadiezz2012
shadiezz2012

2474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 shadiezz2012
Member since 2012 • 2474 Posts

[QUOTE="shadiezz2012"]lol i didn't know that so ( Screen tearing / low res textures / textures slow loading/low frame rate .. and now a sub HD ) yeah it's an xbox360 game and who in the blue hell said that ps3 is holding back the xbox ???? it's the other way around and both are holding back pcStrutten

What the effing are you on about lol, try read digital foundry lulz

"In terms of actual frame-rates, it's rare for The Witcher 2 to dip below 28FPS - quite an outstanding achievement bearing in mind the richness of the visuals, the varying numbers of NPCs roaming around the environments and the multitude of effects in play at any given point. "

-

"it's a move that will not only generate immense levels of goodwill from its existing customers but will doubtless encourage more people to buy the full game - and based on how good the 360 release looks, the PC Enhanced Edition should be something truly special. "

And texture pop.in is fixed by installing.. but i guess cows damage control raid or jelly perhaps i dunno.. anyway just more people gets to enjoy a masterpiece rpg like this ..

lol i'm not a caw and it is a masterpiece...on pc and it's not even 30fps even with the sub HD lolXD the framerate dips to 28fps and the screen tearing still there plus the textuers problems (pop in/loading) and lol i'm jelly ???XD my steam: maxthegreat psn: maxthegreat
Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts
[QUOTE="Strutten"]

[QUOTE="shadiezz2012"]lol i didn't know that so ( Screen tearing / low res textures / textures slow loading/low frame rate .. and now a sub HD ) yeah it's an xbox360 game and who in the blue hell said that ps3 is holding back the xbox ???? it's the other way around and both are holding back pcshadiezz2012

What the effing are you on about lol, try read digital foundry lulz

"In terms of actual frame-rates, it's rare for The Witcher 2 to dip below 28FPS - quite an outstanding achievement bearing in mind the richness of the visuals, the varying numbers of NPCs roaming around the environments and the multitude of effects in play at any given point. "

-

"it's a move that will not only generate immense levels of goodwill from its existing customers but will doubtless encourage more people to buy the full game - and based on how good the 360 release looks, the PC Enhanced Edition should be something truly special. "

And texture pop.in is fixed by installing.. but i guess cows damage control raid or jelly perhaps i dunno.. anyway just more people gets to enjoy a masterpiece rpg like this ..

lol i'm not a caw and it is a masterpiece...on pc and it's not even 30fps even with the sub HD lolXD the framerate dips to 28fps and the screen tearing still there plus the textuers problems (pop in/loading) and BTW my steam: maxthegreat psn: maxthegreat

NOT 28 FPS! Seriously, looks fine - it speaks volumes about SW priorities when this is a fast moving topic lol
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#29 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

If I cared, I'd go buy/build a beefcake PC. I don't so I'll enjoy the 360 version. :)

Bigboi500
A GT 260 is hardly beefcake PC. That's the recommended GPU.
Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

BTW, how's the lack of save import? Pushing around characters, you know nothing about?

I remember it was a big issue on PS3 version of ME2, but now it OK, amirite?

You know how the fanboy hypocrisy works. Anyways good for 360 only owners but I've had this on PC since launch so, I'll stick with the far Superior version.

lol flames please dont act as though you unbiased or level headed and superior version? in graphics only otherwise it seems like witcher 2 transfered well to the 360. P.S: I hate people that talk about the faults of fanboys yet has those same faults quite often.

You should be the last one calling me out. Pot calling the kettle black. Everyone is biased and only fools trying to convince themselves say otherwise. Yes, just like the majority of multiplats that appear on PC it will be superior in graphics and peformance for those like myself with rigs to make it so.
Avatar image for DarkOfKnight
DarkOfKnight

2543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 DarkOfKnight
Member since 2011 • 2543 Posts
A better question is how many people would have known if they weren't told.soulitane
Next to nobody. It doesn't matter at all.
Avatar image for Strutten
Strutten

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Strutten
Member since 2008 • 1263 Posts

[QUOTE="Strutten"]

[QUOTE="shadiezz2012"]lol i didn't know that so ( Screen tearing / low res textures / textures slow loading/low frame rate .. and now a sub HD ) yeah it's an xbox360 game and who in the blue hell said that ps3 is holding back the xbox ???? it's the other way around and both are holding back pcshadiezz2012

What the effing are you on about lol, try read digital foundry lulz

"In terms of actual frame-rates, it's rare for The Witcher 2 to dip below 28FPS - quite an outstanding achievement bearing in mind the richness of the visuals, the varying numbers of NPCs roaming around the environments and the multitude of effects in play at any given point. "

