This topic is locked from further discussion.
Maybe it will end up being GoTY. Afterall 300+ million of you bought the damn game.....
Just thought I say what I thought about it.
Im sorry but that is the funnyest thing Ive seen in ages, and thats even after that 100billion people on earth thing. No it's the fact you can't spell a simple word.i played and beat all 3 its a kool shooter other than that i dont spend my life playing it like a majority of the world. makes me wonder if halo fans are worse than world of war craft fans
THANK YOU! finally someon who can agree. Its true 95% of games will involve one or many of these types of personalities, you dont see this in the more hardcore games like vegas2, well i have not anyway. Palantas, you accused me of not using evidence, which i didnt, so wheres yours? Thats right, there is no valid evidence to support your words, because halo is an average game which should have been godly for the hardcore gamer, but no. The grunt emphasises halo in every way, i wanna know what the devs were on when they came up with that stupid useless alien, we as humans are supposed to fear aliens, instead we get these cartoon like aliens that have no horrifying construction at all, plus the useless marines, lol.KorruptRaidenHorrifying construction? I can not recall at any point where the Halo series was supposed to be scary? Try playing the game on Legendary with some of the gold skulls turned on and you'll see that the grunts aren't useless. I don't know, all of your posts sounds like you're being overly critical. The Halo series in general has always had a high level of polish to it, the games run extremely well. Take Hour of Victory for example. When launched, that game was a broken, buggy mess. With that in mind, all of your posts do not make any sense whatsoever.
[QUOTE="KorruptRaiden"]THANK YOU! finally someon who can agree. Its true 95% of games will involve one or many of these types of personalities, you dont see this in the more hardcore games like vegas2, well i have not anyway. Palantas, you accused me of not using evidence, which i didnt, so wheres yours? Thats right, there is no valid evidence to support your words, because halo is an average game which should have been godly for the hardcore gamer, but no. The grunt emphasises halo in every way, i wanna know what the devs were on when they came up with that stupid useless alien, we as humans are supposed to fear aliens, instead we get these cartoon like aliens that have no horrifying construction at all, plus the useless marines, lol.Lance_KalzasHorrifying construction? I can not recall at any point where the Halo series was supposed to be scary? Try playing the game on Legendary with some of the gold skulls turned on and you'll see that the grunts aren't useless. I don't know, all of your posts sounds like you're being overly critical. The Halo series in general has always had a high level of polish to it, the games run extremely well. Take Hour of Victory for example. When launched, that game was a broken, buggy mess. With that in mind, all of your posts do not make any sense whatsoever. Come on man, i didnt even imply that is was meant to be scary, i said it should have been, horrifying construction was a term i used to describe how bad the characterization/construction of the characters is, would have been better if some horror elements were implemented though.
[QUOTE="Lance_Kalzas"][QUOTE="KorruptRaiden"]THANK YOU! finally someon who can agree. Its true 95% of games will involve one or many of these types of personalities, you dont see this in the more hardcore games like vegas2, well i have not anyway. Palantas, you accused me of not using evidence, which i didnt, so wheres yours? Thats right, there is no valid evidence to support your words, because halo is an average game which should have been godly for the hardcore gamer, but no. The grunt emphasises halo in every way, i wanna know what the devs were on when they came up with that stupid useless alien, we as humans are supposed to fear aliens, instead we get these cartoon like aliens that have no horrifying construction at all, plus the useless marines, lol.KorruptRaidenHorrifying construction? I can not recall at any point where the Halo series was supposed to be scary? Try playing the game on Legendary with some of the gold skulls turned on and you'll see that the grunts aren't useless. I don't know, all of your posts sounds like you're being overly critical. The Halo series in general has always had a high level of polish to it, the games run extremely well. Take Hour of Victory for example. When launched, that game was a broken, buggy mess. With that in mind, all of your posts do not make any sense whatsoever. Come on man, i didnt even imply that is was meant to be scary, i said it should have been, horrifying construction was a term i used to describe how bad the characterization/construction of the characters is, would have been better if some horror elements were implemented though. lol raiden you are battling so hard its funny, you've kinda dug yourself a hole by stating your opinion as fact and then when palantas actually deconstructs your comments we all see how...lacking they are. i really dont care how much you dont like the game, your loss in my opinion, but you cannot say a game that averaged over 9.0 in ratings is terrible, and how bad everything is in the game. i can tell you right now, if it was actually as bad as YOU say it is, then no one would play it. so basically give your opinion, thats fine, but dont try and push your opinion onto everyone else and treat it as fact
(Too much quotation) Well it took me about 3 seconds to think for what i had written before hand, so yeah i would not call that effort, and yes i am on top because no one has actually made any valid points or remarks towards my posts other than indirectly saying that im wrong without anything to support their statements with so yes i will stick by my word, countless times people have given into my whining and tried the games i say are the best and time and time again i they agree.KorruptRaidenGive in to your whining? What are you, 5 years old? I made several points that you've conveinently ignored but that's okay. Everyone knows the Halo series is solid, not the best by any means but far from the worst. The way you describe Halo 3 would put it on par with Flintstones Bowling or Hour of Victory. It's perfectly all right if you don't like a game, no one cares but just state that. I can say that I don't like COD4 MP but that doesn't mean it's horrible because, unlike you, I can recognize what is good even if I don't like it personally.
