If you want to go by scores, Killzone 3 and inFamous 2 both flopped. :)
shahilsyed
Yes 91 is a flop, it was hyped to like 95. Considering Gears 1 was 94 and gears 2 was 93. It is a flop. Yes KZ and Infamous flopped but LBP 2 didn't. And KZ3 is the best fps in recent times. Many reviewers havent even submitted their review to metacritic yet. Remember when RDR was 92 on Metacritic and then it slid up to 95 when the company started submitting their reviews. Also 91 is a huge sucess and not a flop. If you are saying Gears of war 3 flops because its previous games got higher scores, then Littlebigplanet 2 is a huge flop because littlebigplanet 1 got 95 where 2 got 92. So you fail. Gears 3 started as like 95 and now slid down to 91. Yeah you're right it isn't a flop I already retracted that statement long time ago.
How can you prove this? It was hyped AAAE. It met the hype.
soulitane
Ok then still lower score than LBP2, which was the whole point. Also KZ3 any day over Gears 3 and I guess LBP2 was a flop in comparison to super mario galaxy 1 and 2? What?
Flop of wars 3 only got 91 in metacritic, compared to Little Big Planet 2 that got 92. So PS3 have a higher rated AAAE and also Resistance 3, Infamous 2 and Killzone 3 (which is awesome BTW, definitely AAAE quality) and then we still got Uncharted 3, Journey and Payback the heist.
BloodyFalcon007
Flop of War? LOL! And you're defending LBP2! A game made for casuals and children 5 years old children!
Flop of wars 3 only got 91 in metacritic, compared to Little Big Planet 2 that got 92. So PS3 have a higher rated AAAE and also Resistance 3, Infamous 2 and Killzone 3 (which is awesome BTW, definitely AAAE quality) and then we still got Uncharted 3, Journey and Payback the heist.
UnrealLegend
Oh wow...
So 91 is a flop? :lol:
If you want to go by scores, Killzone 3 and inFamous 2 both flopped. :)
Yes 91 is a flop, it was hyped to like 95. Considering Gears 1 was 94 and gears 2 was 93. It is a flop. Yes KZ and Infamous flopped but LBP 2 didn't. And KZ3 is the best fps in recent times.
I recently measured the distance of the path I walk my dog on, and Google Earth gave me an answer of 1.1111... miles. I know this is 10/9, so I mentioned to someone that it is 10/9 of a mile long. They then proceed to tell me, "You're an idiot, you have to simplify that to 1 and 1/9, your final answer can't be an improper fraction." This blew my mind...in any math class from precalc forward, mixed numbers are frowned upon. Improper fractions are superior in every way. They take what they learn in like fifth grade about simplifying improper fractions and proceed to tell me I don't know what I'm talking about. The ONLY time I use mixed numbers is for measuring something on the scale of inches, because that's how rulers are set up. Other than that, improper fractions are always better in my opinion, and they're primarily what I use. I don't know if it's because of it being hammered into my head in calculus classes or because I don't like wasting time converting to a less useful form, but I think mixed numbers are a waste of time 99% of the time.
What do you think? Do you use improper fractions or mixed numbers, and why?
Log in to comment