BigGimp77's forum posts

Avatar image for BigGimp77
BigGimp77

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 BigGimp77
Member since 2006 • 532 Posts
I lost all hope for Rare at this point anyway. I was seriously on the verge of getting a 360 because of a new Banjo game. Then I found out it was a car game and bought a PC instead lol.
Avatar image for BigGimp77
BigGimp77

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 BigGimp77
Member since 2006 • 532 Posts
Poor Rare.
Avatar image for BigGimp77
BigGimp77

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 BigGimp77
Member since 2006 • 532 Posts
Someone posted an idea to turn Starfox into a TBS JRPG game and cited Valk Chron as an influence.... Or did you miss that post?
Avatar image for BigGimp77
BigGimp77

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 BigGimp77
Member since 2006 • 532 Posts
God I can't imagine playing Baldur's Gate on a console. It would be painful. It's just one of those games that need kb/m. Graphics will no doubt be better on the Pc version as well.
Avatar image for BigGimp77
BigGimp77

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 BigGimp77
Member since 2006 • 532 Posts
3 years in between 5-hour games, when most of the graphics, physics, and sound effects have been created already, is very dissapointing. The games are still awesome though. As Yahtzee once said "The point of episodic gaming is to 1). Make shorter games, 2) at cheaper rates, c) and release them more freuqnetly. And while Valve has apects 1 and 2 down, they struggle terribly with 3." or something to that effect.
Avatar image for BigGimp77
BigGimp77

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 BigGimp77
Member since 2006 • 532 Posts
There is no need for Starfox on the Wii. We have a million rail shooters as it stands now. I do like the Valk Chron idea tho.
Avatar image for BigGimp77
BigGimp77

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 BigGimp77
Member since 2006 • 532 Posts
I for one didnt buy the game. And is there anyway they can prove this? I mean they could just be saying this. Valve could easily be lying.
Avatar image for BigGimp77
BigGimp77

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 BigGimp77
Member since 2006 • 532 Posts
$2.50 for one of the best multiplayer games in the past 10 years. Wow that is a great deal. You can easily get 80+ hrs of gameplay for $2.50.
Avatar image for BigGimp77
BigGimp77

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 BigGimp77
Member since 2006 • 532 Posts
You can find the game for very cheap. I got it on Steam for $5. It's defiantly worth it. The presentation, sound, atmosphere, and story are all excellent. The game play was solid but could have been better. I played on hard and ran through and just used the wrench the entire time. Ammo seemed hard to come by and I always saved up the little ammo I had for bosses/big daddys.
Avatar image for BigGimp77
BigGimp77

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 BigGimp77
Member since 2006 • 532 Posts
Metriod Other M, Zelda, and Diablo 3 are probably 2011 titles. No way is Blizzard going to release WOW:Cat, D3, and SC2 ALL in the same year.