Gears or Halo 3?

  • 169 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for noobkiller205
noobkiller205

236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 noobkiller205
Member since 2007 • 236 Posts
I like gears but there is something about halo that is so much better and with gears not having any type of ranking system makes it even easier to see which is better.
Avatar image for nrt25
nrt25

670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 nrt25
Member since 2005 • 670 Posts
Cover system shooters are kinda bleh for me, give me the likes of Halo or Half Life anyday over Gears.
Avatar image for Magicmaster-E
Magicmaster-E

788

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#53 Magicmaster-E
Member since 2004 • 788 Posts
Halo 3, hands downits just a better matchmaking and single player experience. Gears was just something to tide gamers over until Halo 3, thats all it was.
Avatar image for andrewkozis
andrewkozis

3336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#54 andrewkozis
Member since 2005 • 3336 Posts
Halo3
Avatar image for Boostd4
Boostd4

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Boostd4
Member since 2006 • 167 Posts

I can't really come to a difinitive answer to this question, as it has been posed to me by friends. I personally think it is comparing apples and oranges. I've always been a fan of the 1st person perspective over 3rd person, but Epic did so well with Gears that it almost feels like a 1st person game. The one thing that drove me nuts about Gears was that I always felt like I had blinders on and couldn't see to my left. And the character movement to me was always kinda sluggish.

If I had a gun to my head and had to pick between the two, I would have to go with Halo....simply because it is a much more rewarding MP experience IMO. Even though its lacking the cover element (best displayed in R6V), it still have enough variety in the game modes and weapons that it really doesn't get old. I was playing Halo 2 for over 2 years and I still had fun with it.

Avatar image for burger33
burger33

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 burger33
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

i have both. i got gears when it first came out, halo3 when it first came out. i've logged way more time into gears than halo3 but some things are easy to see

Graphics - Gears by a long shot

Single Player - Gears

Co-op - Halo3, 4 man co-op = good time

Multiplayer - Halo3, they've perfected the multiplayer system for xbox live

Replay Value - Halo3, gears was a cake-walk on all difficulty levels, at least halo3 provides some difficult, skulls, and 4 man co-op are all good reasons to replay this game.

neither is a clear-cut winner. each is good at what it does, and each does different things well. neither has a huge negative. personally i like halo3. to me graphics don't make something fun. graphics make you think, "damn this looks real." Is this important? Yes. Integral to fun? Not to me.

Avatar image for Hickamie14
Hickamie14

1652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#57 Hickamie14
Member since 2007 • 1652 Posts
You can't realloy compare the two side by side because GoW was third person, with cover and had completely different gameplay and style. However if I had to pick one to play I would probably pick Halo 3, mabe it is because it just came I don't, but as of right now Halo 3. And Halo 3 got a lower rating then Gears of War because as of earlier this year gamespot no longer rates game between 9.5 and 10. Story. Gears of War Single player.Tie( each was really fun and had different styles) Multi-player. Halo 3 Xtra stuff. Halo 3. Menu's. Halo 3( this one really does not matter, but still Halo 3 is easilly accesable for all the stuff they have) Weapons. Tie( Gears has that chainsaw andHammer of dawn, but Halo 3 has the Grav hammer. needler, Mauler, spiker, spartan Laser, and way more weapons than Gears has) Over all game-play.Halo 3 (I just like First person shooters more than Third person) Over all.HALO 3. Halo 3 is better than Gears in my opinion because it's an FPS, it has a more forgiving life system it's more social, has more xtra features and replay value, andI've always been a fan of the Halo series, but that's my opinion.
Avatar image for VariousObjects
VariousObjects

106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 VariousObjects
Member since 2007 • 106 Posts
Halo 3. I got bored with Gears. Very repetitive.
Avatar image for ajefferism
ajefferism

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 ajefferism
Member since 2006 • 2006 Posts

Hmmm tough call, these are both tied for 2nd as my favorite games behind Oblivion.

