Xbox 360 game going to PC doesn't take its exclusiveness away

  • 178 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

[QUOTE="gamer-adam1"]

PCs have 0 exclusives, if you can play PC games on the mac, than its not exclusive, and you can install windows os on a mac, am I right?

ronvalencia

You can install LinuxPPC on XBox 360.

how would you do that, illegal im guessing?

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#102 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

On the PC side, there are competitors to Wintel e.g. Mactel. Some of us live through the fragment PC era.

MacOS is part an older system wars. "Microsoft exclusive" was used in such scenarios.

With Google and Intel's backing, Android OS X64 PC could restart another PC system wars.

As for "Microsoft exclusive"usage,

refer to http://www.rpgfan.com/features/Mass_Effect_2_Interview/index.html

'People find that to be a surprising answer. We have exclusivity with Microsoft.' - Electronic Arts/Bioware

refer to http://www.oxm.co.uk/article.php?id=20937

Microsoft has POVof "Microsoft exclusive" when it comes to Xbox360/Wintel.

Mystic-G

Doesn't change my opinion at all... refer to this post instead to make things clearer for you.

All I'm saying is...

Crysis was NEVER considered a Microsoft exclusive, so how is it if it came out on 360 & PC that it's suddenly a Microsoft exclusive?

Shenanigans.

Mystic-G

I recall Crysis has "Games For Windows".

Was Crysis available for AmigaOS 4.1 PowerPC, Android OS 2.2 X86, BeOS X86, MacOS X PowerPC, MacOS X X86, OS2/Warp X86?

Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"] Doesn't change my opinion at all... refer to this post instead to make things clearer for you. [QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

All I'm saying is...

Crysis was NEVER considered a Microsoft exclusive, so how is it if it came out on 360 & PC that it's suddenly a Microsoft exclusive?

Shenanigans.

ronvalencia

I recall Crysis has "Games For Windows".

Was Crysis available for AmigaOS 4.1 PowerPC, Android OS 2.2 X86, BeOS X86, MacOS X PowerPC, MacOS X X86, OS2/Warp X86?

cant you just install windows on the mac to run it? than it would lose its exlsuive because you can play it on a mac

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#104 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="gamer-adam1"]

PCs have 0 exclusives, if you can play PC games on the mac, than its not exclusive, and you can install windows os on a mac, am I right?

gamer-adam1

You can install LinuxPPC on XBox 360.

how would you do that, illegal im guessing?

Only if it breaks DRM. It's not illegal to destroy your purchased hardware.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#105 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

gamer-adam1

I recall Crysis has "Games For Windows".

Was Crysis available for AmigaOS 4.1 PowerPC, Android OS 2.2 X86, BeOS X86, MacOS X PowerPC, MacOS X X86, OS2/Warp X86?

cant you just install windows on the mac to run it? than it would lose its exlsuive because you can play it on a mac

Besides the GPU differences, Macbook Pro is similar to my DELL laptop. Both Apple and DELL contracts to Chinese ODM laptop manufactures.

To run Crysis, you would need Microsoft's software eco-system i.e. Microsoft is primarily a software company who sells OS (software eco-system).

Avatar image for shinrabanshou
shinrabanshou

8458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 shinrabanshou
Member since 2009 • 8458 Posts

PCs have 0 exclusives, if you can play PC games on the mac, than its not exclusive, and you can install windows os on a mac, am I right?

gamer-adam1

A Mac is still a personal computer. :/

Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

[QUOTE="gamer-adam1"]

PCs have 0 exclusives, if you can play PC games on the mac, than its not exclusive, and you can install windows os on a mac, am I right?

shinrabanshou

A Mac is still a personal computer. :/

mac is owned by Apple, than it would be a apple exclusive

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#108 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

A Mac is still a personal computer. :/

shinrabanshou
They were called "micro-computers" back in the 80s. "PC" usually refers to IBM PC compatible which runs Microsoft OS(PC-DOS/MS-DOS) i.e. "PC clones". IBM popularised the term PC. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_PC_compatible Mactels are just Intel X86 hardware with Intel UEFI (the next PC BIOS standard).
Avatar image for gamer4life85
gamer4life85

1203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 gamer4life85
Member since 2003 • 1203 Posts

99% pc games can only run on Microsoft windows. Games like gears halo ect that microsoft let go on pc because in microsoft eyes PC is really just another microsoft platform. yea pc open ended everyone knows micro owns pc they have for years.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#110 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="shinrabanshou"]

[QUOTE="gamer-adam1"]

PCs have 0 exclusives, if you can play PC games on the mac, than its not exclusive, and you can install windows os on a mac, am I right?

gamer-adam1

A Mac is still a personal computer. :/

mac is owned by Apple, than it would be a apple exclusive

You missed Microsoft eco-system software requirements. Without the OS, the hardware is useless.

