[QUOTE="Cow4ever"]

Uncharted 3 wins

CorbraMax

Nope. Textures are better in Gears 3. Notice the poor filtering in that UC3 shot...

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

the guy in the comments was right

Uncharted 2 wasnt a blur fest, it used 2xAA, v-sync to 30fps at all times, and most importantly, Uncharted 2 actually had color, its easy to look good when your whole game is brown and bloom

CorbraMax

So according to you... God of War 3 is a blur fest since it also had high quality camera and object based motion blur...

Don't knock the tech because Uncharted 2 is lacking in certain areas.

And Gears 3 gets very colorful in the campaign. Play the game to find out. Or just play Sandbar in the MP...

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="o0HAPPY0o"] Now whats really sad is that there are ZERO PS3 games that can feature hi-res alpha, high quality textures, motion blur, shadows and lighting at 720p all together while still providing a 4 player campaign co-op. UC2, KZ3 and GOW3 can't even use hi res alpha effects like Gears3 does because of the fail limited bandwidth on PS3.

CorbraMax

Gears 3 does have better quality textures. Check the Beta Graphics King thread.

The motion blur is there to make the game seem buttery smooth at 30fps. It's the same high quality motion blur seen in God of War 3. If you played both games you would have noticed...

The only game on PS3 with comparable shadow quality is God of War 3...

Killzone 2/3, UC1-3, and God of War 3 are filled with low resolutionalpha effects. The only game I know on PS3 with high resolution alpha effects is FFXIII.

Uncharted 3 wins

[QUOTE="rich-sac"]Gears 3 have no Anti-Aliasing but is the most Technically advanced 360 game? Lol Sado0HAPPY0o

On the subject of textures... The textures in Gears 3 are above Uncharted 2 in terms of filtering. There's also a healthy amount of POM throughout. I would put the textures on par with Killzone 3.

CorbraMax

[QUOTE="TheEroica"][QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

It's pretty impressive. Doesn't beat Uncharted 2 though, just matches it. Effects, shadows and lighting ect. look better than what we've seen in UC2, but the AA and performance are lacking. It's clear that there's nothing left in the consoles.

Not that Uncharted 3 will either, The only developer who will squeeze more (But not much more) out of the consoles are id, and probably ICO and Sony Santa monica.

But I'm fine that the consoles are tapped, because all these games look really great.

theuncharted34

Because the textures and models are up to par with what we've seen in UC2. I'm not simply looking at the art for comparsions, but the tech. Gears has more advanced effects, lighting and shadows, but at the price of performance and AA. A simple case of "to get this, I have to take away that." Consoles are tapped.

Yes, it could. Not sure what that has to do with what I said though.

sure, though it won't mean a huge deal on the ground.

honestly, it gives the Palestinians as much responsibility as it gives them legitimacy.

right now, if rockets fly from Gaza into Israel (which they do quite often) Palestinians can claim a whole bunch of things to avoid direct conflict, and can practically get away with it.

once they are a legitimate state and UN member , if rockets fly into Israel , its game over, as its an attack on another UN member state (it really doesn't matter if its government funded or not, if its an attack , its an attack, and a state has to police its borders).

though frankly the UN means nothing on the ground so for the short term its just a piece of paper.

Darkman2007

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="gaming25"]

Not disputing the claim, I just want to know fully why is that illegal, is it because millions will be dispersed into a land affecting economy etc. I just want to know full reason why. What I think that law is there is that it would be pressing something on a people that were there. Is that true, if so, I guess I want to know more about such implications and more in depth to why violating it isnt morally sound.

gaming25