Gears Wins with:

Graphics, innovative new shooter system, visceral feel to combat, chainsaw gun!

Halo 3 wins with:

Story, characters, online functionality (more game types, forge and theater are AWESOME), bungie.net, 4 player co-op

Its a tough call I love both games equally, but preferences aside I'd have to say Gears was a bit more innovative in its basic gameplay and graphics. Plus its a brand new IP not yet another sequel.

Avatar image for slayerofasavior
slayerofasavior

99

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 slayerofasavior
Member since 2007 • 99 Posts
i'd have to go with gears...gears is definately a next gen game.....and plus there's nothing that compares to getting a headshot on gears.....or sawing someone with the lancer......plenty of good times playing gears
Avatar image for BMI_2005
BMI_2005

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 BMI_2005
Member since 2005 • 123 Posts
im giving it to Halo because damn..... so much customization of everything screen shots film clips file share you the possibilities are endless or near endless so many things you can do create your own games create your own maps your style of gameplay your everything halo is much better than queers of war
Avatar image for SocialAnXieTy
SocialAnXieTy

1219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 SocialAnXieTy
Member since 2007 • 1219 Posts

I honestly don't see how Gears is getting so many votes

...Allow me to elaborate.

GoW's storyline is fairly simple, but fun to understand. An alien-like invasion from a species dubbed as the 'Locust' are invading Sera (Their Earth), and they have to fight them off. You follow a character named Marcus Fenix and his rag-tag squad of soldiers as they attempt to bring a plan together that'll stop the Locust, in what seems to be for good. Now, that sounds like a good plot on paper, right?

Well, as the game develops, the story hardly does the same. Occasionally, there is an attempt to do a little character developing, but it fails drastically. You never learn much of anything about anyone in the games past, which makes the current events that unfold with certain characters seem unexplained, and irrelevant. Hell, the only way you can find out how Fenix ended up in Prison is to read some small print in the manual, and even that doesn't tell you exactly what happened. And I don't care if they plan on making a second game that explains alot of this just for the sake of it being a trilogy, they left out way too much.

As for the gameplay, it's amazing. The one-button cover system is innovative, and works fairly well. Except when you accidentally run into walls. But it's not something that happens a whole lot, and it doesn't seem annoying when it does occur. The campaign can get a little dragged out on single player, but co-op tends to be pretty fun. I don't see why Epic couldn't allowed a 4 player co-op, since you have a 4-man squad, but egh, co-op did pretty good nonetheless. The achievements for the game were simple, but fun to go for. Hell, it's the main reason I continued to play the multiplayer on Gears for as long as I did.

Speaking of the multiplayer, it was alright. Worked the same way as it does in Campaign, only you fight other people. It's fun for the first few times you play it, and from there, it's nearly ALWAYS the same. Everyone uses a shotgun and blind-fires it, or Active Reload's the Sniper Rifle to down you in one shot and snatch an easy kill. It's also severely glitchy, with such glitches as the Crabwalk, where you can roadie-run in any direction you want as if you're walking, but at roadie-run speed, and the Chainsaw glitch, where you can walk around with your chainsaw revved and shooting people, so that the chainsaw doesn't lower and you can possibly stun them as you get close. Not to mention they fall to pieces the moment you touch them.

With all of that in mind, Gears is a good game, but the lack of story and amount of glitches/flaws involved in it's multiplayer really hurt it, especially since Epic hasn't done anything about said glitches.

So, if I haven't made it abundantly clear yet, I choose Halo 3.:)

Avatar image for DrDeath10
DrDeath10

689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 DrDeath10
Member since 2005 • 689 Posts

I honestly don't see how Gears is getting so many votes

...Allow me to elaborate.

GoW's storyline is fairly simple, but fun to understand. An alien-like invasion from a species dubbed as the 'Locust' are invading Sera (Their Earth), and they have to fight them off. You follow a character named Marcus Fenix and his rag-tag squad of soldiers as they attempt to bring a plan together that'll stop the Locust, in what seems to be for good. Now, that sounds like a good plot on paper, right?

