Wouldn't Valve make a huge profit if they made HL3?

  • 114 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-622466a483e10
deactivated-622466a483e10

659

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 deactivated-622466a483e10
Member since 2003 • 659 Posts
I don't get it.. Sure they are making great money of steam, but seriously, HL3 would generate so much profit...
Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts
I don't get it.. Sure they are making great money of steam, but seriously, HL3 would generate so much profit...Kloney
But imagine the pressure. It would be hyped as the third coming, 12/10 game...
Avatar image for deactivated-622466a483e10
deactivated-622466a483e10

659

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 deactivated-622466a483e10
Member since 2003 • 659 Posts
[QUOTE="Kloney"]I don't get it.. Sure they are making great money of steam, but seriously, HL3 would generate so much profit...Mozelleple112
But imagine the pressure. It would be hyped as the third coming, 12/10 game...

They've done it before and they could surely do it again tbf, the pressure shouldn't be an excuse..
Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts
[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="Kloney"]I don't get it.. Sure they are making great money of steam, but seriously, HL3 would generate so much profit...Kloney
But imagine the pressure. It would be hyped as the third coming, 12/10 game...

They've done it before and they could surely do it again tbf, the pressure shouldn't be an excuse..

The way I see, HL1 is The Godfather, and HL2 is the Godfather Part II I can't imagine HL3 being up to the standard of the first two, but I can always hope..
Avatar image for FoxbatAlpha
FoxbatAlpha

10669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 FoxbatAlpha
Member since 2009 • 10669 Posts
It has been so long that I hope they haven't lost their touch. It would be great to see what they could do now.
Avatar image for rjdofu
rjdofu

9171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 rjdofu
Member since 2008 • 9171 Posts
Sit on their ass and do nothing while gaining millions vs brainstorming, developing, facing the hype etc to gain millions.
Avatar image for rjdofu
rjdofu

9171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 rjdofu
Member since 2008 • 9171 Posts
It has been so long that I hope they haven't lost their touch. It would be great to see what they could do now.FoxbatAlpha
Portal 2 just released like 2 years ago :|
Avatar image for FoxbatAlpha
FoxbatAlpha

10669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 FoxbatAlpha
Member since 2009 • 10669 Posts
[QUOTE="FoxbatAlpha"]It has been so long that I hope they haven't lost their touch. It would be great to see what they could do now.rjdofu
Portal 2 just released like 2 years ago :|

I am talking about Half Life. Portal was good. Did you ever read who created it? I think it was two Full Sail University students that did it for a class project or some expo. Valve hired them on site.
Avatar image for rjdofu
rjdofu

9171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 rjdofu
Member since 2008 • 9171 Posts
[QUOTE="rjdofu"][QUOTE="FoxbatAlpha"]It has been so long that I hope they haven't lost their touch. It would be great to see what they could do now.FoxbatAlpha
Portal 2 just released like 2 years ago :|

I am talking about Half Life. Portal was good. Did you ever read who created it? I think it was two Full Sail University students that did it for a class project or some expo. Valve hired them on site.

What does it have anything to do with the fact that Valve develop those games themselves? The gameplay were perfect. So no, even if they develop Half Life 3 now, I don't think there will be any problem in term of gameplay.
Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

[QUOTE="Kloney"]I don't get it.. Sure they are making great money of steam, but seriously, HL3 would generate so much profit...Mozelleple112
But imagine the pressure. It would be hyped as the third coming, 12/10 game...

people would still buy it no matter what.

Avatar image for TheEroica
TheEroica

24558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 TheEroica  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 24558 Posts

Imagine a world where a company makes what they feel compelled to make because they feel confident its the right time to make it... then imagine a world where a company just bleeds something to death to squeeze every last cent out of it killing any type of lasting legacy the property may have... Praise be Valve.

Avatar image for FoxbatAlpha
FoxbatAlpha

10669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 FoxbatAlpha
Member since 2009 • 10669 Posts
[QUOTE="rjdofu"][QUOTE="FoxbatAlpha"][QUOTE="rjdofu"] Portal 2 just released like 2 years ago :|

I am talking about Half Life. Portal was good. Did you ever read who created it? I think it was two Full Sail University students that did it for a class project or some expo. Valve hired them on site.