[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="KorruptRaiden"](Too much quotation) Well it took me about 3 seconds to think for what i had written before hand, so yeah i would not call that effort, and yes i am on top because no one has actually made any valid points or remarks towards my posts other than indirectly saying that im wrong without anything to support their statements with so yes i will stick by my word, countless times people have given into my whining and tried the games i say are the best and time and time again i they agree.KorruptRaidenahahahahaha oh wow, you just keep on digging dont u? you gonna have to think for a little longer than 3 seconds to get anything intelligent out, which u have managed to prove time and time again. and people have made valid points, you just chose to not read them or only read what you wanted to. and you also spoke about people supporting their statements...wheres your support? i dont see any evidence to back up your claims other than the blatent opinion stated as fact. and congrats for making yourself sound like a child with your last sentence, 'most time people give into my whining,' toddlers whine alot too ;) Do you actually know what valid means??? making a statement or implication without any supporting evidence is not a valid one, that is my point, and i have said it before that i dont need any support, simply because i dont need it and i know that because none of your have successfully made a single valid point that actually draws for the need to back myself up.
Dude quit your complaining ...Halo isnt about the campaign its about the online play, not our fault if you suck at it. Go play something else that takes less skill. You dont like Halo... we know, who cares? ...haha.
The Halo series has received enormous critical and popular acclaim. When you're going against established sentiment, the burden of proof is on you. Furthermore, in response to a number of your statements, I haven't even asked for "proof." I've simply asked for you to explain what you said, which you have been utterly unable to do. I'm assuming you're English as a second language, which is fine, but some of your thoughts have been very poorly translated.
In the rare occasion that I have asked for evidence of your claims (i.e., Bungie used the Predalien as a concept model for the Elite) you either ignore it, or in a particularly bizzare move, claim that you don't need to provide any support for your claims. Why don't you? Who knows. You always win arguments and are always right, and if that's good enough for you, you seem to think it should be good enough for everyone else. Judging by the increasingly mocking tone other forum-goers are taking to your posts, I'm guessing it isn't.
making a statement or implication without any supporting evidence is not a valid one...
...i have said it before that i dont need any support, simply because i dont need it...
KorruptRaiden
:lol: If you had set out to write a collection of posts more totally void of reason, you could not possibly have done so. This bit above is signature-worthy. If you can't see how what you said here is senseless and contradictory, I'm sure you're the only one.
I seriously doubt you're actually going to engage in any real discussion here. Your MO so far has been to make bizzare claims, then refuse to back them up or even explain them. I don't think you're going to change, but that's not going to stop me from having some fun with you.
Getting back on track here, let's review some of your "arguments":
[QUOTE="KorruptRaiden"]
2. gameplay is so basic any noob can play it successfully
I
What's wrong with that? Why does every game need to have a Byzantine level of complexity in order to be a good experience? This is the same sort of elitist attitude that some people have about all shooters. Just give me a shooter you do like, and I'll tell you it's a bad game, because it's not as easy to pick up and play as Europa Universalis. What does that prove?
You haven't even attempted to address any of these issues. Adding to that, I'd like to know which shooters you think don't have easy-to-pick-up gameplay, as long as you're playing on the easier difficulties. Team Fortress can be rather noob-unfriendly, I suppose. I blame that on the lack of a tutorial. (Note: This is a bad thing.)