Well, as the game develops, the story hardly does the same. Occasionally, there is an attempt to do a little character developing, but it fails drastically. You never learn much of anything about anyone in the games past, which makes the current events that unfold with certain characters seem unexplained, and irrelevant. Hell, the only way you can find out how Fenix ended up in Prison is to read some small print in the manual, and even that doesn't tell you exactly what happened. And I don't care if they plan on making a second game that explains alot of this just for the sake of it being a trilogy, they left out way too much.

As for the gameplay, it's amazing. The one-button cover system is innovative, and works fairly well. Except when you accidentally run into walls. But it's not something that happens a whole lot, and it doesn't seem annoying when it does occur. The campaign can get a little dragged out on single player, but co-op tends to be pretty fun. I don't see why Epic couldn't allowed a 4 player co-op, since you have a 4-man squad, but egh, co-op did pretty good nonetheless. The achievements for the game were simple, but fun to go for. Hell, it's the main reason I continued to play the multiplayer on Gears for as long as I did.

Speaking of the multiplayer, it was alright. Worked the same way as it does in Campaign, only you fight other people. It's fun for the first few times you play it, and from there, it's nearly ALWAYS the same. Everyone uses a shotgun and blind-fires it, or Active Reload's the Sniper Rifle to down you in one shot and snatch an easy kill. It's also severely glitchy, with such glitches as the Crabwalk, where you can roadie-run in any direction you want as if you're walking, but at roadie-run speed, and the Chainsaw glitch, where you can walk around with your chainsaw revved and shooting people, so that the chainsaw doesn't lower and you can possibly stun them as you get close. Not to mention they fall to pieces the moment you touch them.

With all of that in mind, Gears is a good game, but the lack of story and amount of glitches/flaws involved in it's multiplayer really hurt it, especially since Epic hasn't done anything about said glitches.

So, if I haven't made it abundantly clear yet, I choose Halo 3.:)

SocialAnXieTy

Well written. People will overlook any flaw in a game just because they believe it's better than everything else.

Avatar image for Macutchi
Macutchi

11217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#64 Macutchi
Member since 2007 • 11217 Posts

Based on single player -

Gears looked amazing but Halo was more fun to play

Both absolutely fantastic games though

Avatar image for Progn0sticator
Progn0sticator

392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Progn0sticator
Member since 2006 • 392 Posts

Halo 3 most definitely. While Gears has excellent Multiplayer, its replayability is a bit lacking. Halo 3's is not. Halo 3 with 4-Player Online Co-op, Campaign Scoring and Skulls gives it tons of Single Player Replayability. Then once you add Halo 3's Excellent Multiplayer with Saved Films, Screenshots, Forge and Custom Games you have a game worth your money more than Gears.

Personally though, just get both. Gears and Halo are both very different in their Gameplay and are both must-haves for any 360 owner.

Avatar image for Cowing30
Cowing30

450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 Cowing30
Member since 2007 • 450 Posts

gears was pretty awsome and the single player was better but in terms of multiplayer Halo 3 blows it out of the water

Halo 3 is better over all

Avatar image for Shmiity
Shmiity

6625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#67 Shmiity
Member since 2006 • 6625 Posts

Gears.

None of the Halo's have really wow'd me.

Halo 3 was pretty good, but It just didnt strike the same chords with me as Gears.

Its just idk, not as entertaining to me.