Apple would need to sign their Windows driver package for Windows X64. With Mactel, Apple follows Microsoft's WinHEC direction.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_PC_compatible#.22IBM_PC_compatible.22_becomes_.22Wintel.22

No mass-market personal computer hardware vendor dared to be incompatible with the latest version of Windows, and Microsoft's annual WinHEC conferences provided a setting in which Microsoft can lobby for and —in some cases— dictate the pace and direction of the hardware side of the PC industry. Microsoft and Intel had become so important to the ongoing development of the PC hardware that industry writers began using the portmanteau word Wintel to refer to the combined hardware-software platform

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#111 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

MS doesn't see PC as a competitor, when watching a video on Inside Xbox I have noticed they mention whether it will be on PC, or if it was on PC first, etc. They don't mention PS3 though :P And why would they? In the real world, maybe not a big deal. Doesn't count as exclusive on SW though.SaltyMeatballs

Yes they do.

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/53403

"If we launched a Halo game on PC and 360 in Germany simultaneously, 80 per cent of sales would be on the PC," he toldGamesIndustry.biz. "We basically shoot ourselves in the foot by allowing the German market to choose to play the PC version."

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#112 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="shinrabanshou"]

[QUOTE="gamer-adam1"]

PCs have 0 exclusives, if you can play PC games on the mac, than its not exclusive, and you can install windows os on a mac, am I right?

gamer-adam1

A Mac is still a personal computer. :/

mac is owned by Apple, than it would be a apple exclusive

This is not a sound argument.. because if you want to go down this road consoles have no exclusives either.. since the PS3 uses a nvidia GPU and the 360 uses an ATI GPU, and the 360 also uses an IBM processor.

Avatar image for NatalataN
NatalataN

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 NatalataN
Member since 2010 • 74 Posts
TC has a point, the PC version is the superior version and that should disqualify the 360 version.
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#114 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]MS doesn't see PC as a competitor, when watching a video on Inside Xbox I have noticed they mention whether it will be on PC, or if it was on PC first, etc. They don't mention PS3 though :P And why would they? In the real world, maybe not a big deal. Doesn't count as exclusive on SW though.Espada12

Yes they do.

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/53403

"If we launched a Halo game on PC and 360 in Germany simultaneously, 80 per cent of sales would be on the PC," he toldGamesIndustry.biz. "We basically shoot ourselves in the foot by allowing the German market to choose to play the PC version."

During that time, MS trying to establish Xbox 360. Fables 3 changes this POV to some degree.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#115 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
TC has a point, the PC version is the superior version and that should disqualify the 360 version.NatalataN
Just treat Xbox 360 like IGP equipped PC i.e. baseline gaming performance.
Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#116 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts

[QUOTE="dommeus"][QUOTE="DumbDubya"]

It seems only in this forum, that if an Xbox 360 game is released on PC, it is no longer exclusive. Except that is because last I checked Windows is a Microsoft platform along with Xbox 360. And the game is not getting released on PS3 or Wii which are their competitors. PC is not a competitor to Xbox. The OS's are owned by the same company and Microsooft is willingly letting developers release on both.

It's the same as saying a game that was on Wii gets released on DS is no longer an exclusive. It's a stupid argument.

Mystic-G

In before "System wars not company wars"

Last I checked, this was System Wars, not Company Wars. Windows is an OPEN platform where Microsoft makes zero royalties from games. Sony even makes games for and on PC. (ie: The Agency) So which company owns that game through this logic?

PC exclusive games are not of Microsoft property whatsoever, so how is it when it's on 360/PC that it's considered a 'Microsoft exclusive'? I smell shenanigans.