What does it have anything to do with the fact that Valve develop those games themselves? The gameplay were perfect. So no, even if they develop Half Life 3 now, I don't think there will be any problem in term of gameplay.

I was trying to have a conversation about how Portal was created. Im not slamming anyone. I thought is was good how Valve took them in and got the game out.
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
HL3 is just vapour wear. Hell we're going to get L4D3 before HL3.
Avatar image for TheEroica
TheEroica

24558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 TheEroica  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 24558 Posts
HL3 is just vapour wear. Hell we're going to get L4D3 before HL3. clyde46
yes please... :D
Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts

Well Anyways, I really do hope Half Life 3 comes out, its definitely needed. A brand new, state of the art engine. HL1 and HL2 were both the best looking games graphically upon release (despite releasing after Doom 3 and FC1)

 

So Imagine HL3 will graphics that surpass even Crysis 3's. And then they can make a new CS game, Team Fortress 3, Portal 3, Left 4 Dead 3 on the new engine. Would be awesome!

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts
You have to wait for Source 2. We're gonna get L4D 3 first, and then MAYBE HL3. It's definitely being worked on, but you know, Valve Time.
Avatar image for Sushiglutton
Sushiglutton

10472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#17 Sushiglutton
Member since 2009 • 10472 Posts
Yeah but at the say time they could damage the god like status of the brand if they didn't release something groundbreaking and world class. Wasn't there a rumour away back that they wanted the animations to adjust better to the player's posittion and they waited for tech like that or something.
Avatar image for edidili
edidili

3449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 edidili
Member since 2004 • 3449 Posts

HL3 would generate so much profit...Kloney

As strange as it may sound there are other things that are important, not just profits. They want to make sure HL3 is a good game first. The only reason why they haven't released HL3 is because they're not happy with what they have most probably. 

Unlike EA or Activision, Valve doesn't have shareholders to please so they are not forced to release sequels of popular franchises every year to keep the stock prices high.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15877 Posts

HL3 is just vapour wear. Hell we're going to get L4D3 before HL3. clyde46
I think a game has to actually be announced and shown off before it can be vaporware.

Avatar image for 00-Riddick-00
00-Riddick-00

18884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#20 00-Riddick-00
Member since 2009 • 18884 Posts

HL2=Immensely overrated

Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts

To be honest. I'd rather have a team fortress 3 lol

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 49125 Posts

They've done it before and they could surely do it again tbf, the pressure shouldn't be an excuse..Kloney

The pressure is what makes them take so long for each game. 6 years for Half Life 2, 6+ years and counting for HL3 (and we still have yet to see a single screenshot, so I think that shows how far along the game is).

Half Life 1 was a ground breaking game and Valve tried to top it with each new one. IMO they have succeeded with HL2 as it was spectacular too.

I don't know why they are taking so incredibly long with HL3 though and are afraid to show anything of it.

Avatar image for Lumpy311
Lumpy311

2009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Lumpy311
Member since 2013 • 2009 Posts

If HL3 lives up to the hype, i'll be very surpised.

Avatar image for MoneySha
MoneySha

209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 MoneySha
Member since 2013 • 209 Posts

I don't get it.. Sure they are making great money of steam, but seriously, HL3 would generate so much profit...Kloney

 

Doubtful; I think the reason why Valve has held back on "Half-Life" is because of the already flooded market in FPSs...

Avatar image for sweeten16
sweeten16

2872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 sweeten16
Member since 2005 • 2872 Posts
They should release a steam box with half life 3 exclusive to steam at launch.
Avatar image for Lumpy311
Lumpy311

2009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Lumpy311
Member since 2013 • 2009 Posts

They should release a steam box with half life 3 exclusive to steam at launch.sweeten16

Oh, quit it you, if Steam had Half Life as exclusive System Wars would be useless since there would be only a single clear winner.

Avatar image for MoneySha
MoneySha

209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 MoneySha
Member since 2013 • 209 Posts

[QUOTE="sweeten16"]They should release a steam box with half life 3 exclusive to steam at launch.Lumpy311

Oh, quit it you, if Steam had Half Life as exclusive System Wars would be useless since there would be only a single clear winner.

