[QUOTE="zekere"]

Love the topic . this, ladies and gentlemen, is why Uncharted 2 is game of the year ! It not only destroys every othe 360 game , it is miles ahead in terms of graphics .

cainetao11

Based on the demo I saw, it's really amazingly accurate. Now, to be sure, that's not always a great thing. Say you're playing a FPS, the aiming might vibrate when you want it stuck on only one point. Plus you'd have to hold the thing up the whole time and I sometimes play shooters for hours, for example.

Not to mention in the demo the guy couldnt even manage to hit the tennis ball even once.

And my last issue is the graphcs. I know it was a demo, but unless the graphics are the exact same as when using the normal controller, I'm not buying it. Imagine playing a shooter with childish 3D graphics like the demo - no thanks. And I'm not a graphics-centric guy either. If you can play, let's say, Call of Duty 4 using the thing, and the only difference is the controls (guns look just as realistic as normal but you feel like you're really aiming), then I'm sold.

Not to mention the idea of using it as a sword and the DS3 as a shield. Pretty good idea. It looks like a pretty good idea, considering Sony can pull it off well. Not much of a fan of the casual games the Wii offers at the moment. Hopefully it'll be implemented well into the heavier games and such. Same goes for Natal, even though I never use a 360, but it's a good direction for games to go for the future.

Speaking of Natal, while the technology behind it must be ingenious, it might just be a bit TOO ambitious and kind of fail. Can't really go running around just to play Halo using Natal or something. Maybe it would come with a rotating treadmill though. And a Natal gun for shooting. Yeah, create this whole room dedicated for the one game.

Being sarcastic, obviously, though say we head that direction someday. And instead of playing using the TV you'd actually be playing the actual game using your own body, all the while seeing the game as if you're actually in it (360 view). Now THAT would be interesting to see.

All the same, I'm sure I'd never want only the option of a motion controller. While it may be fun to live the action once in a while, sometimes it's just more comfy to sit back and use a controller to blast your way through a video game.

Anyway what do you guys think of the controller?

Haven't signed up for the PSN yet (still upgrading the firmware to do that) but was just wondering - can you for example get the original Prince of Persia? Mario by any chance [even if it's Nintendo]? Final Fantasy VII?

[QUOTE="BadBoy_97"]Just Googled a bit more, for images of the back covers of the Uncharted 2 in particular. The US version is different than one marked "Region 2". It's a completely different back cover. US: http://www.vgboxart.com/boxes/PS3/32668_uncharted_2_among_thieves.png Region 2: http://www.mobygames.com/images/covers/large/1257199391-00.jpg The US one doesn't seem to have a region label if I'm not mistaken. Seems like either only region 2 games are encoded or the label means nothing. Good thing both ways. That IS the US cover/back, I assume?Everiez

Region 1 (US) label located at the side/bone of box with BLUS code, ESRB rating in front.

Region 2 (EU) label located at the back of box with BLES or BCES code, PEGI rating. Sometimes accompanied by German rating and Australia rating

Region 3 (AS) label located at the back of box with BLAS or BCAS code, handled by SCEJ or SCEH (Hongkong). Mostly no rating label.

Region 4 (AU) label located at the back of box with BLES code, Australia rating.

Printing location can be found at the back of box if you read it.

Well do the regions matter or are they only for info like previous posters said?