I love how the cows get on nivet14 for saying it looked like a AA, yet the cows official hype is AA.:roll:BioShockOwnz

cuz he's still wearing the MC's helmet on...

LOL, compared to MS's $4 billion dollar loss against $1.7...???

this thread failed already..

dont even try TC :roll:

Mantisheep, not lemming here, and I'm rather dissapointed in Sony for this. My PS2 is just about to die so being able to play PS2 games on a PS3 is a very important factor. Hilarious howthe fanboys act though.

360 launch: "LOL! 360 BCis T3H suk! BC is soooo important!"

Now: "BC? Why would we need that? It's not important at all." :|

glitchgeeman

LOL, it must've sucked for Xbox owners for them not to have BC, but for PS owners it's not even a problem. Cows have experienced the last gen had to offer (PS2) and now they want to have a taste of the 'new gen' that's why PS3 pretty much have what the cows have always been wanting: wifi, bluetooth, free PSN, home, blu-ray, etc..

why dont you lems just admit that the 360 is still in their last gen.., i mean why still the use of low capacity DVDs? remote controller cords? still paying for online multiplay?

lemmings aren't the only ones complaining about it. As a cow i'm dissapointed. I was actually planning on gettting one. I need that B/C. There are so many games on the PS2 that I still haven't played/finished yet. jack_russel

from your post, it sounded like you already got yourself a PS2. so why the need of PS2 BC??

LOL, TC was right.

only lems are the ones that bashes on the new 40g sku, not to mention the ones with MC helmets on..

you lems are ridiculous.

does the 80 gig one still come with Motorstorm ?Sonic_on_crack

Yes Sir!

Plus 5 free blu-ray movies offer extended.

[QUOTE="Supernova_86"][QUOTE="BambooBanger"]

[QUOTE="Supernova_86"]BC is not too important because after all, who DOESN'T own a PS2 already? The PS2 has been out for 7 years and is incredibly cheap. If you did not have a PS2 after 7 years, you probably don't care about BC on the PS3 either.BambooBanger

I don't have a PS2 and there are some games I'd love to play on it without having to buy a PS2 and PS3 :roll:

You can get the 80gb PS3 then, since that has PS2 compatibility and even upscales the games. Only the 40gb lacks the BC. If you are more interested in PS2 and don't really care about PS3, then get a PS2 by itself because its heaps cheaper.

PS3 40GB is $699.00 here... 60GB (our only other model) is $1000.00, both come stand alone, without games, without remote, one control, etc...

I can afford it but why should I have to pay that price for something that's going to sit on a shelf ? Just another thing to dust as far as I'm concerned.

LoL, where do you live??

if you want a $399 or a $499 PS3 you know there's always the net.. (amazon, ebay, newegg, etc..)

i got a PS3 and i dont even play as much PS2 games since some of 'em are taking up most of my time.

Like PH said, Sony wants to focus on consumers buying more PS3 games hence no BC.

so wait.., if people dont have online then what where lemms so excited about Halo 3's multiplayer..??

..nothing but a buncha BS; you lemms are in denial even from the first page of this thread.

you lemms enjoy your $50 Live/year or Halo 3's 6 hour campaign and these cows will enjoy their free PSN.

wow, to many lemms retalliating....

imo, PSN is better cuz of it's $0 price tag /monthly/annually.

be honest lemms, what does your $50/year XBL give you..??

And now with the new 80g PS3 heading down to $500, this could probably be the next July 07 for Sony.

so lems are stating that just because it's not on the 360 it is considered a bad game.

is the 360 some kind of ornament that they reveere on or somethin'...??

oh nevermind...........i just remembered....................it's the Bringer of Death.. the great and almighty..

You lems crack me up sometimes...