Avatar image for jmartin1016
jmartin1016

1363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#68 jmartin1016
Member since 2003 • 1363 Posts
Gears. But I think Halo captures the scale of a war much better. Gears seemed lik Resident Evil 4 on Steriods. Which is awesome.
Avatar image for gamerfreak1991
gamerfreak1991

2501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 gamerfreak1991
Member since 2005 • 2501 Posts
Gears is an awesome game as far as singleplayer, but as for multiplayer it was annoyingly unfair. Host shotgun, need I say more. I mean Halo 3 has host advantage too but it is covered a whole lot better. I enjoyed Halo 3's campaign more than Gears' also. The only thing that Gears has that will be held over Halo 3 is the eye-candy graphics.
Avatar image for Gvirus44
Gvirus44

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Gvirus44
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

hmm in graphics id say gears

multiplayer definitly halo 3

umm story i cant decide because we dont know all of halos story seeings how theres books and hopefully another game

fanbase id probably say halo won

i dont think of which ones better i just leave the computer and play both

Avatar image for otepadilla
otepadilla

239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 otepadilla
Member since 2004 • 239 Posts

I say Gears since never a game had me playing it with enthusiasm for such a long time. In gears killing someone is a big deal and you are a more important part of your team on the other hand in halo 3 people get killed like 10 times more than they kill and most of them are lone wolves and when you kill someone is just a bit step closer to reach the score limit.

P.S I don't know if it was CoD4 Beta that got me so hyped that just when halo 3 came I think about it and prefer CoD4 so much more.

Avatar image for tatu2004
tatu2004

17173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 tatu2004
Member since 2004 • 17173 Posts
Halo 3 it's the best game i'v played this year..
Avatar image for wreak
wreak

4645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 wreak
Member since 2005 • 4645 Posts

Gears of War. Easily.

Halo 3. The game should have gotten a 7 if it were not for the theatre and forge editer. Otherwise, average shooter.

Gameplay : Gears of War

Story : Gears of War

Graphics : Gears of War

Multiplayer : I'd have to say Gears of War because it's just so much more fun and there's really nothing else quite like it on the Xbox 360.

Ultra-Alue

i hate when ppl act as if gears is so revolutionary. everything ok, and i mean everything in gears has been done before, and been done in a much much better way. gears is a collaboration of rip offs namely from RE4. and as far as story goes, i realy can't beleave that anyone actually thinks that gears has a story...it has like no story at all, once i got above ground again i had no idea what was going on, or why i was doing the things i was doing; even before that the only thing i was aware off is that i was going to set off some bomb for some reason. as for multie player, gears has like 4 MP modes all of witch play pretty much exactly the same, and they are only fun if your hosting caus you always win when yer hosting.

when you look at halo 3 and gears in the MP department alone it's like a sliding scale where gears almost falls off the map from the amount of content and game varients that halo 3 has. so realy it's like no contest, halo 3 is like 10 times the game that gears is.

Avatar image for otepadilla
otepadilla

239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 otepadilla
Member since 2004 • 239 Posts
[QUOTE="Ultra-Alue"]

Gears of War. Easily.

Halo 3. The game should have gotten a 7 if it were not for the theatre and forge editer. Otherwise, average shooter.

Gameplay : Gears of War

Story : Gears of War

Graphics : Gears of War

Multiplayer : I'd have to say Gears of War because it's just so much more fun and there's really nothing else quite like it on the Xbox 360.

wreak

i hate when ppl act as if gears is so revolutionary. everything ok, and i mean everything in gears has been done before, and been done in a much much better way. gears is a collaboration of rip offs namely from RE4. and as far as story goes, i realy can't beleave that anyone actually thinks that gears has a story...it has like no story at all, once i got above ground again i had no idea what was going on, or why i was doing the things i was doing; even before that the only thing i was aware off is that i was going to set off some bomb for some reason. as for multie player, gears has like 4 MP modes all of witch play pretty much exactly the same, and they are only fun if your hosting caus you always win when yer hosting.

when you look at halo 3 and gears in the MP department alone it's like a sliding scale where gears almost falls off the map from the amount of content and game varients that halo 3 has. so realy it's like no contest, halo 3 is like 10 times the game that gears is.