I don't support "MS exlcusive" (maybe unless they're at least published by MS), but I would say MS has made a lot of money from PC gaming, maybe no royalties, but for the reason that people lol'd at the Mac on gaming forums. If you wanted to game you would have a Windows PC. Now with Steam having Mac support it's not as bad.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#117 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]MS doesn't see PC as a competitor, when watching a video on Inside Xbox I have noticed they mention whether it will be on PC, or if it was on PC first, etc. They don't mention PS3 though :P And why would they? In the real world, maybe not a big deal. Doesn't count as exclusive on SW though.ronvalencia

Yes they do.

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/53403

"If we launched a Halo game on PC and 360 in Germany simultaneously, 80 per cent of sales would be on the PC," he toldGamesIndustry.biz. "We basically shoot ourselves in the foot by allowing the German market to choose to play the PC version."

During that time, MS trying to establish Xbox 360. Fables 3 changes this POV to some degree.

I disagree, what I think is, withholding exclusives isn't doing anything for their console sales in these territories but hurting their game sales so they aren't bothering to do it with ALL their games (because they are still doing it with gears 3 and reach).

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#118 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]MS doesn't see PC as a competitor, when watching a video on Inside Xbox I have noticed they mention whether it will be on PC, or if it was on PC first, etc. They don't mention PS3 though :P And why would they? In the real world, maybe not a big deal. Doesn't count as exclusive on SW though.Espada12

Yes they do.

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/53403

"If we launched a Halo game on PC and 360 in Germany simultaneously, 80 per cent of sales would be on the PC," he toldGamesIndustry.biz. "We basically shoot ourselves in the foot by allowing the German market to choose to play the PC version."

Maybe in Germany, but I gave my reasoning concerning the present and what I've seen, not some 2 year old article.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#119 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

Yes they do.

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/53403

"If we launched a Halo game on PC and 360 in Germany simultaneously, 80 per cent of sales would be on the PC," he toldGamesIndustry.biz. "We basically shoot ourselves in the foot by allowing the German market to choose to play the PC version."

During that time, MS trying to establish Xbox 360. Fables 3 changes this POV to some degree.

I disagree, what I think is, withholding exclusives isn't doing anything for their console sales in these territories but hurting their game sales so they aren't bothering to do it with ALL their games (because they are still doing it with gears 3 and reach).

There are some overlaps but Xbox 360 is "missing in action" in mobile HD gaming. It's best to describe this situation as lukewarm support.
Avatar image for Asim90
Asim90

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 Asim90
Member since 2005 • 3692 Posts

Of course it does, if you don't need an Xbox 360 to play the game then it isn't a 360 exclusive is it. Come on its just common sense.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#121 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

Of course it does, if you don't need an Xbox 360 to play the game then it isn't a 360 exclusive is it. Come on its just common sense.

Asim90
Do you know why SW has this line "Emulators, ...can also lead to a suspension or the possibility of permanent ban"?
Avatar image for OneLazyAsian
OneLazyAsian

1715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 OneLazyAsian
Member since 2009 • 1715 Posts

[QUOTE="OneLazyAsian"]

Another one...and a level 18 too? I would have thought you would know better by now. Okay, I'm going to explain this slowly so you'll understand (I doubt you'll listen though). Microsoft owning Windows =/= Microsoft owning the PC platform. Why? Because Windows isn't the only thing you need to get a computer to work. Developers could make a game for OSX or Linux. How is the PC platform Microsoft's now? Exactly, it's not. It is a separate platform that IS in direct competition with the XBox360. If a person has a choice of buying a game for the PC or Xbox360 and chooses PC, then the XBox360 just lost a potential sale. Microsoft does not see any of the money that went into the PC sale, therefore they try to get people to buy the XBox360 version. And what is it called when you are trying to get someone to pick your product over another product? Oh yeah, COMPETITION! I hope you are now somewhat informed.

topsemag55

What would his level have to do with the issue at hand?:?

Microsoft sees money from other sources, such as when it grants WHQL status to a graphics driver version.

You would think that most people over level 10 would have been here long enough to see know what we do and don't consider "exclusive." To reignite this boomshell reeks of trolling. And what that last part have anything to do with what MS sees in payment from PC game developers?

Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#123 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts

Actually it does, being on 2 platforms makes it multiplat.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#124 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

PCs have 0 exclusives, if you can play PC games on the mac, than its not exclusive, and you can install windows os on a mac, am I right?

gamer-adam1
Macs are PCs.
Avatar image for JonSnow777
JonSnow777

787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 JonSnow777
Member since 2009 • 787 Posts

People make too large a deal out of exclusives. Yesterday, when I bought my Xbox 360 slim to replace my launch console that just red ringed, I briefly considered getting a PS3 for something different. The exclusives get good ratings, and are pretty decent 8 hour bursts of entertainment, for the most part. And I really want to be able to play Little Big Planet. But then I thought about all the multiplats and how I would be stuck with an inferior version of a lot of them. And when it comes to online, I can't think of anybody I know who actually uses their PS3 instead of their 360. So, I went with the 360, and I'm genuinely glad about it.

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#126 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]MS doesn't see PC as a competitor, when watching a video on Inside Xbox I have noticed they mention whether it will be on PC, or if it was on PC first, etc. They don't mention PS3 though :P And why would they? In the real world, maybe not a big deal. Doesn't count as exclusive on SW though.SaltyMeatballs

Yes they do.

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/53403

"If we launched a Halo game on PC and 360 in Germany simultaneously, 80 per cent of sales would be on the PC," he toldGamesIndustry.biz. "We basically shoot ourselves in the foot by allowing the German market to choose to play the PC version."

Maybe in Germany, but I gave my reasoning concerning the present and what I've seen, not some 2 year old article.

Germany was just an example, this is their stance in all PC dominated territories and even up to last year when they announced alan wake as a 360 exclusive they were going with that policy.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#127 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][ Do you know why SW has this line "Emulators, ...can also lead to a suspension or the possibility of permanent ban"?

Because Gamespot is super cautious when it comes to this gray area of the law.
Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#128 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

From all the years this debate has been waged, I don't think a very crucial viewpoint has been examined before. It's not so important whether or not PC/360 games are exclusive or not, so much as that they serve the same purpose as exclusives games, to a given consumer gamer market.

What do I mean by types of "consumer gamer market"? As much as there is a divide between platform fans, those who rally behind the banner of 360, PS3, Wii, or PC, as their chosen platform to game on, there is an even bigger divide between PC gamers and console gamers.

Oh you know what I mean. You've seen it so often on the boards, discussions of why people do and do not game on the PC platform. One side says why they prefer to play on consoles, the other side arguing why those points are irrelevant and PC is still the superior platform. But my point here is not which is the superior platform, but to illustrate that there's really 3 distinct markets of gamers.

All Systems Gamers – plays on multiple systems, both console and PC
Console Only Gamers – will play on one or more consoles, but only on consoles
PC Only Gamers – will game only on the PC, refusing to ever touch a console

While it may seem like I'm creating my own terms and criteria, you simply cannot argue against the fact that these categories DO exist. Why else do we see discussions on these boards as to why console is a preference and reasons not to game on PC, as well as why others don't play on consoles? Doesn't matter whether you agree or disagree with the reasoning's behind this, just the fact that this divide is real.

While PC IS a gaming platform, some people just use theirs for every other function but that, like office productivity, online browsing, multimedia viewing, emailing, graphics & art creation, and so on. PC is unique in that not all PCs are used for gaming purposes whereas all consoles are designed as gaming devices even if having extra multimedia features. Thus the divide between PC gamers and console gamers.

Certain games not being released on PS3 or Wii is relevant to purchasing choices depending on which group you belong to. This is NOT to say that certain games are "console exclusive" or "microsoft exclusive", no I'm not trying to promote those erroneous terms. BUT, from the Console Only Gamer's perspective, if he isn't going to be playing on PC anyway, a game being shared between 360 and PC is irrelevant. He's looking at which games are on which consoles, so SC Conviction, Mass Effect 2, The Orange Box (prior to recent events in Valve's development policy), and GeoW1 would still be deciding factors to pick up a 360 over a PS3.

