[QUOTE="3ggman"][QUOTE="Zeliard9"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]But the game isn't in still pictures, it's movement, that we see on screen. So doesn't that make your arguement moot?
Lonelynight
It's a picture of the game when everything is moving, and this is the first game with real object-based motion blur, which is why it may seem really odd. In-game the motion blur is far more natural, if you've seen the videos. But if you take a picture of it the blur will show, because it's still ultimately a still pic when everything on screen is moving. So with the realistic motion blur, you have a blurry picture. This is why the majority of Project Offset pics are quite blurry.
And the blur doesn't just come from the object-based motion blur. Project Offset also uses full temporal anti-aliasing. It's got some tech underneath its belt that's more advanced that what we've seen to date.
And Crysis still beats it in terms of graphics.
Too early to tell IMO
Unless they show better screenshots of this game I am not really impressed. The ones posted in this thread just proved me more about how Crysis whoops its butt in graphics (atleast for now).
Log in to comment