3. the characters are averaged and are cliche's of characters from movies, eg sgt johson is a replica of sgt apone from aliens
4. story is weak and should have been done better
7. the story is too jumpy, they could have fit like another 5 levels in it
9. lack of originality, basically copied aliens and starship troopers
KorruptRaiden
You haven't elaborated on or even explain most of these, so I'll let my original challenges stand. Regarding the last one, I'll repeat myself here: Many great stories are based in whole or in part on earlier stories and myths. This does not invalid them. I'll ask you again: You hated Star Wars, right?
In any case, you've managed to find only the vaguest of similarities between Aliens, Starship Troopers, and Halo. Apparently by your definition, if I can find one or two characters or plot threads in common between two stories, one must be a ripoff of the other. Hmm...you know what? I think Halo must be a ripoff of Star Trek. See, the Flood are like the Borg, and Captain Keyes is like Captain Picard, 'cause they both get captured and assimilated. Ha! Halo is a ripoff of Star Trek! Make it so.
I think most everyone here will grasp that I'm being sarcastic, but I probably shouldn't assume that with you. My point here is that your definition of what constitutes unoriginality is so flimsy and undefined, that you can make most any story a ripoff of another.
6. multiplayer maps are lame
KorruptRaiden
Come on, Mr. I've-Played-System Shock, where's your analysis here? We're all waiting to be educated by you. This shouldn't be that hard. Take a level from Unreal Tournament or Quake, describe what makes it a good deathmatch level, and then show how all those elements are lacking from any Halo levels.
And...
You know what? It occurred to me that I could keep going here, but I seriously doubt you're going to respond in any reasonable fashion to any of this. You're going to write another short, single-giant-sentence post about how you don't have to explain yourself. What I'd really love for you to explain is why you think you don't have to back up any of your claims.
What points am I supposed to back up? So far the only thing I've asked is that you explain yourself. I'm asking "How did you come to this conclusion?" and your response is "I don't have to explain myself, but you do." Okay, I'm going to explain myself here: I'm asking how you came to your conclusions. Is that clear? You want me to back up my points? Okay, I'm backing up my point that I want you to explain your conclusions, by asking you to explain your conclusions using the English language.
The rest of your recent post was an obvious appeal to authority argument. (You can go wiki that phrase if you like.) Your latest batch of non-reasoning has the added bonus of insulting a huge number of people, but I doubt you care about that.
Well i played halo for quite a strong number of hours, but ive also played close to 100 games in my gaming history, titles such as ff7, ss2, avp2, mgs4, all good games that are not actually acknowledged by alot of people, anyways, when playing halo i noticed alot of things like when i got in a passenger seat of the warthog the marine wud drive straight into a rock, the aliens, covenant, flood, all dumb, even though the covenant has all those technologies. Btw did you actually watch that review i showed, that mostly summed up my pov of the game. The amount of direct quotes taken from aliens which i dont mind but it emphasises the unorginality of the game, master chief does not show any emotion which is ridiculous because he is a cyborg not a robot and like the other characters there is no actual construction to how their character came to be, no story, and the only way in which the characters were constructed efficiently was by the attitude which is something i could have scripted alot better lol. Although some multiplayer maps are ok, most dont have any use of cover at all, the maps are basically set up so you cannot hide at all, all this does is induce more run n gun forget yourteam mates gameplay. In the campaign i noticed an inconsistency in the graphics which does emphasise that this game may have been rushed a little as well as that there are large proportions of story skipping which really irritates me (in betweens of each level). The thing that annoys me the most about this game is the way it is played, good controls but very lame gameplay, especially online, no one even thinks of strategy and squad gameplay, most just jump in and spray. Anyways argue all you want but i wont be back for 10 hours, in the meantime watch the review.What points am I supposed to back up? So far the only thing I've asked is that you explain yourself. I'm asking "How did you come to this conclusion?" and your response is "I don't have to explain myself, but you do." Okay, I'm going to explain myself here: I'm asking how you came to your conclusions. Is that clear? You want me to back up my points? Okay, I'm backing up my point that I want you to explain your conclusions, by asking you to explain your conclusions using the English language.