The games may not have been exclusive by the truest definition, yet they still served the same purpose as exclusives do. And that's the point, when you factor in that console only gamers is a consumer market for which the console releases is relevant, PC shared not withstanding.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#129 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
He's looking at which games are on which consolesAdobeArtist
Even this is an erroneous statement considering the modern dictionary definition of a game console is broad enough to include the PC thanks to changes in the marketplace such as SKUs, patches, installations, etc.
Avatar image for hd5870corei7
hd5870corei7

1612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#130 hd5870corei7
Member since 2010 • 1612 Posts

It seems only in this forum, that if an Xbox 360 game is released on PC, it is no longer exclusive. Except that is because last I checked Windows is a Microsoft platform along with Xbox 360. And the game is not getting released on PS3 or Wii which are their competitors. PC is not a competitor to Xbox. The OS's are owned by the same company and Microsooft is willingly letting developers release on both.

It's the same as saying a game that was on Wii gets released on DS is no longer an exclusive. It's a stupid argument.

DumbDubya
So Crysis is a Sony exclusive because I could play it on a SONY VAIO laptop? /Thread
Avatar image for hd5870corei7
hd5870corei7

1612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#131 hd5870corei7
Member since 2010 • 1612 Posts

Why is it always lemmings making PC/360 games 360 exclusive, but you never see hermits trying to claim they are PC exclusives.

ManicAce
Because the 360 has an abysmal exclusive lineup, they need to grasp any straw they can :D PC on the other hand, has an amazing library of exclusives, they don't need to try and twist around the rules to get more games so that they can have a defined exclusive lineup.
Avatar image for bigboss5ak
bigboss5ak

2962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#132 bigboss5ak
Member since 2007 • 2962 Posts
[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="aaronmullan"]Yep, it does. These rules have been made. You can't just waltz in and change 'em.aaronmullan
what rules would those be? please point them out to me,listen buddy, if you can have console graphics king, you can have console exclusive, end of,people can't have it both ways, it's both or niether, it made me laugh the other day, people are not allowed to use PC/360 games as a positive point for the 360, but they are allowed to use a PC/360 game as a negative against the 360 when it flops, it's hypocrisy at it's finest, from total hypocrites who invented the phrase 'console graphics king' just so there console could actually have a graphics king, i disagree with both statements, but if console graphics king is acceptable then so is the phrase console exclusive.

Rules of SW. It's been debated and solved many times over. Also, don't "listen buddy" me.

Rules?? solved?? many people dont agree with these so called rules so how can it be solved
Avatar image for GrilledCharlie
GrilledCharlie

754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#133 GrilledCharlie
Member since 2009 • 754 Posts

It seems only in this forum, that if an Xbox 360 game is released on PC, it is no longer exclusive. Except that is because last I checked Windows is a Microsoft platform along with Xbox 360. And the game is not getting released on PS3 or Wii which are their competitors. PC is not a competitor to Xbox. The OS's are owned by the same company and Microsooft is willingly letting developers release on both.

It's the same as saying a game that was on Wii gets released on DS is no longer an exclusive. It's a stupid argument.

DumbDubya
I agree with you, but the rules of system wars on this site don't. You have to use the term "console exclusive" to make those exclusives count. Somehow, every PS3 or Wii owner also has a gaming rig. So they claim they can buy many of the 360/windows games on PC...which we all know is BS. I'm not saying that some of them don't own a gaming rig, but definitely not as many as claim it.
Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#134 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"] He's looking at which games are on which consolesVandalvideo
Even this is an erroneous statement considering the modern dictionary definition of a game console is broad enough to include the PC thanks to changes in the marketplace such as SKUs, patches, installations, etc.

Consoles may be getting closer to PCs, in functionality and complexity from their cartridge days, but even so, you aren't going to look me in the eye (figuratively speaking :P ) and say someone's going to pick up a 360 or PS3 to run their home office from, or start a web development business.

Consoles haven't gotten that close to PCs to the point where there isn't a clear labelling distinction between PC and console. Not yet at least. But for now the distinctions are still very relevant.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#135 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Consoles may be getting closer to PCs, in functionality and complexity from their cartridge days, but even so, you aren't going to look me in the eye (figuratively speaking :P ) and say someone's going to pick up a 360 or PS3 to run their home office from, or start a web development business.Consoles haven't gotten that close to PCs to the point where there isn't a clear labelling distinction between PC and console. Not yet at least. But for now the distinctions are still very relevant.AdobeArtist
Oxford English Dictionary disagrees. I'm more inclined to listen to them than System Wars posters. The traditional definition of console is obsolete. Unless System Wars can come up with a better definition than Oxford and get it published then I'm not listening to it.
Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#136 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts

[QUOTE="DumbDubya"]

It seems only in this forum, that if an Xbox 360 game is released on PC, it is no longer exclusive. Except that is because last I checked Windows is a Microsoft platform along with Xbox 360. And the game is not getting released on PS3 or Wii which are their competitors. PC is not a competitor to Xbox. The OS's are owned by the same company and Microsooft is willingly letting developers release on both.