 

Lmao... Here you go again!:roll:

 

If Valve only released HL3 on Steam, they'd be assuring finacial failure... Just like they did with the first HL, HL2, The Orange Box, Left 4 Dead, and Portal 2, they'd have to release it for console, PERIOD!!! Steam is NO where near as profitable as the console and mobile market; which is why damn-near ALL PC developers (including Valve) have moved to the console market to earn better profit... Developers won't make anything back only selling to "beggars" (hermits).

Avatar image for Lumpy311
Lumpy311

2009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Lumpy311
Member since 2013 • 2009 Posts

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

[QUOTE="sweeten16"]They should release a steam box with half life 3 exclusive to steam at launch.MoneySha

Oh, quit it you, if Steam had Half Life as exclusive System Wars would be useless since there would be only a single clear winner.

 

Lmao... Here you go again!:roll:

 

If Valve only released HL3 on Steam, they'd be assuring finacial failure... Just like they did with the first HL, HL2, The Orange Box, Left 4 Dead, and Portal 2, they'd have to release it for console, PERIOD!!! Steam is NO where near as profitable as the console and mobile market...  PC gaming is not as a profitable market as consoles, which is why damn-near ALL PC developers (including Valve) have moved to the console market to earn better profit... Developers won't make anything back only selling to "beggars" (hermits).

I love all your proof to back up those stupid statements.

Avatar image for Rattlesnake_8
Rattlesnake_8

18452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#30 Rattlesnake_8
Member since 2004 • 18452 Posts
They would make a lot of money but they want to make sure it would be amazing.. the hype level would be off the charts and they probably feel no matter how great it is, people will feel disappointed because of what they have built up in their minds.
Avatar image for DeadMan1290
DeadMan1290

15754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#31 DeadMan1290
Member since 2005 • 15754 Posts
[QUOTE="Kloney"]I don't get it.. Sure they are making great money of steam, but seriously, HL3 would generate so much profit...Mozelleple112
But imagine the pressure. It would be hyped as the third coming, 12/10 game...

This.
Avatar image for MoneySha
MoneySha

209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 MoneySha
Member since 2013 • 209 Posts

[QUOTE="MoneySha"]

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

Oh, quit it you, if Steam had Half Life as exclusive System Wars would be useless since there would be only a single clear winner.

Lumpy311

 

Lmao... Here you go again!:roll:

 

If Valve only released HL3 on Steam, they'd be assuring finacial failure... Just like they did with the first HL, HL2, The Orange Box, Left 4 Dead, and Portal 2, they'd have to release it for console, PERIOD!!! Steam is NO where near as profitable as the console and mobile market...  PC gaming is not as a profitable market as consoles, which is why damn-near ALL PC developers (including Valve) have moved to the console market to earn better profit... Developers won't make anything back only selling to "beggars" (hermits).

I love all your proof to back up those stupid statements.

 

What "proof"??? Are you stupid??? So you're telling me, Valve did not port the first Half-life to PS2; they did not port Half-Life 2 to the original Xbox; they did not release Left 4 Dead 1 and 2 for Xbox 360; they did not put out the Orange Box on both consoles; they did not make both console versions of Portal 2 along side PC version, with the PS3 version being the definitive version out of all three? Are you really this blind??? Or are you just pretending to be... 

 

Left 4 Dead 3 is coming and that's going to be on (the more profitable) consoles as well as Steam; And when (if ever) Half-Life 3 is made and ready for release, there will be console versions of that game as well... You know why, because PC gaming is a minority. 

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#33 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

Imagine a world where a company makes what they feel compelled to make because they feel confident its the right time to make it... then imagine a world where a company just bleeds something to death to squeeze every last cent out of it killing any type of lasting legacy the property may have... Praise be Valve.

TheEroica

Damn straight. People bitch about publishers churning out games every year but when a company has the abiliy to take their time, they complain about that as well.

It has been awhile though, but it's Valve and they do quality shit like, all the time. If they were just sitting on their ass instead of making Steam the most interesting Digital platform on the internet I can understand. Instead just look at Steam and then STFU. 

They just released family sharing where you can share your WHOLE GODDAMN STEAM COLLECTION to friend and fam.. 

