Cow4ever's forum posts

Avatar image for Cow4ever
Cow4ever

689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Cow4ever
Member since 2011 • 689 Posts

[QUOTE="eboyishere"]

[QUOTE="Frostbite24"] If Killzone 2 came out today and was reviewed with Killzone 3 already being out, you seriously think that it would score better than KZ3? Wow, just wow.xOMGITSJASONx

killzone 2 would DEFINITELY score higher then kz3

The fans ruined Killzone 3. I blame them for the changes and the fact Guerrilla Games listened to their whining.

Killzone 3 was a great game though. I'd take it over gears 3 any day!
Avatar image for Cow4ever
Cow4ever

689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Cow4ever
Member since 2011 • 689 Posts

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] Depends on what he means by "done right". Places like Norway and Sweden seem very well off and their about as socialist as we've seen. If by Capitalism done right you mean laissez faire then I really don't know what to say.theone86

Ehm I live in Sweden and I can guarantee you that it's much much closer to Capitalism than Socialism. Very far from "about as socialist as we've seen", does soviet, cuba or china mean anything to you?

Well, most people seem to be referring to socialism more as social democracy in this thread, so Sweeden definitely fits. Secondly, when we're speaking about the failures of the USSR, I find that "socialism made it fail" is a rather trite and inspecific explanation of the problems of the USSR. One of the largest contributing factors to their failure was overspending, and the biggest contributor to their overspending was an inflated military budget, both reminiscient of the modern day US. If there were a power with a strong industry that decided to engage in abattle of escalation militaryspending with the U.S., then the U.S. might very well be facing the same scenario as the USSR was back then. Furthermore, when you start to talk about the corruption that was also a part of their downfall, that was intrinsic to Vanguardism/Stalinism, not communism. I'd grant that Vanguardism and Stalinism are instrinsically flawed, but that doesn't mean that communism is instrinsically flawed. Finally, when discussing Cuba, how are we going to define failure?

Actually Sweden isn't ruled by social democrats for a long time but regardless social democracy and capitalism aren't opposites at all. So then this thread doesn't make sense at all. The fact is the market here is run by supply and demand so it's a capitalistic market despite high taxes. Communism is flawed because planned economies just doesn't work and you know that. That's why people had to stand in long lines to get some bread. Now that doesn't mean you can't have high taxes and a social security system.
Avatar image for Cow4ever
Cow4ever

689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Cow4ever
Member since 2011 • 689 Posts

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] Depends on what he means by "done right". Places like Norway and Sweden seem very well off and their about as socialist as we've seen. If by Capitalism done right you mean laissez faire then I really don't know what to say.Ace6301
Ehm I live in Sweden and I can guarantee you that it's much much closer to Capitalism than Socialism. Very far from "about as socialist as we've seen", does soviet, cuba or china mean anything to you?

I should say without just being straight up communism. Also China is pretty capitalist.

You're right about china but there are many other examples:

lol

Now about Sweden I can gurantue you it's a capitalist country. There is a free market, there are privately owned hospitals, pharmacies, schools etc. Yes the taxes are high but that really doesn't matter. High taxes isn't the definition of socialism and low taxes aren't the definition of capitalism. And we have had for like 8 years a right wing government with economically liberal policies and the standard of living has improved significantly IMO.

Avatar image for Cow4ever
Cow4ever

689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Cow4ever
Member since 2011 • 689 Posts

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"]

[QUOTE="Bretter2200"]

Derp, I can say Gears of war 3 wins to.

By the way, those stating it lacks A.A is incorrect. Compare the jags from the beta to the final retail build. It's quite a revalation. I see a major difference.

Diviniuz

Well TBH it doesn't look like it's worse textures or anything just really badly designed stones or whatever it's suppose to be, and that's the only place Uncharted 3 looks bad. Gears 3 has relatively bad textures throughout as you can see in your own pics as well. And honestly can't see the difference on these which is the beta? Im just saying cause that's what the eurogamer article says.