"halo 3 is like 10 times the game that gears is." LoL I think I found a huge halo fan. For me after it's all about personal opinions and preferences, there's no real "better game". As for my OPINION I think halo is not a bad game but I don't like the fact that in most MP games whoever gets to shoot first kills >.>

Avatar image for james28893
james28893

3252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#75 james28893
Member since 2007 • 3252 Posts

The only reason Halo got a 9.5 was because of the new reviewing system. Gears would have got 9.5 too otherwise. My game's Halo 3 for multiplayer and Gears when I'm all by myself. Graphics don't really matter to me as long as they look OK. Halo 3's controls seem to work more fluidly. It's pretty even. Halo series is dead. Gears has two more to come. Mass Effect will probably have sequels and become the best single player game on the 360.

Halo series: Dead now :cry:

Gears series: Alive :D

Avatar image for wreak
wreak

4645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 wreak
Member since 2005 • 4645 Posts
i wouldn't say that the halo series is dead, i mean for one we have halo wars coming out next year, and i mean the first 3 star wars movies came out in the 1970's and 80's, that doesn't mean that star wars is dead.
Avatar image for Josepiphus
Josepiphus

571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 Josepiphus
Member since 2003 • 571 Posts
300 million in one week = alive and kicking.
Avatar image for Shmiity
Shmiity

6625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#78 Shmiity
Member since 2006 • 6625 Posts

You can't say Halo 3 is unique.

Its the most generic first person shooter Ive ever played.

But its just a really well put together game, thats why its good.

Gears was really fresh to me, I had never played a game where taking cover was implemented.

Its just so gruesome and vulgar, so it tops Halo.

Its just much more entertaining in my opinion, with heads just popping off and bodies exploding.

Avatar image for james28893
james28893

3252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#79 james28893
Member since 2007 • 3252 Posts
What I meant was that the Halo series (with MC and Cortana etc) is over. Probably. I have seen the LE ending though. What do you guys make of it?
Avatar image for Josepiphus
Josepiphus

571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 Josepiphus
Member since 2003 • 571 Posts

For me the games are technically even. What edges halo 3 ahead of gears of war is simply my love for the universe thay created. The whole visual style also appeals to me more... I'm so sick of dark games.

Avatar image for salamancecool
salamancecool

963

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#81 salamancecool
Member since 2004 • 963 Posts
I like GOW more but both are great games.
Avatar image for Rock-City
Rock-City

1533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Rock-City
Member since 2004 • 1533 Posts
Well for me it's Gears. I went out and bought that game like 4 hours after a friend exposed me to it. I've played a friend's copy of Halo3, and I have yet to run out to a store and buy my own. For me, it's just another "been there done that" tired ass FPS; an overrated one for that matter. Gears really blew my mind when I saw it the first time, that game is awesome...still awesome.
Avatar image for sabroso50
sabroso50

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 sabroso50
Member since 2003 • 25 Posts

Im gonna have to stick with GoW. Jaw dropping graphics (makes me wanna hump my 360), groundbreaking gameplay. but its also true that the mp's got a few glitches which makes, us standard gamers (none hardcore),impossible toget achievements like seriously.

Halo 3 is a great game!, its true it got hyped, but the graphics are just fine,but at the endit remains as just another FPS, thats for sure. im not digging halo 3 mp that much..... after a while i get bored.

Avatar image for Lo_Rising
Lo_Rising

930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#84 Lo_Rising
Member since 2007 • 930 Posts
i like gears of war but HALO 3 is the king of games right now. So with that being said HALO 3!!!!!!!
Avatar image for Solidshark21
Solidshark21

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Solidshark21
Member since 2003 • 350 Posts
The fact that GOW was a Third person shooter was one of the biggest reasons i give it my vote.  I wish that halo would have adopted that style.  I would have enjoyed seeing master chief fighting in the third person.  Plus masterchief cant duck or roll out of the way of the attacker.  I would would play games in multiplayer and kill like three spartans in a row but get taken out by the fourth guy just because my shield hadn't regenerated.  If i could have just sprinted or dove out of the way i would have like halo more but GOW was more tactical.  Also the characters in Gears have far more charismatic.  Someone posted before that the story was bad in gears but I even thought the invasion senario was done better than most games.  When i first popped in gears, I turned off the lights and boosted up the sound and this gave the game a real sense of impending danger.  
Avatar image for mor-ski
mor-ski

