Witcher 2 on XBOX 360 - SUB HD

Xbox 360 ... Best myopia simulator ever. Or, I could just take my glasses off when playing games, for a similar result.

Anyone surprised?

What's the excuse now: "Bu bu bu - the PS3 was holding it back ?"

SubHDBox - CONFIRMED !

P.S. No save import - Witcher 2 FE (FAIL EDITION)

P.P.S. Enhanced Edition - free upgrade for PC owners. All future content also free; Xbox - not so lucky.

KiZZo1

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Supa_F_L_Y"]PC fanboys your just jelly that you spend 1000$ on your PC for you to lose your best game.Supa_F_L_Y

How do you work this native resolution out? 720 is the dimention of the image (the actual image file) by number of horizontal pixels? 15 is the number of pixels vertically in that little square you cut out? What's the 14 for?

-Unreal-

14 is the number of rows before upscaling, which you can determine by the number of the stairs formed by the jaggies.

I might not be completely correct in the number, but I think it's somewhere in that range.

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]

How do you work this native resolution out? 720 is the dimention of the image (the actual image file) by number of horizontal pixels? 15 is the number of pixels vertically in that little square you cut out? What's the 14 for?

KiZZo1

14 is the number of rows before upscaling, which you can determine by the number of the stairs formed by the jaggies.

I might not be completely correct in the number, but I think it's somewhere in that range.

Lol does it matter? game looks great.TheGuardian03

[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]Lol does it matter? game looks great.FIipMode

I counted that and I got 15.-Unreal-

If it was 15 you wouldn't see such fading on top of the polygon - see how it gets more and more transparent.

Regardless, wouldn't that number be different depending on what size of area you're counting in determined by that white box?-Unreal-

It will be different but the proportion will always be equal to the ratio between rendering and upscaled resolution.

YES

PIXELS MATTER SO MUCH WHEN I'M PLAYING ON MY 40" 1080p PLASMA TV FROM 6 FEET AWAY FROM THE SCREEN!.

Seriously... pixel arguments are stupid. It's about the end result. If you have to pause the game and then take a sample of pixels from a plank in the game, you're missing the bigger picture.

It obviously looks great when you're playing in motion on a decent screen.

Sub HD must mean it's unplayable trash, right?

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"] I counted that and I got 15.KiZZo1

If it was 15 you wouldn't see such fading on top of the polygon - see how it gets more and more transparent.

Regardless, wouldn't that number be different depending on what size of area you're counting in determined by that white box?-Unreal-

It will be different but the proportion will always be equal to the ratio between rendering and upscaled resolution.

Well TC it shows how stupid you are if you expected it to have the same standard as todays PC. The 360 has the game, it is gorgeous, and playable. And accross the board every reviewer has ben impressed with it. So the only fail is your pathetic attempt to be cute.

A better question is how many people would have known if they weren't told.soulitane

YES

PIXELS MATTER SO MUCH WHEN I'M PLAYING ON MY 40" 1080p PLASMA TV FROM 6 FEET AWAY FROM THE SCREEN!.

Seriously... pixel arguments are stupid. It's about the end result. If you have to pause the game and then take a sample of pixels from a plank in the game, you're missing the bigger picture.

It obviously looks great when you're playing in motion on a decent screen.

Wasdie

From 6 feet on 40" display the difference is definitely visible. In fact, at that distance you get almost the full benefit of 1080p, as seen from the following chart.

I recommend this article: 1080p Does Matter

Well TC it shows how stupid you are if you expected it to have the same standard as todays PC. The 360 has the game, it is gorgeous, and playable. And accross the board every reviewer has ben impressed with it. So the only fail is your pathetic attempt to be cute.

WarTornRuston

Still glad it's coming to the 360. Don't have the money right now to go build a PC capable of playing it.

360 game Sub-HD!? This is crazy!chaoz-king

Still great on the Xbox. Haters gonna hate, and cows will continue to be the most insecure fanboys of the bunch, and the laughing stock of System Wars.charizard1605

Seriously, I'm insecure? Even though you make threads daily, seeking approval about your favorite handheld, franchise, console, developer or company?

LOL, now I've seen it all - please, get a grip ...

hmm....seems to look great to me...seems that its not being released on ps3 as of yet....

WilliamRLBaker

Wow, really? I think you need your eyes checked.

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

Wow the 360 is so bad. What a shame.

Play this game on the PC guys, it's the best RPG ever imo.

WilliamRLBaker

Dude, seriously?

YES

PIXELS MATTER SO MUCH WHEN I'M PLAYING ON MY 40" 1080p PLASMA TV FROM 6 FEET AWAY FROM THE SCREEN!.

Seriously... pixel arguments are stupid. It's about the end result. If you have to pause the game and then take a sample of pixels from a plank in the game, you're missing the bigger picture.

It obviously looks great when you're playing in motion on a decent screen.

Wasdie

[QUOTE="charizard1605"]Still great on the Xbox. Haters gonna hate, and cows will continue to be the most insecure fanboys of the bunch, and the laughing stock of System Wars.KiZZo1

Seriously, I'm insecure? Even though you make threads daily, seeking approval about your favorite handheld, franchise, console, developer or company?

LOL, now I've seen it all - please, get a grip ...

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

hmm....seems to look great to me...seems that its not being released on ps3 as of yet....

Masenkoe

Wow, really? I think you need your eyes checked.

Sub HD or not, console peasants with only a meager 360 will be able to play one of the better rpg's on the system.

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

[QUOTE="shadiezz2012"]lol i didn't know that so ( Screen tearing / low res textures / textures slow loading/low frame rate .. and now a sub HD ) yeah it's an xbox360 game and who in the blue hell said that ps3 is holding back the xbox ???? it's the other way around and both are holding back pcshadiezz2012

installing fixes most of those problems, its confirmed. and a sub hd version lol. 672p>>>>>>>>>>>>0p which is the current res of the ps3 version.

this thread is nothing but damage control from butt hurt cows.

TRUE pc gamers will be happy that the 360 owners will help support the devs.

Looks solid to me. And the Metacritic score is 91.

I have it on order. Should be in the mail next week.

remember before Alan wake released and the "OMG im not buying now it's sub HD" boycotts that were supposed to happen? You are all acting crazy with this

It's not the first nor the last game to have this sort of issue. BUT the game still looks great even on the 360 and has a pretty solid Framerate too. Only looks rough when you take screens and analyse them too much or when compared with the Max PC settings. But when you sit down and just play it will look great in motion

Also lol at all the consolites that say "you herms and your graphics. Its story/gameplay/art that matters not higher resolutions and graphic options" then you go and actually count the pixels in a screenshot and debate that. At least the improvements on PC are pretty noticeable

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

Wow the 360 is so bad. What a shame.

Play this game on the PC guys, it's the best RPG ever imo.

WilliamRLBaker

^^Yah, why are people making a big deal out of it? The 360 version is even more cinematic than before confirmed. Dante2710

Because xbox 360 gets another huge game, one of the best games of all time and PS3 still has nothing in 2012 and is the laughstock of the gaming insdustry

[QUOTE="Dante2710"]^^Yah, why are people making a big deal out of it? The 360 version is even more cinematic than before confirmed. loosingENDS

Because xbox 360 gets another huge game, one of the best games of all time and PS3 still has nothing in 2012 and is the laughstock of the gaming insdustry

EDIT: oh, you mean Star Wars AAA?

One plank of wood looks bad! This game is garbage!

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="Dante2710"]^^Yah, why are people making a big deal out of it? The 360 version is even more cinematic than before confirmed. BibiMaghoo

Because xbox 360 gets another huge game, one of the best games of all time and PS3 still has nothing in 2012 and is the laughstock of the gaming insdustry

EDIT: oh, you mean Star Wars AAA?

Halo 4 (best shooter of all time)

Skyrim DLC

Fable

Mass Effect 3 KINECT eclusive edition

Witcher 2

Forza Horizon

etc etc

.

All the true 10/10 games are on 360

Looks okay to me. If I wanted to run the game with the highest possible settings, I'd have built a PC to do so. As it stands, I don't have the money for that but have a 360 that I can dust off and play this on.

If you play the game, pause it at a certain section and then proceed to individually count all the little pixels on a strip and then cry foul when you realise that a few are missing, you really, really need to get a grip on reality.

Maybe a breath of fresh air and some sun might do you some good.

I know this is the name and the game of System Wars but it's getting ridiculous. There are better things to waste our time arguing about.

[QUOTE="FIipMode"]

[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]Lol does it matter? game looks great.Duckyindiana

so what are you crybabies crying about today?

oh, yet another game this generation does not have high enough resolution for your precious widdle eyes?

ahhh, that's too bad. poor widdle snobs. life is soooo tough for a widdle guy sometimes.