BudsMcGreen's forum posts

Avatar image for BudsMcGreen
BudsMcGreen

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 BudsMcGreen
Member since 2008 • 841 Posts
[QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="rolo107"]

Then wouldn't it go over 60% in those battles? If not, that makes absolutely no sense. You hav no idea what you are talking about...

killzowned24

QFT

To be fair, most cows, not just faithful cows like killzowned24, in this thread don't have even a basic grasp of game development. It's very apparent to people who do.

lol, look above at my post it really is not hard to comprehend is it?

Actually it lacks comprehension and pretty much makes you look like you have no idea what you're talking about.

Avatar image for BudsMcGreen
BudsMcGreen

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 BudsMcGreen
Member since 2008 • 841 Posts

ok, ive recently bought a ps3 and ive owned a wii since it came out, i can finally put to bed any arguments people have whether your a wii hater or sony hater!

well at least my minds at rest

for me it all comes down to one thing!

graphics vs innovative gameplay

so ps3 is better graphics and the main reason i bought one was more 'mature' games, i must admit though that if the wii had ps3/360 graphics the latter would'nt have a market anymore....im sorry wii haters thats a fact

games i have on both systems at moment are fifa 09 which ps3 version wins...hands down

but..... and it's a controversial big BUT (did i just say big but, lol) call of duty 5 on wii owns the hd consoles and i played it on all 3

graphically not as good although remarkably close, but the gameplay is far superior and i mean FAR which makes me think/wish/dream there was a ps..wii

i don't own a 360 but my mate does, i just think its dead technology now

these are just my opinion though... look forward to your comments ps3- lukeg81 wii - 3509 5931 1303 8552

offspringer24

Well apparently 'dead technology' outsells the PS3 and offers superior multi-plats.:lol:

Avatar image for BudsMcGreen
BudsMcGreen

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 BudsMcGreen
Member since 2008 • 841 Posts

Oh yea I forgot. 360 owners have almost nothing exclusive to look forward to when compared against PS3. Sure glad I like GAMES and not numbers and price drops to try to justify a broken machine with a weak future lineup.

Sucks. Cows have alot of ammo against lemmings. That is why we see so much discussion about PS3 games and weather they will be good or bad. Without dicussions about PS3 games there would be nothing to talk about.

howell1972

:lol:Aren't you sick of getting hyped by CGI then playing the dissapointing actual product?:|

Avatar image for BudsMcGreen
BudsMcGreen

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 BudsMcGreen
Member since 2008 • 841 Posts

Sony probably asked them to only use 60% of the CELL because they want the PS3 to continuously improve graphically over time. They want the PS3 to be a 10-year system. :DRikusaki

At that rate the PS3 will be almost maxed out at the end of next year. If the system is using 60% power after 2 years, then you could argue that the PS3 should achieve 100% performance in a little over a year from now.

Avatar image for BudsMcGreen
BudsMcGreen

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 BudsMcGreen
Member since 2008 • 841 Posts

Speaking in IGN's latest Play Beyond podcast, Jeff Haynes revealed that even during the heaviest loads, Killzone 2 utilizes roughly only 60 per cent of the SPU's.

"It's incredible to see huge levels and see the deferred rendering and note that on all the SPU's, even on the heaviest load were coming up to about 60%," Haynes said. "They weren't coming close to maxing out. .They had about 40% of space before they started tripping or saw slow down on some of the processes."

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=34314

P.S what about the remaining 40%? the OS?

Mystery_Writer

Well this explains the low-poly characters and blurry textures.:oops:

Avatar image for BudsMcGreen
BudsMcGreen

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 BudsMcGreen
Member since 2008 • 841 Posts

it will get 9.2 or 9.5 quote me.;)claywalker21

What was your hype for KZ1?

Avatar image for BudsMcGreen
BudsMcGreen

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 BudsMcGreen
Member since 2008 • 841 Posts

Where are people getting 4 years? The PS3 released in Nov. of 2006. They just passed the 2 year mark and considering that Killzone 2 comes out in February, that's only just over 2 years.

Puckhog04

The CGI video and announcement of Killzone 2 was shown at E3 05. Killzone 2 releases in 09. That's four years. F-O-U-R.

Avatar image for BudsMcGreen
BudsMcGreen

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 BudsMcGreen
Member since 2008 • 841 Posts
[QUOTE="angry_fork"][QUOTE="BudsMcGreen"]

Maybe because it is a funner game. And how are those two games legitimately better than Halo 3?

heretrix

the latter 2 trump Halo 3 in every category, which is why the critical scores should be higher on the latter 2.

Please. You have no proof to back up what you are declaring as fact. It's your opinion lets leave it at that.

Exactly.

Avatar image for BudsMcGreen
BudsMcGreen

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 BudsMcGreen
Member since 2008 • 841 Posts
[QUOTE="BudsMcGreen"][QUOTE="angry_fork"]

Halo gets bashed because games like Call of Duty 4 and Resistance 2 are legitimately better,but Halo 3 gets all the sales and the multiplayer crown for some reason.

angry_fork

Maybe because it is a funner game. And how are those two games legitimately better than Halo 3?

If you think Halo 3 is technically better then COD4 or Resistance 2 you haven't played the latter 2 period. If you think Halo 3 is more fun that's fine that's your opinion but technically and option-wise, the latter 2 trump Halo 3 in every category, which is why the critical scores should be higher on the latter 2, the sales will go to whichever is marketed the best.

Resistance 2 is a great game but pales in comparison to Halo 3's gameplay, especially multiplayer IMO. CoD4 is actually one of the funnest games this gen.