Cut some slack.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#34 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

[QUOTE="MoneySha"]

 

Lmao... Here you go again!:roll:

 

If Valve only released HL3 on Steam, they'd be assuring finacial failure... Just like they did with the first HL, HL2, The Orange Box, Left 4 Dead, and Portal 2, they'd have to release it for console, PERIOD!!! Steam is NO where near as profitable as the console and mobile market...  PC gaming is not as a profitable market as consoles, which is why damn-near ALL PC developers (including Valve) have moved to the console market to earn better profit... Developers won't make anything back only selling to "beggars" (hermits).

MoneySha

I love all your proof to back up those stupid statements.

 

What "proof"??? Are you stupid??? So you're telling me, Valve did not port the first Half-life to PS2; they did not port Half-Life 2 to the original Xbox; they did not release Left 4 Dead 1 and 2 for Xbox 360; they did not put out the Orange Box on both consoles; they did not make both console versions of Portal 2 along side PC version, with the PS3 version being the definitive version out of all three? Are you really this blind??? Or are you just pretending to be... 

 

Left 4 Dead 3 is coming and that's going to be on (the more profitable) consoles as well as Steam; And when (if ever) Half-Life 3 is made and ready for release, there will be console versions of that game as well... You know why, because PC gaming is a minority. 

Releasing games on multiple platforms is no proof of financial weakness, it just means you have the opportunity to make more money.

Avatar image for metal_zombie
metal_zombie

2288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 metal_zombie
Member since 2004 • 2288 Posts
they must not need money
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#36 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

they must not need moneymetal_zombie
They probably aren't hurting. It's not like they are THQ, lol.

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts

[QUOTE="metal_zombie"]they must not need moneyheretrix

They probably aren't hurting. It's not like they are THQ, lol.

Considering Gaben himself is worth 1.5+ bil I think they're fine. :P
Avatar image for Dave_NBF
Dave_NBF

1974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Dave_NBF
Member since 2005 • 1974 Posts

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

[QUOTE="MoneySha"]

 

Lmao... Here you go again!:roll:

 

If Valve only released HL3 on Steam, they'd be assuring finacial failure... Just like they did with the first HL, HL2, The Orange Box, Left 4 Dead, and Portal 2, they'd have to release it for console, PERIOD!!! Steam is NO where near as profitable as the console and mobile market...  PC gaming is not as a profitable market as consoles, which is why damn-near ALL PC developers (including Valve) have moved to the console market to earn better profit... Developers won't make anything back only selling to "beggars" (hermits).

MoneySha

I love all your proof to back up those stupid statements.

 

What "proof"??? Are you stupid??? So you're telling me, Valve did not port the first Half-life to PS2; they did not port Half-Life 2 to the original Xbox; they did not release Left 4 Dead 1 and 2 for Xbox 360; they did not put out the Orange Box on both consoles; they did not make both console versions of Portal 2 along side PC version, with the PS3 version being the definitive version out of all three? Are you really this blind??? Or are you just pretending to be... 

 

Left 4 Dead 3 is coming and that's going to be on (the more profitable) consoles as well as Steam; And when (if ever) Half-Life 3 is made and ready for release, there will be console versions of that game as well... You know why, because PC gaming is a minority. 

 

Maybe it's YOU who just doesn't get it.  Steam is a huge success and so is Valve.  They are releasing PC made games to consoles (ports).  So YOU are getting the ports and it has NO impact on the PC side except it gives Valve more money to make QUALITY PC games that will also go to console. Anyone knows the PC version is supremely better of all those games you listed.  L4D sucks on consoles and a big reason is that it is made with the PC in mind; including the UI.  So they just port over the best they can to make more money to make PC games. It's not that they are abandoning PC by going to the consoles..it is actually the opposite.  And if you had a PC and actually used Steam and saw the user statistics you would not be speaking this ignorantly. 

Avatar image for Zaibach
Zaibach

13466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#39 Zaibach
Member since 2007 • 13466 Posts

most people dont care about Half Life, jsut a really loud internet minority

Avatar image for metal_zombie
metal_zombie

2288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 metal_zombie
Member since 2004 • 2288 Posts

[QUOTE="metal_zombie"]they must not need moneyheretrix

They probably aren't hurting. It's not like they are THQ, lol.

