As with their Demigod review, they fail. Demigod was completely fixed and patched a week and a half after release so, technically speaking, that already makes their review completely useless regarding the game.Puckhog04
I don't understand how a review can be disregarded on the basis that it's not close to a metacritic average :?
rpg9000owner
Keep in mind, people were disregarding this review before the Metacritic score was ever mentioned. Using the Metacritic score is just an attempt to quantify the incorrectness of this review.
I don't understand how a review can be disregarded on the basis that it's not close to a metacritic average :?
agentfred
Keep in mind, people were disregarding this review before the Metacritic score was ever mentioned. Using the Metacritic score is just an attempt to quantify the incorrectness of this review. I can understand if its been called incorrect on the basis that there's inaccuracies in the review,admittedely I haven't read the review or played the game, but if people are just calling the score incorrect (without the presence on inaccuracies in the review) and using other peoples OPINIONS to validate that point, then that to me just seems ridicolous.
To be honest, i've always been a but leery of Gamespots coverage of PC games, Greg Kasavin was good, but there are things like the Neverhood's review which I strongly disagree with, this ambivalnce is hardly a few thing, this is gamespot after all, not IGN.
Log in to comment