Gears 3 has relatively bad textures to what? What is it relative to? Relative to other console games or PC games, because for a console game, gears 3 textures are great

Not compared to the top PS3 exclusives
Avatar image for Cow4ever
Cow4ever

689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Cow4ever
Member since 2011 • 689 Posts

Uncharted DF!

lol

Avatar image for Cow4ever
Cow4ever

689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Cow4ever
Member since 2011 • 689 Posts

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"]

Uncharted 3 wins

Bretter2200

Derp, I can say Gears of war 3 wins to.

By the way, those stating it lacks A.A is incorrect. Compare the jags from the beta to the final retail build. It's quite a revalation. I see a major difference.

Well TBH it doesn't look like it's worse textures or anything just really badly designed stones or whatever it's suppose to be, and that's the only place Uncharted 3 looks bad. Gears 3 has relatively bad textures throughout as you can see in your own pics as well. And honestly can't see the difference on these which is the beta? Im just saying cause that's what the eurogamer article says.

Avatar image for Cow4ever
Cow4ever

689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Cow4ever
Member since 2011 • 689 Posts
[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="Eponique"]Socialism done right is better than capitalism done right. I prefer the mixed economy we have now, but we can use labour rights. People working 50h+ to make a living should not be standard.Ace6301
"Socialism done right is better than Capitalism done right". Prove it. A socialist economy can never, ever, ever work. The system is inherently destined to fail.

Depends on what he means by "done right". Places like Norway and Sweden seem very well off and their about as socialist as we've seen. If by Capitalism done right you mean laissez faire then I really don't know what to say.

Ehm I live in Sweden and I can guarantee you that it's much much closer to Capitalism than Socialism. Very far from "about as socialist as we've seen", does soviet, cuba or china mean anything to you?
Avatar image for Cow4ever
Cow4ever

689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Cow4ever
Member since 2011 • 689 Posts

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="o0HAPPY0o"]That's strange.. because chris Watters makes a reference about Gears of Wars gorgeous visuals at about 00:47 you probably weren't paying attention. And plenty of creditable review sites have praised Crysis3 (360) for it's visuals vs PS3 exclusives also, didn't John Carmack praise the capabilities of the 360 over the PS3 in a recent tweet? So in short.. you can just drop "The Powa of the Mighty PS3" argument because it doesn't exist.

o0HAPPY0o

Oh pulease don't don't bring up Crysis 2. Let the big boys (Gears, Uncharted etc) fight. Crysis 2 would be massacred.

What are you on about? I brought Crysis2 up because you mentioned KZ3 and Gow3. As for Crysis2 getting massacred.. real mature statement there. If you want to dispute something with me at least re-read what you post plz.

I didn't say anything about KZ3 or GoW3. And I don't understand. Crysis 2 looks way worse than these or gears 3 also.
Avatar image for Cow4ever
Cow4ever

689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Cow4ever
Member since 2011 • 689 Posts

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="o0HAPPY0o"] Now whats really sad is that there are ZERO PS3 games that can feature hi-res alpha, high quality textures, motion blur, shadows and lighting at 720p all together while still providing a 4 player campaign co-op. UC2, KZ3 and GOW3 can't even use hi res alpha effects like Gears3 does because of the fail limited bandwidth on PS3.

o0HAPPY0o

And yet reviewers don't mention anything about Gears 3's graphics in their reviews, while UC2, KZ3, Gow3 etc get called "best graphics ever" etc.

That's strange.. because chris Watters makes a reference about Gears of Wars gorgeous visuals at about 00:47 you probably weren't paying attention. And plenty of creditable review sites have praised Crysis3 (360) for it's visuals vs PS3 exclusives also, didn't John Carmack praise the capabilities of the 360 over the PS3 in a recent tweet? So in short.. you can just drop "The Powa of the Mighty PS3" argument because it doesn't exist.

Oh pulease don't don't bring up Crysis 2. Let the big boys (Gears, Uncharted etc) fight. Crysis 2 would be massacred.