-

"it's a move that will not only generate immense levels of goodwill from its existing customers but will doubtless encourage more people to buy the full game - and based on how good the 360 release looks, the PC Enhanced Edition should be something truly special. "

And texture pop.in is fixed by installing.. but i guess cows damage control raid or jelly perhaps i dunno.. anyway just more people gets to enjoy a masterpiece rpg like this ..

lol i'm not a caw and it is a masterpiece...on pc and it's not even 30fps even with the sub HD lolXD the framerate dips to 28fps and the screen tearing still there plus the textuers problems (pop in/loading) and BTW my steam: maxthegreat psn: maxthegreat

i say it again read the effing article.
screentearing is cuts-scenes(mostly in cut-scenes) and only in scenes where lots of transparencies are in play. . and you dont read at all do you ? . texture pop-ins is confirmed to by fixed by installing .. which is true got the game myself.. so what if its sub-hd its 6-7year old consoles .. seriously dude its a great looking game by consoles standards, and by console standards if def up there with the big ones imo.

Avatar image for gpuking
gpuking

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 gpuking
Member since 2004 • 3914 Posts

anyway why are cows freaking out of this, its multiplat anyway lulz , and sure is one of the best looking games even if its sub-hd .. imo i couldnt care less, with such an hardware demanding game, im impressed thats its even came to xbox360 in the first place.. but seriously cows to learn to grow up.. :roll:

Strutten

Hey, just because you couldn't care less doesn't mean it's not there lol, you should learn to grow up and accept fact. Telling yourself it's one of the best looking game enough times maybe IGN would give its graphic 10/10 "uncharted 3's score" instead of 8/10. Admit defeat soldier.

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#34 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
TC is a d*ck, but lol 672p.
Avatar image for iamrob7
iamrob7

2138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#35 iamrob7
Member since 2007 • 2138 Posts

I find the idea that 720p is genuinely considered "HD" rather comical in itself. I appreciate that technically that is how it is labelled, but being half as sharp as a 1080p image, it's hard to really consider 720p proper HD. 672p is not that much of a come down from 720p. I mean you are playing on a console so it is going to be extremely low resolution and jagged either way right.

Avatar image for shadiezz2012
shadiezz2012

2474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#36 shadiezz2012
Member since 2012 • 2474 Posts
"Strutten" on xbox maybe it looks better than any thing on it but but on ps3 you have the gfx award winniers uncharted 3/kz3/god of war3 all looks incredible and non of them is a sub hd or have a pop in or low res textures and non of them have install
Avatar image for Strutten
Strutten

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Strutten
Member since 2008 • 1263 Posts

[QUOTE="Strutten"]anyway why are cows freaking out of this, its multiplat anyway lulz , and sure is one of the best looking games even if its sub-hd .. imo i couldnt care less, with such an hardware demanding game, im impressed thats its even came to xbox360 in the first place.. but seriously cows to learn to grow up.. :roll:

gpuking

Hey, just because you couldn't care less doesn't mean it's not there lol, you should learn to grow up and accept fact. Telling yourself it's one of the best looking game enough times maybe IGN would give its graphic 10/10 "uncharted 3's score" instead of 8/10. Admit defeat soldier.

grasping straws dude ?, exclusives vs multiplat .. and what are you talking about if i could'nt care less, i never said it wasnt there dude Reading Comprehension?

but i do like that you feel the need to use exclusives now, to get some sort of ownage.. hilarious cows never cease to amuse .. its a great game dude, no matter if it was on ps3 its still a great game.. but feeling the need to bash the games because its on xbox is rather sad ..

Avatar image for gpuking
gpuking

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 gpuking
Member since 2004 • 3914 Posts
so what if its sub-hd its 6-7year old consoles .. seriously dude its a great looking game by consoles standards, and by console standards if def up there with the big ones imo.Strutten
Understand this, being sub hd means you have less pixels on screen thus blurring the entire image which is clearly evident in the UC3 vs Witcher 2 thread. I knew something was off in the witcher 2 screens, the textures are less sharp than a typical 720p game, especially compared to UC3. Again not saying it ain't good looking but it's not going for the best looking console game crown neither.
Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11898 Posts

That makes it more cinematic than the PC version :D

Avatar image for gpuking
gpuking

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 gpuking
Member since 2004 • 3914 Posts

[QUOTE="gpuking"]