The rest of your recent post was an obvious appeal to authority argument. (You can go wiki that phrase if you like.) Your latest batch of non-reasoning has the added bonus of insulting a huge number of people, but I doubt you care about that.
Palantas
There's more: On the rare occasion you do actually explain anything, your reasoning makes no sense. We're going to focus on a single point here, and I'm going to go through this slowly, step by step, so hopefully you'll understand. You posted this:
9. lack of originality, basically copied aliens and starship troopers
KorruptRaiden
I've challenged this statement on two grounds:
I used examples for both of these. If you scroll up and read my post using literacy you'll see these. I've used examples to suggest that your reasoning is flawed. Do you understand now? I don't know how to make this any more simple for you.
EDIT: I see you posted some more stuff. Let's just focus on the above for now; we'll get back to everything else later.
Two year old topic.. I bet a lot of people will still post in it though.craigalan23You were right Surprised it didn't get locked
Do you actually know what valid means??? making a statement or implication without any supporting evidence is not a valid one, that is my point, and i have said it before that i dont need any support, simply because i dont need it and i know that because none of your have successfully made a single valid point that actually draws for the need to back myself up.[QUOTE="KorruptRaiden"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] ahahahahaha oh wow, you just keep on digging dont u? you gonna have to think for a little longer than 3 seconds to get anything intelligent out, which u have managed to prove time and time again. and people have made valid points, you just chose to not read them or only read what you wanted to. and you also spoke about people supporting their statements...wheres your support? i dont see any evidence to back up your claims other than the blatent opinion stated as fact. and congrats for making yourself sound like a child with your last sentence, 'most time people give into my whining,' toddlers whine alot too ;)SHiFTY_v4
Dude quit your complaining ...Halo isnt about the campaign its about the online play, not our fault if you suck at it. Go play something else that takes less skill. You dont like Halo... we know, who cares? ...haha.
Actually id probably pwn your @$$ in halo3, i averaged around +20 on the kd spread for the last few months b4 i quit it, what annoys me is how i have to carry useless team mates you get matched with that dont know the simple protocol of teamwork.In all honesty i always pick on halo because its an easy target, and the majority of the halo community diserve it TBH, they have got to learn there is more than halo in the world.
300+ million copies= i think i fainted for about 30 seconds, since when did it do that lol
There's more: On the rare occasion you do actually explain anything, your reasoning makes no sense. We're goingto focus on a single point here, and I'm going to go through this slowly, step by step, so hopefully you'll understand. You posted this:
[QUOTE="KorruptRaiden"]
9. lack of originality, basically copied aliens and starship troopers
Palantas
I've challenged this statement on two grounds:
I used examples for both of these. If you scroll up and read my post using literacy you'll see these. I've used examples to suggest that your reasoning is flawed. Do you understand now? I don't know how to make this any more simple for you.
I never said that story is bad because of its unoriginality actually, your reading is unclear, if you read up i posted a few of the points, unoriginality is only a minor factor, most important is the depth of the story, it was not very complex, infact you knew the story's introduction-conflict-resolution form the first level of all 3 of the games. Most of the greatest of the games forced characters into side quests and complex issues to emphasise the story effectively, final fantasy 7 is a great example of this, it was done quite brilliantly with the flashbacks of clouds past and his relationships with the other characters, this is not performed at all with halo3, another dissapointment. I must also point out from earlier, you called me a fanboy, of what?? and why am i a fanboy of (insert whatever it is here) just because i did not enjoy halo and queers of war.Yes that is a good point, there is more to the world, in fact 5 star post mate, there is so many other games out there SOOOOO MANY GREAT GAMES that just get ignored because of the sheer focus on the mainstream titles, this oftenly comes down to the fact that these games suit the casual gamer and not the hardcore gamer such as myself.In all honesty i always pick on halo because its an easy target, and the majority of the halo community diserve it TBH, they have got to learn there is more than halo in the world.