It's the same as saying a game that was on Wii gets released on DS is no longer an exclusive. It's a stupid argument.

GrilledCharlie

I agree with you, but the rules of system wars on this site don't. You have to use the term "console exclusive" to make those exclusives count. Somehow, every PS3 or Wii owner also has a gaming rig. So they claim they can buy many of the 360/windows games on PC...which we all know is BS. I'm not saying that some of them don't own a gaming rig, but definitely not as many as claim it.

Its not really about who can run it or not, its just that a game on multiple platforms is not exclusive anymore, its multiplat.

Avatar image for Asim90
Asim90

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 Asim90
Member since 2005 • 3692 Posts

[QUOTE="Asim90"]

Of course it does, if you don't need an Xbox 360 to play the game then it isn't a 360 exclusive is it. Come on its just common sense.

ronvalencia

Do you know why SW has this line "Emulators, ...can also lead to a suspension or the possibility of permanent ban"?

:| Are you joking or did you really miss the entire point of my post?

Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#139 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]Consoles may be getting closer to PCs, in functionality and complexity from their cartridge days, but even so, you aren't going to look me in the eye (figuratively speaking :P ) and say someone's going to pick up a 360 or PS3 to run their home office from, or start a web development business.Consoles haven't gotten that close to PCs to the point where there isn't a clear labelling distinction between PC and console. Not yet at least. But for now the distinctions are still very relevant.Vandalvideo
Oxford English Dictionary disagrees. I'm more inclined to listen to them than System Wars posters. The traditional definition of console is obsolete. Unless System Wars can come up with a better definition than Oxford and get it published then I'm not listening to it.

I'm not talking about dictionaries or online forums. I'm talking about the real world. Please, please don't pretend to me that Wii, PS3, and 360 are called "PCs". They are addressed as consoles by everybody, or damn near 97% majority of the population. Walk into any GameStop or BestBuy and the staff and any shopper will call em as such.

PCs are a distinct category from consoles, thus why we have these labels in the first place. Its as universally recognized as anything can get, and your denial and quoting dictionary definitions, which in itself is only as relevant as its practiced by the masses, will not change that.

Ah console gamers or should I say lemms and their idiot antics. They never fail to amuse.

Dahaka-UK

And PS3 users aren't console gamers? :|

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#140 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62044 Posts

Microsoft has no say about who releases what on it's OS. It's a completely open platform, and they don't even earn royalties, unless they are developing the game through 1st party and/or publishing it in some way.

If it releases on PC, it's no longer exclusive.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#141 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
I'm not talking about dictionaries or online forums. I'm talking about the real world. Please, please don't pretend to me that Wii, PS3, and 360 are called "PCs". They are addressed as consoles by everybody, or damn near 97% majority of the population. Walk into any GameStop or BestBuy and the staff and any shopper will call em as such. PCs are a distinct category from consoles, thus why we have these labels in the first place. Its as universally recognized as anything can get, and your denial and quoting dictionary definitions, which in itself is only as relevant as its practiced by the masses, will not change that.AdobeArtist
Sorry, but Oxford English Dictionary is the most widely used source for the english language. I'm not going to listen to some silent majority you haven't proven to exist. Fact; dictionary defines console in such a way that the PC applies. Prove to me that the silent majority exists and thinks the way you claim they do. And even if you can, which I doubt you can, dictionary still wins.
Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#142 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

PCs have 0 exclusives, if you can play PC games on the mac, than its not exclusive, and you can install windows os on a mac, am I right?

gamer-adam1

That argument might have made sense 5 years ago, but not anymore. Nowadays Macs are just another brand of PCs, not any different from Dells or HPs

Avatar image for xsubtownerx
xsubtownerx

10705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#143 xsubtownerx
Member since 2007 • 10705 Posts

[QUOTE="gamer-adam1"]

PCs have 0 exclusives, if you can play PC games on the mac, than its not exclusive, and you can install windows os on a mac, am I right?