[QUOTE="Strutten"]anyway why are cows freaking out of this, its multiplat anyway lulz , and sure is one of the best looking games even if its sub-hd .. imo i couldnt care less, with such an hardware demanding game, im impressed thats its even came to xbox360 in the first place.. but seriously cows to learn to grow up.. :roll:

Strutten

Hey, just because you couldn't care less doesn't mean it's not there lol, you should learn to grow up and accept fact. Telling yourself it's one of the best looking game enough times maybe IGN would give its graphic 10/10 "uncharted 3's score" instead of 8/10. Admit defeat soldier.

grasping straws dude ?, exclusives vs multiplat .. and what are you talking about if i could'nt care less, i never said it wasnt there dude Reading Comprehension?

but i do like that you feel the need to use exclusives now, to get some sort of ownage.. hilarious cows never cease to amuse .. its a great game dude, no matter if it was on ps3 its still a great game.. but feeling the need to bash the games because its on xbox is rather sad ..

I'm sorry but where have I bashed the game itself? I was strictly arguing on its native resolution and other technicalities. In fact I'm going to get it for my 360 anyway just to support CD Project's effort so that we might get The Witcher 3 some day. Anyway I think we have all made out points here, peace.
Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11898 Posts

[QUOTE="shadiezz2012"]lol i didn't know that so ( Screen tearing / low res textures / textures slow loading/low frame rate .. and now a sub HD ) yeah it's an xbox360 game and who in the blue hell said that ps3 is holding back the xbox ???? it's the other way around and both are holding back pcsts106mat

installing fixes most of those problems, its confirmed. and a sub hd version lol. 672p>>>>>>>>>>>>0p which is the current res of the ps3 version.

this thread is nothing but damage control from butt hurt cows.

TRUE pc gamers will be happy that the 360 owners will help support the devs.

But I thought console gamers hated installing

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52566 Posts

Cry moar.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#43 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

BTW, how's the lack of save import? Pushing around characters, you know nothing about?

I remember it was a big issue on PS3 version of ME2, but now it OK, amirite?

KiZZo1

It's an issue to be sure, but to be fair, you were kind of thrust into the middle of things in the first game on the PC as well.The difference between Mass Effect and The Witcher is that the first Mass Effect game WAS the beginning of the story.

But I don't think it's in your interest to be fair here so whatever.

Avatar image for shadiezz2012
shadiezz2012

2474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#44 shadiezz2012
Member since 2012 • 2474 Posts

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

[QUOTE="shadiezz2012"]lol i didn't know that so ( Screen tearing / low res textures / textures slow loading/low frame rate .. and now a sub HD ) yeah it's an xbox360 game and who in the blue hell said that ps3 is holding back the xbox ???? it's the other way around and both are holding back pcNoodleFighter

installing fixes most of those problems, its confirmed. and a sub hd version lol. 672p>>>>>>>>>>>>0p which is the current res of the ps3 version.

this thread is nothing but damage control from butt hurt cows.

TRUE pc gamers will be happy that the 360 owners will help support the devs.

But I thought console gamers hated installing

they hate it when it's ps3 game but when it's xbox game it's fine and every thing is ok
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52566 Posts

they hate it when it's ps3 game but when it's xbox game it's fine and every thing is okshadiezz2012

There's a difference between optional and mandatory.

Avatar image for kungfool69
kungfool69

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 kungfool69
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts

this sub HD argument is why i am egerly awaiting Wii U :D

current gen games at higher res, closer to PC counterpart, with a standard control scheme (not a wii mote by default).

anyway, iplayed witcher 1 for about an hour on my PC, got bored.

Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

Low res than 2002 pc.

Wow.

Avatar image for Strutten
Strutten

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Strutten
Member since 2008 • 1263 Posts

[QUOTE="NoodleFighter"]

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

installing fixes most of those problems, its confirmed. and a sub hd version lol. 672p>>>>>>>>>>>>0p which is the current res of the ps3 version.

this thread is nothing but damage control from butt hurt cows.

TRUE pc gamers will be happy that the 360 owners will help support the devs.

shadiezz2012

But I thought console gamers hated installing

they hate it when it's ps3 game but when it's xbox game it's fine and every thing is ok

Installing games on xbox360 is not mandatory dude, and its a nice feature xbox got. :roll:

Avatar image for deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0
deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0

2051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0
Member since 2008 • 2051 Posts

Still a **** amazing rpg. Going to make a video comparison on this.

Avatar image for Supa_F_L_Y
Supa_F_L_Y

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Supa_F_L_Y
Member since 2012 • 29 Posts
PC fanboys your just jelly that you spend 1000$ on your PC for you to lose your best game.