300+ million copies= i think i fainted for about 30 seconds, since when did it do that lol
Jehuty-88
Do you actually know what valid means??? making a statement or implication without any supporting evidence is not a valid one, that is my point, and i have said it before that i dont need any support, simply because i dont need it and i know that because none of your have successfully made a single valid point that actually draws for the need to back myself up.[QUOTE="KorruptRaiden"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] ahahahahaha oh wow, you just keep on digging dont u? you gonna have to think for a little longer than 3 seconds to get anything intelligent out, which u have managed to prove time and time again. and people have made valid points, you just chose to not read them or only read what you wanted to. and you also spoke about people supporting their statements...wheres your support? i dont see any evidence to back up your claims other than the blatent opinion stated as fact. and congrats for making yourself sound like a child with your last sentence, 'most time people give into my whining,' toddlers whine alot too ;)SHiFTY_v4
Dude quit your complaining ...Halo isnt about the campaign its about the online play, not our fault if you suck at it. Go play something else that takes less skill. You dont like Halo... we know, who cares? ...haha.
Oh ok because halo is a online game only it will score a 10 yeah that makes sense, it actually did have single player if you were not blind and the sole purpose was not the multiplayer, the multiplayer became huge because of its simplicity.I never said that story is bad because of its unoriginality actually
KorruptRaiden
Theres many valid reasons to why people dont like halo and here are mine...lack of originality, basically copied aliens and starship troopers
KorruptRaiden
You posted a list of reasons why you don't Halo. You never indicated that one was particularly more important than the other. I picked this unoriginality bit because it was one of the few points to which you actually gave any examples. So, is this a good reason to dislike Halo or not? Which of your original points did you actually state seriously, and which ones, after I call you out on them, are you going to say "Well that one isn't a big deal"? Maybe you should start over with a new list, and write what you actually mean this time. I'll hold off on tearing into the all the other nonsense you've posted recently, if you want to do this.
Oh, except for this:
I must also point out from earlier, you called me a fanboy, of what??
KorruptRaiden
I'd like you to produce a quote block from me where I call you a fanboy.
There's more: On the rare occasion you do actually explain anything, your reasoning makes no sense. We're goingto focus on a single point here, and I'm going to go through this slowly, step by step, so hopefully you'll understand. You posted this:
[QUOTE="KorruptRaiden"]
9. lack of originality, basically copied aliens and starship troopers
I've challenged this statement on two grounds:
I used examples for both of these. If you scroll up and read my post using literacy you'll see these. I've used examples to suggest that your reasoning is flawed. Do you understand now? I don't know how to make this any more simple for you.
I never said that story is bad because of its unoriginality actually, your reading is unclear, if you read up i posted a few of the points, unoriginality is only a minor factor, most important is the depth of the story, it was not very complex, infact you knew the story's introduction-conflict-resolution form the first level of all 3 of the games. Most of the greatest of the games forced characters into side quests and complex issues to emphasise the story effectively, final fantasy 7 is a great example of this, it was done quite brilliantly with the flashbacks of clouds past and his relationships with the other characters, this is not performed at all with halo3, another dissapointment. I must also point out from earlier, you called me a fanboy, of what?? and why am i a fanboy of (insert whatever it is here) just because i did not enjoy halo and queers of war. So now you're comparing an JRPG to an FPS....what?frankly, i dont care much for halo, too pre-teen for me.. no blood and you have the option to shoot some pink stuff at some bright blue midgets.. not my cup of tea.. im more of a gears type shooter fan.. not neccesarily third person.. just need some more depth in combat, and i dont feel the enemy die in the same way in halo as in gears.. :)
So now you're comparing an JRPG to an FPS....what?
Lance_Kalzas
Believe me, that did not escape my attention. I'm going to wait and see if he revises his gripe list and publishes a definitive copy. Apparently, he's going to pull the "Oh I didn't really mean that" bit in regards to his old list.
(Too much quotation) Well it took me about 3 seconds to think for what i had written before hand, so yeah i would not call that effort, and yes i am on top because no one has actually made any valid points or remarks towards my posts other than indirectly saying that im wrong without anything to support their statements with so yes i will stick by my word, countless times people have given into my whining and tried the games i say are the best and time and time again i they agree.KorruptRaidenI think you're missing the point, Raiden (BTW "you're" is the contraction of "you are", not "your"). Your oponnents here are telling you that your ideas are simply opinion, and since everyone has different opinions it is impossible for you to be "on top". You can't be right or wrong on a subjective issue, buddy. Let's just leave it at the fact that everyone thinks differently about everything and let it go. You can't prove your point any more than they can prove theirs, so let's just let it go and stop wasting time huh?
