I thought the first bioshock was crap and overated I dont have high hopes for this.
210189677155857843583653671808's forum posts
So you didn't buy anything after that?DaViD_99
In all honesty no.
I want games for the wii that make use of the motion controller only - I'm not interested in mutli-plat wii games that look on my ps3.
I just found the games boring, ugly and the novelty went really fast.
I still got the wii - but to be honest the PS3 games that have been getting released as of late deserve my money much more then the games Nintendo have.
playing singstar is more fun and has more appeal than the wii does imo
On August the 1st 2009
From Amazon I bought a:
Nintendo Wii
Wii play with additional controller
additional nunchuck
4bg sd card
Truma center
House of the dead 2&3
Wii fit % balance board
EA Sports active
Wiimote chargers
balance board charger
it all set me back approx £330 (all new)
It all arrived on the 4th of August 2009.................................................................................6th August the last time I played on the wii.
NINTENDO HAVE REALLY LET ME DOWN. they could have just released the wiimote for the gamecube
I would go for the Wand being a bigger success.
Only because of what the wiimote has accomplished and eyetoy being a bit of a flop.
Like Sony have said some "games you simply need buttons" and I think Nintendo got this right.
Sony could have evolved the eye toy if they wanted to, but instead have followed Nintendo - it says something.
If they are going to make them even this means the game is going to be worse then MGS4.
Apparently MGS4 could only be done on the PS3 (i don't believe this)
To make them even it would mean putting the 360 version on about 6dvds or allowing the Ps3 Version to suffer because of the limitations of the 360.
which one is more likely to happen?
if its the latter it would have been better as a PS3 exclusive (if you believe MGS4 could not be done on 360).
One thing I do hope for is 10 hours of gamelplay and 5 hours of video, unlike the 5 hours of gameplay and 10 hours of video in MGS4.
I think the game will be more like Ninja gaiden than metal gear solid to be honest.
Im just looking forward to this game to see if it can better MGS4.
I am glad MGS4 was an exclusive, however I think it could have been easily done on the 360. (nothing in that game made me think wow - only on ps3 can this be done).
if MGS4 could not be done on the 360 making this a multiplat game is a big mistake, because logically it is going to be worse then MGS4.
I expect games to get better as time goes on, not worse.
[QUOTE="anthonydwyer"]
[QUOTE="FIipMode"] This is exactly what I am talking about, your so intimidated that you can't crack on the physics anymore or the wall riding mechanics so now GT haters like you have to resort to attacking the graphics even though its been stated time and time again this is only to "showcase the realism of the brand-new physics engine" You still have to act as though these graphics in the demo somehow represent the final product but you yourself know deep in your fanboy heart its not the case at all. And for the demo being boring thats your opinion, but since your just a hater it doesn't surprise me one bit. ;)
PrimusGears
well said
well said, but after it gets AA status, Im sure you will both be signing a different soon.
I've not hyped the game lol, if you read my earlier post I have made it clear I think it is a mixed bag and forza clearly has the advantage. when I said "well said" - I just liked the way Flipmode handled the GT5 hater.
again go bad and read what I have said.
Log in to comment