[QUOTE="-M117-"]

[QUOTE="nba532002"] actually the pol that was made was in favor for it being exclusive, also in gamespot's list of editor's choice games in the the year of 2009, they have mlb 09 listed as ps3 and does not show ps2 and psp as in other multiplats...nba532002

the poll is opinion. Actually it was IGNs review that put the debate to rest, saying both versions werent that different. I dont want to argue here, just know that ended the debate. And again, MLB 07 and 08 were AA and cows didnt care that its exclusive.

lets not get into this. The opinion of a professional reviewer > cows that happen to outnumber lems on system wars. The thread concluded with 09 being a multiplat, JUST LIKE 08 and 07. Just drop it.

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

[QUOTE="GreenGoblin2099"] TC got owned because that sheep made a valid point and owned him following TC's logic. So yeah, I agree with you on that last line :roll:lundy86_4

ok.......but 360 and PS3. This is all that concerns us.

Wii owns us in "A" quality? ok...........but who cares?

So you omit the Wii, because then your logic wouldn't stand up to scrutiny. Good call.

no...........I omit the Wii because The Holy War only consists of 360 vs PS3.

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

i listed quality too

4 A > 3 A

lundy86_4

Dont forget the fact that those 4As costs 4 times more than the AAA! I think Lost and Damned sould be a better argument against PS3.

Lost and Damned would have made for the better debate. With this thread as it stands, it just calls the TC's logic into question.

LAD isnt reviewed and cows would have said "its a expansion" and "its not a full game" and "it isnt reviewed"

believe me i would love to list it but it would bring more trouble then its worthh. I did mention it in the origional post, i edited it.

[QUOTE="Synthetic_NinJI"]

Ah making fun of sheep is always funny, however he just owned you.GreenGoblin2099

:| Explain how he got "owned" if the topic tile,TC, or other posters before the orignal poster never mentioned Wii. Their is a reading comprehension fail there.

ok.......but 360 and PS3. This is all that concerns us.

Wii owns us in "A" quality? ok...........but who cares?

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

[QUOTE="GreenGoblin2099"] Ah making fun of sheep is always funny, however he just owned you. Also it's funny how you ommit MLB09 even though it's been mentioned in this thread several times now. :roll: Back to you bridge.nba532002

system wars confirmed MLB to not be exclusive. Some cows still think so but it isnt.

If MLB 07 and MLB 08 werent exclusive, what makes 09 exlcusive? It was the AAA that made cows care.

the poll is opinion. Actually it was IGNs review that put the debate to rest, saying both versions werent that different. I dont want to argue here, just know that ended the debate. And again, MLB 07 and 08 were AA and cows didnt care that its exclusive.

This thread just has to be flamebait. It just lacks all logic.

lundy86_4

im using gamespot scores and simple math...................

stop saying Gamespot lacks logic troll :P

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

[QUOTE="bobcheeseball"]

Ok going by that the wii beats all.

marble saga(A)

Madworld(A)

Overkill (AA)

Deadly Creatures (A)

that makes 5 A's.. so going by that logic the Wii is having the best year.

GreenGoblin2099

thats true, but cows and lems dont care. sorry :P

system wars confirmed MLB to not be exclusive. Some cows still think so but it isnt.

If MLB 07 and MLB 08 werent exclusive, what makes 09 exlcusive? It was the AAA that made cows care.

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

i listed quality too

4 A > 3 A

Gamer4Iife

The problem with your post is that an AAA game does not equal 3 A games.

Do you get a Gears of War, if you buy Too Human 3 times? :|

Too Human is sub-A.

But I wouldnt mind Crackdown, Lost Odessey, and Ninja Blade instead of Gears of War.

Ok going by that the wii beats all.

marble saga(A)

Madworld(A)

Overkill (AA)

Deadly Creatures (A)

that makes 5 A's.. so going by that logic the Wii is having the best year.

bobcheeseball

thats true, but cows and lems dont care. sorry :P

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

[QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]PS3 has the better quality game. The 360 has a better quantity of games. You cant add up quality to match 1 very good quality thing. You can have 4 Toyota Carola's but there still not better than a Ferrari. lundy86_4

sorry, but you can gang up on the one game. Car analogies violate the terms of use by the way.

4 A > 3 A

deal

I'll go again. That makes no sense, because Killzone 2 is much better than all of them. You can't add 4 A rated games and pit them against a AAA rated game, as they would still lose.

how is KZ2 better then all of them? Maybe on a one on one comparison but KZ2 cant beat all 4 games at the same time. Yes, its ganging up and it isnt fair, but too bad. 4 > 3.

You have a sports game, a racer, a jrpg, and a action game, 4 genres with all having some level of quality to them. Then you have one surpurb fps, a saturated genre. I dont know, 4 varied gaming experiences can very possibily beat out one.