XBL users will have to provide their own dedicated servers in upcoming 360 game

[QUOTE="gaboi09"]

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] OOOOOOOOOOOO you mean like how sony provides servers for 3rd party games even though its a free service then?WilliamRLBaker

Thatreally dosen't make any sense, itwill stillcost you 50 dollars a year to play ANY games online with xbox360 no matter who provides it 1st or 3rd party

if its on sony'sPS3 regardless of whether it's dedicated serviers on1st partygames or per to per on 3rd party games it's still aFREE service to allit'susers. You trying to turn this around and point the finger at sony in some kind of way is really rediclious.

What you saying dosn't make any sense.

you taking this vastly superior crap you're spotting makes no sence when I feel the most important thinkin online games is who the game runs and the number of players it supports online.

what by vastly superior are you taking about talking to people on xboxlive...who aren't even playing the same game?how the **** dose stuff like that make PLAYING THE GAME ONLINE better?

Nothing you said changes my original replay to what I said, u just come off abrasive and mad. what I said was fact if you can't deal with it...tough.

[QUOTE="gaboi09"]

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] OOOOOOOOOOOO you mean like how sony provides servers for 3rd party games even though its a free service then?WilliamRLBaker

Thatreally dosen't make any sense, itwill stillcost you 50 dollars a year to play ANY games online with xbox360 no matter who provides it 1st or 3rd party

if its on sony'sPS3 regardless of whether it's dedicated serviers on1st partygames or per to per on 3rd party games it's still aFREE service to allit'susers. You trying to turn this around and point the finger at sony in some kind of way is really rediclious.

Where is the proof of 360 games running p2p ?

Where is the proof of 360 games running p2p ?

druggyjoe3000

Where is the proof of 360 games running p2p ?

druggyjoe3000

[QUOTE="Jamex1987"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"] Dedicated servers are never free.HuusAsking

[QUOTE="druggyjoe3000"]

Where is the proof of 360 games running p2p ?

Bluray001

Where is the proof of 360 games running p2p ?

Halo 3 is also Peer to Peer.

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=13372

Most games on XBL are Peer to Peer. The only game that is no is Final Fantasy XI, which requires a monthly subscription fee because it is an MMORPG.

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="gaboi09"]

Thatreally dosen't make any sense, itwill stillcost you 50 dollars a year to play ANY games online with xbox360 no matter who provides it 1st or 3rd party

if its on sony'sPS3 regardless of whether it's dedicated serviers on1st partygames or per to per on 3rd party games it's still aFREE service to allit'susers. You trying to turn this around and point the finger at sony in some kind of way is really rediclious.

Bluray001

Halo 3 is also Peer to Peer.

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=13372

Most games on XBL are Peer to Peer. The only game that is no is Final Fantasy XI, which requires a monthly subscription fee because it is an MMORPG.

Bluray001

and you often try to do the same thing with no developer know how or any thing you make statements as trying to show microsoft and 360 looking bad so why shouldn't i do the same thing? As for that its a perfectly valid argument since bluray actually makes out constantly there are no dedicated server games, infact he is on record as saying only one game on xbox live is dedicated server and thats Final Fantasy 11. Sony doesn't pay for 3rd party servers, why should microsoft? oh because they charge money for the service? a service VASTLY superior to psn in every way? Id rather they put that money into keeping xbox live the superior service instead of providng dedicated servers i have no problem playing the games on xbox live, and all a dedicated server gurantees is you never play a game with people outside your area cause if you play on a dedicate server too far away and it will lag just as badly as any client side game on xbox live.WilliamRLBaker

[QUOTE="Bluray001"]

Halo 3 is also Peer to Peer.

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=13372

Most games on XBL are Peer to Peer. The only game that is no is Final Fantasy XI, which requires a monthly subscription fee because it is an MMORPG.

SpruceCaboose

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="Bluray001"] Metal Gear Online is run via a Konami Dedicated Server. Last time I checked, Konami is a 3rd party. XBL uses Peer to Peer. There is no such thing as a "superior peer to peer service". EG. UFC 2009 uses the same peer to peer matchmaking on XBL as the PSN version. They both use Gamespy matchmaking. The only difference is it costs 50 bucks a year for the XBL version.

Bluray001

At least the EA server takedowns are understandable since they bring in new games in close proximity. The lag time between MGS3:S's online going down and MGS4O's going up was much more significant.

[QUOTE="Bluray001"][QUOTE="HuusAsking"]Now go ask Konami how long those servers will stay up. In fact, ask them where their servers came from. Betcha at least some of them once ran MGS3:S's online network...which has been taken down.HuusAsking

But they were taken down while plenty of people were still playing the game. And with no recourse since MGS3:S's netcode, IIRC, couldn't be updated to become client-hosted.

At least the EA server takedowns are understandable since they bring in new games in close proximity. The lag time between MGS3:S's online going down and MGS4O's going up was much more significant.

HuusAsking

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]But they were taken down while plenty of people were still playing the game. And with no recourse since MGS3:S's netcode, IIRC, couldn't be updated to become client-hosted.

At least the EA server takedowns are understandable since they bring in new games in close proximity. The lag time between MGS3:S's online going down and MGS4O's going up was much more significant.

SpruceCaboose

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]But they were taken down while plenty of people were still playing the game. And with no recourse since MGS3:S's netcode, IIRC, couldn't be updated to become client-hosted.

At least the EA server takedowns are understandable since they bring in new games in close proximity. The lag time between MGS3:S's online going down and MGS4O's going up was much more significant.

HuusAsking