AdrianWerner

That argument might have made sense 5 years ago, but not anymore. Nowadays Macs are just another brand of PCs, not any different from Dells or HPs

So with what you're saying, it should be "PC vs Consoles" right? I guess saying "PC vs Wii vs PS3 vs 360" is inaccurate. Not bad. I can live with this logic.
Avatar image for xsalvioutlawx
xsalvioutlawx

423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 xsalvioutlawx
Member since 2007 • 423 Posts

It seems only in this forum, that if an Xbox 360 game is released on PC, it is no longer exclusive. Except that is because last I checked Windows is a Microsoft platform along with Xbox 360. And the game is not getting released on PS3 or Wii which are their competitors. PC is not a competitor to Xbox. The OS's are owned by the same company and Microsooft is willingly letting developers release on both.

It's the same as saying a game that was on Wii gets released on DS is no longer an exclusive. It's a stupid argument.

DumbDubya

Agreed...But you know how the nerds are on this forum.

The average computer cannot run most of these games that are on the 360/PC.

I am no way dissing the PC either, but people make it out to be something attrocious just because it's on the PC and 360.

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#145 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]

[QUOTE="gamer-adam1"]

PCs have 0 exclusives, if you can play PC games on the mac, than its not exclusive, and you can install windows os on a mac, am I right?

xsubtownerx

That argument might have made sense 5 years ago, but not anymore. Nowadays Macs are just another brand of PCs, not any different from Dells or HPs

So with what you're saying, it should be "PC vs Consoles" right? I guess saying "PC vs Wii vs PS3 vs 360" is inaccurate. Not bad. I can live with this logic.

Consoles would still lose.. but that's beyond the point. All gaming PCs can play PC games that's why all the manufactures can lumped into 1 lot, you can't play all the console games on any single console.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#146 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62044 Posts

Agreed...But you know how the nerds are on this forum.

The average computer cannot run most of these games that are on the 360/PC.

I am no way dissing the PC either, but people make it out to be something attrocious just because it's on the PC and 360.

xsalvioutlawx

Attrocious? No. Multiplat? Yes.

It's not just the 360/PC multiplats people look down on, as posters even look down on 360/PS3 multiplats, due to them not being exclusive.

Avatar image for xsubtownerx
xsubtownerx

10705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#147 xsubtownerx
Member since 2007 • 10705 Posts

[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"][QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]That argument might have made sense 5 years ago, but not anymore. Nowadays Macs are just another brand of PCs, not any different from Dells or HPs

Espada12

So with what you're saying, it should be "PC vs Consoles" right? I guess saying "PC vs Wii vs PS3 vs 360" is inaccurate. Not bad. I can live with this logic.

Consoles would still lose.. but that's beyond the point. All gaming PCs can play PC games that's why all the manufactures can lumped into 1 lot, you can't play all the console games on any single console.

Well you can't play all PC games on all PCs. A lot of games won't work on MACs.
Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#148 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts

[QUOTE="DumbDubya"]

It seems only in this forum, that if an Xbox 360 game is released on PC, it is no longer exclusive. Except that is because last I checked Windows is a Microsoft platform along with Xbox 360. And the game is not getting released on PS3 or Wii which are their competitors. PC is not a competitor to Xbox. The OS's are owned by the same company and Microsooft is willingly letting developers release on both.

It's the same as saying a game that was on Wii gets released on DS is no longer an exclusive. It's a stupid argument.

xsalvioutlawx

Agreed...But you know how the nerds are on this forum.

The average computer cannot run most of these games that are on the 360/PC.

I am no way dissing the PC either, but people make it out to be something attrocious just because it's on the PC and 360.

I'll just repeat my earlier response,

Its not really about who can run it or not, its just that a game on multiple platforms is not exclusive anymore, its multiplat.


Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#149 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
I love how some just do not want the PC to come in to play at all. As if they are terrified of it. If a game is on PC and 360 it is not a 360 exclusive I am sorry.
Avatar image for The_Gaming_Baby
The_Gaming_Baby

6425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 117

User Lists: 52

#150 The_Gaming_Baby
Member since 2010 • 6425 Posts

Why do people care so much anyway? Damn fanboys. Stop hating, buy a decent PC, a PS3 and a 360 and have some frekkin good times!