I wouldn't. The game felt like a sidequest with no purpose and a plot fit for an episodic 80's cartoon. It's sad how Termina's image had to be affected by the game's time-travel mechanics but I still think it should stay in the past. The whole thing felt like an experiment.

Zelda II isn't the blacksheep of the series, Majora is.

I bought the Megaman X Complete Works book a couple of months back (95% of my love for the series stems from X4) and I finally had the time to thoroughly read it yesterday. I looked at Inafune's opening statement where he thanked the fans for their continued support and how he hopes to keep working on the franchise for the next 20 years and on.

This statement actually made me cringe in disappointment. For as you know Inafune quit Capcom a few months back post the release of the complete works book. Reading that statement made me think that he had ideas being set up for the series' future (excluding Universe). It's really ironic now.

So guys, what's your take on Megaman's future? Seeing as how Capcom pulled the plug on Universe, I can't help but think it was something more than a simple case of non-leadership to drive the project. Could Inafune claim that he owns some rights to Megaman therefore could create future Megaman games whenever he settles down with his proposed new game studio? The series wouldn't be the same without him anyway. Biggest example is the trainwreck that was MMX6.

I recall adding a PSN ID to my friends list way back and the individual told me that they never got an invite. I then re-added the ID while being case-specific with the letters and they got the invite almost immediately. So yeah, back to topic question.

P.S. In case you're curious, I'm not much into online gaming and rarely care about PSN Friends. Which explains why I'm asking such a noob question.

I'm gonna be the odd apple here and say the game's enjoyment is solely based on your stance towards Strategy RPGs. I had fun with it until I got to Chapter 11, got bored and frustrated with it by then, sold it, saw the rest of the story through walkthrough videos.

Not saying it's a bad game, it's just not as perfect as people make it out to be IMO. Though at 5 bucks it's a steal.

I love Daft Punk. And July 12th, 2007 was (and still is) the best night of my life.

I'm worried about the direction devs are taking with DLC. I'm a story-driven gamer so I'd hate to go through a DLC story pack with half the commitment and terrible gameplay (compared to the main game) just so that I can see more of the story. I already bit the bullet with Mafia II. Main problem is I can't sell the pack afterwards.

I don't get the hate for Activision in general. From what I can tell they're simply milking the Hero and CoD series and not all their IPs. I'm not a DLC-heavy user aside from the occassional Rock Band and story pack download so I can't say with regards to that.

My trophies won't sync past 11% its really starting to annoy and stress me out now.

Hanzoadam

Same issue with me, but the rest (including downloading off PSN) is ok.

@ TC, Just keep trying to sign in and it'll eventually work. I've come across this issue occasionally but it sorts itself out in the end.

Problem solved. Looks like downloading the packs properly and NOT in the background is the solution with the highest success rate. Thankfully worked for me.

Just wanted to bump this for FYI purposes (and those who will most likely Google the common error).

I dunno. InFamous, though very engaging with its open-world structure, felt repetitive in its tasks a couple of hours into it. UC2 on the other hand kept bombarding you with action fit for a Holywood blockbuster. So I think UC3 will provide (and improve on) the same thrills as UC2 but InFamous 2 will stick to that repetitive formula.

So no, I don't get that feeling. But it's all about individual preference.