[QUOTE="-M117-"]

[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"]

im not saying games are worse, in the end they are even because i get few textures go missing and you get to pay to play.

ZoomZoom2490

pay to play the better experience. Hence answering your thread question of QUALITY, NOT cost.

i found SF4 to be a better experience onps3 and its free.

thats a fighter. Any other genre and 360 gets the edge.

PS3 loses another exclusive.404-not-found

ya im surprised this news didnt "hit" the cows yet.

[QUOTE="Bruceisright"]

i am still trying to figure out why paying for XBL seems to make the games worse based on what the TC aregument seems to be from what I am getting?

ZoomZoom2490

im not saying games are worse, in the end they are even because i get few textures go missing and you get to pay to play.

pay to play the better experience. Hence answering your thread question of QUALITY, NOT cost.

[QUOTE="Bruceisright"]

i am still trying to figure out why paying for XBL seems to make the games worse based on what the TC aregument seems to be from what I am getting?

bez2083

Hey, who needs smooth framerates or good textures when I can play online for free.

but it aint #1

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

[QUOTE="Nirron"] For simplicity's sake, why not just do MS? Sony would involve liquidating something like 15 studios/devs, while we could streamline the liquation of Rare/Lionhead/Turn 10. The speed would be hilarity. Then again, losing 15+ studios would be interesting to see on the interwebs.

(Please nobody take me serious :( . I do wish MS had more internal studios, but I don't really know why Sony has so freakin' many)

-Melix-

MS is smart to downsize studious. In the long run with games looking better and requiring more money, MS wont eat up as much money with studios making games. Sony however, must pay and maintain every studio they own, which can be very costly. And with every PS3 game they make costing ridiculous amounts of money and will only go up with PS4.........Sony will realize that too many studious can be a curse.

Yea but it could also be an advantage over the long run. For example ms has sold most of their studios which is a bad idea, considering that they have to rely on 3 party exclusives, which most of the time goes multi plat. And what is 360 left with? your answer is multiplats..

nope. As logn as MS keeps releasing first and gets a head start install base wise, they can easily woe 3rd party devs for exclusives, timed exclusives, and exclusive DLC.......just like now.

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

[QUOTE="rockguy92"]So is Ghost back?W1NGMAN-

whos he?

Out of all the people to ask that it had to be you lol....he didn't even quote you, you just blew your cover!

o? what cover? I just like having ghosts in my sig, thats all.

[QUOTE="porky_ownsu"]

thats like saying if the ps3 cost something stupid like 400$ would i buy it??

..oh wait

Gxgear

And every year 360 users are 50 dollars deeper into the hole. Your point?

point is its worth it. And its better then PSn.........which is priceless :P

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

[QUOTE="vdastampede"]

Playstation 3 by a landslide.

vdastampede

you do realize the title says "console exclusives"?

because you know.......the 360 has the most of those, by far.

they are overall higher reviewed.......or more total "A" then PS3 lists.

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"]

switching nothing, you got owned.

rrod, f74, disk scratching, etc is the future of gaming, right?

ZoomZoom2490

so you admitted defeat to PS3 multiplats.............now u wanna talk about reliability?

better change your thread title........ :lol:

"Kinda spits in the face of Sonys argument that PS3 is future proof"

you wrote that, forgat?

ur still straying tfrom your OWN thread subject......which you have recently ran out of comebacks.

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

[QUOTE="Nero_Paladin"]

Then what will happen to devs like Team Ico? :cry:

Nirron

they get liquidated offcourse :)

(Please nobody take me serious :( . I do wish MS had more internal studios, but I don't really know why Sony has so freakin' many)

MS is smart to downsize studious. In the long run with games looking better and requiring more money, MS wont eat up as much money with studios making games. Sony however, must pay and maintain every studio they own, which can be very costly. And with every PS3 game they make costing ridiculous amounts of money and will only go up with PS4.........Sony will realize that too many studious can be a curse.