It sucks that THQ is having problems they were a good dev oh and it will be a long time till we see HL3 if ever
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#41 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

most people dont care about Half Life, jsut a really loud internet minority

Zaibach

:(

Avatar image for CJ_ofCamelot
CJ_ofCamelot

2072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 CJ_ofCamelot
Member since 2013 • 2072 Posts
I'd rather have Portal 3. P2 was amazing.
Avatar image for Consternated
Consternated

848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Consternated
Member since 2013 • 848 Posts

most people dont care about Half Life, jsut a really loud internet minority

Zaibach


Yup - people over 21.

Valve, per employee, are worth more than Apple & Google, by the way: http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/15/valve-makes-more-money-per-employee-than-google-or-apple/

I doubt they care too much about the profit they'd potentially make on HL3, but moreso on the fact it's going to be the most criticized & built up sequel of all time.

Avatar image for hoola
hoola

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 hoola
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts

Although I want to play it i realize that these things, they take time.  It will be a huge surprise when it is announced and lots of people will go crazy, especially if it is on a new amazing engine.  The Gaben has stated that the new engine is really far along in development and they are just waiting on a game to release it with.  

What interesting is now that DOTA2 is out, Valve currently has no announced game in development.  That means we should see something soon and I hope its HL3, although I wouldn't be disappointed L4D3 or some new IP which they are rumored to be working on releases first.  As long as HL3 stays true to the HL formula, I will be happy.

Avatar image for jer_1
jer_1

7451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#45 jer_1
Member since 2003 • 7451 Posts

[QUOTE="MoneySha"]

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

I love all your proof to back up those stupid statements.

Dave_NBF

 

What "proof"??? Are you stupid??? So you're telling me, Valve did not port the first Half-life to PS2; they did not port Half-Life 2 to the original Xbox; they did not release Left 4 Dead 1 and 2 for Xbox 360; they did not put out the Orange Box on both consoles; they did not make both console versions of Portal 2 along side PC version, with the PS3 version being the definitive version out of all three? Are you really this blind??? Or are you just pretending to be... 

 

Left 4 Dead 3 is coming and that's going to be on (the more profitable) consoles as well as Steam; And when (if ever) Half-Life 3 is made and ready for release, there will be console versions of that game as well... You know why, because PC gaming is a minority. 

 

Maybe it's YOU who just doesn't get it.  Steam is a huge success and so is Valve.  They are releasing PC made games to consoles (ports).  So YOU are getting the ports and it has NO impact on the PC side except it gives Valve more money to make QUALITY PC games that will also go to console. Anyone knows the PC version is supremely better of all those games you listed.  L4D sucks on consoles and a big reason is that it is made with the PC in mind; including the UI.  So they just port over the best they can to make more money to make PC games. It's not that they are abandoning PC by going to the consoles..it is actually the opposite.  And if you had a PC and actually used Steam and saw the user statistics you would not be speaking this ignorantly. 

Agree with you completely. I'm perfectly fine with Valve taking a long time on this one, it should not be rushed one bit. It's been damn near 10 years since HL2, I can wait double that for the proper ending.
Avatar image for percech
percech

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 percech
Member since 2011 • 5237 Posts
I don't think Valve even makes games anymore.
Avatar image for metal_zombie
metal_zombie

2288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 metal_zombie
Member since 2004 • 2288 Posts

Although I want to play it i realize that these things, they take time.  It will be a huge surprise when it is announced and lots of people will go crazy, especially if it is on a new amazing engine.  The Gaben has stated that the new engine is really far along in development and they are just waiting on a game to release it with.  

What interesting is now that DOTA2 is out, Valve currently has no announced game in development.  That means we should see something soon and I hope its HL3, although I wouldn't be disappointed L4D3 or some new IP which they are rumored to be working on releases first.  As long as HL3 stays true to the HL formula, I will be happy.

hoola
i'm concerned that valve might become the next Id Software
Avatar image for MoneySha
MoneySha

209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 MoneySha
Member since 2013 • 209 Posts

[QUOTE="MoneySha"]

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

I love all your proof to back up those stupid statements.

