[QUOTE="Citan_Uzuki"][QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]

[QUOTE="Citan_Uzuki"]This from a guy who still thinks tekken is the worst series in games today.....thats not just fighting games but all of games yet most tekken games with the exception of 4 have outscored all of his games except ninja gaiden on xbox.......he's an idiot who is lucky to have a talented team under his control. His games lack any sort of reasonable story or coherence and rely on solid game mechanics that he doesn't even implement.Kratos_OMEGA

when u make a game better than NG then u can call this guy an idiot

Wow valid argument my opinion is he's an idiot based on the bashing of other games and complete lack of any cohernce in story. When he is the director and producer that is his job his stories are sub par(especially in DOA). His games are good even excellent games gameplay wise but he doesn't develop that part his TEAM does which I awknoledged as talented, they implement their gamerplay elements very well and even they aren't original the basic gameplay is ripped from DMC although refined in a different way that most people prefer it so he didn't come up with the gameplay and merely directs his very very talented team.(I only brought that point up to counter any argument that he somehow came up with the concept of the gameplay)

Call me an idiot if you want but any man that list tekken 1-5 as the 5 worst games in history deserves to be called an idiot tekken is proabably the best 3d fighting series behing VF and to call the whole series the WORST of all time is sour grapes and a pretty idiotic statement.

To futher reiterate my point Itagaki didn't have anything to do with sigma and it scored AAA here at gamespot.

Itagaki made NG, NGS is a port. So he did have something to do with it lol And he's nto an idiot. Maybe arrogant or stuck up..but idiot? come one that's just idiotic.

well maybe I exaggerate a bit I'm a huge tekken fan but I still stand by my point that Itagaki's Team is what makes his games great not he himself but he sure does take all the credit. You have to admit that his story's are just a mess and the games shine on the gameplay itself which he has very little to do with when it comes down to it he a producer/director of a very talented team but the way he acts its like its just him making games especially apparent with that develop at home comment like its jsut him at home plugging away with the 360 devkit. I just don't like the way he acts. I like his games I think DOA get way more flack than it deserves from other tekken fans but he himself does at least act like an idiot, maybe he isn't an idiot but jerk is certainly appropriate especially when you consider he is embroiled in a sexual harassment accusation..

[QUOTE="Citan_Uzuki"]This from a guy who still thinks tekken is the worst series in games today.....thats not just fighting games but all of games yet most tekken games with the exception of 4 have outscored all of his games except ninja gaiden on xbox.......he's an idiot who is lucky to have a talented team under his control. His games lack any sort of reasonable story or coherence and rely on solid game mechanics that he doesn't even implement.chikenfriedrice

when u make a game better than NG then u can call this guy an idiot

Wow valid argument my opinion is he's an idiot based on the bashing of other games and complete lack of any cohernce in story. When he is the director and producer that is his job his stories are sub par(especially in DOA). His games are good even excellent games gameplay wise but he doesn't develop that part his TEAM does which I awknoledged as talented, they implement their gamerplay elements very well and even they aren't original the basic gameplay is ripped from DMC although refined in a different way that most people prefer it so he didn't come up with the gameplay and merely directs his very very talented team.(I only brought that point up to counter any argument that he somehow came up with the concept of the gameplay)

Call me an idiot if you want but any man that list tekken 1-5 as the 5 worst games in history deserves to be called an idiot tekken is proabably the best 3d fighting series behing VF and to call the whole series the WORST of all time is sour grapes and a pretty idiotic statement.

To futher reiterate my point Itagaki didn't have anything to do with sigma and it scored AAA here at gamespot.

[QUOTE="AgentA-Mi6"]

Errr No... FF is the best RPG series ever made period

MrGrimFandango

No.

Actually you have to agree, there can be some arguments about balders gate and fallout but the fact is the FF series though 11 main games so far has consistantly been AAA. not to mention the huge sales the series has attained it really is the best RPG series now when it comes down to single games it is a much trickier argument but for the sake of comparing series' there isn't really even a competition.

The TC is right so let me just say that, having never played Fallout 1 or 2, I am hereby hyping Fallout 3 as AAA and possible game of the year. Who's with me?MentatAssassin

So wait you never played either yet rag on a guy who has when he complained about them changing it away from fallout's roots. I have played both 1 and 2 not extensively but enough to see what people loved about them and that was the freedom the games gave you and the extensive charcter development, the varied gameplay styles and vast amount of choices and options they gave you in how and which way you wanted to play the game.

While I think fallout 3 is going to be great I agree with the people who say it will disappoint some fans simply because they decided to focus it as a shooter you will automatically lose some of the variety and choice the series is know for because of the focus on that gameplay. I'm sure bethesda will add tons and tons of stuff to do more than most games and rpgs, but I like others are concerned not at how much they give you to do but how the options available to you may or may not limit how to acheive that whereas in the first 2 the structured it to be as open as possible.

Guess we'll have to wait and see I am still looking forward to how it turns out though.

Wow this is some of the worst flamebait I've seen in awhile you even went to go as far as to say metal arms was better than R&C. You really want to start a flame war don't you.

It's a collectors item now. Understandable. I still know a few people with the original copy and they wouldn't part with it for the worldf50p90

I'm one of those people, bought first week it came out dug it out about 2 weeks ago to play it again on my ps3 still as addictive as ever. Although I wouldn't sell it I probably wouldn't gert much for it as I have played the hell out of it and it has circular marks on a couple of the disks from playing so much, still works though :D.

The visuals are actually quite impressive for a sandbox game. I wish some people could grasp that it's not technically possible to have a sandbox game that looks like Uncharted or GeoW on current-gen consoles.fakecliche

I hope my first post helped some of those people understand that concept. Of course those same people also claim not to be graphics whores.

[QUOTE="XaosII"]

Multiplatform development and lack of memory on consoles.

Thats pretty much it. The PC version of the GTA's always look much better and rarely suffer from the horrible texture pop-ups during high speeds, pretty much solely on the extra memory PC's typically have.

GTA games are pretty large in scope and memory because of it.

stephant_6

True. I loaded up San Andreas for PC,it looked so much better than the ps2 version I could barely tell they were the same game. It still looked awful,but alot better atleast.

And to the guy who said it will have amazing graphics,we all know thats BS. The graphics will be good,my main complaint is that they wont change them for the next 4-5 years. That's when it'll get real bad.

you do know that there were graphical tweaks to the engine for vice city and san andreas the graphics will improve but not alot. The fact is both sequels last gen were so good because they add so much more content and things to do which is the point of a gta game. iIs getting harder and harder to believe you are not a graphics whore or know what you are talking about.

Why do people make posts like this? its been said before and it will be said again but there are limitations when making a game the size of GTA you ca't make cities the size of that and have really good graphics or expect the framerate to be any bit decent. Another problem is R* north try to create life like cities with lots of stuff going on this takes processing power to compute everything and keep track of it all the engines they create hanlde so much stuff and do it very well if graphics were thef ocal point you would get agame like the getaway fantastic graphics with limited gameplay because the graphics are taking up so much of the processing muscle in the system.

While the graphics probably could be a bit better its not the focus of the game and with such a large world glitches would be rampant and hinder gameplay(we've all experienced glitches in past gta games but most would not affect gameplay) with a more complex graphics engine the glitches would be more frequent or require a rediculous amount of play testing and optimization that it simply doesn't make sense to do so when they can make a good looking enginethat will run relatively smoothly to better immerse the charcter in a much busier world with lots of content. If you want better graphics go play saints row or wait for the sequel the graphics are better but the cities lack the lifelike feel of GTA games not to mention the content is not even close.