However I've always like Resistance more than Gears of War. I actually look back at Resistance with fondness while I feel I could have done without Gears. I especially prefer the online play wherre every gun seems to serve some purpose (even if Wraiths did rack in too many kills in 2) while in Gears the shotgun seemed to be the main gun to watch out for, and I could never just quite get the hang of the multiplayer. I could beat Gears on it's highest difficulty but could barely get 5 kills in a single match smh.

Maybe Resistance just didn't have enough testosterone to gain as much mainstream apppeal as other shooters.

Idk I enjoyed Resistance. I liked their unique array of guns. And I enjoyed the single player. And when I finally started playing the online multiplayer in 2 I enjoyed it. I found it accessible I was actually getting kills and not head-shotted every 2 secs. Also i really enjoyed the co-op online play that was really fun.

I still maintian that the PS3's best online shooter to date was Warhawk

@DrKill09 well you haven't even seen what it can do yet....I mean like at all. It might surprise you and end up being a nice innovation.

I'm interested to see how this helps with game immersion especially with RPGs. Actually this technology could potentially have some crazy potential. Imagine years from now you could actually play games just though lenses like these without a TV. You wouldn't have to buy a huge TV you'd have it all in front of your eyes.

@MooncalfReviews true but not all the radiation is harmful/cancer causing....or atleast that's what a quick GOOgle search told me......also I learned 2 GOOGLE do a barrel roll

@rasterror So what exactly do you want from Sony that they aren't already giving?

@alchie11 so you're saying it works even without a 3DTV? If so that sounds great. I must admit my interest is peaked

@jayjay444 "30 games" huh... lol

I don't foresee too many people enjoying this

dang it quit reminding me this game isn't out yet!