Dave_NBF

 

What "proof"??? Are you stupid??? So you're telling me, Valve did not port the first Half-life to PS2; they did not port Half-Life 2 to the original Xbox; they did not release Left 4 Dead 1 and 2 for Xbox 360; they did not put out the Orange Box on both consoles; they did not make both console versions of Portal 2 along side PC version, with the PS3 version being the definitive version out of all three? Are you really this blind??? Or are you just pretending to be... 

 

Left 4 Dead 3 is coming and that's going to be on (the more profitable) consoles as well as Steam; And when (if ever) Half-Life 3 is made and ready for release, there will be console versions of that game as well... You know why, because PC gaming is a minority. 

 

Maybe it's YOU who just doesn't get it.  Steam is a huge success and so is Valve.  They are releasing PC made games to consoles (ports).  So YOU are getting the ports and it has NO impact on the PC side except it gives Valve more money to make QUALITY PC games that will also go to console. Anyone knows the PC version is supremely better of all those games you listed.  L4D sucks on consoles and a big reason is that it is made with the PC in mind; including the UI.  So they just port over the best they can to make more money to make PC games. It's not that they are abandoning PC by going to the consoles..it is actually the opposite.  And if you had a PC and actually used Steam and saw the user statistics you would not be speaking this ignorantly. 

 

Steam is only successful in the fact that it hasn't failed... But nowhere near as profitable as the console and mobile market; I don't care if their games are ports or not, I'm just simply pointing out why, companies like Valve see the necessities of console development and gaming;

 

That statement made absolutly no sense... So you're basically saying, at some point, Valve is gonna abandon console development? For what??? As long as there are consoles and a mobile market, and as long as those markets are making up 40, 50, 60, 70 percent of the gaming market, they won't be abandoning anything; Unless you have a link of Gabe saying anything like that, you should probably just keep that nonsense to yourself... Because it's stupid!

 

I like how you and your other hermit cheerleaders try to make Valve out to be anything other than a "game developer" in the general sense. Yea, Gabe has talked a lot of sh!t about console but, he also see the necessity of the market; Gabe mostly wishes consoles were more open for modding and Steam;

 

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="Dave_NBF"]

[QUOTE="MoneySha"]

 

What "proof"??? Are you stupid??? So you're telling me, Valve did not port the first Half-life to PS2; they did not port Half-Life 2 to the original Xbox; they did not release Left 4 Dead 1 and 2 for Xbox 360; they did not put out the Orange Box on both consoles; they did not make both console versions of Portal 2 along side PC version, with the PS3 version being the definitive version out of all three? Are you really this blind??? Or are you just pretending to be... 

 

Left 4 Dead 3 is coming and that's going to be on (the more profitable) consoles as well as Steam; And when (if ever) Half-Life 3 is made and ready for release, there will be console versions of that game as well... You know why, because PC gaming is a minority. 

MoneySha

 

Maybe it's YOU who just doesn't get it.  Steam is a huge success and so is Valve.  They are releasing PC made games to consoles (ports).  So YOU are getting the ports and it has NO impact on the PC side except it gives Valve more money to make QUALITY PC games that will also go to console. Anyone knows the PC version is supremely better of all those games you listed.  L4D sucks on consoles and a big reason is that it is made with the PC in mind; including the UI.  So they just port over the best they can to make more money to make PC games. It's not that they are abandoning PC by going to the consoles..it is actually the opposite.  And if you had a PC and actually used Steam and saw the user statistics you would not be speaking this ignorantly. 

 

Steam is only successful in the fact that it hasn't failed... But nowhere near as profitable as the console and mobile market; I don't care if their games are ports or not, I'm just simply pointing out why, companies like Valve see the necessities of console development and gaming;

 

That statement made absolutly no sense... So you're basically saying, at some point, Valve is gonna abandon console development? For what??? As long as there are consoles and a mobile market, and as long as those markets are making up 40, 50, 60, 70 percent of the gaming market, they won't be abandoning anything; Unless you have a link of Gabe saying anything like that, you should probably just keep that nonsense to yourself... Because it's stupid!

 

 

All I see is consolite trash.
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

Yes, and they would also shake the FPS genre which is getting stale, tbh.