[QUOTE="kris9031998"][QUOTE="ColdWraith"][QUOTE="kris9031998"] Aaaand...what about single player? How about 4 player co-op, a whole new faction of enemies to fight, new weapons, much more polish, modified game play mechanics but that's generally. Better A.I, better bosses and I could go on. Alright then, ill think about it. Though the new weapons/enemies are expected from sequels, i must say 4 player co op sounds great. Although, the reason why i find gears boring is the fact that the core game mechanics....are boring. I absolutely hate having to go into cover, taking a shot, go back to cover, take another shot, and rinse and repeat. Same reason i dont like UC2. They expanded of the shoot, cover a lot more. Giving you a lot more diversity to drive people out of cover. The executions, digger launcher, ability to jump onto enemies over cover. The much higher melee weapon count. The butcher sword, chainsaw, retro charge etc. Just co-op with all of your team mates will get you out of the cover system and give you the ability to flank more often if you choose so.
[QUOTE="ABCarmine"][QUOTE="kris9031998"][QUOTE="ABCarmine"] Dedicated servers stopped that stupid Host Advantage BS, Kicking people out of cover is a wonderful thing imo, The Shotty has a huge bright light on it now so you know when to stay back, They fixed Corner Camping and Spawn Traps. All dat good stuff. Aaaand...what about single player? Kicking people out of cover, Weapons are more Balanced, 4 Player Co-Op, Better A.I And probably a lot more. Shouldn't we wait for the whole game to come out before we ask what happened differently in SP. Ahem, yes much more. How about 4 player co-op, a whole new faction of enemies to fight, new weapons, much more polish, modified game play mechanics, Better A.I, better bosses, better story. Basically much like the multi-player, going from the epitome of broken to fixed and then some. I used to have a list of engine changes, game play changes graphical changes on my EHD. It was 8 pages long. ;)
[QUOTE="kris9031998"][QUOTE="ABCarmine"][QUOTE="kris9031998"] What exactly was different with Gears 3? Dedicated servers stopped that stupid Host Advantage BS, Kicking people out of cover is a wonderful thing imo, The Shotty has a huge bright light on it now so you know when to stay back, They fixed Corner Camping and Spawn Traps. All dat good stuff. Aaaand...what about single player? How about 4 player co-op, a whole new faction of enemies to fight, new weapons, much more polish, modified game play mechanics, Better A.I, better bosses, better story. Basically much like the multi-player, going from the epitome of broken to fixed and then some.
Im not getting either. Honestly, they both are just so uninteresting for me. Gears 2 was .....boring. Polished, but boring. I really dont know what to say about it, but there was just nothing truly different from any other cover third person shooter. I dont really see much of a difference in 3 except better graphics.
Uncharted 2 was......fun. For about a week. After beating the story, i headed to the multiplayer. I dont know what was about it, but i found it absolutely boring as well. Just like Gears, it looks to be like another third person shooter. The only difference is that it has teh platforming! Yay. But i honestly dont care.
Anyone else not getting either?
kris9031998
"Im not getting either. Honestly, they both are just so uninteresting for me. Gears 2 was .....boring. Polished, but boring. I really dont know what to say about it, but there was just nothing truly different from any other cover third person shooter. I dont really see much of a difference in 3 except better graphics." Gears of war 3 was one of the greatest games I've ever laid hands on. The beta was the best beta I've ever laid hands on. I hated Gears of war 2 as well. I'll defiantly be getting it. Uncharted 3 is the same thing, horrid multi-player. But a great campaign. I'll be picking it up as well. And before someone calls me a fan boy. I own both, and have played both betas. http://i1236.photobucket.com/albums/ff448/Darkener33/IMG_0641.jpg What exactly was different with Gears 3? Je I wonder, the multi-player went from the epitome of broken to near perfect levels.
[QUOTE="ColdWraith"][QUOTE="daveg1"]looks no diffrent to gears 2daveg1
I don't know, maybe it's the enormously higher polygon count, the near perfect lighting and far superior A.A. But I'm going to have to absolutely disagree. il go further on my last quick comment.. the current gen hardware prevented it from looking notiecbly better.. Disagree, unlike most games. Like Uncharted' graphical leap from 2 - 3 I can actually tell the difference right away. Btw, before fanbois start hunting me down. http://i1236.photobucket.com/albums/ff448/Darkener33/IMG_0641.jpg
[QUOTE="ColdWraith"][QUOTE="daveg1"]looks no diffrent to gears 2ktrotter11
I don't know, maybe it's the enormously higher polygon count, the near perfect lighting and far superior A.A. But I'm going to have to absolutely disagree. its def better than gears 2 but its not the revolution of graphical power that gears 1 was... mlb the show looks better really Actually, I think it's far more. Gears of war 1 was lucky. It didn't do much in a technical aspect; just good textures and lighting. Gears of war 3 has managed to do much, much higher polygon counts on the same system with near perfect lighting. It's also much more open with 4 player co-op now, which in Gears of war 1 only had 2 and was much more closed and linear. And that's not all; up to 30 enemies at once non scripted instances with 4-5 team mates.
Im not getting either. Honestly, they both are just so uninteresting for me. Gears 2 was .....boring. Polished, but boring. I really dont know what to say about it, but there was just nothing truly different from any other cover third person shooter. I dont really see much of a difference in 3 except better graphics.
Uncharted 2 was......fun. For about a week. After beating the story, i headed to the multiplayer. I dont know what was about it, but i found it absolutely boring as well. Just like Gears, it looks to be like another third person shooter. The only difference is that it has teh platforming! Yay. But i honestly dont care.
Anyone else not getting either?
kris9031998
"Im not getting either. Honestly, they both are just so uninteresting for me. Gears 2 was .....boring. Polished, but boring. I really dont know what to say about it, but there was just nothing truly different from any other cover third person shooter. I dont really see much of a difference in 3 except better graphics." Gears of war 3 was one of the greatest games I've ever laid hands on. The beta was the best beta I've ever laid hands on. I hated Gears of war 2 as well. I'll defiantly be getting it. Uncharted 3 is the same thing, horrid multi-player. But a great campaign. I'll be picking it up as well. And before someone calls me a fan boy. I own both, and have played both betas. http://i1236.photobucket.com/albums/ff448/Darkener33/IMG_0641.jpg
Log in to comment