@ninjanemesis: I'm talking about actual trademarked names for products here. GS would never refer to "Call of Duty: Black Ops" as "Call of Duty: The Black Ops" because that's not its official name. Maybe I'm splitting hairs here, but when it comes to journalism, generally you should be going for accuracy.

$30 at target.com with free standard shipping. Couldn't resist.

@sudge197: Think of all the loot boxes you could buy with that!

@ninjanemesis: GTA V is the name of the single player game. The online multiplayer is "GTA Online". "GTA 5 Online" doesn't make any sense.

Meg is a crack shot!

You'd think by now GS writers would know the difference between GTA 5 vs GTA Online. The headline is wrong as well as the first sentence in the article: "Grand Theft Auto V Online".

Professional wrestling, the soap opera for dudes.

@dagubot: Yeah, I'll avoid this like the plague. Not sure what is was about Clash Royale, but I broke a $400 tablet over it. That's not like me, but something about the 1v1 aspect just got to me.

I genuinely don't care about historical accuracy or women in combat with artificial limbs. If I fire up the game and have fun, then it's a good game. Maybe that makes me a megalame casual, but that's okay with me. I got into BF at LAN parties where we played the modern mod of 1942 (and had a blast doing it), then jumped into BF 3 when it came out. I've enjoyed them ever since and I'll probably enjoy this one too. I'm just a little backlogged right now (the bane of nearly every gamer).

@md3blue: Preach. Reminds me of the Family Guy episode where Stewie goes to high school.

Stewie as Zach Sawyer: "No, it's lame. Everything is lame."