If someone has all 3 consoles he could be one of the following:

1) Filthy spoiled rich.

2) Working but living with his parents.

3) Working but living in a tin can.

4) REALLY lucky.

5) Some punk kid who got everything he wanted for each Christmass and birthday.

[QUOTE="1xcalibur1"][QUOTE="heretrix"][QUOTE="1xcalibur1"][QUOTE="heretrix"][QUOTE="1xcalibur1"]

Easy.

Having the game using the entire Bluray surface disc (if I recall correct Kojima even complained that 50gb wasnt enough for him) - that alone could have never been done on the box. So there ya go.

IronBass

http://gizmodo.com/363075/blu+ray-cannot-contain-metal-gear-solid-4s-awesomeness

Read'em and whip.

The reason MGS 4 takes up so much space is the uncompressed audio which takes up a phenomenal amount of space.

You really don't know what you are talking about do you?

You wanna take that arguement up with Kojima? Go ahead.

Kojima says "50GB BD Not Enough For MGS4".

That's plain english black on white.

Yup, declarations. MGS 4 is about 33 Gb.

Actually that's 44.6gb in ISO size.

[QUOTE="1xcalibur1"][QUOTE="heretrix"][QUOTE="1xcalibur1"]

Easy.

Having the game using the entire Bluray surface disc (if I recall correct Kojima even complained that 50gb wasnt enough for him) - that alone could have never been done on the box. So there ya go.

heretrix

http://gizmodo.com/363075/blu+ray-cannot-contain-metal-gear-solid-4s-awesomeness

Read'em and whip.

The reason MGS 4 takes up so much space is the uncompressed audio which takes up a phenomenal amount of space.

You really don't know what you are talking about do you?

You wanna take that arguement up with Kojima? Go ahead.

Kojima says "50GB BD Not Enough For MGS4".

That's plain english black on white.

I am forced to agree with the only one above shouting out logic - It doesn't matter what's inside, it matters what is on the screen and what is fun to play. If graphics and power are the only ways to have fun and enjoy and be completely consumed by a video game, tell me why people thought OoT was the best game. Tell me why Mario Cart, Pong, and Commander Keen (DOS game) were thought to be amazing. It was for how fun and great they were. Sure they tested the limit of graphics at the time, but it wasn't that that made them truely great.

Anyone who tries to compare anything on PAPER is ignorant. That is like telling me that a football player that is 295 and 6'5 and can run a 4.7 is automatically a beast of a D-tackle. Paper means nothing, performance is everything.

360 = PS3 on performance

Games are preference and that is the only reason people bought PS3s (other than people buying them as a movie player or fanboys or people who link to PS3 forums claiming the hidden power of thier console of choice in order to justify in their minds, the purchase of a several hundred dollar piece of electronics).

seabiscuit8686

"Anyone who tries to compare anything on paper is ignorant" - actually that is a state of ignorance right there.

If it was well known that the entire might of PS3 was unleashed right at it's first year, I'm not sure how many would buy it. I mean why bother spending the extra 100$ on a system when you already have a so called "better" and cheaper one out? You saw it yourself. Almost all first year titles ported to PS3 were a complete disaster. It's Sony's reputation, potential and BLACK ON WHITE PAPER promises that bought it it's customers when it was still down.

[QUOTE="1xcalibur1"]

Easy.

Having the game using the entire Bluray surface disc (if I recall correct Kojima even complained that 50gb wasnt enough for him) - that alone could have never been done on the box. So there ya go.

heretrix

http://gizmodo.com/363075/blu+ray-cannot-contain-metal-gear-solid-4s-awesomeness

Read'em and whip.

[QUOTE="1xcalibur1"][QUOTE="Frozzik"][QUOTE="1xcalibur1"][QUOTE="Frozzik"]

I really dont want to read it. Is it another pointless rant about the "theoretical" power of the PS3?

Look, lets settle this now, it really doesn't matter what the PS3 "Could do" its about what it has and is doing. The fact is, most games look no different on PS3 than they do on 360, whether they are exclusives or multiplats. DEAL with it.

The only platform that actually puts its money where its mouth is is PC, atleast with that u see a difference. But hey, hermits are elitist for saying so right?

chikenfriedrice

It actually sheds some light about the so called "inferior" RSX comparing to the Xenos.

Reading this might shut all Tech-fanboys once and for all.

I dont think anyone cares whats inside either the PC, 360 or PS3, its what you see on screen that counts m8. The PS3 has yet to show us anything that the 360 couldn't also do. The sooner PS3 owners come to terms with that the better.

Is that a joke?

Remind me again what XBOX360 exclusive game scored a perfect 10 on IGN, GAMESPOT etc?

Might that be MGS4? Oh I'm sorry, but that's a PS3 exclusive. So there ya go, something that xbox couldnt do thus far.

what does a game scoring a 10 have to do with the power of the PS3? That is the talent of the dev

Easy.

Having the game using the entire Bluray surface disc (if I recall correct Kojima even complained that 50gb wasnt enough for him) - that alone could have never been done on the box. So there ya go.

[QUOTE="1xcalibur1"][QUOTE="Frozzik"]

I really dont want to read it. Is it another pointless rant about the "theoretical" power of the PS3?

Look, lets settle this now, it really doesn't matter what the PS3 "Could do" its about what it has and is doing. The fact is, most games look no different on PS3 than they do on 360, whether they are exclusives or multiplats. DEAL with it.

The only platform that actually puts its money where its mouth is is PC, atleast with that u see a difference. But hey, hermits are elitist for saying so right?

Frozzik

It actually sheds some light about the so called "inferior" RSX comparing to the Xenos.

Reading this might shut all Tech-fanboys once and for all.

I dont think anyone cares whats inside either the PC, 360 or PS3, its what you see on screen that counts m8. The PS3 has yet to show us anything that the 360 couldn't also do. The sooner PS3 owners come to terms with that the better.

Is that a joke?

Remind me again what XBOX360 exclusive game scored a perfect 10 on IGN, GAMESPOT etc?

Might that be MGS4? Oh I'm sorry, but that's a PS3 exclusive. So there ya go, something that xbox couldnt do thus far.

I really dont want to read it. Is it another pointless rant about the "theoretical" power of the PS3?

Look, lets settle this now, it really doesn't matter what the PS3 "Could do" its about what it has and is doing. The fact is, most games look no different on PS3 than they do on 360, whether they are exclusives or multiplats. DEAL with it.

The only platform that actually puts its money where its mouth is is PC, atleast with that u see a difference. But hey, hermits are elitist for saying so right?

Frozzik

It actually sheds some light about the so called "inferior" RSX comparing to the Xenos.

Reading this might shut all Tech-fanboys once and for all.

This is by far the best and TRUE anaylisis of the PS3 architecture.

Take a look:

http://www.ps3forums.com/showthread.php?t=22858