Bdking57's forum posts

Avatar image for Bdking57
Bdking57

1320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Bdking57
Member since 2005 • 1320 Posts
Shipped vs Sold is irrelevant.... When Sony, Nintendo and MS talk about sales, they are talking shipped... and virtually all these systems as similiar in stock levels at the store.. its not like there are 100 xboxs sitting in a gamespot and 5 PS3s
Avatar image for Bdking57
Bdking57

1320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Bdking57
Member since 2005 • 1320 Posts
A cheesy action platform game with no depth and low replay value and a wannabe halo killer vs Mass Effect 2.. Mass Effect 2 is the only game i care about for the rest of this gen.
Avatar image for Bdking57
Bdking57

1320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Bdking57
Member since 2005 • 1320 Posts

you are so very wrong... Atlus's JRPGS, Nocturne III, Digital Devil Saga, & Persona far out surpassed anything Square had ever created. Iv played their games since the late 80s and Atlus >>>> Square when it comes to JRPGs. For one, the games are actually a challenge.

[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] THis is exactly what i wanted to post....thank you sirthegoldenpoo
Square Enix is just simply pedestrian these days. I've been saying this for the last 2 years. People laughed at me but now you guys see the truth.

The problem is that no one has really filled the hole left by SE sucking so bad, JRPGs have been on the decline scince the late 90's IMO they just havn't evolved the same and it would seem to be becuase everyone was/is looking to SE to push the bounderies and set the bar, Ive never really liked FF games or JRPGs in general. They take themselvs WAY to seriously but their stoies are laughable and shallow. Someone really needs to take a leap and actually make a GOOD JRPG that we can all enjoy, and i hope that SE can do it with their new found confidence in a Western console.

Avatar image for Bdking57
Bdking57

1320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Bdking57
Member since 2005 • 1320 Posts

Here is a very sad truth for cows.

Cows will try to blame the 360 vs of final fantasy XIII on the delay, but if the game was on the 360 to begin with, it would have launched over a year ago if not sooner. Every single PS3 game has been hyped to no end years before release. The Dev time is almost double and ultimately not worth it to the developer. Next gen you will see these companies give in to the current economic recession and focus on the most synergistic platform.. the next xbox. The PS3 might be the best playstation yet, but Sony is no match for Microsoft when it comes to creating a profitable platform.

Avatar image for Bdking57
Bdking57

1320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Bdking57
Member since 2005 • 1320 Posts

played them all.. have to say,

Mass Effect..EPIC

Fallout 3, long

Persona 4, I love atlus.

Fable II, different

Avatar image for Bdking57
Bdking57

1320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Bdking57
Member since 2005 • 1320 Posts

EA continues to follow a failed market share strategy.... this is a the problem. Your the biggest studio, and you produce alot of games.. you have some big hitters like madden and other sports games that produce huge profits, on the other hand, your pour tons of money into hit or miss projects that result in low sales volumes. If you would have canned 6 of these games, put half the money into producing 1 really good game, you would have production costs, cut marketing and have the chance of a much bigger hit. EA is just fighting themselves at this point.

Yeah, I remember reading that EA is gonna do some cost cutting too. But since they aren't a console manufacturer the same strategy wouldn't really work for them.

It's incredible that with cash cows like Madden they're still loosing money. But maybe that's just cause they've made some heavy investments, once profits from heavy hitters like Sims3 are in the books and investments like Bioware start putting out games like ME2 and Kotor MMO I'd expect them to turn profit. If not, then they're screwed.

mr_mozilla
Avatar image for Bdking57
Bdking57

1320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Bdking57
Member since 2005 • 1320 Posts

Your right.. The smaller companies have more drive, more reward to get the job done more effeciently. The thing is MS is still giving serious support to them while maintaing high standards.

EA owns dozens of studios, makes games every year, and they all sell millions upon millions.

Yet every year they post a loss.

I think that despite their success in sales, the overall costs of paying their studios employees salaries, maintaining the studio property, the massive advertising money needed to promote almost every game, and other expenses that come with owning multiple studios, the financial burden is greater then their titles retail success.

That is why MS is downsizing (now down to Lionhead, Rare, Turn 10, and Mistwalker). Less property and salries to pay. Instead they cut a checque and buy out 360/PC exclusivity, timed exclusivity or DLC exclusivity......for a fraction of the cost fo doing it in-house.

I for one think its a great long-term stragety. They are financially stable and buy out deals for a fraction of developing it with a 1st party studio.

-General_Ram-
Avatar image for Bdking57
Bdking57

1320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Bdking57
Member since 2005 • 1320 Posts

Im an analyst. Attach rate / Game Sales are the driving factor behind the 360s sucess. The game sales / attach rate are like a giant bowl of Honey.. everyone can only hold out so long before they wants a piece. Do we need a better example then Square Enix? System sales definately matter less then game sales. In the end, its game customers that developers are selling to, not unplayed consoles. Casuals are HIGHLY OVERATED!

Sales determines preference, popularity, where the market is spending their money and their focus. If people say thats not important then somethings wrong.

In the event of the fierce PS3/360 rivalry, I think its very important to note that most multiplats sell better on 360. Now im sure cows play down sales and say:

quantity /=/ quality

I play games, not sales

Offcourse......we all play games and we never admit that sales = quality. The point is merely that one system is more popular then the other in terms of where the market is heading.

And like it or not, that means something.

-General_Ram-
Avatar image for Bdking57
Bdking57

1320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Bdking57
Member since 2005 • 1320 Posts
anybody trying to negate the importance of xbox to microsoft needs to consider their overal portfolio. I think what most analyst, including myself are noting is that even in a slowing economy, game sales are constant as long as the games are good. If you bring good games, even in a bad economy, well what better way to chear people up and let them escape from their daily stress. They are in gaming for good.
Avatar image for Bdking57
Bdking57

1320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Bdking57
Member since 2005 • 1320 Posts
wow.. console graphics king confirmed.