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 mor-ski
Member since 2003 • 25 Posts

u can tell a gears fan over a halo fan because u must be japanese to prefer ambiguous rainbow coloured aliens(much like pokemon) over a gritty, noire-style shooter

Gears...period

Avatar image for misterkhan
misterkhan

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 misterkhan
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
pee on both of them, call of duty smokes both of them with just a multi beta. playing the single player mode is just going to be icing on the cake. cod4 has got game of the year locked up...period
Avatar image for geraldwillkill
geraldwillkill

1134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#88 geraldwillkill
Member since 2005 • 1134 Posts

Gears of War. Easily.

Halo 3. The game should have gotten a 7 if it were not for the theatre and forge editer. Otherwise, average shooter.

Gameplay : Gears of War

Story : Gears of War

Graphics : Gears of War

Multiplayer : I'd have to say Gears of War because it's just so much more fun and there's really nothing else quite like it on the Xbox 360.

Ultra-Alue

Gears Had like no story, although the graphics were better Gears gameplay sucked in my opinion, it had horrible AI, horrible Multiplayer, very easy to beat especially on the hardest mode, the online was soooooooo laaagggyyy!

Avatar image for timmotool
timmotool

1761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 timmotool
Member since 2005 • 1761 Posts
Halo 3. Gears is an ok game. Halo has alot more depth and a decent story line. Plus look at the main hero, MC kicks so much more a$$ than marcus.
Avatar image for insane_metalist
insane_metalist

7797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#90 insane_metalist
Member since 2006 • 7797 Posts
Gears all the way it's way more fun then halo
Avatar image for lacrimosamo
lacrimosamo

691

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#93 lacrimosamo
Member since 2005 • 691 Posts
I picked Halo 3. For me a game is for having fun, graphics, story, etc are just a plus and Halo 3 has given me wonderful experiences on Live. GeoW is my second fave.
Avatar image for imperial_agent
imperial_agent

2195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#94 imperial_agent
Member since 2006 • 2195 Posts

Gears baby. As Chad Warden would say, "they best rename Halo to GAYlo"

j/k Halo is a fun game too. But... Gears is where it's at for me personally.

Avatar image for PotatoSan
PotatoSan

3491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#95 PotatoSan
Member since 2005 • 3491 Posts

lol @ people who think Gears at better. Just lol.

freaken idiots.

Avatar image for kkbeach93
kkbeach93

1089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 kkbeach93
Member since 2004 • 1089 Posts

Halo 3 is way better imo. I thought GeoW was one of the most overrated games ever.BioShockOwnz

YES.

Gears is way too overrated.

Avatar image for mikemd4eva
mikemd4eva

564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 mikemd4eva
Member since 2007 • 564 Posts
Cant choose so tie ..... My 2 favorite games ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Avatar image for sonofabear17
sonofabear17

1941

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#98 sonofabear17
Member since 2006 • 1941 Posts

I am not sure if this is already been done, but whats your pick, everyones saying Halo 3 is better when the Gamespot score was 9.5 and User score was 9.0 while Gears of war was 9.6 and 9.4, So take your pick, I say Gears, but Halo a very very close second.

DamienRulz
how many freakin times do people have to make this exact same topic
Avatar image for shockwave04
shockwave04

19257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#99 shockwave04
Member since 2002 • 19257 Posts
I like gears of war better.
Avatar image for 69Kameleon69
69Kameleon69

46

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 69Kameleon69
Member since 2005 • 46 Posts
Halo 3 for me is better than Gears of War because of the style of Halo(First Person Shooter). Gears of War is awesome but it cannot touch Halo 3 or even Halo 1 or 2.