There's more: On the rare occasion you do actually explain anything, your reasoning makes no sense. We're goingto focus on a single point here, and I'm going to go through this slowly, step by step, so hopefully you'll understand. You posted this:
[QUOTE="KorruptRaiden"]
9. lack of originality, basically copied aliens and starship troopers
I've challenged this statement on two grounds:
I used examples for both of these. If you scroll up and read my post using literacy you'll see these. I've used examples to suggest that your reasoning is flawed. Do you understand now? I don't know how to make this any more simple for you.
I never said that story is bad because of its unoriginality actually, your reading is unclear, if you read up i posted a few of the points, unoriginality is only a minor factor, most important is the depth of the story, it was not very complex, infact you knew the story's introduction-conflict-resolution form the first level of all 3 of the games. Most of the greatest of the games forced characters into side quests and complex issues to emphasise the story effectively, final fantasy 7 is a great example of this, it was done quite brilliantly with the flashbacks of clouds past and his relationships with the other characters, this is not performed at all with halo3, another dissapointment. I must also point out from earlier, you called me a fanboy, of what?? and why am i a fanboy of (insert whatever it is here) just because i did not enjoy halo and queers of war. So now you're comparing an JRPG to an FPS....what? PLEASE GOD STOP USING COMMAS or my brain is going to squirt out my ears!!!! Use periods!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!!You can dislike Halo all you want. However, when express your reasons for disliking it in public, and they don't make sense, then expect to be criticized. I can write a post about how I hate Gears of War because it destabilizes the Earth's orbit. Now, you can't argue that I dislike Gears, but you can argue that my reasons for disliking it are either biased, inconsistent, or outright wrong.
Here, I'll give you an example from this thread:
frankly, i dont care much for halo, too pre-teen for me.. no blood and you have the option to shoot some pink stuff at some bright blue midgets.. not my cup of tea.. im more of a gears type shooter fan..
kazater
This guy doesn't like Halo because he thinks it's oriented at children, and he bases that conclusion in part on the fact that the game has no blood. Except...that's just dead wrong. Here's a screenshot:
I see blood. How 'bout you? Big trail of blood right there. Obviously this poster's statement that there's no blood in the game is completely incorrect.
[QUOTE="SragentThom"][QUOTE="spencdiamonds"]Halo Series is the worst game since big rigs for the pcthisguy51
Half life 2 fanboy?
:lol: Why would you post in this old thread?You're the one that gave me moderation then you sir are evil.
Here, I'll give you an example from this thread:
[QUOTE="kazater"]
frankly, i dont care much for halo, too pre-teen for me.. no blood and you have the option to shoot some pink stuff at some bright blue midgets.. not my cup of tea.. im more of a gears type shooter fan..
Palantas
This guy doesn't like Halo because he thinks it's oriented at children, and he bases that conclusion in part on the fact that the game has no blood. Except...that's just dead wrong. Here's a screenshot:
I see blood. How 'bout you? Big trail of blood right there. Obviously this poster's statement that there's no blood in the game is completely incorrect.
I think he meant Gore, Halo is violent and has some crud deaths but I think it doesnt have any goreThank you, vash; I'm glad you're enjoying yourself. :)
I think he meant Gore, Halo is violent and has some crud deaths but I think it doesnt have any gore
doubalfa
If that's what he meant (which is what he should have said), then it calls into question his whole line of reasoning, in which a game lacking gore must be intended for children.
Thank you, vash; I'm glad you're enjoying yourself. :)
[QUOTE="doubalfa"]
I think he meant Gore, Halo is violent and has some crud deaths but I think it doesnt have any gore
Palantas
If that's what he meant (which is what he should have said), then it calls into question his whole line of reasoning, in which a game lacking gore must be intended for children.
It is because of people like palantas that I enjoy coming to forums from time to time. Good job calling out all these people on their b/s.
Thank you, vash; I'm glad you're enjoying yourself. :)
[QUOTE="doubalfa"]
I think he meant Gore, Halo is violent and has some crud deaths but I think it doesnt have any gore
Palantas
If that's what he meant (which is what he should have said), then it calls into question his whole line of reasoning, in which a game lacking gore must be intended for children.
In which case his beloved Final Fantasy VII must be for even younger audiance considering there is absolutely no blood or gore in it.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment